Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374 |
Resumo: | Worldwide, peach propagation has been performed mainly by grafting scions of desirable cultivars on rootstocks obtained from seeds. There are, however, other potential propagation methods not widely adopted due to the limited reports on the field performance of the resultant trees. This study addressed this knowledge gap and investigated the field performance of peach trees of the cultivar Maciel that were established in an orchard (5.0 m × 1.4 m spacing) in 2011. The trees were trained in a "Y" system, with seedlings from three propagation techniques: 1) Conventional System (CS) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained from seed; 2) Rootstock by Minicutting (RM) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained by minicutting in a semi-hydroponic system; 3) Self-Rooting (SR) - self-rooting of the scion in a semi-hydroponic system. The vegetative, productive, and fruit quality parameters were assessed during 2012 and 2013. The Maciel peach trees that were propagated by the SR technique were found to have similar or even superior field performance to those propagated by the CS. The RM propagation method was also found to be an important potential alternative to peach propagation, since this it combines two techniques (cutting and grafting) to reduce tree vigor, especially if the goal is high-density planting. |
id |
UEL-11_0fcde61b21cceb4f6cf76dc3f21c5dc5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26374 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees?O método de propagação influencia o desempenho de pessegueiro?Prunus persicaCloningSelf-rootingMinicutting.Prunus persicaClonagemAutoenraizamentoMiniestaca.Worldwide, peach propagation has been performed mainly by grafting scions of desirable cultivars on rootstocks obtained from seeds. There are, however, other potential propagation methods not widely adopted due to the limited reports on the field performance of the resultant trees. This study addressed this knowledge gap and investigated the field performance of peach trees of the cultivar Maciel that were established in an orchard (5.0 m × 1.4 m spacing) in 2011. The trees were trained in a "Y" system, with seedlings from three propagation techniques: 1) Conventional System (CS) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained from seed; 2) Rootstock by Minicutting (RM) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained by minicutting in a semi-hydroponic system; 3) Self-Rooting (SR) - self-rooting of the scion in a semi-hydroponic system. The vegetative, productive, and fruit quality parameters were assessed during 2012 and 2013. The Maciel peach trees that were propagated by the SR technique were found to have similar or even superior field performance to those propagated by the CS. The RM propagation method was also found to be an important potential alternative to peach propagation, since this it combines two techniques (cutting and grafting) to reduce tree vigor, especially if the goal is high-density planting.Em todo o mundo, a propagação de pessegueiro tem sido realizada principalmente por enxertia de cultivares copa em porta-enxertos obtidos a partir de sementes. No entanto, existem outros métodos de propagação potenciais que não são amplamente adotados devido à pouca informação em relação ao desempenho a campo das plantas. A fim de responder a esta pergunta, em 2011, pessegueiros da cultivar Maciel foram plantados (5,0m × 1,4 m de espaçamento) em um sistema de condução em "Y", com mudas oriundas de três diferentes técnicas de propagação. 1) Sistema Convencional (CS) - enxertia da copa sobre o porta-enxerto ‘Okinawa’ obtido por semente; 2) Porta-enxerto clonado (RM) - enxertia da copa sobre o porta-enxerto ‘Okinawa’ obtido por miniestaquia em sistema semi-hidropônico; 3) Autoenraizamento (SR) - autoenraizamento da copa em sistema semi-hidropônico. No período de três anos, foram avaliadas variáveis vegetativas, produtivas e de qualidade dos frutos. Concluiu-se que o sistema de produção da muda por semi-hidroponia proporcionou plantas de qualidade igual ou superior ao método tradicional, tornando-se uma alternativa de propagação de pessegueiro. Além disso, o método de propagação RM parece ser uma alternativa importante para a propagação de pessegueiro quando o objetivo for o plantio de alta densidade, uma vez que este combina duas técnicas para reduzir o vigor da planta.UEL2017-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa experimentalAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2637410.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2815Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-2822Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-28221679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374/21592Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, André Luiz Kulkamp deSchuch, Márcia WulffCamargo, Samila SilvaPereira, Robson RodriguesSouza, Edson Luiz dePasa, Mateus da Silveira2022-10-24T11:57:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26374Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T11:57:04Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? O método de propagação influencia o desempenho de pessegueiro? |
title |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? |
spellingShingle |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de Prunus persica Cloning Self-rooting Minicutting. Prunus persica Clonagem Autoenraizamento Miniestaca. |
title_short |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? |
title_full |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? |
title_fullStr |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? |
title_sort |
Does propagation method affect the field performance of peach trees? |
author |
Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de |
author_facet |
Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de Schuch, Márcia Wulff Camargo, Samila Silva Pereira, Robson Rodrigues Souza, Edson Luiz de Pasa, Mateus da Silveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schuch, Márcia Wulff Camargo, Samila Silva Pereira, Robson Rodrigues Souza, Edson Luiz de Pasa, Mateus da Silveira |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, André Luiz Kulkamp de Schuch, Márcia Wulff Camargo, Samila Silva Pereira, Robson Rodrigues Souza, Edson Luiz de Pasa, Mateus da Silveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Prunus persica Cloning Self-rooting Minicutting. Prunus persica Clonagem Autoenraizamento Miniestaca. |
topic |
Prunus persica Cloning Self-rooting Minicutting. Prunus persica Clonagem Autoenraizamento Miniestaca. |
description |
Worldwide, peach propagation has been performed mainly by grafting scions of desirable cultivars on rootstocks obtained from seeds. There are, however, other potential propagation methods not widely adopted due to the limited reports on the field performance of the resultant trees. This study addressed this knowledge gap and investigated the field performance of peach trees of the cultivar Maciel that were established in an orchard (5.0 m × 1.4 m spacing) in 2011. The trees were trained in a "Y" system, with seedlings from three propagation techniques: 1) Conventional System (CS) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained from seed; 2) Rootstock by Minicutting (RM) - vegetative bud grafting of the scion on the rootstock of the Okinawa cultivar obtained by minicutting in a semi-hydroponic system; 3) Self-Rooting (SR) - self-rooting of the scion in a semi-hydroponic system. The vegetative, productive, and fruit quality parameters were assessed during 2012 and 2013. The Maciel peach trees that were propagated by the SR technique were found to have similar or even superior field performance to those propagated by the CS. The RM propagation method was also found to be an important potential alternative to peach propagation, since this it combines two techniques (cutting and grafting) to reduce tree vigor, especially if the goal is high-density planting. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa experimental Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2815 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2815 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26374/21592 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-2822 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2815-2822 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306076389113856 |