Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schelter, Mayra Luiza
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Prates, Antonio Americo, Fruet, Diogo Luiz, Souza, Marissa Prá de, Guerra, Naiara, Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46688
Resumo: Herbicide selectivity is the basis for chemical control of weeds; however, it depends on the interactions between herbicide, crop, and edaphoclimatic conditions. The objective of this work was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides applied at the pre-emergence stage of soybean cultivars with different maturation times grown in different locations. The experiment was conducted under field conditions, in two crop seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021), in Lages and Curitibanos, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was used, with treatments organized in 4×3 (2019/2020) and 4×4 (2020/2021) factorial arrangements, with four replications. The treatments consisted of interactions between four soybean cultivars: BMX Raio IPRO® (Raio), BMX Zeus IPRO® (Zeus), MONSOY 5947 IPRO® (Monsoy), and BMX Fibra IPRO® (Fibra) and three or four herbicide treatments: control with no herbicides, sulfentrazone + diuron, and diclosulam in 2019/2020; and control with no herbicide, sulfentrazone + diuron, diclosulam, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin in 2020/2021. The plots were evaluated for phytotoxicity of herbicides, canopy closure, plant height, stand of plants, number of pods per plant, one-thousand grain weight, and grain yield. The phytotoxicity of herbicides on the soybean plants was mild, under 11%, regardless of the cultivar and growth location. The soybean plants fully recovered from the injuries at 14 days after herbicide application. In Curitibanos, the cultivar Zeus presented higher grain yield in both crop seasons. The herbicide factor showed that sulfentrazone + diuron and diclosulam decreased the grain yield of the cultivars Raio and Zeus in 2019/2020. In the following crop season, only the cultivar Raio presented decreases in grain yield due to the application of diclosulam and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. In Lages, the soybean cultivar factor affected the grain yield; the cultivars Monsoy and Fibra were the most productive.
id UEL-11_0bc5708358fc9cceb40fa3fc225b970c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46688
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicidesResposta de cultivares de soja com diferentes grupos de maturação a herbicidas aplicados em pré-emergênciaPhytotoxicityGlycine maxYieldSelectivity.FitointoxicaçãoGlycine maxProdutividadeSeletividade.Herbicide selectivity is the basis for chemical control of weeds; however, it depends on the interactions between herbicide, crop, and edaphoclimatic conditions. The objective of this work was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides applied at the pre-emergence stage of soybean cultivars with different maturation times grown in different locations. The experiment was conducted under field conditions, in two crop seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021), in Lages and Curitibanos, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was used, with treatments organized in 4×3 (2019/2020) and 4×4 (2020/2021) factorial arrangements, with four replications. The treatments consisted of interactions between four soybean cultivars: BMX Raio IPRO® (Raio), BMX Zeus IPRO® (Zeus), MONSOY 5947 IPRO® (Monsoy), and BMX Fibra IPRO® (Fibra) and three or four herbicide treatments: control with no herbicides, sulfentrazone + diuron, and diclosulam in 2019/2020; and control with no herbicide, sulfentrazone + diuron, diclosulam, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin in 2020/2021. The plots were evaluated for phytotoxicity of herbicides, canopy closure, plant height, stand of plants, number of pods per plant, one-thousand grain weight, and grain yield. The phytotoxicity of herbicides on the soybean plants was mild, under 11%, regardless of the cultivar and growth location. The soybean plants fully recovered from the injuries at 14 days after herbicide application. In Curitibanos, the cultivar Zeus presented higher grain yield in both crop seasons. The herbicide factor showed that sulfentrazone + diuron and diclosulam decreased the grain yield of the cultivars Raio and Zeus in 2019/2020. In the following crop season, only the cultivar Raio presented decreases in grain yield due to the application of diclosulam and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. In Lages, the soybean cultivar factor affected the grain yield; the cultivars Monsoy and Fibra were the most productive.A seletividade de herbicidas é a base para o controle químico de plantas daninhas, entretanto, esta depende da interação entre o herbicida, a cultura e as condições edafoclimáticas. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar a seletividade de herbicidas aplicados em pré-emergência de cultivares de soja de ciclos contrastantes, em diferentes regiões de Santa Catarina. O experimento foi conduzido em condições de campo, em duas safras (2019/2020 e 2020/2021), nos municípios de Lages e Curitibanos, Santa Cataria, Brasil. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi de blocos ao acaso com tratamentos organizados em esquema fatorial 4 x 3 (2019/2020) e 4 x 4 (2020/2021), com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos resultaram da interação de quatro cultivares de soja: BMX Raio IPRO® (Raio), BMX Zeus IPRO® (Zeus), MONSOY 5947 IPRO® (Monsoy) e BMX Fibra IPRO® (Fibra), com três tratamentos: testemunha sem herbicida, sulfentrazone + diuron e diclosulam em 2019/2020; e testemunha sem herbicida, sulfentrazone + diuron, diclosulam e pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin em 2020/21. As avaliações realizadas foram fitointoxicação, fechamento de entrelinhas, altura de plantas, estande, número de vagens por planta, peso de mil grãos e produtividade de grãos. A fitointoxicação das plantas de soja foi leve, não ultrapassando os 11% independente da cultivar e do município. A soja se recuperou totalmente das injúrias aos 14 dias após a aplicação (DAA). Em Curitibanos, a cultivar Zeus apresentou maior produtividade de grãos nas duas safras. Para o fator herbicida observou-se que a mistura sulfentrazone + diuron e diclosulam reduziram a produtividade das cultivares Raio e Zeus em 2019/2020. Na safra seguinte, apenas a cultivar Raio teve a produtividade reduzida com a aplicação de diclosulam e pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. Em Lages houve diferença na produtividade de grãos apenas para o fator cultivares de soja, onde as cultivares Monsoy e Fibra foram as mais produtivas.UEL2023-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4668810.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p841Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2023); 841-858Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2023); 841-8581679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46688/48993Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchelter, Mayra LuizaPrates, Antonio AmericoFruet, Diogo LuizSouza, Marissa Prá deGuerra, NaiaraOliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes de2023-07-04T19:57:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/46688Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-07-04T19:57:51Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
Resposta de cultivares de soja com diferentes grupos de maturação a herbicidas aplicados em pré-emergência
title Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
spellingShingle Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
Schelter, Mayra Luiza
Phytotoxicity
Glycine max
Yield
Selectivity.
Fitointoxicação
Glycine max
Produtividade
Seletividade.
title_short Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
title_full Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
title_fullStr Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
title_full_unstemmed Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
title_sort Response of soybean cultivars with different maturation times to pre-emergence herbicides
author Schelter, Mayra Luiza
author_facet Schelter, Mayra Luiza
Prates, Antonio Americo
Fruet, Diogo Luiz
Souza, Marissa Prá de
Guerra, Naiara
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes de
author_role author
author2 Prates, Antonio Americo
Fruet, Diogo Luiz
Souza, Marissa Prá de
Guerra, Naiara
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schelter, Mayra Luiza
Prates, Antonio Americo
Fruet, Diogo Luiz
Souza, Marissa Prá de
Guerra, Naiara
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Phytotoxicity
Glycine max
Yield
Selectivity.
Fitointoxicação
Glycine max
Produtividade
Seletividade.
topic Phytotoxicity
Glycine max
Yield
Selectivity.
Fitointoxicação
Glycine max
Produtividade
Seletividade.
description Herbicide selectivity is the basis for chemical control of weeds; however, it depends on the interactions between herbicide, crop, and edaphoclimatic conditions. The objective of this work was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicides applied at the pre-emergence stage of soybean cultivars with different maturation times grown in different locations. The experiment was conducted under field conditions, in two crop seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021), in Lages and Curitibanos, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was used, with treatments organized in 4×3 (2019/2020) and 4×4 (2020/2021) factorial arrangements, with four replications. The treatments consisted of interactions between four soybean cultivars: BMX Raio IPRO® (Raio), BMX Zeus IPRO® (Zeus), MONSOY 5947 IPRO® (Monsoy), and BMX Fibra IPRO® (Fibra) and three or four herbicide treatments: control with no herbicides, sulfentrazone + diuron, and diclosulam in 2019/2020; and control with no herbicide, sulfentrazone + diuron, diclosulam, and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin in 2020/2021. The plots were evaluated for phytotoxicity of herbicides, canopy closure, plant height, stand of plants, number of pods per plant, one-thousand grain weight, and grain yield. The phytotoxicity of herbicides on the soybean plants was mild, under 11%, regardless of the cultivar and growth location. The soybean plants fully recovered from the injuries at 14 days after herbicide application. In Curitibanos, the cultivar Zeus presented higher grain yield in both crop seasons. The herbicide factor showed that sulfentrazone + diuron and diclosulam decreased the grain yield of the cultivars Raio and Zeus in 2019/2020. In the following crop season, only the cultivar Raio presented decreases in grain yield due to the application of diclosulam and pyroxasulfone + flumioxazin. In Lages, the soybean cultivar factor affected the grain yield; the cultivars Monsoy and Fibra were the most productive.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46688
10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p841
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46688
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n2p841
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/46688/48993
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2023); 841-858
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2023); 841-858
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306086855999488