Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to analyze economically different control protocols for beef cattle gastrointestinal nematodes in Brazil. Field study data previously published was used to compare three groups: 1) non-dosed; 2) current deworming program with two doses - May and November; and 3) alternative strategic control program with three doses - May, August, and November. An economic sensitivity analysis was performed based on beef carcass price (BCP) variation, thus creating three economic scenarios: 1) more probable (M) using the mean BCP in the studied region; 2) optimistic (O) using the mean BCP plus standard deviation; and 3) pessimistic (P) using the mean BCP minus standard deviation. Stock valuation (SV), operational result (OP), and treatment differential (TD) were calculated for each scenario. Average BCP was US$ 2.93 kg-1 carcass (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 carcass). The mean annual cost of deworming per animal was US$ 5.43 and US$ 7.97 for protocols with two and three doses, respectively. The cost of anthelmintic treatment represented 0.63% and 0.74% of operating results, both in M scenario. TD ranged from 9.5% to 27.6% for the assessed protocols. Regardless of the scenario, the protocol with three annual dosages presented the highest SV and OP, which economically justifies its implementation in strategic control of gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle in Central Brazil. These results also demonstrate the relevance of strategic anthelmintic treatments in weaned stocker calves in tropical and humid subtropical areas. |
id |
UEL-11_06062cbec9c059d9465e47d6abf46c98 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34818 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central BrazilAnálise econômica do programa de controle estratégico (5, 8, 11) de nematodas gastrointestinais em bovinos de corte em recria a pasto no Brasil CentralControlCooperia sppEconomicHaemonchus sppTropical.ControleCooperiaEconômicoHaemonchusTropical.This study aimed to analyze economically different control protocols for beef cattle gastrointestinal nematodes in Brazil. Field study data previously published was used to compare three groups: 1) non-dosed; 2) current deworming program with two doses - May and November; and 3) alternative strategic control program with three doses - May, August, and November. An economic sensitivity analysis was performed based on beef carcass price (BCP) variation, thus creating three economic scenarios: 1) more probable (M) using the mean BCP in the studied region; 2) optimistic (O) using the mean BCP plus standard deviation; and 3) pessimistic (P) using the mean BCP minus standard deviation. Stock valuation (SV), operational result (OP), and treatment differential (TD) were calculated for each scenario. Average BCP was US$ 2.93 kg-1 carcass (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 carcass). The mean annual cost of deworming per animal was US$ 5.43 and US$ 7.97 for protocols with two and three doses, respectively. The cost of anthelmintic treatment represented 0.63% and 0.74% of operating results, both in M scenario. TD ranged from 9.5% to 27.6% for the assessed protocols. Regardless of the scenario, the protocol with three annual dosages presented the highest SV and OP, which economically justifies its implementation in strategic control of gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle in Central Brazil. These results also demonstrate the relevance of strategic anthelmintic treatments in weaned stocker calves in tropical and humid subtropical areas.O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar diferentes protocolos de controle de nematodas gastrointestinais em bovinos de corte no Brasil. Dados de estudo de campo publicados anteriormente foram utilizados para comparar três grupos: 1) não dosificado; 2) o programa de desverminação utilizado atualmente com duas dosificações - maio e novembro; e 3) um programa de controle estratégico com três dosificações - maio, agosto e novembro. A análise de sensibilidade econômica foi realizada com base na variação do Preço da Carcaça Bovina (PCB), assim criando três cenários econômicos: mais provável (M), utilizando o PCB médio na região do estudo; Otimista (O), usando o PCB mais o desvio padrão e pessimista (P), usando o PCB menos o desvio padrão. Para cada cenário, a valorização de estoque (VE), o resultado operacional (OP) e o diferencial de tratamento (DT) foram calculados. O PCB médio foi de US$ 2.93 kg-1 de carcaça (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 de carcaça). O custo médio anual de desverminação por animal foi US$ 5.43 e US$ 7.97 no protocolo com duas e três doses, respectivamente, e o custo do anti-helmíntico representou 0.63% e 0.74% do resultado operacional, ambos no cenário M. Os diferenciais de tratamento dos protocolos avaliados variaram de 9.5% a 27.6%. Independentemente do cenário econômico simulado, o protocolo com três dosagens anuais apresentou a maior VE e OP entre os protocolos avaliados, justificando economicamente sua implementação para o controle estratégico de nematodas gastrointestinais de bovinos de corte criados em pastagem no Brasil Central e também demonstram a relevância de tratamentos anti-helmínticos estratégicos em bezerros desmamados em áreas subtropicais tropicais e úmidas.UEL2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo CientíficoArtigo científicoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3481810.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5Supl1p2309Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-2318Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-23181679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818/25851Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConde, Mário HenriqueHeckler, Rafael PereiraBorges, Dyego Gonçalves LinoOnselen, Valter Joost VanBrumatti, Ricardo CarneiroBorges, Fernando de Almeida2022-10-18T16:29:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34818Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-18T16:29:34Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil Análise econômica do programa de controle estratégico (5, 8, 11) de nematodas gastrointestinais em bovinos de corte em recria a pasto no Brasil Central |
title |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil Conde, Mário Henrique Control Cooperia spp Economic Haemonchus spp Tropical. Controle Cooperia Econômico Haemonchus Tropical. |
title_short |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil |
title_full |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil |
title_sort |
Economic analysis of strategic control program (5, 8, 11) for gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle during the growing phase in Central Brazil |
author |
Conde, Mário Henrique |
author_facet |
Conde, Mário Henrique Heckler, Rafael Pereira Borges, Dyego Gonçalves Lino Onselen, Valter Joost Van Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro Borges, Fernando de Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Heckler, Rafael Pereira Borges, Dyego Gonçalves Lino Onselen, Valter Joost Van Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro Borges, Fernando de Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Conde, Mário Henrique Heckler, Rafael Pereira Borges, Dyego Gonçalves Lino Onselen, Valter Joost Van Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro Borges, Fernando de Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Control Cooperia spp Economic Haemonchus spp Tropical. Controle Cooperia Econômico Haemonchus Tropical. |
topic |
Control Cooperia spp Economic Haemonchus spp Tropical. Controle Cooperia Econômico Haemonchus Tropical. |
description |
This study aimed to analyze economically different control protocols for beef cattle gastrointestinal nematodes in Brazil. Field study data previously published was used to compare three groups: 1) non-dosed; 2) current deworming program with two doses - May and November; and 3) alternative strategic control program with three doses - May, August, and November. An economic sensitivity analysis was performed based on beef carcass price (BCP) variation, thus creating three economic scenarios: 1) more probable (M) using the mean BCP in the studied region; 2) optimistic (O) using the mean BCP plus standard deviation; and 3) pessimistic (P) using the mean BCP minus standard deviation. Stock valuation (SV), operational result (OP), and treatment differential (TD) were calculated for each scenario. Average BCP was US$ 2.93 kg-1 carcass (± US$ 0.27 kg-1 carcass). The mean annual cost of deworming per animal was US$ 5.43 and US$ 7.97 for protocols with two and three doses, respectively. The cost of anthelmintic treatment represented 0.63% and 0.74% of operating results, both in M scenario. TD ranged from 9.5% to 27.6% for the assessed protocols. Regardless of the scenario, the protocol with three annual dosages presented the highest SV and OP, which economically justifies its implementation in strategic control of gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing beef cattle in Central Brazil. These results also demonstrate the relevance of strategic anthelmintic treatments in weaned stocker calves in tropical and humid subtropical areas. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Científico Artigo científico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5Supl1p2309 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5Supl1p2309 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34818/25851 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-2318 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 5Supl1 (2019); 2309-2318 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306080872824832 |