Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Conde, Mário Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Heckler, Rafael Pereira, Borges, Dyego Gonçalves Lino, Onselen, Valter Joost Van, Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro, Borges, Fernando de Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818
Resumo: This study aimed to analyze economically different control protocols for beef cattle gastrointestinal nematodes in Brazil. Field study data previously published was used to compare three groups: 1) non-dosed; 2) current deworming program with two doses - May and November; and 3) alternative strategic control program with three doses - May, August, and November. An economic sensitivity analysis was performed based on beef carcass price (BCP) variation, thus creating three economic scenarios: 1) more probable (M) using the mean BCP in the studied region; 2) optimistic (O) using the mean BCP plus standard deviation; and 3) pessimistic (P) using the mean BCP minus standard deviation. Stock valuation (SV), operational result (OP), and treatment differential (TD) were calculated for each scenario. Average BCP was US$ 2.93 kg-1 carcass (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 carcass). The mean annual cost of deworming per animal was US$ 5.43 and US$ 7.97 for protocols with two and three doses, respectively. The cost of anthelmintic treatment represented 0.63% and 0.74% of operating results, both in M scenario. TD ranged from 9.5% to 27.6% for the assessed protocols. Regardless of the scenario, the protocol with three annual dosages presented the highest SV and OP, which economically justifies its implementation in strategic control of gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle in Central Brazil. These results also demonstrate the relevance of strategic anthelmintic treatments in weaned stocker calves in tropical and humid subtropical areas.
id UEL-11_06062cbec9c059d9465e47d6abf46c98
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34818
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central BrazilAnálise econômica do programa de controle estratégico (5, 8, 11) de nematodas gastrointestinais em bovinos de corte em recria a pasto no Brasil CentralControlCooperia sppEconomicHaemonchus sppTropical.ControleCooperiaEconômicoHaemonchusTropical.This study aimed to analyze economically different control protocols for beef cattle gastrointestinal nematodes in Brazil. Field study data previously published was used to compare three groups: 1) non-dosed; 2) current deworming program with two doses - May and November; and 3) alternative strategic control program with three doses - May, August, and November. An economic sensitivity analysis was performed based on beef carcass price (BCP) variation, thus creating three economic scenarios: 1) more probable (M) using the mean BCP in the studied region; 2) optimistic (O) using the mean BCP plus standard deviation; and 3) pessimistic (P) using the mean BCP minus standard deviation. Stock valuation (SV), operational result (OP), and treatment differential (TD) were calculated for each scenario. Average BCP was US$ 2.93 kg-1 carcass (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 carcass). The mean annual cost of deworming per animal was US$ 5.43 and US$ 7.97 for protocols with two and three doses, respectively. The cost of anthelmintic treatment represented 0.63% and 0.74% of operating results, both in M scenario. TD ranged from 9.5% to 27.6% for the assessed protocols. Regardless of the scenario, the protocol with three annual dosages presented the highest SV and OP, which economically justifies its implementation in strategic control of gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle in Central Brazil. These results also demonstrate the relevance of strategic anthelmintic treatments in weaned stocker calves in tropical and humid subtropical areas.O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar diferentes protocolos de controle de nematodas gastrointestinais em bovinos de corte no Brasil. Dados de estudo de campo publicados anteriormente foram utilizados para comparar três grupos: 1) não dosificado; 2) o programa de desverminação utilizado atualmente com duas dosificações - maio e novembro; e 3) um programa de controle estratégico com três dosificações - maio, agosto e novembro. A análise de sensibilidade econômica foi realizada com base na variação do Preço da Carcaça Bovina (PCB), assim criando três cenários econômicos: mais provável (M), utilizando o PCB médio na região do estudo; Otimista (O), usando o PCB mais o desvio padrão e pessimista (P), usando o PCB menos o desvio padrão. Para cada cenário, a valorização de estoque (VE), o resultado operacional (OP) e o diferencial de tratamento (DT) foram calculados. O PCB médio foi de US$ 2.93 kg-1 de carcaça (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 de carcaça). O custo médio anual de desverminação por animal foi US$ 5.43 e US$ 7.97 no protocolo com duas e três doses, respectivamente, e o custo do anti-helmíntico representou 0.63% e 0.74% do resultado operacional, ambos no cenário M. Os diferenciais de tratamento dos protocolos avaliados variaram de 9.5% a 27.6%. Independentemente do cenário econômico simulado, o protocolo com três dosagens anuais apresentou a maior VE e OP entre os protocolos avaliados, justificando economicamente sua implementação para o controle estratégico de nematodas gastrointestinais de bovinos de corte criados em pastagem no Brasil Central e também demonstram a relevância de tratamentos anti-helmínticos estratégicos em bezerros desmamados em áreas subtropicais tropicais e úmidas.UEL2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo CientíficoArtigo científicoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3481810.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5Supl1p2309Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-2318Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-23181679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818/25851Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConde, Mário HenriqueHeckler, Rafael PereiraBorges, Dyego Gonçalves LinoOnselen, Valter Joost VanBrumatti, Ricardo CarneiroBorges, Fernando de Almeida2022-10-18T16:29:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34818Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-18T16:29:34Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
Análise econômica do programa de controle estratégico (5, 8, 11) de nematodas gastrointestinais em bovinos de corte em recria a pasto no Brasil Central
title Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
spellingShingle Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
Conde, Mário Henrique
Control
Cooperia spp
Economic
Haemonchus spp
Tropical.
Controle
Cooperia
Econômico
Haemonchus
Tropical.
title_short Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
title_full Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
title_fullStr Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
title_sort Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
author Conde, Mário Henrique
author_facet Conde, Mário Henrique
Heckler, Rafael Pereira
Borges, Dyego Gonçalves Lino
Onselen, Valter Joost Van
Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro
Borges, Fernando de Almeida
author_role author
author2 Heckler, Rafael Pereira
Borges, Dyego Gonçalves Lino
Onselen, Valter Joost Van
Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro
Borges, Fernando de Almeida
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Conde, Mário Henrique
Heckler, Rafael Pereira
Borges, Dyego Gonçalves Lino
Onselen, Valter Joost Van
Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro
Borges, Fernando de Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Control
Cooperia spp
Economic
Haemonchus spp
Tropical.
Controle
Cooperia
Econômico
Haemonchus
Tropical.
topic Control
Cooperia spp
Economic
Haemonchus spp
Tropical.
Controle
Cooperia
Econômico
Haemonchus
Tropical.
description This study aimed to analyze economically different control protocols for beef cattle gastrointestinal nematodes in Brazil. Field study data previously published was used to compare three groups: 1) non-dosed; 2) current deworming program with two doses - May and November; and 3) alternative strategic control program with three doses - May, August, and November. An economic sensitivity analysis was performed based on beef carcass price (BCP) variation, thus creating three economic scenarios: 1) more probable (M) using the mean BCP in the studied region; 2) optimistic (O) using the mean BCP plus standard deviation; and 3) pessimistic (P) using the mean BCP minus standard deviation. Stock valuation (SV), operational result (OP), and treatment differential (TD) were calculated for each scenario. Average BCP was US$ 2.93 kg-1 carcass (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 carcass). The mean annual cost of deworming per animal was US$ 5.43 and US$ 7.97 for protocols with two and three doses, respectively. The cost of anthelmintic treatment represented 0.63% and 0.74% of operating results, both in M scenario. TD ranged from 9.5% to 27.6% for the assessed protocols. Regardless of the scenario, the protocol with three annual dosages presented the highest SV and OP, which economically justifies its implementation in strategic control of gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle in Central Brazil. These results also demonstrate the relevance of strategic anthelmintic treatments in weaned stocker calves in tropical and humid subtropical areas.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Científico
Artigo científico
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5Supl1p2309
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5Supl1p2309
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818/25851
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-2318
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-2318
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306080872824832