AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO |
Texto Completo: | http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/482 |
Resumo: | This study had by objective to carry out an operational comparative analysis involving technical and cost aspects of timber harvesting applying two thinning treatments in Pinus taeda L., in the first thinning at age 10. Data were obtained from the forest area of a company located in the city Quedas of Iguaçu, Paraná State. The treatments were two thinning models determined by the systematic elimination of 5th line (model 1, considered as traditional practices) and 7th line (model 2, alternative thinning model) and selective elimination in the lines that were determined for these intervals. The treatments were executed by two harvesting subsystems: mechanized composed by harvester and forwarder and mixed system compound by chainsaw, harvester and forwarder, the introduction of the chainsaw was the creation of an area outside the range of harvester, called "midfield". The proposed changes by the new model of thinning and mixed harvesting subsystem aimed to increasing productivity, reducing transaction costs and better quality of the remaining stands, in addition prevent the loss of productive area and disturbances in terms of soil compaction. To compare the performance of both harvesting systems working under the same conditions, a stand was selected with homogeneous characteristics. A study of the time and motion machines in both thinning treatments was performed, allowing a comparison of operational cycles and determining productivity, operational efficiency, operational costs and production costs. An evaluation of the quality of operations through the application of damages inventory in remaining population was made. The results showed the main factors that affected the operational cycle of the machines involved in these operations: for the harvester were affected mainly the searching and cutting, displacement and disruption; to the forwarder were affected the empty travel and loading. The subsystem of mechanized harvesting implementing in the thinning model 1 showed the highest productivity (42,3 m³.h-1against 40,5 m³.h-1), lower production costs (R$ 14,98/m³ against R$ 16,25/m³) and better quality of operation due to the less occurrence of damage to remaining trees (13 % versus 17 %). In addition to being defined the damage as minor, the proposed treatment enabled a better distribution of damage in the forest. Comparatively, the thinning treatment 2 did not offer better operational and cost of harvest results, but showed better results in relation to quality with minor damage in remaining trees of the stand. |
id |
UCEN_2094f8d11cb51cfa3fdac995c7b16476 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:tede/482 |
network_acronym_str |
UCEN |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lopes, Eduardo da SilvaCPF:833883833838http://lattes.cnpq.br/1280835655867163Figueiredo Filho, AfonsoCPF:88484848484848http://lattes.cnpq.br/4151544991447365CPF:01201716942não constaCabral, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera2016-09-20T12:30:02Z2016-05-242014-03-10CABRAL, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera. AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L.. 2014. 111 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Manejo Florestal) - UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste, Irati, 2014.http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/482This study had by objective to carry out an operational comparative analysis involving technical and cost aspects of timber harvesting applying two thinning treatments in Pinus taeda L., in the first thinning at age 10. Data were obtained from the forest area of a company located in the city Quedas of Iguaçu, Paraná State. The treatments were two thinning models determined by the systematic elimination of 5th line (model 1, considered as traditional practices) and 7th line (model 2, alternative thinning model) and selective elimination in the lines that were determined for these intervals. The treatments were executed by two harvesting subsystems: mechanized composed by harvester and forwarder and mixed system compound by chainsaw, harvester and forwarder, the introduction of the chainsaw was the creation of an area outside the range of harvester, called "midfield". The proposed changes by the new model of thinning and mixed harvesting subsystem aimed to increasing productivity, reducing transaction costs and better quality of the remaining stands, in addition prevent the loss of productive area and disturbances in terms of soil compaction. To compare the performance of both harvesting systems working under the same conditions, a stand was selected with homogeneous characteristics. A study of the time and motion machines in both thinning treatments was performed, allowing a comparison of operational cycles and determining productivity, operational efficiency, operational costs and production costs. An evaluation of the quality of operations through the application of damages inventory in remaining population was made. The results showed the main factors that affected the operational cycle of the machines involved in these operations: for the harvester were affected mainly the searching and cutting, displacement and disruption; to the forwarder were affected the empty travel and loading. The subsystem of mechanized harvesting implementing in the thinning model 1 showed the highest productivity (42,3 m³.h-1against 40,5 m³.h-1), lower production costs (R$ 14,98/m³ against R$ 16,25/m³) and better quality of operation due to the less occurrence of damage to remaining trees (13 % versus 17 %). In addition to being defined the damage as minor, the proposed treatment enabled a better distribution of damage in the forest. Comparatively, the thinning treatment 2 did not offer better operational and cost of harvest results, but showed better results in relation to quality with minor damage in remaining trees of the stand.Este trabalho teve por objetivo realizar uma análise operacional comparativa envolvendo os aspectos técnicos e de custos da colheita de madeira aplicando dois tratamentos de desbaste em povoamentos de Pinus taeda L., no primeiro desbaste aos 10 anos de idade. Os dados foram obtidos da área florestal de uma empresa localizada no município de Quedas do Iguaçu, estado do Paraná. Os tratamentos foram dois modelos de desbaste determinados pela eliminação sistemática da 5a linha (modelo 1, considerado como tradicional) e 7a linha (modelo 2, considerado como alternativo) e eliminação seletiva das demais linhas do plantio. Os tratamentos foram executados por dois subsistemas de colheita: mecanizado composto pelo harvester e forwarder e misto, composto pela motosserra, harvester e forwarder, sendo a introdução da motosserra justificada pela área que ficou fora do alcance da grua do harvester empregado, denominada "centro de campo". As mudanças propostas pelo novo modelo de desbaste e subsistema misto de colheita visaram aumento de produtividade, redução de custos das operações e melhor qualidade do povoamento remanescente, além de evitar a perda de área produtiva e distúrbios ao solo em termos de compactação. Para a comparação do desempenho de ambos os subsistemas de colheita de madeira trabalhando nas mesmas condições, foi selecionado um povoamento com caraterísticas homogêneas. Foi realizado um estudo de tempos e movimentos das máquinas de colheita de madeira em ambos os tratamentos de desbaste, permitindo uma comparação dos ciclos operacionais e determinando-se a produtividade, eficiência operacional, custos operacionais e de produção. Foi realizada uma avaliação da qualidade das operações por meio da aplicação de inventário de danos no povoamento remanescente. Os resultados mostraram os principais fatores que afetaram o ciclo operacional das máquinas envolvidas nestas operações: para o harvester foram afetados principalmente a busca e corte, o deslocamento e as interrupções; para o forwarder foram afetados a viagem vazia e o carregamento. O subsistema de colheita mecanizado na execução do tratamento de desbaste 1 apresentou maior produtividade (42,3 m³.h-1) em relação ao modelo 2 (40,5 m³.h-1), menores custos de produção (R$ 14,98/m³ contra R$ 16,25 /m³) e melhor qualidade da operação devido à menor ocorrência dos danos às árvores remanescentes (13 % contra 17 %). Além de serem definidos os danos como pouco importantes, o tratamento proposto possibilitou uma melhor distribuição dos danos na floresta. Comparativamente, o tratamento de desbaste 2 não ofereceu melhores resultados operacionais e de custos de colheita de madeira, porém apresentou os melhores resultados em relação à qualidade com menores danos nas árvores remanescentes do povoamento.Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-20T12:30:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PR OSCAR MANUEL DE JESUS VERA CABRAL.pdf: 3808224 bytes, checksum: bf56ae8e5605d84da1c61a060ec57020 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-03-10Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://localhost:8080/tede/retrieve/1484/PR%20OSCAR%20MANUEL%20DE%20JESUS%20VERA%20CABRAL.pdf.jpgporUNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro OestePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Florestais (Mestrado)UNICENTROBRUnicentro::Departamento de Ciências FlorestaisharvesterforwarderprodutividadecustosqualidademecanizaçãoharvesterforwarderproductivitycostsqualitymechanizationSILVICULTURA::FLORESTAMENTO E REFLORESTAMENTOCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTALRECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTALAVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L.Operational evaluation of timber harvest in thinning of Pinus taeda L.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis6065515305966967648600600600500500600-5938256993918186975-4784538462405253470-604049389552879283-76664982548871839512075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTROinstname:Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO)instacron:UNICENTROORIGINALPR OSCAR MANUEL DE JESUS VERA CABRAL.pdfapplication/pdf3808224http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/482/1/PR+OSCAR+MANUEL+DE+JESUS+VERA+CABRAL.pdfbf56ae8e5605d84da1c61a060ec57020MD51TEXTPR OSCAR MANUEL DE JESUS VERA CABRAL.pdf.txtPR OSCAR MANUEL DE JESUS VERA CABRAL.pdf.txttext/plain69827http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/482/2/PR+OSCAR+MANUEL+DE+JESUS+VERA+CABRAL.pdf.txt11eb15f2245b6dea1d8a7d12ade039c3MD52THUMBNAILPR OSCAR MANUEL DE JESUS VERA CABRAL.pdf.jpgPR OSCAR MANUEL DE JESUS VERA CABRAL.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3499http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/482/3/PR+OSCAR+MANUEL+DE+JESUS+VERA+CABRAL.pdf.jpg876b0a9b239c9315cc6047ce7246f767MD53tede/4822021-02-23 08:16:51.024oai:localhost:tede/482Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unicentro.br:8080/jspui/PUBhttp://tede.unicentro.br/tde_oai/oai3.phprepositorio@unicentro.br||fabianoqueiroz@yahoo.com.bropendoar:2021-02-23T11:16:51Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Operational evaluation of timber harvest in thinning of Pinus taeda L. |
title |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. |
spellingShingle |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. Cabral, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera harvester forwarder produtividade custos qualidade mecanização harvester forwarder productivity costs quality mechanization SILVICULTURA::FLORESTAMENTO E REFLORESTAMENTO CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTAL |
title_short |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. |
title_full |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. |
title_fullStr |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. |
title_full_unstemmed |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. |
title_sort |
AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L. |
author |
Cabral, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera |
author_facet |
Cabral, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Eduardo da Silva |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:833883833838 |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1280835655867163 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Figueiredo Filho, Afonso |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:88484848484848 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4151544991447365 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:01201716942 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
não consta |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cabral, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera |
contributor_str_mv |
Lopes, Eduardo da Silva Figueiredo Filho, Afonso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
harvester forwarder produtividade custos qualidade mecanização |
topic |
harvester forwarder produtividade custos qualidade mecanização harvester forwarder productivity costs quality mechanization SILVICULTURA::FLORESTAMENTO E REFLORESTAMENTO CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTAL |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
harvester forwarder productivity costs quality mechanization |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
SILVICULTURA::FLORESTAMENTO E REFLORESTAMENTO CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL::MANEJO FLORESTAL |
description |
This study had by objective to carry out an operational comparative analysis involving technical and cost aspects of timber harvesting applying two thinning treatments in Pinus taeda L., in the first thinning at age 10. Data were obtained from the forest area of a company located in the city Quedas of Iguaçu, Paraná State. The treatments were two thinning models determined by the systematic elimination of 5th line (model 1, considered as traditional practices) and 7th line (model 2, alternative thinning model) and selective elimination in the lines that were determined for these intervals. The treatments were executed by two harvesting subsystems: mechanized composed by harvester and forwarder and mixed system compound by chainsaw, harvester and forwarder, the introduction of the chainsaw was the creation of an area outside the range of harvester, called "midfield". The proposed changes by the new model of thinning and mixed harvesting subsystem aimed to increasing productivity, reducing transaction costs and better quality of the remaining stands, in addition prevent the loss of productive area and disturbances in terms of soil compaction. To compare the performance of both harvesting systems working under the same conditions, a stand was selected with homogeneous characteristics. A study of the time and motion machines in both thinning treatments was performed, allowing a comparison of operational cycles and determining productivity, operational efficiency, operational costs and production costs. An evaluation of the quality of operations through the application of damages inventory in remaining population was made. The results showed the main factors that affected the operational cycle of the machines involved in these operations: for the harvester were affected mainly the searching and cutting, displacement and disruption; to the forwarder were affected the empty travel and loading. The subsystem of mechanized harvesting implementing in the thinning model 1 showed the highest productivity (42,3 m³.h-1against 40,5 m³.h-1), lower production costs (R$ 14,98/m³ against R$ 16,25/m³) and better quality of operation due to the less occurrence of damage to remaining trees (13 % versus 17 %). In addition to being defined the damage as minor, the proposed treatment enabled a better distribution of damage in the forest. Comparatively, the thinning treatment 2 did not offer better operational and cost of harvest results, but showed better results in relation to quality with minor damage in remaining trees of the stand. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014-03-10 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-20T12:30:02Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-24 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
CABRAL, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera. AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L.. 2014. 111 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Manejo Florestal) - UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste, Irati, 2014. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/482 |
identifier_str_mv |
CABRAL, Oscar Manuel de Jesús Vera. AVALIAÇÃO OPERACIONAL DA COLHEITA DE MADEIRA EM DESBASTES DE Pinus taeda L.. 2014. 111 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Manejo Florestal) - UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste, Irati, 2014. |
url |
http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/482 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
6065515305966967648 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-5938256993918186975 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-4784538462405253470 -604049389552879283 -7666498254887183951 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Florestais (Mestrado) |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNICENTRO |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Unicentro::Departamento de Ciências Florestais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO instname:Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO) instacron:UNICENTRO |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO) |
instacron_str |
UNICENTRO |
institution |
UNICENTRO |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/482/1/PR+OSCAR+MANUEL+DE+JESUS+VERA+CABRAL.pdf http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/482/2/PR+OSCAR+MANUEL+DE+JESUS+VERA+CABRAL.pdf.txt http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/482/3/PR+OSCAR+MANUEL+DE+JESUS+VERA+CABRAL.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bf56ae8e5605d84da1c61a060ec57020 11eb15f2245b6dea1d8a7d12ade039c3 876b0a9b239c9315cc6047ce7246f767 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@unicentro.br||fabianoqueiroz@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1811733809448615936 |