CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sultonova, Laylo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Vasyukov, Vitalii, Kirillova, Elena
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Lex Humana
Texto Completo: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2596
Resumo: The article is devoted to the concepts of the legal personality of artificial intelligence. The intensive development of AI technologies, which can autonomously make decisions and perform creative and intellectual tasks, raises the question of the need to determine AI's legal status. The main purpose of the study is to propose a concept of conditionally special legal personality that can be applied to certain types of AI. A multi-criteria analysis of works devoted to the development of concepts of the AI legal personality and documents of the judicial authorities of Australia, the UK, the USA, and France were carried out within the framework of the study. The study showed that there is no uniform systematic approach to determining the AI legal personality at the national and international levels. The study highlights the main software-synthesized abilities of some types of intelligence. It is concluded that AI can have a special legal personality only in the presence of certain software-synthesized abilities. Depending on their availability and volume, AI in some cases can be defined solely as a tool in the hands of a person and as an electronic subject of law in other hands.
id UCP-1_8d634e6528376f5d32384dd4df26294f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2596
network_acronym_str UCP-1
network_name_str Lex Humana
repository_id_str
spelling CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCECONCEITOS DE PERSONALIDADE JURÍDICA DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIALArtificial intelligenceComputer and software technologiesRoboticsLegal personalityDutyLegal relationshipSubjectObjectThe article is devoted to the concepts of the legal personality of artificial intelligence. The intensive development of AI technologies, which can autonomously make decisions and perform creative and intellectual tasks, raises the question of the need to determine AI's legal status. The main purpose of the study is to propose a concept of conditionally special legal personality that can be applied to certain types of AI. A multi-criteria analysis of works devoted to the development of concepts of the AI legal personality and documents of the judicial authorities of Australia, the UK, the USA, and France were carried out within the framework of the study. The study showed that there is no uniform systematic approach to determining the AI legal personality at the national and international levels. The study highlights the main software-synthesized abilities of some types of intelligence. It is concluded that AI can have a special legal personality only in the presence of certain software-synthesized abilities. Depending on their availability and volume, AI in some cases can be defined solely as a tool in the hands of a person and as an electronic subject of law in other hands.O artigo é dedicado aos conceitos da personalidade jurídica da inteligência artificial. O desenvolvimento intensivo das tecnologias de IA, que podem tomar decisões de forma autônoma e executar tarefas criativas e intelectuais, levanta a questão da necessidade de determinar o status legal da IA. O objetivo principal do estudo é propor um conceito de personalidade jurídica condicionalmente especial que possa ser aplicado a certos tipos de IA. Uma análise multicritério de trabalhos dedicados ao desenvolvimento de conceitos de personalidade jurídica da IA e documentos das autoridades judiciais da Austrália, do Reino Unido, dos EUA e da França foi realizada no âmbito do estudo. O estudo mostrou que não há uma abordagem sistemática uniforme para determinar a personalidade jurídica da AI nos níveis nacional e internacional. O estudo destaca as principais capacidades de sintetização de software de alguns tipos de inteligência. Conclui-se que a IA pode ter uma personalidade jurídica especial somente na presença de certas habilidades de sintetização de software. Dependendo de sua disponibilidade e volume, a IA em alguns casos pode ser definida apenas como uma ferramenta nas mãos de uma pessoa e como um sujeito eletrônico de direito em outras mãos.Universidade Católica de Petrópolis2023-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2596Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); Vol. 15 No. 3 (2023): JUL-SEP; 283-295Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); v. 15 n. 3 (2023): JUL-SET; 283-2952175-0947reponame:Lex Humanainstname:Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)instacron:UCPenghttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2596/3532Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSultonova, Laylo Vasyukov, Vitalii Kirillova, Elena 2023-05-02T00:27:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2596Revistahttp://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php?journal=LexHumanaPUBhttp://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/oai||sergio.salles@ucp.br2175-09472175-0947opendoar:2023-05-02T00:27:03Lex Humana - Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
CONCEITOS DE PERSONALIDADE JURÍDICA DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL
title CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
spellingShingle CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sultonova, Laylo
Artificial intelligence
Computer and software technologies
Robotics
Legal personality
Duty
Legal relationship
Subject
Object
title_short CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
title_full CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
title_fullStr CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
title_full_unstemmed CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
title_sort CONCEPTS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
author Sultonova, Laylo
author_facet Sultonova, Laylo
Vasyukov, Vitalii
Kirillova, Elena
author_role author
author2 Vasyukov, Vitalii
Kirillova, Elena
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sultonova, Laylo
Vasyukov, Vitalii
Kirillova, Elena
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artificial intelligence
Computer and software technologies
Robotics
Legal personality
Duty
Legal relationship
Subject
Object
topic Artificial intelligence
Computer and software technologies
Robotics
Legal personality
Duty
Legal relationship
Subject
Object
description The article is devoted to the concepts of the legal personality of artificial intelligence. The intensive development of AI technologies, which can autonomously make decisions and perform creative and intellectual tasks, raises the question of the need to determine AI's legal status. The main purpose of the study is to propose a concept of conditionally special legal personality that can be applied to certain types of AI. A multi-criteria analysis of works devoted to the development of concepts of the AI legal personality and documents of the judicial authorities of Australia, the UK, the USA, and France were carried out within the framework of the study. The study showed that there is no uniform systematic approach to determining the AI legal personality at the national and international levels. The study highlights the main software-synthesized abilities of some types of intelligence. It is concluded that AI can have a special legal personality only in the presence of certain software-synthesized abilities. Depending on their availability and volume, AI in some cases can be defined solely as a tool in the hands of a person and as an electronic subject of law in other hands.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2596
url https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2596
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2596/3532
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Petrópolis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Petrópolis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); Vol. 15 No. 3 (2023): JUL-SEP; 283-295
Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947); v. 15 n. 3 (2023): JUL-SET; 283-295
2175-0947
reponame:Lex Humana
instname:Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)
instacron:UCP
instname_str Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)
instacron_str UCP
institution UCP
reponame_str Lex Humana
collection Lex Humana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Lex Humana - Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sergio.salles@ucp.br
_version_ 1809279387768455168

Registros relacionados