Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Schuch, Márcia Wulff, Camargo, Samila Silva, Pereira, Robson Rodrigues, Souza, Edson Luiz de, Pasa, Mateus da Silveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374
Resumo: Worldwide, peach propagation has been performed mainly by grafting scions of desirable cultivars on rootstocks obtained from seeds. There are, however, other potential propagation methods not widely adopted due to the limited reports on the field performance of the resultant trees. This study addressed this knowledge gap and investigated the field performance of peach trees of the cultivar Maciel that were established in an orchard (5.0 m × 1.4 m spacing) in 2011. The trees were trained in a "Y" system, with seedlings from three propagation techniques: 1) Conventional System (CS) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained from seed; 2) Rootstock by Minicutting (RM) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained by minicutting in a semi-hydroponic system; 3) Self-Rooting (SR) - self-rooting of the scion in a semi-hydroponic system. The vegetative, productive, and fruit quality parameters were assessed during 2012 and 2013. The Maciel peach trees that were propagated by the SR technique were found to have similar or even superior field performance to those propagated by the CS. The RM propagation method was also found to be an important potential alternative to peach propagation, since this it combines two techniques (cutting and grafting) to reduce tree vigor, especially if the goal is high-density planting.
id UEL-11_0fcde61b21cceb4f6cf76dc3f21c5dc5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26374
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?O método de propagação influencia o desempenho de pessegueiro?Prunus persicaCloningSelf-rootingMinicutting.Prunus persicaClonagemAutoenraizamentoMiniestaca.Worldwide, peach propagation has been performed mainly by grafting scions of desirable cultivars on rootstocks obtained from seeds. There are, however, other potential propagation methods not widely adopted due to the limited reports on the field performance of the resultant trees. This study addressed this knowledge gap and investigated the field performance of peach trees of the cultivar Maciel that were established in an orchard (5.0 m × 1.4 m spacing) in 2011. The trees were trained in a "Y" system, with seedlings from three propagation techniques: 1) Conventional System (CS) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained from seed; 2) Rootstock by Minicutting (RM) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained by minicutting in a semi-hydroponic system; 3) Self-Rooting (SR) - self-rooting of the scion in a semi-hydroponic system. The vegetative, productive, and fruit quality parameters were assessed during 2012 and 2013. The Maciel peach trees that were propagated by the SR technique were found to have similar or even superior field performance to those propagated by the CS. The RM propagation method was also found to be an important potential alternative to peach propagation, since this it combines two techniques (cutting and grafting) to reduce tree vigor, especially if the goal is high-density planting.Em todo o mundo, a propagação de pessegueiro tem sido realizada principalmente por enxertia de cultivares copa em porta-enxertos obtidos a partir de sementes. No entanto, existem outros métodos de propagação potenciais que não são amplamente adotados devido à pouca informação em relação ao desempenho a campo das plantas. A fim de responder a esta pergunta, em 2011, pessegueiros da cultivar Maciel foram plantados (5,0m × 1,4 m de espaçamento) em um sistema de condução em "Y", com mudas oriundas de três diferentes técnicas de propagação. 1) Sistema Convencional (CS) - enxertia da copa sobre o porta-enxerto ‘Okinawa’ obtido por semente; 2) Porta-enxerto clonado (RM) - enxertia da copa sobre o porta-enxerto ‘Okinawa’ obtido por miniestaquia em sistema semi-hidropônico; 3) Autoenraizamento (SR) - autoenraizamento da copa em sistema semi-hidropônico. No período de três anos, foram avaliadas variáveis vegetativas, produtivas e de qualidade dos frutos. Concluiu-se que o sistema de produção da muda por semi-hidroponia proporcionou plantas de qualidade igual ou superior ao método tradicional, tornando-se uma alternativa de propagação de pessegueiro. Além disso, o método de propagação RM parece ser uma alternativa importante para a propagação de pessegueiro quando o objetivo for o plantio de alta densidade, uma vez que este combina duas técnicas para reduzir o vigor da planta.UEL2017-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa experimentalAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2637410.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2815Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-2822Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-28221679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374/21592Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, André Luiz Kulkamp deSchuch, Márcia WulffCamargo, Samila SilvaPereira, Robson RodriguesSouza, Edson Luiz dePasa, Mateus da Silveira2022-10-24T11:57:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26374Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T11:57:04Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
O método de propagação influencia o desempenho de pessegueiro?
title Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
spellingShingle Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de
Prunus persica
Cloning
Self-rooting
Minicutting.
Prunus persica
Clonagem
Autoenraizamento
Miniestaca.
title_short Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
title_full Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
title_fullStr Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
title_full_unstemmed Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
title_sort Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
author Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de
author_facet Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de
Schuch, Márcia Wulff
Camargo, Samila Silva
Pereira, Robson Rodrigues
Souza, Edson Luiz de
Pasa, Mateus da Silveira
author_role author
author2 Schuch, Márcia Wulff
Camargo, Samila Silva
Pereira, Robson Rodrigues
Souza, Edson Luiz de
Pasa, Mateus da Silveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de
Schuch, Márcia Wulff
Camargo, Samila Silva
Pereira, Robson Rodrigues
Souza, Edson Luiz de
Pasa, Mateus da Silveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prunus persica
Cloning
Self-rooting
Minicutting.
Prunus persica
Clonagem
Autoenraizamento
Miniestaca.
topic Prunus persica
Cloning
Self-rooting
Minicutting.
Prunus persica
Clonagem
Autoenraizamento
Miniestaca.
description Worldwide, peach propagation has been performed mainly by grafting scions of desirable cultivars on rootstocks obtained from seeds. There are, however, other potential propagation methods not widely adopted due to the limited reports on the field performance of the resultant trees. This study addressed this knowledge gap and investigated the field performance of peach trees of the cultivar Maciel that were established in an orchard (5.0 m × 1.4 m spacing) in 2011. The trees were trained in a "Y" system, with seedlings from three propagation techniques: 1) Conventional System (CS) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained from seed; 2) Rootstock by Minicutting (RM) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained by minicutting in a semi-hydroponic system; 3) Self-Rooting (SR) - self-rooting of the scion in a semi-hydroponic system. The vegetative, productive, and fruit quality parameters were assessed during 2012 and 2013. The Maciel peach trees that were propagated by the SR technique were found to have similar or even superior field performance to those propagated by the CS. The RM propagation method was also found to be an important potential alternative to peach propagation, since this it combines two techniques (cutting and grafting) to reduce tree vigor, especially if the goal is high-density planting.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa experimental
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2815
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2815
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374/21592
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-2822
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-2822
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306076389113856