“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Educação & Formação (Fortaleza) |
DOI: | 10.25053/redufor.v6i2.4189 |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the speeches of parliamentarians who proposed the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” in the municipalities of Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande in the state of Paraíba. These laws were proposed and approved based on the Christian ideological foundation, with the purpose of prohibiting the debate of gender in public and private schools of the referred municipalities. Methodologically, we used the proposal of discourse analysis from Michel Foucault (2014) which aims to perceive discursive production as an exercise in reading, interpreting and producing another / new discourse. For this, we look at the interviews made with the three parliamentarians in order to understand their interests and “ideologies” defended. Ideology, gender and education are fundamental categories for the theoretical dialogue in this text. Therefore, it is concluded that the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” functioned as a prohibitive and punitive device, but that it also generated resistance. |
id |
UECE-1_48de0c402bd6a77f5662a770d86cded4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.uece.br:article/4189 |
network_acronym_str |
UECE-1 |
network_name_str |
Educação & Formação (Fortaleza) |
spelling |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018)“Prohibida la igualdad de género en este establecimiento”: discursos políticos sobre la aprobación de la “Ley de Ideología de Género” en Santa Rita, Patos y Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018)“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018)“É proibida a igualdade gênero nesse estabelecimento”: discursos sobre a “Lei da Ideologia de Gênero” em Santa Rita, Patos e Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018)Ideologia de GêneroGêneroEducaçãoIdeologia de GêneroGender ideologyGenreEducationIdeología de género. Género. EducaciónThis article aims to analyze the speeches of parliamentarians who proposed the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” in the municipalities of Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande in the state of Paraíba. These laws were proposed and approved based on the Christian ideological foundation, with the purpose of prohibiting the debate of gender in public and private schools of the referred municipalities. Methodologically, we used the proposal of discourse analysis from Michel Foucault (2014) which aims to perceive discursive production as an exercise in reading, interpreting and producing another / new discourse. For this, we look at the interviews made with the three parliamentarians in order to understand their interests and “ideologies” defended. Ideology, gender and education are fundamental categories for the theoretical dialogue in this text. Therefore, it is concluded that the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” functioned as a prohibitive and punitive device, but that it also generated resistance.Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar los discursos de los parlamentarios que propusieron la denominada “Ley de Ideología de Género” en los municipios de Santa Rita, Patos y Campina Grande del estado de Paraíba. Estas leyes fueron propuestas y aprobadas con base en el fundamento ideológico cristiano, con el propósito de prohibir el debate de género en las escuelas públicas y privadas de los municipios referidos. Metodológicamente, utilizamos la propuesta de análisis del discurso de Michel Foucault (2014) que tiene como objetivo percibir la producción discursiva como un ejercicio de lectura, interpretación y producción de otro / nuevo discurso. Para ello, nos fijamos en las entrevistas realizadas a los tres parlamentarios con el fin de entender sus intereses e “ideologías” defendidas. Ideología, género y educación son categorías fundamentales para el diálogo teórico en este texto. Por tanto, se concluye que la llamada “Ley de la Ideología de Género” funcionó como un dispositivo prohibitivo y punitivo, pero que también generó resistencias.This article aims to analyze the speeches of parliamentarians who proposed the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” in the municipalities of Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande in the state of Paraíba. These laws were proposed and approved based on the Christian ideological foundation, with the purpose of prohibiting the debate of gender in public and private schools of the referred municipalities. Methodologically, we used the proposal of discourse analysis from Michel Foucault (2014) which aims to perceive discursive production as an exercise in reading, interpreting and producing another / new discourse. For this, we look at the interviews made with the three parliamentarians in order to understand their interests and “ideologies” defended. Ideology, gender and education are fundamental categories for the theoretical dialogue in this text. Therefore, it is concluded that the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” functioned as a prohibitive and punitive device, but that it also generated resistance.Esse artigo tem por objetivo analisar os discursos dos parlamentares que propuseram a chamada “Lei da Ideologia de Gênero” nos municípios de Santa Rita, Patos e Campina Grande no estado da Paraíba. Essas leis foram propostas e aprovadas a partir do embasamento ideológico cristão, com a finalidade de proibir o debate de gênero nas escolas públicas e privadas dos referidos municípios. Metodologicamente, utilizamos a proposta da análise do discurso a partir de Michel Foucault (2014) que visa perceber a produção discursiva como um exercício de leitura, interpretação e produção de um outro/novo discurso. Para tanto, nos debruçamos sobre as entrevistas feitas com os três parlamentares no sentido de perceber seus interesses e “ideologias” defendidas. Ideologia, gênero e educação são categorias fundamentais para o diálogo teórico nesse texto. Portanto, conclui-se que a chamada “Lei da Ideologia de Gênero” funcionou como um dispositivo proibitivo e punitivo, mas que também gerou resistências.EdUECE2021-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/xmlapplication/ziphttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/418910.25053/redufor.v6i2.4189Educ. Form.; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e4189Educ. Form.; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e4189Éducation et formation; Vol. 6 No 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e4189Educ. Form.; v. 6 n. 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e41892448-3583reponame:Educação & Formação (Fortaleza)instname:Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)instacron:UECEporenghttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4006https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4007https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4132https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4435https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4436Copyright (c) 2021 Azemar dos Santos Soares Junior, Guilherme de Lima Arrudahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArruda, Guilherme de LimaSoares Junior, Azemar dos Santos2021-06-08T22:17:58Zoai:ojs.revistas.uece.br:article/4189Revistahttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/reduforPUBhttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/oairedufor@gmail.com||lia.fialho@uece.br2448-35832448-3583opendoar:2021-06-08T22:17:58Educação & Formação (Fortaleza) - Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) “Prohibida la igualdad de género en este establecimiento”: discursos políticos sobre la aprobación de la “Ley de Ideología de Género” en Santa Rita, Patos y Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) “Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) “É proibida a igualdade gênero nesse estabelecimento”: discursos sobre a “Lei da Ideologia de Gênero” em Santa Rita, Patos e Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) |
title |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) |
spellingShingle |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) “Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) Arruda, Guilherme de Lima Ideologia de Gênero Gênero Educação Ideologia de Gênero Gender ideology Genre Education Ideología de género. Género. Educación Arruda, Guilherme de Lima Ideologia de Gênero Gênero Educação Ideologia de Gênero Gender ideology Genre Education Ideología de género. Género. Educación |
title_short |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) |
title_full |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) |
title_fullStr |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) “Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) “Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) |
title_sort |
“Gender equality in this establishment is prohibited”: political speeches about the approval of the “Gender Ideology Law” in Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande – Paraíba (2017-2018) |
author |
Arruda, Guilherme de Lima |
author_facet |
Arruda, Guilherme de Lima Arruda, Guilherme de Lima Soares Junior, Azemar dos Santos Soares Junior, Azemar dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soares Junior, Azemar dos Santos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arruda, Guilherme de Lima Soares Junior, Azemar dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ideologia de Gênero Gênero Educação Ideologia de Gênero Gender ideology Genre Education Ideología de género. Género. Educación |
topic |
Ideologia de Gênero Gênero Educação Ideologia de Gênero Gender ideology Genre Education Ideología de género. Género. Educación |
description |
This article aims to analyze the speeches of parliamentarians who proposed the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” in the municipalities of Santa Rita, Patos and Campina Grande in the state of Paraíba. These laws were proposed and approved based on the Christian ideological foundation, with the purpose of prohibiting the debate of gender in public and private schools of the referred municipalities. Methodologically, we used the proposal of discourse analysis from Michel Foucault (2014) which aims to perceive discursive production as an exercise in reading, interpreting and producing another / new discourse. For this, we look at the interviews made with the three parliamentarians in order to understand their interests and “ideologies” defended. Ideology, gender and education are fundamental categories for the theoretical dialogue in this text. Therefore, it is concluded that the so-called “Law of Gender Ideology” functioned as a prohibitive and punitive device, but that it also generated resistance. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189 10.25053/redufor.v6i2.4189 |
url |
https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25053/redufor.v6i2.4189 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4006 https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4007 https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4132 https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4435 https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/4189/4436 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Azemar dos Santos Soares Junior, Guilherme de Lima Arruda http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Azemar dos Santos Soares Junior, Guilherme de Lima Arruda http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf text/xml application/zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EdUECE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EdUECE |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educ. Form.; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e4189 Educ. Form.; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e4189 Éducation et formation; Vol. 6 No 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e4189 Educ. Form.; v. 6 n. 2 (2021): Educação & Formação; e4189 2448-3583 reponame:Educação & Formação (Fortaleza) instname:Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE) instacron:UECE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE) |
instacron_str |
UECE |
institution |
UECE |
reponame_str |
Educação & Formação (Fortaleza) |
collection |
Educação & Formação (Fortaleza) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educação & Formação (Fortaleza) - Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
redufor@gmail.com||lia.fialho@uece.br |
_version_ |
1822181123845783552 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.25053/redufor.v6i2.4189 |