The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Leila
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Barrett, Hazel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Sociedade em Debate (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3332
Resumo: For many women in the world sterilization is the most appropriate contraceptive method. It can, though, be used as a control instrument when reproductive rights are not widely guaranteed. This paper analyzes the Bills at the Brazilian National Congress that propose amendments to the Family Planning Law regarding voluntary sterilization in an attempt to demonstrate that these Bills would imply restriction of the reproductive cycle of women. Documentary research was utilized in the texts of 15 bills in progress until 2020. It was verified that neo-Malthusian philosophy predominates among legislators and that the Bills are evidence of the advance of conservatism in the Brazilian National Congress. The legislators institutionalize, through the Bills, the oppression on women by offering easy access to a definitive procedure, as they know that women opt for surgery to contain their reproductive cycle in a context of absence of social policies and frailty of reproductive rights.
id UCPEL-2_adc05be7f90d88a85173a69b678940b3
oai_identifier_str oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/3332
network_acronym_str UCPEL-2
network_name_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National CongressO debate sobre a esterilização feminina no Congresso Nacional BrasileiroWomen’s Reproductive Rights. Family Planning. Social Policy.Women’s Reproductive RightsFamily PlanningSocial PolicyFor many women in the world sterilization is the most appropriate contraceptive method. It can, though, be used as a control instrument when reproductive rights are not widely guaranteed. This paper analyzes the Bills at the Brazilian National Congress that propose amendments to the Family Planning Law regarding voluntary sterilization in an attempt to demonstrate that these Bills would imply restriction of the reproductive cycle of women. Documentary research was utilized in the texts of 15 bills in progress until 2020. It was verified that neo-Malthusian philosophy predominates among legislators and that the Bills are evidence of the advance of conservatism in the Brazilian National Congress. The legislators institutionalize, through the Bills, the oppression on women by offering easy access to a definitive procedure, as they know that women opt for surgery to contain their reproductive cycle in a context of absence of social policies and frailty of reproductive rights.Para muitas mulheres no mundo, a esterilização é o método contraceptivo mais apropriado. No entanto, este método pode ser usado como um instrumento de controle quando os direitos reprodutivos não são amplamente garantidos. Este artigo analisa os Projetos de Lei do Congresso Nacional que propõem emendas à Lei do Planejamento Familiar em relação à esterilização na tentativa de demonstrar que estas propostas implicam na restrição do ciclo reprodutivo das mulheres. A pesquisa documental foi utilizada para analisar 15 projetos de lei que tramitavam até 2020. Foi verificado que a filosofia neomalthusiana predomina entre os legisladores e que os projetos são evidências do avanço do conservadorismo no Congresso Nacional brasileiro. Os legisladores institucionalizam, por meio das suas propostas, a opressão sobre a mulher, oferecendo fácil acesso a um procedimento definitivo, pois sabem que a mulher opta pela cirurgia para conter seu ciclo reprodutivo num contexto de ausência de políticas sociais e de fragilidade dos direitos reprodutivos.PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2023-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/333210.47208/sd.v29i1.3332Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 90-109Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 90-109Sociedade em Debate; v. 29 n. 1 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 90-1092317-02041414-986910.47208/sd.v29i1reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELenghttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3332/1947Copyright (c) 2023 Leila Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Hazel Barretthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarchezi Tavares Menandro, LeilaBarrett, Hazel2023-04-30T21:59:22Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/3332Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2023-04-30T21:59:22Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
O debate sobre a esterilização feminina no Congresso Nacional Brasileiro
title The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
spellingShingle The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Leila
Women’s Reproductive Rights. Family Planning. Social Policy.
Women’s Reproductive Rights
Family Planning
Social Policy
title_short The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
title_full The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
title_fullStr The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
title_full_unstemmed The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
title_sort The debate concerning female sterilization in the Brazilian National Congress
author Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Leila
author_facet Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Leila
Barrett, Hazel
author_role author
author2 Barrett, Hazel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Leila
Barrett, Hazel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Women’s Reproductive Rights. Family Planning. Social Policy.
Women’s Reproductive Rights
Family Planning
Social Policy
topic Women’s Reproductive Rights. Family Planning. Social Policy.
Women’s Reproductive Rights
Family Planning
Social Policy
description For many women in the world sterilization is the most appropriate contraceptive method. It can, though, be used as a control instrument when reproductive rights are not widely guaranteed. This paper analyzes the Bills at the Brazilian National Congress that propose amendments to the Family Planning Law regarding voluntary sterilization in an attempt to demonstrate that these Bills would imply restriction of the reproductive cycle of women. Documentary research was utilized in the texts of 15 bills in progress until 2020. It was verified that neo-Malthusian philosophy predominates among legislators and that the Bills are evidence of the advance of conservatism in the Brazilian National Congress. The legislators institutionalize, through the Bills, the oppression on women by offering easy access to a definitive procedure, as they know that women opt for surgery to contain their reproductive cycle in a context of absence of social policies and frailty of reproductive rights.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3332
10.47208/sd.v29i1.3332
url https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3332
identifier_str_mv 10.47208/sd.v29i1.3332
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/3332/1947
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Leila Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Hazel Barrett
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Leila Marchezi Tavares Menandro, Hazel Barrett
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 90-109
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 90-109
Sociedade em Debate; v. 29 n. 1 (2023): Sociedade em Debate; 90-109
2317-0204
1414-9869
10.47208/sd.v29i1
reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)
instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron:UCPEL
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron_str UCPEL
institution UCPEL
reponame_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
collection Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br
_version_ 1799304255486558208