THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Synesis (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2086 |
Resumo: | In this paper, I intend to present and critique what Nicholas Agar has called "liberal eugenics," the idea that parents would be fully entitled to use genetic engineering in order to promote the enhancement of certain physical, cognitive, or behavioral abilities of their children according to their own values. To this end, I first point out the central elements of the author's argument; the distinction he draws between new and old forms of eugenics, the reasons why parents would be entitled to enhance their children, and the limits that should be observed by them both in order to avoid the errors of the old forms of eugenics and in respect of the main argument for pro-enhancement, which is liberal respect for autonomy. In a second step, however, I point to a tension between reasons and limits in Agar's argument, so as to conclude that, if it is to escape this apparent contradiction, liberal eugenics needs to be revised in some of its fundamental theses. |
id |
UCP-2_ebecd47415a5917f449314811e70d700 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2086 |
network_acronym_str |
UCP-2 |
network_name_str |
Synesis (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICSOS LIMITES DA EUGENIA LIBERALEngenharia genéticaAprimoramento genético humanoEugenia liberalIn this paper, I intend to present and critique what Nicholas Agar has called "liberal eugenics," the idea that parents would be fully entitled to use genetic engineering in order to promote the enhancement of certain physical, cognitive, or behavioral abilities of their children according to their own values. To this end, I first point out the central elements of the author's argument; the distinction he draws between new and old forms of eugenics, the reasons why parents would be entitled to enhance their children, and the limits that should be observed by them both in order to avoid the errors of the old forms of eugenics and in respect of the main argument for pro-enhancement, which is liberal respect for autonomy. In a second step, however, I point to a tension between reasons and limits in Agar's argument, so as to conclude that, if it is to escape this apparent contradiction, liberal eugenics needs to be revised in some of its fundamental theses.Neste trabalho, pretendo apresentar e criticar o que Nicholas Agar chamou de “eugenia liberal”, a ideia segundo a qual os pais teriam pleno direito de utilizar engenharia genética a fim de promover o aprimoramento de determinadas capacidades físicas, cognitivas ou comportamentais de seus filhos, de acordo com seus próprios valores. Nesse sentido, primeiro aponto os elementos centrais do argumento do autor; a distinção que ele traça entre novas e velhas formas de eugenia, as razões pelas quais os pais teriam direito a aprimorar seus filhos, e os limites que devem ser observados por eles a fim tanto de se evitar os erros das antigas formas de eugenia como em respeito ao principal argumento prol aprimoramento, qual seja, o respeito liberal pela autonomia. Num segundo momento, contudo, aponto uma tensão existente entre razões e limites no argumento de Agar, de forma a concluir que, caso queira escapar dessa aparente contradição, a eugenia liberal precisa ser revista em alguma de suas teses fundamentais.UCP2021-07-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2086Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754); Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): AGO.-DEZ.; 1-18Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754); v. 13 n. 2 (2021): AGO.-DEZ.; 1-181984-67541678-6785reponame:Synesis (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)instacron:UCPporhttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2086/3225Copyright (c) 2021 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Adan John Gomes2023-03-03T11:33:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2086Revistahttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesisPRIhttps://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/oaisergio.salles@ucp.br || paulo.cerqueira@ucp.br1984-67541678-6785opendoar:2023-03-03T11:33:32Synesis (Online) - Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS OS LIMITES DA EUGENIA LIBERAL |
title |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS |
spellingShingle |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS da Silva, Adan John Gomes Engenharia genética Aprimoramento genético humano Eugenia liberal |
title_short |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS |
title_full |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS |
title_fullStr |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS |
title_sort |
THE LIMITS OF LIBERAL EUGENICS |
author |
da Silva, Adan John Gomes |
author_facet |
da Silva, Adan John Gomes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Adan John Gomes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia genética Aprimoramento genético humano Eugenia liberal |
topic |
Engenharia genética Aprimoramento genético humano Eugenia liberal |
description |
In this paper, I intend to present and critique what Nicholas Agar has called "liberal eugenics," the idea that parents would be fully entitled to use genetic engineering in order to promote the enhancement of certain physical, cognitive, or behavioral abilities of their children according to their own values. To this end, I first point out the central elements of the author's argument; the distinction he draws between new and old forms of eugenics, the reasons why parents would be entitled to enhance their children, and the limits that should be observed by them both in order to avoid the errors of the old forms of eugenics and in respect of the main argument for pro-enhancement, which is liberal respect for autonomy. In a second step, however, I point to a tension between reasons and limits in Agar's argument, so as to conclude that, if it is to escape this apparent contradiction, liberal eugenics needs to be revised in some of its fundamental theses. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2086 |
url |
https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2086 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2086/3225 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UCP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UCP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754); Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): AGO.-DEZ.; 1-18 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754); v. 13 n. 2 (2021): AGO.-DEZ.; 1-18 1984-6754 1678-6785 reponame:Synesis (Online) instname:Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP) instacron:UCP |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP) |
instacron_str |
UCP |
institution |
UCP |
reponame_str |
Synesis (Online) |
collection |
Synesis (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Synesis (Online) - Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (UCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio.salles@ucp.br || paulo.cerqueira@ucp.br |
_version_ |
1797042085998624768 |