Strategic Non-Entry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Economic Analysis of law Review
Texto Completo: https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171
Resumo: This paper brings out a simple idea and a straight policy recommendation. The idea is that a producer in a given geographic or product market A may prefer not to enter another geographic or product market B in order to acquire the monopoly power holder in B at a later date without being challenged by the antitrust/competition authority competent for B – to the harm of consumers in B.We provide stylized facts for this non-entry plus later entry-by-acquisition behaviour and build a game-theoretical model supporting them. Our model extends the classic entry model highlighting the rationale for the observed behaviour.The straight policy implication is that competition/antitrust authorities should pay more attention to proposed mergers where market power only changes hands. The possibility of blocking those mergers – if no efficiency gain compared to entry by building is shown – should be seriously considered, as a more dynamic setting like ours suggests.
id UCB-6_43e8ddd8e31780906afdac24e2d2b9ad
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/7171
network_acronym_str UCB-6
network_name_str Economic Analysis of law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Strategic Non-EntryAntitruste Jogos de Entrada Compra Hostil Monopolização InternacionalThis paper brings out a simple idea and a straight policy recommendation. The idea is that a producer in a given geographic or product market A may prefer not to enter another geographic or product market B in order to acquire the monopoly power holder in B at a later date without being challenged by the antitrust/competition authority competent for B – to the harm of consumers in B.We provide stylized facts for this non-entry plus later entry-by-acquisition behaviour and build a game-theoretical model supporting them. Our model extends the classic entry model highlighting the rationale for the observed behaviour.The straight policy implication is that competition/antitrust authorities should pay more attention to proposed mergers where market power only changes hands. The possibility of blocking those mergers – if no efficiency gain compared to entry by building is shown – should be seriously considered, as a more dynamic setting like ours suggests.Universidade Católica de Brasília2017-08-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Pares; Peer ReviewedArtigo com modelagem de jogosapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/717110.31501/ealr.v8i1.7171Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 8 n. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-2472178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBporhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171/5177Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinho Senra de Morais, Rafael2023-06-15T18:35:05Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/7171Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2023-06-15T18:35:05Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Strategic Non-Entry
title Strategic Non-Entry
spellingShingle Strategic Non-Entry
Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael
Antitruste
Jogos de Entrada
Compra Hostil
Monopolização Internacional
title_short Strategic Non-Entry
title_full Strategic Non-Entry
title_fullStr Strategic Non-Entry
title_full_unstemmed Strategic Non-Entry
title_sort Strategic Non-Entry
author Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael
author_facet Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antitruste
Jogos de Entrada
Compra Hostil
Monopolização Internacional
topic Antitruste
Jogos de Entrada
Compra Hostil
Monopolização Internacional
description This paper brings out a simple idea and a straight policy recommendation. The idea is that a producer in a given geographic or product market A may prefer not to enter another geographic or product market B in order to acquire the monopoly power holder in B at a later date without being challenged by the antitrust/competition authority competent for B – to the harm of consumers in B.We provide stylized facts for this non-entry plus later entry-by-acquisition behaviour and build a game-theoretical model supporting them. Our model extends the classic entry model highlighting the rationale for the observed behaviour.The straight policy implication is that competition/antitrust authorities should pay more attention to proposed mergers where market power only changes hands. The possibility of blocking those mergers – if no efficiency gain compared to entry by building is shown – should be seriously considered, as a more dynamic setting like ours suggests.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed
Artigo com modelagem de jogos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171
10.31501/ealr.v8i1.7171
url https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171
identifier_str_mv 10.31501/ealr.v8i1.7171
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171/5177
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247
Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247
Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 8 n. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247
2178-0587
reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Economic Analysis of law Review
collection Economic Analysis of law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com
_version_ 1798675420560752640