International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cantorani,José Roberto Herrera
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pedroso,Bruno, Vargas,Leandro Martinez, Picinin,Claudia Tania, Pilatti,Luiz Alberto, Gutierrez,Gustavo Luis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132019000100313
Resumo: Abstract: The present article aims to analyze the WHOQOL-DIS (World Health Organization Quality of Life - Disabilities) structure to verify this instrument’s adequacy to the theoretical principles underlying its construction. The methodology consists in an analysis of the WHOQOL-DIS underlying theory, prompting questions about the adequacies of this theoretical model. The procedure is complemented by a syntax analysis in order to verify the relevant questions for the score calculation. The obtained results show that the subjects “participation” and “autonomy” are not objectively present in the international version, although they are considered in the theories as justifying elements for the instrument’s creation. In the Brazilian version, there are questions addressed to the themes. However, these questions are also not factored into the score calculation. In conclusion, the presence of autonomy and participation in the Brazilian version of WHOQOL-DIS represents a proximity with the theoretical assumptions underlying its creation. However, because they do not compose the score calculation, this adequacy is still limited.
id TECPAR-1_aa24772e0015e37071be10056f7a133e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-89132019000100313
network_acronym_str TECPAR-1
network_name_str Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
repository_id_str
spelling International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinningsquality of lifedisabled personsdisability evaluationAbstract: The present article aims to analyze the WHOQOL-DIS (World Health Organization Quality of Life - Disabilities) structure to verify this instrument’s adequacy to the theoretical principles underlying its construction. The methodology consists in an analysis of the WHOQOL-DIS underlying theory, prompting questions about the adequacies of this theoretical model. The procedure is complemented by a syntax analysis in order to verify the relevant questions for the score calculation. The obtained results show that the subjects “participation” and “autonomy” are not objectively present in the international version, although they are considered in the theories as justifying elements for the instrument’s creation. In the Brazilian version, there are questions addressed to the themes. However, these questions are also not factored into the score calculation. In conclusion, the presence of autonomy and participation in the Brazilian version of WHOQOL-DIS represents a proximity with the theoretical assumptions underlying its creation. However, because they do not compose the score calculation, this adequacy is still limited.Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132019000100313Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.62 2019reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technologyinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)instacron:TECPAR10.1590/1678-4324-2019180691info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCantorani,José Roberto HerreraPedroso,BrunoVargas,Leandro MartinezPicinin,Claudia TaniaPilatti,Luiz AlbertoGutierrez,Gustavo Luiseng2020-01-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-89132019000100313Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/babt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbabt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br1678-43241516-8913opendoar:2020-01-31T00:00Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
title International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
spellingShingle International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
Cantorani,José Roberto Herrera
quality of life
disabled persons
disability evaluation
title_short International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
title_full International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
title_fullStr International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
title_full_unstemmed International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
title_sort International and Brazilian Versions of WHOQOL-DIS: (in)adequacy to its Underpinnings
author Cantorani,José Roberto Herrera
author_facet Cantorani,José Roberto Herrera
Pedroso,Bruno
Vargas,Leandro Martinez
Picinin,Claudia Tania
Pilatti,Luiz Alberto
Gutierrez,Gustavo Luis
author_role author
author2 Pedroso,Bruno
Vargas,Leandro Martinez
Picinin,Claudia Tania
Pilatti,Luiz Alberto
Gutierrez,Gustavo Luis
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cantorani,José Roberto Herrera
Pedroso,Bruno
Vargas,Leandro Martinez
Picinin,Claudia Tania
Pilatti,Luiz Alberto
Gutierrez,Gustavo Luis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv quality of life
disabled persons
disability evaluation
topic quality of life
disabled persons
disability evaluation
description Abstract: The present article aims to analyze the WHOQOL-DIS (World Health Organization Quality of Life - Disabilities) structure to verify this instrument’s adequacy to the theoretical principles underlying its construction. The methodology consists in an analysis of the WHOQOL-DIS underlying theory, prompting questions about the adequacies of this theoretical model. The procedure is complemented by a syntax analysis in order to verify the relevant questions for the score calculation. The obtained results show that the subjects “participation” and “autonomy” are not objectively present in the international version, although they are considered in the theories as justifying elements for the instrument’s creation. In the Brazilian version, there are questions addressed to the themes. However, these questions are also not factored into the score calculation. In conclusion, the presence of autonomy and participation in the Brazilian version of WHOQOL-DIS represents a proximity with the theoretical assumptions underlying its creation. However, because they do not compose the score calculation, this adequacy is still limited.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132019000100313
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132019000100313
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4324-2019180691
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.62 2019
reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
instname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)
instacron:TECPAR
instname_str Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)
instacron_str TECPAR
institution TECPAR
reponame_str Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
collection Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv babt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br
_version_ 1750318279188021248