Strategic Non-Entry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Economic Analysis of law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171 |
Resumo: | This paper brings out a simple idea and a straight policy recommendation. The idea is that a producer in a given geographic or product market A may prefer not to enter another geographic or product market B in order to acquire the monopoly power holder in B at a later date without being challenged by the antitrust/competition authority competent for B – to the harm of consumers in B.We provide stylized facts for this non-entry plus later entry-by-acquisition behaviour and build a game-theoretical model supporting them. Our model extends the classic entry model highlighting the rationale for the observed behaviour.The straight policy implication is that competition/antitrust authorities should pay more attention to proposed mergers where market power only changes hands. The possibility of blocking those mergers – if no efficiency gain compared to entry by building is shown – should be seriously considered, as a more dynamic setting like ours suggests. |
id |
UCB-6_43e8ddd8e31780906afdac24e2d2b9ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/7171 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB-6 |
network_name_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Strategic Non-EntryAntitruste Jogos de Entrada Compra Hostil Monopolização InternacionalThis paper brings out a simple idea and a straight policy recommendation. The idea is that a producer in a given geographic or product market A may prefer not to enter another geographic or product market B in order to acquire the monopoly power holder in B at a later date without being challenged by the antitrust/competition authority competent for B – to the harm of consumers in B.We provide stylized facts for this non-entry plus later entry-by-acquisition behaviour and build a game-theoretical model supporting them. Our model extends the classic entry model highlighting the rationale for the observed behaviour.The straight policy implication is that competition/antitrust authorities should pay more attention to proposed mergers where market power only changes hands. The possibility of blocking those mergers – if no efficiency gain compared to entry by building is shown – should be seriously considered, as a more dynamic setting like ours suggests.Universidade Católica de Brasília2017-08-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Pares; Peer ReviewedArtigo com modelagem de jogosapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/717110.31501/ealr.v8i1.7171Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 8 n. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-2472178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBporhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171/5177Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinho Senra de Morais, Rafael2023-06-15T18:35:05Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/7171Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2023-06-15T18:35:05Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Strategic Non-Entry |
title |
Strategic Non-Entry |
spellingShingle |
Strategic Non-Entry Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael Antitruste Jogos de Entrada Compra Hostil Monopolização Internacional |
title_short |
Strategic Non-Entry |
title_full |
Strategic Non-Entry |
title_fullStr |
Strategic Non-Entry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategic Non-Entry |
title_sort |
Strategic Non-Entry |
author |
Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael |
author_facet |
Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinho Senra de Morais, Rafael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antitruste Jogos de Entrada Compra Hostil Monopolização Internacional |
topic |
Antitruste Jogos de Entrada Compra Hostil Monopolização Internacional |
description |
This paper brings out a simple idea and a straight policy recommendation. The idea is that a producer in a given geographic or product market A may prefer not to enter another geographic or product market B in order to acquire the monopoly power holder in B at a later date without being challenged by the antitrust/competition authority competent for B – to the harm of consumers in B.We provide stylized facts for this non-entry plus later entry-by-acquisition behaviour and build a game-theoretical model supporting them. Our model extends the classic entry model highlighting the rationale for the observed behaviour.The straight policy implication is that competition/antitrust authorities should pay more attention to proposed mergers where market power only changes hands. The possibility of blocking those mergers – if no efficiency gain compared to entry by building is shown – should be seriously considered, as a more dynamic setting like ours suggests. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed Artigo com modelagem de jogos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171 10.31501/ealr.v8i1.7171 |
url |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31501/ealr.v8i1.7171 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/7171/5177 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247 Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247 Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 8 n. 1 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 228-247 2178-0587 reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
collection |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798675420560752640 |