Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43893 |
Resumo: | This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of protein-energy supplementation on productive performance, intake, digestibility, and microbial protein synthesis in heifers fed tropical forage. Twelve Nellore heifers at 11 months of age, with a mean initial body weight of 248.8 ± 11.40 kg were used. The animals were distributed in a completely randomized design with two treatments and six replicates. The treatments evaluated were: control (without supplementation); and supplementation in the amount of 1.5 kg animal-1 day-1. Forage samples were collected to evaluate the chemical composition and the total availability of dry matter of the pasture consumed by the animals. To evaluate the intake and forage digestibility, a trial was performed using internal and external markers. In this study no effect of supplementation was observed on the intakes of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), forage DM, or neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein (NDFap; P > 0.10). However, supplementation increased (P < 0.01) the intakes of crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), and non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC). Additionally, an upward trend (P=0.076) was observed in the intake of digested OM (DOM) with supplementation. On the other hand, supplementation increased (P < 0.01) the digestibility coefficients of OM, CP, EE, and NFC, although supplementation did not affect the ruminal synthesis of nitrogen compounds (MICN), efficiency of protein microbial synthesis (EMS), relative microbial nitrogen (RMICN) or urine urea nitrogen (UUN) excretion (P > 0.57). Lastly, supplementation increased (P=0.050) the average daily gain of the animals, although no effect (P > 0.10) was observed on their final body weight. These results suggested that protein-energy supplementation improves the productive performance and nutritional characteristics of grazing beef heifers. |
id |
UEL-11_1e94323836ae03b686d32f4835b61cdd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43893 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifersA suplementação proteico-energética no desempenho produtivo e nutricional de novilhas de corte em pastejoAnimal nutritionCattleDigestibilityTropical pastureUrea nitrogenVoluntary intake.Consumo voluntarioDigestibilidadeGadoNitrogênio ureicoNutrição animalPastagem tropical.This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of protein-energy supplementation on productive performance, intake, digestibility, and microbial protein synthesis in heifers fed tropical forage. Twelve Nellore heifers at 11 months of age, with a mean initial body weight of 248.8 ± 11.40 kg were used. The animals were distributed in a completely randomized design with two treatments and six replicates. The treatments evaluated were: control (without supplementation); and supplementation in the amount of 1.5 kg animal-1 day-1. Forage samples were collected to evaluate the chemical composition and the total availability of dry matter of the pasture consumed by the animals. To evaluate the intake and forage digestibility, a trial was performed using internal and external markers. In this study no effect of supplementation was observed on the intakes of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), forage DM, or neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein (NDFap; P > 0.10). However, supplementation increased (P < 0.01) the intakes of crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), and non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC). Additionally, an upward trend (P=0.076) was observed in the intake of digested OM (DOM) with supplementation. On the other hand, supplementation increased (P < 0.01) the digestibility coefficients of OM, CP, EE, and NFC, although supplementation did not affect the ruminal synthesis of nitrogen compounds (MICN), efficiency of protein microbial synthesis (EMS), relative microbial nitrogen (RMICN) or urine urea nitrogen (UUN) excretion (P > 0.57). Lastly, supplementation increased (P=0.050) the average daily gain of the animals, although no effect (P > 0.10) was observed on their final body weight. These results suggested that protein-energy supplementation improves the productive performance and nutritional characteristics of grazing beef heifers.Este estudo foi conduzido com o objetivo de avaliar o efeito da suplementação proteico-energético sobre o desempenho produtivo, consumo, digestibilidade e sínteses de proteína microbiana em novilhas de corte alimentadas com forragem tropical. Doze novilhas Nelore com 11 meses de idade e peso corporal médio inicial de 248,8±11,40 kg foram utilizadas. Os animais foram distribuídos em delineamento inteiramente casualizado com dois tratamentos e seis repetições. Os tratamentos avaliados foram: controle (não suplementado); e suplementado na quantidade de 1,5 kg animal-1 dia-1. Amostras de forragem foram coletadas para avaliar a composição química e a disponibilidade total de matéria seca do pasto consumido pelos animais. Para avaliar o consumo e digestibilidade da forragem, um ensaio foi conduzido usando marcadores internos e externos. Neste estudo não foi observado efeito da suplementação sobre o consumo de matéria seca (MS), matéria orgânica (MO), MS da forragem, ou fibra em detergente neutro corrigida para cinzas e proteína (FDNcp; P > 0,10). No entanto, a suplementação incrementou o consumo de proteína bruta (PB), extrato etéreo (EE) e carboidratos não fibrosos (CNF). Além disso, foi observada uma tendência de aumento (P=0,076) no consumo de MO digerida (MOD) com a suplementação. Por outro lado, a suplementação aumentou (P < 0,01) os coeficientes de digestibilidade da MO, PB, EE e CNF, embora a suplementação não tenha afetado a síntese ruminal de compostos nitrogenados (NMIC), eficiência de síntese de proteína microbiana (EFM), nitrogênio microbiano relativo (NMICR) ou excreção de nitrogênio ureico na urina (NUU) (P > 0,57). Finalmente, a suplementação aumentou (P < 0,050) o ganho médio diário dos animais, embora nenhum efeito (P > 0,10) tenha sido observado no peso corporal final. Esses resultados sugerem que a suplementação proteico-energética melhora o desempenho produtivo e as características nutricionais de novilhas de corte em pastejo.UEL2022-01-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4389310.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n1p297Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 43 No. 1 (2022); 297-310Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 43 n. 1 (2022); 297-3101679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43893/30569Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrtega, Román MazaMoreno, Deilen SoteloAngúlo, Libardo Maza2022-09-29T15:54:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43893Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-09-29T15:54:42Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers A suplementação proteico-energética no desempenho produtivo e nutricional de novilhas de corte em pastejo |
title |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers |
spellingShingle |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers Ortega, Román Maza Animal nutrition Cattle Digestibility Tropical pasture Urea nitrogen Voluntary intake. Consumo voluntario Digestibilidade Gado Nitrogênio ureico Nutrição animal Pastagem tropical. |
title_short |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers |
title_full |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers |
title_fullStr |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers |
title_sort |
Protein-energy supplementation on productive and nutritional performance of grazing beef heifers |
author |
Ortega, Román Maza |
author_facet |
Ortega, Román Maza Moreno, Deilen Sotelo Angúlo, Libardo Maza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moreno, Deilen Sotelo Angúlo, Libardo Maza |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ortega, Román Maza Moreno, Deilen Sotelo Angúlo, Libardo Maza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal nutrition Cattle Digestibility Tropical pasture Urea nitrogen Voluntary intake. Consumo voluntario Digestibilidade Gado Nitrogênio ureico Nutrição animal Pastagem tropical. |
topic |
Animal nutrition Cattle Digestibility Tropical pasture Urea nitrogen Voluntary intake. Consumo voluntario Digestibilidade Gado Nitrogênio ureico Nutrição animal Pastagem tropical. |
description |
This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of protein-energy supplementation on productive performance, intake, digestibility, and microbial protein synthesis in heifers fed tropical forage. Twelve Nellore heifers at 11 months of age, with a mean initial body weight of 248.8 ± 11.40 kg were used. The animals were distributed in a completely randomized design with two treatments and six replicates. The treatments evaluated were: control (without supplementation); and supplementation in the amount of 1.5 kg animal-1 day-1. Forage samples were collected to evaluate the chemical composition and the total availability of dry matter of the pasture consumed by the animals. To evaluate the intake and forage digestibility, a trial was performed using internal and external markers. In this study no effect of supplementation was observed on the intakes of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), forage DM, or neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein (NDFap; P > 0.10). However, supplementation increased (P < 0.01) the intakes of crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), and non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC). Additionally, an upward trend (P=0.076) was observed in the intake of digested OM (DOM) with supplementation. On the other hand, supplementation increased (P < 0.01) the digestibility coefficients of OM, CP, EE, and NFC, although supplementation did not affect the ruminal synthesis of nitrogen compounds (MICN), efficiency of protein microbial synthesis (EMS), relative microbial nitrogen (RMICN) or urine urea nitrogen (UUN) excretion (P > 0.57). Lastly, supplementation increased (P=0.050) the average daily gain of the animals, although no effect (P > 0.10) was observed on their final body weight. These results suggested that protein-energy supplementation improves the productive performance and nutritional characteristics of grazing beef heifers. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43893 10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n1p297 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43893 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n1p297 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/43893/30569 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 43 No. 1 (2022); 297-310 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 43 n. 1 (2022); 297-310 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306085506482176 |