Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/552 |
Resumo: | The judicial review was criticized since it was created on the grounds that represent an empowerment of the judiciary in comparison to other government institutions, especially regarding the exercise of the power to remove from the law any rule that "supposedly" is defying the constitution, on the basis of fundamental rights protection and with the scope to prevent a tyranny of the majority. The judicial review is defended by legal philosophers and questioned by political philosophers, among them, Jeremy Waldron, which rejects the use of judicial review arguing the equality of citizens that should, by themselves or through their representatives, discuss and resolve disagreements. In Brazil, the concrete judicial review portrays the empowerment of the judiciary, since the constitutional amendment n. 45/2004 created a filter of general repercussion subsequently regulated in 2006, gives the Brazilian Supreme Court the power to select which cases will be analyzed through the appeals. These choices can be explained by agenda-setting theory, which provides hypothesis of explanation of any changes in the political agenda from its suitability to the agenda of its recipients. Thus, we applied these theories to the Brazilian judicial review in order to identify the existence of a selective behavior in Brazilian Supreme Court towards the procedure of case selection (repercussão geral) and saw which subjects tended to be accepted by the court, verifying finally if this kind of selection bias seeks to the protection of fundamental rights and the tyranny of the majority s prevention. Therefore, we designed a database with all the appeals that had the repercussão geral recognized since 2006, and used descriptive statistics to confirm the court's selectivity and to check the tendency of the court to recognize the general implications of the processes that result some kind of budgetary impact, making the Supreme Court almost a filter for of government agencies future expenses, and showing a lack of commitment to the protection of fundamental rights. |
id |
UCAP_4434cfb66c3c509c1e9fb1e402007d35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/552 |
network_acronym_str |
UCAP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
repository_id_str |
4646 |
spelling |
Teixeira, Joao Paulo Fernandes de Souza AllainCPF:75454335487http://lattes.cnpq.br/3719496592232660Oliveira, Michelle Vieira Fernandez deCPF:00000000832http://lattes.cnpq.br/2265169231859319Lima, Flavia Danielle SantiagoCPF:03015871404http://lattes.cnpq.br/7100425020183379CPF:06835203420http://lattes.cnpq.br/5211177047876161Andrade, Louise Dantas de2017-06-01T18:18:33Z2015-11-302015-09-15http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/552The judicial review was criticized since it was created on the grounds that represent an empowerment of the judiciary in comparison to other government institutions, especially regarding the exercise of the power to remove from the law any rule that "supposedly" is defying the constitution, on the basis of fundamental rights protection and with the scope to prevent a tyranny of the majority. The judicial review is defended by legal philosophers and questioned by political philosophers, among them, Jeremy Waldron, which rejects the use of judicial review arguing the equality of citizens that should, by themselves or through their representatives, discuss and resolve disagreements. In Brazil, the concrete judicial review portrays the empowerment of the judiciary, since the constitutional amendment n. 45/2004 created a filter of general repercussion subsequently regulated in 2006, gives the Brazilian Supreme Court the power to select which cases will be analyzed through the appeals. These choices can be explained by agenda-setting theory, which provides hypothesis of explanation of any changes in the political agenda from its suitability to the agenda of its recipients. Thus, we applied these theories to the Brazilian judicial review in order to identify the existence of a selective behavior in Brazilian Supreme Court towards the procedure of case selection (repercussão geral) and saw which subjects tended to be accepted by the court, verifying finally if this kind of selection bias seeks to the protection of fundamental rights and the tyranny of the majority s prevention. Therefore, we designed a database with all the appeals that had the repercussão geral recognized since 2006, and used descriptive statistics to confirm the court's selectivity and to check the tendency of the court to recognize the general implications of the processes that result some kind of budgetary impact, making the Supreme Court almost a filter for of government agencies future expenses, and showing a lack of commitment to the protection of fundamental rights.A revisão judicial, desde sua criação, se tornou alvo de diversas críticas principalmente no que se refere a sua necessidade por representar o empoderamento do poder judiciário que passa a ter a prerrogativa de retirar do ordenamento jurídico qualquer norma que supostamente esteja afrontando a constituição, tudo com base no discurso de proteção dos direitos fundamentais e de evitar uma tirania da maioria. Apesar de polêmico, esse instituto é defendido pelos filósofos jurídicos e questionado pelos filósofos políticos, dentre eles, Jeremy Waldron, o qual repudia a utilização da revisão judicial por afrontar a igualdade dos cidadãos que deveriam por si, ou através dos seus representantes, discutir e solucionar os desacordos. No Brasil, o controle concreto de constitucionalidade retrata bem o empoderamento do poder judiciário, uma vez que a emenda constitucional n. 45/2004 criou o filtro da repercussão geral regulamentado posteriormente em 2006, o qual limita a apreciação dos recursos com base em conceitos jurídicos indeterminados, possibilitando a escolha pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal dos recursos que serão julgados. Essa possibilidade de escolha pode ser explicada pela teoria do agendamento (agenda-setting), que prevê a hipótese de alteração da agenda política a partir da transferência de saliência da agenda do público. Assim, foram aplicadas tais teorias ao controle concreto brasileiro, no intuito de identificar no comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal a existência de um comportamento seletivo em relação aos processos, bem como verificar quais assuntos tendem a ter sua repercussão geral reconhecida, verificando-se por fim se esse tipo de revisão judicial atende aos aspectos justificadores de proteção dos direitos fundamentais e prevenção de uma tirania da maioria. Para tanto, foi elaborado um banco de dados com todos os recursos que tiveram a repercussão geral reconhecida desde 2006, ao qual se aplicou o método da estatística descritiva, comprovando-se a seletividade do tribunal no que se refere a apreciação dos recursos, e ainda verificando-se a tendência do tribunal de reconhecer a repercussão geral dos processos que ensejem algum tipo de impacto orçamentário, tornando o Supremo Tribunal Federal quase um filtro de despesas dos entes governamentais, e sugerindo o descompromisso da corte com a proteção dos direitos fundamentais, ao menos nesse tipo de revisão judicial.Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:18:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 louise_dantas_andrade.pdf: 1539012 bytes, checksum: e74a6da2f0d87b1ab6a7f098c245e622 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-09-15application/pdfporUniversidade Católica de PernambucoMestrado em DireitoUNICAPBRDireitocontrole da constitucionalidade - Brasildissertaçõescontrol of constitutionality - BrazildissertationsCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOAgenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concretoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAPinstname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)instacron:UNICAPORIGINALlouise_dantas_andrade.pdfapplication/pdf1539012http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/552/1/louise_dantas_andrade.pdfe74a6da2f0d87b1ab6a7f098c245e622MD51tede/5522018-09-24 15:29:23.241oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/552Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.unicap.br:8080/http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/oai/requestbiblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.bropendoar:46462018-09-24T18:29:23Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto |
title |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto |
spellingShingle |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto Andrade, Louise Dantas de controle da constitucionalidade - Brasil dissertações control of constitutionality - Brazil dissertations CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto |
title_full |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto |
title_fullStr |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto |
title_sort |
Agenda-setting: análise do comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no controle de constitucionalidade concreto |
author |
Andrade, Louise Dantas de |
author_facet |
Andrade, Louise Dantas de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Joao Paulo Fernandes de Souza Allain |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:75454335487 |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3719496592232660 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Michelle Vieira Fernandez de |
dc.contributor.referee1ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:00000000832 |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2265169231859319 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Flavia Danielle Santiago |
dc.contributor.referee2ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:03015871404 |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7100425020183379 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:06835203420 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5211177047876161 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Louise Dantas de |
contributor_str_mv |
Teixeira, Joao Paulo Fernandes de Souza Allain Oliveira, Michelle Vieira Fernandez de Lima, Flavia Danielle Santiago |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
controle da constitucionalidade - Brasil dissertações |
topic |
controle da constitucionalidade - Brasil dissertações control of constitutionality - Brazil dissertations CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
control of constitutionality - Brazil dissertations |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The judicial review was criticized since it was created on the grounds that represent an empowerment of the judiciary in comparison to other government institutions, especially regarding the exercise of the power to remove from the law any rule that "supposedly" is defying the constitution, on the basis of fundamental rights protection and with the scope to prevent a tyranny of the majority. The judicial review is defended by legal philosophers and questioned by political philosophers, among them, Jeremy Waldron, which rejects the use of judicial review arguing the equality of citizens that should, by themselves or through their representatives, discuss and resolve disagreements. In Brazil, the concrete judicial review portrays the empowerment of the judiciary, since the constitutional amendment n. 45/2004 created a filter of general repercussion subsequently regulated in 2006, gives the Brazilian Supreme Court the power to select which cases will be analyzed through the appeals. These choices can be explained by agenda-setting theory, which provides hypothesis of explanation of any changes in the political agenda from its suitability to the agenda of its recipients. Thus, we applied these theories to the Brazilian judicial review in order to identify the existence of a selective behavior in Brazilian Supreme Court towards the procedure of case selection (repercussão geral) and saw which subjects tended to be accepted by the court, verifying finally if this kind of selection bias seeks to the protection of fundamental rights and the tyranny of the majority s prevention. Therefore, we designed a database with all the appeals that had the repercussão geral recognized since 2006, and used descriptive statistics to confirm the court's selectivity and to check the tendency of the court to recognize the general implications of the processes that result some kind of budgetary impact, making the Supreme Court almost a filter for of government agencies future expenses, and showing a lack of commitment to the protection of fundamental rights. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-30 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-15 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-01T18:18:33Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/552 |
url |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/552 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Mestrado em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNICAP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP instname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) instacron:UNICAP |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAP |
institution |
UNICAP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/552/1/louise_dantas_andrade.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e74a6da2f0d87b1ab6a7f098c245e622 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.br |
_version_ |
1803085493610479616 |