Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21765 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate the production and chemical composition of silages of grass Tanzania and corn, grown single or intercropping. The experiment was conducted at UTFPR Câmpus Dois Vizinhos in the period between October 2011 and July 2012, a 600 m² area. The treatments were: TMI - single corn, TMT - corn and grass Tanzania consortium at the time of sowing, TT - Tanzania grass single, TT32 - grass Tanzania silage to 32% dry matter (content similar to that of corn). The experimental design a randomized block design with four treatments and five replications. Agronomic evaluations were performed 120 days after planting, as follows: number of linear-1 plants metro, plant height and ear insertion and number of ears.plants-1. In the grass we evaluated canopy height, where it was held the botanical separation in green leaves, dried and stem. Silage started being held in 100 mm PVC pipe (mini-silos) kept sealed for 60 days. At the time of opening of the silo were determined the following parameters: DM, pH, total loss of DM (PDM), specifies mass (SM), dry matter recovery indices (IRDM), losses gas (LG), and size particle. Chemical analysis of the results of OM, MM, ADF were higher for TMI treatments, TT and TT, respectively. CP and LIG had superior results for the treatments containing grass. Corn intercropping with grass Tanzania silage provides more crude protein and lignin compared to exclusive corn silage without damaging the crop yield. Silage maiden Tanzania has higher levels of ADF and crude protein as well as increased production of dry matter than corn silage. The grass Tanzania should be harvested with 30% DM as presented better pH values, higher dry matter recovery rate, less loss of gas as well as increased production of dry matter that Tanzania harvested at the same age corn. |
id |
UEL-11_20eb70f98876cc976ba35b555a83b819 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21765 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercroppingProdução e composição química da silagem de milho e capim-Tanzânia em consórcioAnalysis bromatologicalForage conservationIntercroppingMicrosilos.Composição bromatológicaConservação de forragemConsorciaçãoMicrosilos.The objective of this study was to evaluate the production and chemical composition of silages of grass Tanzania and corn, grown single or intercropping. The experiment was conducted at UTFPR Câmpus Dois Vizinhos in the period between October 2011 and July 2012, a 600 m² area. The treatments were: TMI - single corn, TMT - corn and grass Tanzania consortium at the time of sowing, TT - Tanzania grass single, TT32 - grass Tanzania silage to 32% dry matter (content similar to that of corn). The experimental design a randomized block design with four treatments and five replications. Agronomic evaluations were performed 120 days after planting, as follows: number of linear-1 plants metro, plant height and ear insertion and number of ears.plants-1. In the grass we evaluated canopy height, where it was held the botanical separation in green leaves, dried and stem. Silage started being held in 100 mm PVC pipe (mini-silos) kept sealed for 60 days. At the time of opening of the silo were determined the following parameters: DM, pH, total loss of DM (PDM), specifies mass (SM), dry matter recovery indices (IRDM), losses gas (LG), and size particle. Chemical analysis of the results of OM, MM, ADF were higher for TMI treatments, TT and TT, respectively. CP and LIG had superior results for the treatments containing grass. Corn intercropping with grass Tanzania silage provides more crude protein and lignin compared to exclusive corn silage without damaging the crop yield. Silage maiden Tanzania has higher levels of ADF and crude protein as well as increased production of dry matter than corn silage. The grass Tanzania should be harvested with 30% DM as presented better pH values, higher dry matter recovery rate, less loss of gas as well as increased production of dry matter that Tanzania harvested at the same age corn.Objetivou-se avaliar a produção e composição bromatológica de silagens de capim Tanzânia e de milho, cultivados solteiros ou consorciados. O experimento foi conduzido na UTFPR Câmpus Dois Vizinhos no período entre outubro de 2011 e julho de 2012, numa área de 600 m². Os tratamentos utilizados foram: TMI - milho solteiro, TMT - milho e capim- Tanzânia consorciados no momento da semeadura, TT - capim-Tanzânia solteiro, TT32 - capim-Tanzânia ensilado a 32% de matéria seca (teor semelhante ao do milho). O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso, com quatro tratamentos e cinco repetições. As avaliações agronômicas foram realizadas 120 dias após a semeadura, sendo elas: número de plantas metro linear-1, altura da planta e inserção de espiga e número de espigas planta-1. No capim avaliou-se altura do dossel, onde foi realizada a separação botânica em folhas verdes, secas e colmo. A ensilagem foi realizada em tubos de PVC de 100 mm (microsilos), mantidos vedados por 60 dias. No momento da abertura do silo foram determinados os seguintes parâmetros: MS, pH, perda total de MS (PMS), massa específica (ME), índice de recuperação de massa seca (IRMS), perdas de gases (PG), e tamanho de partícula. Das análises bromatológicas os resultados de MO, MM, FDA foram superiores para os tratamentos TMI, TT e TT, respectivamente. PB e LIG tiveram resultados superiores para os tratamentos contendo capim. O consórcio de milho com Capim Tanzânia proporciona silagem com maior teor de proteína bruta e lignina em comparação com a silagem exclusiva de milho, sem prejudicar a produtividade da cultura. A silagem de Tanzânia solteira apresenta maiores teores de FDA e de proteína bruta, além de maior produção de matéria seca que a silagem de milho. O capim Tanzânia deve ser colhido com 30% de MS visto que apresentou melhores valores de pH, maior índice de recuperação de MS, menor perda de gases, além de maior produção de matéria seca, do que a Tanzânia colhida com a mesma idade do milho.UEL2016-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2176510.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1607Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2016); 1607-1616Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 3 (2016); 1607-16161679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21765/19084http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaula, Fabiana Luiza Matielo deMenezes, Luis Fernando Glasenapp deParis, WagnerRonsani, RicardoHoppen, Sarah MariaCiesca, Julio2022-12-01T15:31:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21765Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-01T15:31:26Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping Produção e composição química da silagem de milho e capim-Tanzânia em consórcio |
title |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping |
spellingShingle |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping Paula, Fabiana Luiza Matielo de Analysis bromatological Forage conservation Intercropping Microsilos. Composição bromatológica Conservação de forragem Consorciação Microsilos. |
title_short |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping |
title_full |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping |
title_fullStr |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping |
title_full_unstemmed |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping |
title_sort |
Silage production and the chemical composition of corn and Grass-tanzania intercropping |
author |
Paula, Fabiana Luiza Matielo de |
author_facet |
Paula, Fabiana Luiza Matielo de Menezes, Luis Fernando Glasenapp de Paris, Wagner Ronsani, Ricardo Hoppen, Sarah Maria Ciesca, Julio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes, Luis Fernando Glasenapp de Paris, Wagner Ronsani, Ricardo Hoppen, Sarah Maria Ciesca, Julio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paula, Fabiana Luiza Matielo de Menezes, Luis Fernando Glasenapp de Paris, Wagner Ronsani, Ricardo Hoppen, Sarah Maria Ciesca, Julio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Analysis bromatological Forage conservation Intercropping Microsilos. Composição bromatológica Conservação de forragem Consorciação Microsilos. |
topic |
Analysis bromatological Forage conservation Intercropping Microsilos. Composição bromatológica Conservação de forragem Consorciação Microsilos. |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the production and chemical composition of silages of grass Tanzania and corn, grown single or intercropping. The experiment was conducted at UTFPR Câmpus Dois Vizinhos in the period between October 2011 and July 2012, a 600 m² area. The treatments were: TMI - single corn, TMT - corn and grass Tanzania consortium at the time of sowing, TT - Tanzania grass single, TT32 - grass Tanzania silage to 32% dry matter (content similar to that of corn). The experimental design a randomized block design with four treatments and five replications. Agronomic evaluations were performed 120 days after planting, as follows: number of linear-1 plants metro, plant height and ear insertion and number of ears.plants-1. In the grass we evaluated canopy height, where it was held the botanical separation in green leaves, dried and stem. Silage started being held in 100 mm PVC pipe (mini-silos) kept sealed for 60 days. At the time of opening of the silo were determined the following parameters: DM, pH, total loss of DM (PDM), specifies mass (SM), dry matter recovery indices (IRDM), losses gas (LG), and size particle. Chemical analysis of the results of OM, MM, ADF were higher for TMI treatments, TT and TT, respectively. CP and LIG had superior results for the treatments containing grass. Corn intercropping with grass Tanzania silage provides more crude protein and lignin compared to exclusive corn silage without damaging the crop yield. Silage maiden Tanzania has higher levels of ADF and crude protein as well as increased production of dry matter than corn silage. The grass Tanzania should be harvested with 30% DM as presented better pH values, higher dry matter recovery rate, less loss of gas as well as increased production of dry matter that Tanzania harvested at the same age corn. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21765 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1607 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21765 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1607 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21765/19084 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2016); 1607-1616 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 3 (2016); 1607-1616 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306074015137792 |