Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UCB |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148 https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368 |
Resumo: | Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
id |
UCB-2_bbf24ef72122a1d42a7233f37fa7a81a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:200.214.135.189:123456789/7368 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UCB |
spelling |
Nakamura, Fábio YuzoOkuno, Nilo MassaruPerandini, Luiz Augusto BuoroOliveira, Fernando Roberto deBuchheit, MartinSimões, Herbert Gustavo2016-10-10T03:51:15Z2016-10-10T03:51:15Z2009NAKAMURA, Fábio Yuzo. et al. Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power. Science & Sports, v. 24, p. 196-201, 2009.http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.Objectifs. – Le but de cette étude était de démontrer la validité du seuil de pénibilité perc¸ue à l’effort (PET) à partir de relations avec des repères physiologiques caractérisant la capacité aérobie, obtenus lors de tests incrémentés et à intensité constante. Méthodes. – Onze étudiants masculins ont effectué 1) un test incrémenté pour déterminer le premier (VT1) et second (VT2) seuil ventilatoire, la consommation maximale d’oxygène ( VO2max ) et la puissance maximale aérobie (MAP) ; 2) quatre exercices rectangulaires pour l’estimation de la puissance critique (CP) et de PET. Résultats. – La consommation d’oxygène (VO2) à VT1 et VT2 était 22,9±4,2 et 35,8±4,7 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. La MAP et VO2max moyenne était 267±34W et 40,3±6,3 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. PET (146±31 W) et CP (146±33 W) n’étaient pas significativement différents, et étaient tout deux entre VT1 (121±28 W) et VT2 (228±36 W). La corrélation entre PET et CP, exprimés de manière relative au poids de corps, était significative (p<0,01, r = 0,84). Les corrélations entre PET et la VO2 relative à VT1 (r = 0,76), VT2 (r = 0,72) et VO2max (r = 0,73) étaient significatives (p<0,05). Conclusion. – PET n’était pas significativement différent de CP et présentait des corrélations significatives avec VT1, VT2 et VO2max obtenues lors du test incrémental. Cela suggère la validité de PET comme une mesure indirecte des capacités aérobies. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-10T03:51:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Perceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdf: 297274 bytes, checksum: 29d81da39f3f03a866e800205f577a70 (MD5) license_url: 52 bytes, checksum: 3d480ae6c91e310daba2020f8787d6f9 (MD5) license_text: 21716 bytes, checksum: c200d7a52028dd255d79d7c917cc149a (MD5) license_rdf: 23005 bytes, checksum: 845fd6e03839c7264c0c164178b2e173 (MD5) license.txt: 1818 bytes, checksum: 46de3043f08e87659ae535ef74b8ce9d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009SimPublicadoTextoAerobic capacityMaximal oxygen uptakeValidityPerceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical powerSeuil de pénibilité perçue à l’effort: comparaison avec les seuils ventilatoires et la puissance critiqueinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleScience & Sportsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBORIGINALPerceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdfapplication/pdf297274https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/1/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf29d81da39f3f03a866e800205f577a70MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urlapplication/octet-stream52https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/2/license_url3d480ae6c91e310daba2020f8787d6f9MD52license_textapplication/octet-stream21716https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/3/license_textc200d7a52028dd255d79d7c917cc149aMD53license_rdfapplication/octet-stream23005https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/4/license_rdf845fd6e03839c7264c0c164178b2e173MD54LICENSElicense.txttext/plain1818https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/5/license.txt46de3043f08e87659ae535ef74b8ce9dMD55TEXTPerceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdf.txtPerceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain28601https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/6/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf.txtd0fe50267a69a73ed9b576c5afceae13MD56123456789/73682017-01-17 15:09:29.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ório de Publicaçõeshttps://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/ |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power |
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Seuil de pénibilité perçue à l’effort: comparaison avec les seuils ventilatoires et la puissance critique |
title |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power |
spellingShingle |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo Aerobic capacity Maximal oxygen uptake Validity |
title_short |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power |
title_full |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power |
title_fullStr |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power |
title_sort |
Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power |
author |
Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo |
author_facet |
Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo Okuno, Nilo Massaru Perandini, Luiz Augusto Buoro Oliveira, Fernando Roberto de Buchheit, Martin Simões, Herbert Gustavo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Okuno, Nilo Massaru Perandini, Luiz Augusto Buoro Oliveira, Fernando Roberto de Buchheit, Martin Simões, Herbert Gustavo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo Okuno, Nilo Massaru Perandini, Luiz Augusto Buoro Oliveira, Fernando Roberto de Buchheit, Martin Simões, Herbert Gustavo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aerobic capacity Maximal oxygen uptake Validity |
topic |
Aerobic capacity Maximal oxygen uptake Validity |
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv |
Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Objectifs. – Le but de cette étude était de démontrer la validité du seuil de pénibilité perc¸ue à l’effort (PET) à partir de relations avec des repères physiologiques caractérisant la capacité aérobie, obtenus lors de tests incrémentés et à intensité constante. Méthodes. – Onze étudiants masculins ont effectué 1) un test incrémenté pour déterminer le premier (VT1) et second (VT2) seuil ventilatoire, la consommation maximale d’oxygène ( VO2max ) et la puissance maximale aérobie (MAP) ; 2) quatre exercices rectangulaires pour l’estimation de la puissance critique (CP) et de PET. Résultats. – La consommation d’oxygène (VO2) à VT1 et VT2 était 22,9±4,2 et 35,8±4,7 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. La MAP et VO2max moyenne était 267±34W et 40,3±6,3 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. PET (146±31 W) et CP (146±33 W) n’étaient pas significativement différents, et étaient tout deux entre VT1 (121±28 W) et VT2 (228±36 W). La corrélation entre PET et CP, exprimés de manière relative au poids de corps, était significative (p<0,01, r = 0,84). Les corrélations entre PET et la VO2 relative à VT1 (r = 0,76), VT2 (r = 0,72) et VO2max (r = 0,73) étaient significatives (p<0,05). Conclusion. – PET n’était pas significativement différent de CP et présentait des corrélations significatives avec VT1, VT2 et VO2max obtenues lors du test incrémental. Cela suggère la validité de PET comme une mesure indirecte des capacités aérobies. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
dc.description.version.pt_BR.fl_txt_mv |
Sim |
dc.description.status.pt_BR.fl_txt_mv |
Publicado |
description |
Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-10T03:51:15Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-10T03:51:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
article |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
NAKAMURA, Fábio Yuzo. et al. Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power. Science & Sports, v. 24, p. 196-201, 2009. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148 https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368 |
identifier_str_mv |
NAKAMURA, Fábio Yuzo. et al. Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power. Science & Sports, v. 24, p. 196-201, 2009. |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148 https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
Texto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UCB instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UCB |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UCB |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/1/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/2/license_url https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/3/license_text https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/4/license_rdf https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/5/license.txt https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/6/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
29d81da39f3f03a866e800205f577a70 3d480ae6c91e310daba2020f8787d6f9 c200d7a52028dd255d79d7c917cc149a 845fd6e03839c7264c0c164178b2e173 46de3043f08e87659ae535ef74b8ce9d d0fe50267a69a73ed9b576c5afceae13 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1724829826950365184 |