Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Maria Isabel Botelho
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Rocha, Hélio Carlos, Ractz, Luiz Augusto Brandão, Nadal, Rogério, Moraes, Roberto Bagatini de, Oliveira, Iali da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2720
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the control of nematode gastrintestinal on ovine meat breeds in Voisin pasturing system during one grazing year. The experiment was carried out at the Research Center Farm of the Passo Fundo University during the period of June 2005 to July 2006. The animals were kept in 85 pasture blocks with 810 square meters each. In the experiment 42 ewe hoggets and 42 Suffolk, Ile de France purebreed and crosses ewes were subdivided in four groups composed of 21 animals each. The groups had been assigned as G1 (traditional sheep), G2 (traditional young ewes) both treated every 60 days with Levamisole; the groups G3 (Famacha® sheep) and G4 (Famacha® young ewes) were evaluated by the Famacha® method. The following variables were evaluated: live weight and worm egg counts (EPG). In relation to the live weights it was proven that it did not have statistics difference (P>0,05) between ewe hoggets and adult sheep of the traditional groups when compared with the ones of the Famacha® method. Differences in EPG counts during of the year in the ewe hoggets were found it had a significant reduction in the frequency of treatments for the Famacha® method when compared with the traditional method, of 90,39% for ewe hoggets and 90.93% for the sheep, becoming this method a viable alternative.
id UEL-11_0765e770d33b31663940f0935ef19efb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2720
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewesComparação de dois métodos de controle de nematódeos gastrintestinais em borregas e ovelhas de corteSheepLive weightFamacha®Haemonchus contortusEPG.OvinosPeso vivoFamacha®Haemonchus contortusOPG.The objective of this work was to evaluate the control of nematode gastrintestinal on ovine meat breeds in Voisin pasturing system during one grazing year. The experiment was carried out at the Research Center Farm of the Passo Fundo University during the period of June 2005 to July 2006. The animals were kept in 85 pasture blocks with 810 square meters each. In the experiment 42 ewe hoggets and 42 Suffolk, Ile de France purebreed and crosses ewes were subdivided in four groups composed of 21 animals each. The groups had been assigned as G1 (traditional sheep), G2 (traditional young ewes) both treated every 60 days with Levamisole; the groups G3 (Famacha® sheep) and G4 (Famacha® young ewes) were evaluated by the Famacha® method. The following variables were evaluated: live weight and worm egg counts (EPG). In relation to the live weights it was proven that it did not have statistics difference (P>0,05) between ewe hoggets and adult sheep of the traditional groups when compared with the ones of the Famacha® method. Differences in EPG counts during of the year in the ewe hoggets were found it had a significant reduction in the frequency of treatments for the Famacha® method when compared with the traditional method, of 90,39% for ewe hoggets and 90.93% for the sheep, becoming this method a viable alternative.Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o controle de helmintos gastrintestinais em ovinos de corte em um sistema de pastoreio Voisin em quatro estações do ano. Foi realizado no Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária da Universidade Passo Fundo no período de junho de 2005 a julho de 2006. Foram utilizados 84 fêmeas das raças Suffolk, Ile de France puras e mestiças as quais foram subdivididas em quatro grupos composto de 21 animais cada. Os grupos foram designados como G1 (ovelha tradicional), G2 (borrega tradicional) tratadas a cada 60 dias com Levamisole; os grupos G3 (ovelha Famacha®), e G4 (borrega Famacha®) foram avaliadas pelo método Famacha®. As variáveis analisadas foram peso vivo e ovos por grama de fezes (OPG). Em relação ao peso vivo não houve diferença estatística (P>0,05) entre borregas e ovelhas dos grupos tradicionais quando comparadas aos do método Famacha®. Ocorreram diferenças no OPG no decorrer das estações do ano para as borregas. Houve uma significativa redução na freqüência dos tratamentos pelo método Famacha® quando comparado ao método tradicional, de 90,39% para as borregas e 90,93% para as ovelhas, tornando este método uma alternativa viável.UEL2008-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/272010.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n4p853Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2008); 853-860Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 29 n. 4 (2008); 853-8601679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2720/4062Vieira, Maria Isabel BotelhoRocha, Hélio CarlosRactz, Luiz Augusto BrandãoNadal, RogérioMoraes, Roberto Bagatini deOliveira, Iali da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:38:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2720Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:38:42Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
Comparação de dois métodos de controle de nematódeos gastrintestinais em borregas e ovelhas de corte
title Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
spellingShingle Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
Vieira, Maria Isabel Botelho
Sheep
Live weight
Famacha®
Haemonchus contortus
EPG.
Ovinos
Peso vivo
Famacha®
Haemonchus contortus
OPG.
title_short Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
title_full Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
title_fullStr Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
title_sort Comparison of two methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in lambs and ewes
author Vieira, Maria Isabel Botelho
author_facet Vieira, Maria Isabel Botelho
Rocha, Hélio Carlos
Ractz, Luiz Augusto Brandão
Nadal, Rogério
Moraes, Roberto Bagatini de
Oliveira, Iali da Silva
author_role author
author2 Rocha, Hélio Carlos
Ractz, Luiz Augusto Brandão
Nadal, Rogério
Moraes, Roberto Bagatini de
Oliveira, Iali da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira, Maria Isabel Botelho
Rocha, Hélio Carlos
Ractz, Luiz Augusto Brandão
Nadal, Rogério
Moraes, Roberto Bagatini de
Oliveira, Iali da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sheep
Live weight
Famacha®
Haemonchus contortus
EPG.
Ovinos
Peso vivo
Famacha®
Haemonchus contortus
OPG.
topic Sheep
Live weight
Famacha®
Haemonchus contortus
EPG.
Ovinos
Peso vivo
Famacha®
Haemonchus contortus
OPG.
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the control of nematode gastrintestinal on ovine meat breeds in Voisin pasturing system during one grazing year. The experiment was carried out at the Research Center Farm of the Passo Fundo University during the period of June 2005 to July 2006. The animals were kept in 85 pasture blocks with 810 square meters each. In the experiment 42 ewe hoggets and 42 Suffolk, Ile de France purebreed and crosses ewes were subdivided in four groups composed of 21 animals each. The groups had been assigned as G1 (traditional sheep), G2 (traditional young ewes) both treated every 60 days with Levamisole; the groups G3 (Famacha® sheep) and G4 (Famacha® young ewes) were evaluated by the Famacha® method. The following variables were evaluated: live weight and worm egg counts (EPG). In relation to the live weights it was proven that it did not have statistics difference (P>0,05) between ewe hoggets and adult sheep of the traditional groups when compared with the ones of the Famacha® method. Differences in EPG counts during of the year in the ewe hoggets were found it had a significant reduction in the frequency of treatments for the Famacha® method when compared with the traditional method, of 90,39% for ewe hoggets and 90.93% for the sheep, becoming this method a viable alternative.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2720
10.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n4p853
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2720
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n4p853
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2720/4062
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 29 No. 4 (2008); 853-860
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 29 n. 4 (2008); 853-860
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306058715365376