Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bockmann Moreira, Egon
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Conrado Caggiano, Heloisa, Paula Rosolen de Oliveira, Ana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Economic Analysis of law Review
Texto Completo: https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/13912
Resumo: Direct contracting on public real estate exchange contracts is a valid hypothesis, given that it may be abouta purchase which will comply specifically with a public interest previoulsy defined by the [public] manager. However, the hypothesis of direct contracting is invalid in public contracts of exchange for building to be built, because its object is not exhausted in the acquisition of specific property, but also includes the execution of a construction, which allows maket competition and, therefore, requires prior bidding processes. The article analyzes Normative Instruction nº 03/2018-SPU and federal Court of Acounts (TCU) jurisprudence.
id UCB-6_9a05cfb91feb6c34f198687ba6a40e42
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/13912
network_acronym_str UCB-6
network_name_str Economic Analysis of law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contractingContratos públicos de permuta de bens imóveis, edificação a construir e os limites da contratação diretaDirect contracting on public real estate exchange contracts is a valid hypothesis, given that it may be abouta purchase which will comply specifically with a public interest previoulsy defined by the [public] manager. However, the hypothesis of direct contracting is invalid in public contracts of exchange for building to be built, because its object is not exhausted in the acquisition of specific property, but also includes the execution of a construction, which allows maket competition and, therefore, requires prior bidding processes. The article analyzes Normative Instruction nº 03/2018-SPU and federal Court of Acounts (TCU) jurisprudence.A contratação direta em contratos públicos de permuta de imóveis é hipótese válida, haja vista que pode vir a se tratar de aquisição de bem que atende especificamente a interesse público definido pelo gestor. No entanto, a hipótese de contratação direta é inválida em contratos públicos de permuta por edificação a construir, na medida em que seu objeto não se esgota na aquisição de imóvel específico, mas contempla a realização de obra, o que viabiliza a competição e demanda prévia licitação. O artigo analisa a Instrução Normativa nº 03/2018-SPU e a jurisprudência do TCU.Universidade Católica de Brasília2024-01-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1391210.31501/ealr.v14i2.13912Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 62-72Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2023): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 62-72Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 14 n. 2 (2023): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 62-722178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBenghttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/13912/11719Copyright (c) 2024 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBockmann Moreira, Egon Conrado Caggiano, Heloisa Paula Rosolen de Oliveira, Ana 2024-02-23T17:51:06Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/13912Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2024-02-23T17:51:06Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
Contratos públicos de permuta de bens imóveis, edificação a construir e os limites da contratação direta
title Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
spellingShingle Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
Bockmann Moreira, Egon
title_short Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
title_full Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
title_fullStr Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
title_full_unstemmed Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
title_sort Public real estate exchange, building to be built contracts and the limits of direct contracting
author Bockmann Moreira, Egon
author_facet Bockmann Moreira, Egon
Conrado Caggiano, Heloisa
Paula Rosolen de Oliveira, Ana
author_role author
author2 Conrado Caggiano, Heloisa
Paula Rosolen de Oliveira, Ana
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bockmann Moreira, Egon
Conrado Caggiano, Heloisa
Paula Rosolen de Oliveira, Ana
description Direct contracting on public real estate exchange contracts is a valid hypothesis, given that it may be abouta purchase which will comply specifically with a public interest previoulsy defined by the [public] manager. However, the hypothesis of direct contracting is invalid in public contracts of exchange for building to be built, because its object is not exhausted in the acquisition of specific property, but also includes the execution of a construction, which allows maket competition and, therefore, requires prior bidding processes. The article analyzes Normative Instruction nº 03/2018-SPU and federal Court of Acounts (TCU) jurisprudence.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/13912
10.31501/ealr.v14i2.13912
url https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/13912
identifier_str_mv 10.31501/ealr.v14i2.13912
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/13912/11719
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Economic Analysis of Law Review
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Economic Analysis of Law Review
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 62-72
Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2023): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 62-72
Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 14 n. 2 (2023): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 62-72
2178-0587
reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Economic Analysis of law Review
collection Economic Analysis of law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com
_version_ 1798675421168926720

Registros relacionados