A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro, Flávio de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Figueiredo, Pedro, Marques, Elisa A., Backes, Othavio Porto, Gaya, Anelise Reis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online)
Texto Completo: https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990
Resumo: This study aimed to describe the statistical methods used and statistical practice in PhD thesis in sports and exercise sciences, and to examine the time trends of statistical methods prevalence. We analyzed 50 PhD theses supported by a post-graduate program recognized by CAPES and defended between January 2003 and December 2013. Most theses used more than two statistical methods, and T-test, ANOVA, multiple comparisons, correlation and reliability analysis were the most used approaches. Less than 50% of both experimental and observational theses reported the effect size (ES), confidence interval (CI), sample size calculation and observed power analysis. The use of multiple comparisons in experimental studies significantly increased in the last 5-years compared to 2004-2008 time period. No other significant changes were observed. Results suggest that several statistical methods are used in quantitative design studies. Due to the observed large prevalence of statistical deficiencies (lack of reporting ES, CI, power analysis), postgraduate programs should have qualified statisticians with a major say in checking the statistical quality of PhD theses and subsequent articles.
id UCB-5_c5320a5aa8dd06964773a550c4613f85
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/8990
network_acronym_str UCB-5
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case studyPhysical education Statistics Research designThis study aimed to describe the statistical methods used and statistical practice in PhD thesis in sports and exercise sciences, and to examine the time trends of statistical methods prevalence. We analyzed 50 PhD theses supported by a post-graduate program recognized by CAPES and defended between January 2003 and December 2013. Most theses used more than two statistical methods, and T-test, ANOVA, multiple comparisons, correlation and reliability analysis were the most used approaches. Less than 50% of both experimental and observational theses reported the effect size (ES), confidence interval (CI), sample size calculation and observed power analysis. The use of multiple comparisons in experimental studies significantly increased in the last 5-years compared to 2004-2008 time period. No other significant changes were observed. Results suggest that several statistical methods are used in quantitative design studies. Due to the observed large prevalence of statistical deficiencies (lack of reporting ES, CI, power analysis), postgraduate programs should have qualified statisticians with a major say in checking the statistical quality of PhD theses and subsequent articles.Universidade Católica de Brasília2019-01-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/899010.31501/rbcm.v26i4.8990Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento; v. 26 n. 4 (2018); 191-2000103-171610.31501/rbcm.v26i4reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBporhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990/6154https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990/9975https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990/9976Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Flávio de SouzaFigueiredo, PedroMarques, Elisa A.Backes, Othavio PortoGaya, Anelise Reis2020-04-14T12:06:01Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/8990Revistahttp://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/RBCMPRIhttp://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/RBCM/oai||jr_lazer@yahoo.com.br2237-90020103-1716opendoar:2020-04-14T12:06:01Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online) - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
title A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
spellingShingle A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
Castro, Flávio de Souza
Physical education
Statistics
Research design
title_short A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
title_full A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
title_fullStr A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
title_full_unstemmed A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
title_sort A review of the statistical methods used in Sports and Exercise Sciences PhD theses: a case study
author Castro, Flávio de Souza
author_facet Castro, Flávio de Souza
Figueiredo, Pedro
Marques, Elisa A.
Backes, Othavio Porto
Gaya, Anelise Reis
author_role author
author2 Figueiredo, Pedro
Marques, Elisa A.
Backes, Othavio Porto
Gaya, Anelise Reis
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro, Flávio de Souza
Figueiredo, Pedro
Marques, Elisa A.
Backes, Othavio Porto
Gaya, Anelise Reis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physical education
Statistics
Research design
topic Physical education
Statistics
Research design
description This study aimed to describe the statistical methods used and statistical practice in PhD thesis in sports and exercise sciences, and to examine the time trends of statistical methods prevalence. We analyzed 50 PhD theses supported by a post-graduate program recognized by CAPES and defended between January 2003 and December 2013. Most theses used more than two statistical methods, and T-test, ANOVA, multiple comparisons, correlation and reliability analysis were the most used approaches. Less than 50% of both experimental and observational theses reported the effect size (ES), confidence interval (CI), sample size calculation and observed power analysis. The use of multiple comparisons in experimental studies significantly increased in the last 5-years compared to 2004-2008 time period. No other significant changes were observed. Results suggest that several statistical methods are used in quantitative design studies. Due to the observed large prevalence of statistical deficiencies (lack of reporting ES, CI, power analysis), postgraduate programs should have qualified statisticians with a major say in checking the statistical quality of PhD theses and subsequent articles.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990
10.31501/rbcm.v26i4.8990
url https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990
identifier_str_mv 10.31501/rbcm.v26i4.8990
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990/6154
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990/9975
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rbcm/article/view/8990/9976
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento; v. 26 n. 4 (2018); 191-200
0103-1716
10.31501/rbcm.v26i4
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online)
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento (Online) - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jr_lazer@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1799304121213255680