Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2738 |
Resumo: | Solidary Selective Collection (CSS) emerges as a new proposal to encourage the minimization of waste generation, capable of significantly reducing the environmental impact and the public expenditure aimed at the collection of waste produced in the urban perimeter. The municipality of Santana do Livramento / RS, which is the object of study of this research, lacks sustainable programs such as CSS, maintaining a totally outsourced MSW management service that directly reflects the costs of public administration. Given this scenario, the present study sought to estimate the economic gain, if there was a CSS policy in the municipality. The research is characterized as exploratory, with the use of primary and secondary data. Among the results, it was verified that, in the period from 2010 to 2017, there was an increase in the cost of outsourcing garbage collection in the municipality, equivalent to 179.06%. Only in 2017, 18 thousand tons of MSW were produced, without reuse of recyclable materials. In addition, it was estimated that more than 5,000 tons could be recycled / reused. In terms of economy, because it does not have CSS, in 2016 the municipality stopped saving about R $ 1.9 million and generating a revenue of R $ 2.6 million with the commercialization of recyclable materials, showing that the prevailing model is rethought. |
id |
UCPEL-2_cb06d5d06adec19e38d0610b557e9b27 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/2738 |
network_acronym_str |
UCPEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RSEstimativa dos benefícios econômicos da implementação da Coleta Seletiva Solidária (CSS) no município de Santana do Livramento – RSSantana do Livramento/RSColeta Seletiva SolidáriaResíduos Sólidos UrbanosTerceirizaçãoGanho EconômicoSolidary Selective Collection (CSS) emerges as a new proposal to encourage the minimization of waste generation, capable of significantly reducing the environmental impact and the public expenditure aimed at the collection of waste produced in the urban perimeter. The municipality of Santana do Livramento / RS, which is the object of study of this research, lacks sustainable programs such as CSS, maintaining a totally outsourced MSW management service that directly reflects the costs of public administration. Given this scenario, the present study sought to estimate the economic gain, if there was a CSS policy in the municipality. The research is characterized as exploratory, with the use of primary and secondary data. Among the results, it was verified that, in the period from 2010 to 2017, there was an increase in the cost of outsourcing garbage collection in the municipality, equivalent to 179.06%. Only in 2017, 18 thousand tons of MSW were produced, without reuse of recyclable materials. In addition, it was estimated that more than 5,000 tons could be recycled / reused. In terms of economy, because it does not have CSS, in 2016 the municipality stopped saving about R $ 1.9 million and generating a revenue of R $ 2.6 million with the commercialization of recyclable materials, showing that the prevailing model is rethought.A Coleta Seletiva Solidária (CSS) surge como uma nova proposta de incentivo à reciclagem de resíduos sólidos capaz de reduzir significativamente o impacto ambiental e o dispêndio público voltado para a coleta de resíduos produzidos no perímetro urbano. O município de Santana do Livramento/RS, objeto desta pesquisa, carece de programas sustentáveis como a CSS, mantendo um serviço de manejo de RSU terceirizado que afeta diretamente os custos da administração pública. Diante desse cenário, o presente estudo buscou estimar o ganho econômico caso houvesse uma política de CSS no município. A pesquisa caracteriza-se como exploratória, com a utilização de dados primários e secundários. Dentre os resultados, constatou-se que, no período de 2010 a 2017, houve um aumento de 179,06% no custo da terceirização da coleta de lixo no município. Somente no ano de 2017 foram produzidas 18 mil toneladas de RSU, sem reaproveitamento dos materiais recicláveis. Além disso, estimou-se que poderiam ser reciclados/reaproveitados mais de 5 mil toneladas. Em termos de economia, por não possuir CSS, em 2016 o município deixou de economizar cerca de R$ 1,9 milhão e de gerar uma receita de R$ 2,6 milhões com a comercialização de materiais recicláveis, evidenciando que o modelo vigente seja repensado.PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/273810.47208/sd.v26i3.2738Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 219-235Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 Núm. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 219-235Sociedade em Debate; v. 26 n. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 219-2352317-02041414-986910.47208/sd.v26i3reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELporhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2738/1733Copyright (c) 2020 Altacir Bunde, Cassiane da Costa, Edenilson Tafernaberry Lencina Machado, Gabriela Martins Braz, Kamilla Raquel Rizzihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBunde, Altacirda Costa, CassianeTafernaberry Lencina Machado, EdenilsonMartins Braz, GabrielaRizzi, Kamilla Raquel2020-12-15T20:22:25Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/2738Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2020-12-15T20:22:25Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS Estimativa dos benefícios econômicos da implementação da Coleta Seletiva Solidária (CSS) no município de Santana do Livramento – RS |
title |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS |
spellingShingle |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS Bunde, Altacir Santana do Livramento/RS Coleta Seletiva Solidária Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos Terceirização Ganho Econômico |
title_short |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS |
title_full |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS |
title_fullStr |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS |
title_sort |
Estimate of the economic benefits of the implementation of Selected Solidary Collection (CSS) no municipality of Santana do Livramento - RS |
author |
Bunde, Altacir |
author_facet |
Bunde, Altacir da Costa, Cassiane Tafernaberry Lencina Machado, Edenilson Martins Braz, Gabriela Rizzi, Kamilla Raquel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Costa, Cassiane Tafernaberry Lencina Machado, Edenilson Martins Braz, Gabriela Rizzi, Kamilla Raquel |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bunde, Altacir da Costa, Cassiane Tafernaberry Lencina Machado, Edenilson Martins Braz, Gabriela Rizzi, Kamilla Raquel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Santana do Livramento/RS Coleta Seletiva Solidária Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos Terceirização Ganho Econômico |
topic |
Santana do Livramento/RS Coleta Seletiva Solidária Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos Terceirização Ganho Econômico |
description |
Solidary Selective Collection (CSS) emerges as a new proposal to encourage the minimization of waste generation, capable of significantly reducing the environmental impact and the public expenditure aimed at the collection of waste produced in the urban perimeter. The municipality of Santana do Livramento / RS, which is the object of study of this research, lacks sustainable programs such as CSS, maintaining a totally outsourced MSW management service that directly reflects the costs of public administration. Given this scenario, the present study sought to estimate the economic gain, if there was a CSS policy in the municipality. The research is characterized as exploratory, with the use of primary and secondary data. Among the results, it was verified that, in the period from 2010 to 2017, there was an increase in the cost of outsourcing garbage collection in the municipality, equivalent to 179.06%. Only in 2017, 18 thousand tons of MSW were produced, without reuse of recyclable materials. In addition, it was estimated that more than 5,000 tons could be recycled / reused. In terms of economy, because it does not have CSS, in 2016 the municipality stopped saving about R $ 1.9 million and generating a revenue of R $ 2.6 million with the commercialization of recyclable materials, showing that the prevailing model is rethought. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2738 10.47208/sd.v26i3.2738 |
url |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2738 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.47208/sd.v26i3.2738 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/2738/1733 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 219-235 Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 26 Núm. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 219-235 Sociedade em Debate; v. 26 n. 3 (2020): Sociedade em Debate; 219-235 2317-0204 1414-9869 10.47208/sd.v26i3 reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online) instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) instacron:UCPEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) |
instacron_str |
UCPEL |
institution |
UCPEL |
reponame_str |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
collection |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br |
_version_ |
1799304254612045824 |