Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral supplementation with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine. Forty-eight Brangus nulliparous heifers were distributed into four experimental groups with three replications each: control group without supplementation and without vaccination (CG01), control group without supplementation and with vaccination (CG02), treatment group with mineral supplementation and vaccination (TG01), and treatment group with mineral supplementation added with protected methionine and vaccination (TG02). The animals were maintained under native pasture with access to water ad libitum and the supplementation was available in high-consumption covered troughs. A supplementation period of 60 days prior to vaccinations was adopted until the first dose of a monovalent experimental vaccine inactivated for BoHV-5 was applied as a method of stimulating the immune response to evaluate the supplementation effects. After a 21-day interval, blood samples were collected to evaluate the humoral response and the second vaccine booster dose was applied following the 21-day interval for new blood samples in order to evaluate the immune response against the two-vaccination protocol. From the beginning of the experiment, the animals were weighed on the days ?60, ?10, 0, 21, and 42 in relation to the vaccine protocol. The experimental groups did not differ for body weight, mean daily weight gain, and body condition score after 102 days of supplementation regardless of the treatment. No animals belonging to CG01 seroconverted throughout the experiment, proving that there was no introduction of the agent (BoHV) in the studied area. When vaccinated animals were compared to the CG01 control group, statistically higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P ? 0.0001) and IgG (P ? 0.0001) were verified 21 days after the second vaccine dose. Among the animals of the three vaccinated groups, there was no difference in seroconversion and IgG production. Therefore, no benefits of mineral supplementation or enriched with protected methionine were observed for the humoral immune response of the studied animals. |
id |
UEL-11_21f7d002eb05e2fb324d246aa5eaaeb1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35059 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionineResposta imune humoral em novilhas de corte suplementadas com sal mineral com ou sem adição de metionina protegida da degradação ruminalAmino acidsPampa biomeImmunityMineralization.AminoácidosBioma pampaImunidadeMineralização.The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral supplementation with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine. Forty-eight Brangus nulliparous heifers were distributed into four experimental groups with three replications each: control group without supplementation and without vaccination (CG01), control group without supplementation and with vaccination (CG02), treatment group with mineral supplementation and vaccination (TG01), and treatment group with mineral supplementation added with protected methionine and vaccination (TG02). The animals were maintained under native pasture with access to water ad libitum and the supplementation was available in high-consumption covered troughs. A supplementation period of 60 days prior to vaccinations was adopted until the first dose of a monovalent experimental vaccine inactivated for BoHV-5 was applied as a method of stimulating the immune response to evaluate the supplementation effects. After a 21-day interval, blood samples were collected to evaluate the humoral response and the second vaccine booster dose was applied following the 21-day interval for new blood samples in order to evaluate the immune response against the two-vaccination protocol. From the beginning of the experiment, the animals were weighed on the days ?60, ?10, 0, 21, and 42 in relation to the vaccine protocol. The experimental groups did not differ for body weight, mean daily weight gain, and body condition score after 102 days of supplementation regardless of the treatment. No animals belonging to CG01 seroconverted throughout the experiment, proving that there was no introduction of the agent (BoHV) in the studied area. When vaccinated animals were compared to the CG01 control group, statistically higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P ? 0.0001) and IgG (P ? 0.0001) were verified 21 days after the second vaccine dose. Among the animals of the three vaccinated groups, there was no difference in seroconversion and IgG production. Therefore, no benefits of mineral supplementation or enriched with protected methionine were observed for the humoral immune response of the studied animals.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resposta imune humoral em novilhas de corte suplementadas com suplemento mineral com ou sem adição de metionina protegida da degradação ruminal. Quarenta e oito novilhas nulíparas da raça Brangus, foram distribuídas em quatro grupos experimentais com três repetições cada: Grupo Controle sem suplementação e ausente de vacinação (GC01), Grupo Controle sem suplementação e com vacinação (GC02), Grupo Tratamento com suplementação mineral e com vacinação (GT01) e Grupo Tratamento com suplementação mineral adicionada de metionina protegida e com vacinação (GT02). Os animais foram mantidos em pastagem nativa com acesso à água ad libitum e a suplementação disponibilizada em cochos cobertos de alto consumo. Um período de suplementação prévio às vacinações de 60 dias foi adotado até a aplicação da primeira dose de uma vacina experimental monovalente inativada para BoHV-5, como método de estímulo da resposta imune para avaliar os efeitos da suplementação. Após 21 dias de intervalo, foram realizadas coletas de sangue para avaliação da resposta humoral e aplicada a segunda dose de reforço vacinal, seguindo o intervalo de 21 dias para novas coletas de sangue a fim de avaliar a resposta imune frente ao protocolo de duas vacinações. A partir do início do experimento, os animais foram pesados nos dias -60, -10, 0, 21 e 42 em relação ao protocolo vacinal. Os grupos experimentais, independente do tratamento, não diferiram quanto ao peso corporal, GMD e ECC após os 102 dias de suplementação. Nenhum animal pertencente ao GC01 soroconverteu ao longo do experimento, comprovando que não houve introdução do agente (BoHV) na área estudada. Quando os animais vacinados foram comparados ao grupo controle GC01, níveis estatisticamente superiores de anticorpos neutralizantes (P ? 0,0001) e de IgG (P ? 0,0001) foram observados 21 dias após a segunda dose vacinal. Entre os animais dos três grupos vacinados, não houve diferença na soroconversão e na produção de IgG. Desta forma, pode-se concluir que não houve benefícios da suplementação mineral ou enriquecida com metionina protegida para a resposta imune humoral dos animais avaliados.UEL2019-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de CampoPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3505910.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl2p3057Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-3068Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-30681679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059/26130Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Matheus GomesDominguez, José Henrique EcheniquePeter, Cristina MendesSantos, EdersonRodrigues, Paula AlmeidaRodrigues, Paulo Ricardo CentenoPicoli, TonyCorrêa, Marcio NunesSchmitt, EduardoLima, Marcelo deFischer, Geferson2022-10-10T16:06:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35059Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-10T16:06:49Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine Resposta imune humoral em novilhas de corte suplementadas com sal mineral com ou sem adição de metionina protegida da degradação ruminal |
title |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine |
spellingShingle |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine Lopes, Matheus Gomes Amino acids Pampa biome Immunity Mineralization. Aminoácidos Bioma pampa Imunidade Mineralização. |
title_short |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine |
title_full |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine |
title_fullStr |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine |
title_sort |
Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine |
author |
Lopes, Matheus Gomes |
author_facet |
Lopes, Matheus Gomes Dominguez, José Henrique Echenique Peter, Cristina Mendes Santos, Ederson Rodrigues, Paula Almeida Rodrigues, Paulo Ricardo Centeno Picoli, Tony Corrêa, Marcio Nunes Schmitt, Eduardo Lima, Marcelo de Fischer, Geferson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dominguez, José Henrique Echenique Peter, Cristina Mendes Santos, Ederson Rodrigues, Paula Almeida Rodrigues, Paulo Ricardo Centeno Picoli, Tony Corrêa, Marcio Nunes Schmitt, Eduardo Lima, Marcelo de Fischer, Geferson |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Matheus Gomes Dominguez, José Henrique Echenique Peter, Cristina Mendes Santos, Ederson Rodrigues, Paula Almeida Rodrigues, Paulo Ricardo Centeno Picoli, Tony Corrêa, Marcio Nunes Schmitt, Eduardo Lima, Marcelo de Fischer, Geferson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Amino acids Pampa biome Immunity Mineralization. Aminoácidos Bioma pampa Imunidade Mineralização. |
topic |
Amino acids Pampa biome Immunity Mineralization. Aminoácidos Bioma pampa Imunidade Mineralização. |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral supplementation with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine. Forty-eight Brangus nulliparous heifers were distributed into four experimental groups with three replications each: control group without supplementation and without vaccination (CG01), control group without supplementation and with vaccination (CG02), treatment group with mineral supplementation and vaccination (TG01), and treatment group with mineral supplementation added with protected methionine and vaccination (TG02). The animals were maintained under native pasture with access to water ad libitum and the supplementation was available in high-consumption covered troughs. A supplementation period of 60 days prior to vaccinations was adopted until the first dose of a monovalent experimental vaccine inactivated for BoHV-5 was applied as a method of stimulating the immune response to evaluate the supplementation effects. After a 21-day interval, blood samples were collected to evaluate the humoral response and the second vaccine booster dose was applied following the 21-day interval for new blood samples in order to evaluate the immune response against the two-vaccination protocol. From the beginning of the experiment, the animals were weighed on the days ?60, ?10, 0, 21, and 42 in relation to the vaccine protocol. The experimental groups did not differ for body weight, mean daily weight gain, and body condition score after 102 days of supplementation regardless of the treatment. No animals belonging to CG01 seroconverted throughout the experiment, proving that there was no introduction of the agent (BoHV) in the studied area. When vaccinated animals were compared to the CG01 control group, statistically higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P ? 0.0001) and IgG (P ? 0.0001) were verified 21 days after the second vaccine dose. Among the animals of the three vaccinated groups, there was no difference in seroconversion and IgG production. Therefore, no benefits of mineral supplementation or enriched with protected methionine were observed for the humoral immune response of the studied animals. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl2p3057 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl2p3057 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059/26130 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-3068 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-3068 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306080954613760 |