Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Matheus Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Dominguez, José Henrique Echenique, Peter, Cristina Mendes, Santos, Ederson, Rodrigues, Paula Almeida, Rodrigues, Paulo Ricardo Centeno, Picoli, Tony, Corrêa, Marcio Nunes, Schmitt, Eduardo, Lima, Marcelo de, Fischer, Geferson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral supplementation with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine. Forty-eight Brangus nulliparous heifers were distributed into four experimental groups with three replications each: control group without supplementation and without vaccination (CG01), control group without supplementation and with vaccination (CG02), treatment group with mineral supplementation and vaccination (TG01), and treatment group with mineral supplementation added with protected methionine and vaccination (TG02). The animals were maintained under native pasture with access to water ad libitum and the supplementation was available in high-consumption covered troughs. A supplementation period of 60 days prior to vaccinations was adopted until the first dose of a monovalent experimental vaccine inactivated for BoHV-5 was applied as a method of stimulating the immune response to evaluate the supplementation effects. After a 21-day interval, blood samples were collected to evaluate the humoral response and the second vaccine booster dose was applied following the 21-day interval for new blood samples in order to evaluate the immune response against the two-vaccination protocol. From the beginning of the experiment, the animals were weighed on the days ?60, ?10, 0, 21, and 42 in relation to the vaccine protocol. The experimental groups did not differ for body weight, mean daily weight gain, and body condition score after 102 days of supplementation regardless of the treatment. No animals belonging to CG01 seroconverted throughout the experiment, proving that there was no introduction of the agent (BoHV) in the studied area. When vaccinated animals were compared to the CG01 control group, statistically higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P ? 0.0001) and IgG (P ? 0.0001) were verified 21 days after the second vaccine dose. Among the animals of the three vaccinated groups, there was no difference in seroconversion and IgG production. Therefore, no benefits of mineral supplementation or enriched with protected methionine were observed for the humoral immune response of the studied animals.
id UEL-11_21f7d002eb05e2fb324d246aa5eaaeb1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35059
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionineResposta imune humoral em novilhas de corte suplementadas com sal mineral com ou sem adição de metionina protegida da degradação ruminalAmino acidsPampa biomeImmunityMineralization.AminoácidosBioma pampaImunidadeMineralização.The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral supplementation with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine. Forty-eight Brangus nulliparous heifers were distributed into four experimental groups with three replications each: control group without supplementation and without vaccination (CG01), control group without supplementation and with vaccination (CG02), treatment group with mineral supplementation and vaccination (TG01), and treatment group with mineral supplementation added with protected methionine and vaccination (TG02). The animals were maintained under native pasture with access to water ad libitum and the supplementation was available in high-consumption covered troughs. A supplementation period of 60 days prior to vaccinations was adopted until the first dose of a monovalent experimental vaccine inactivated for BoHV-5 was applied as a method of stimulating the immune response to evaluate the supplementation effects. After a 21-day interval, blood samples were collected to evaluate the humoral response and the second vaccine booster dose was applied following the 21-day interval for new blood samples in order to evaluate the immune response against the two-vaccination protocol. From the beginning of the experiment, the animals were weighed on the days ?60, ?10, 0, 21, and 42 in relation to the vaccine protocol. The experimental groups did not differ for body weight, mean daily weight gain, and body condition score after 102 days of supplementation regardless of the treatment. No animals belonging to CG01 seroconverted throughout the experiment, proving that there was no introduction of the agent (BoHV) in the studied area. When vaccinated animals were compared to the CG01 control group, statistically higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P ? 0.0001) and IgG (P ? 0.0001) were verified 21 days after the second vaccine dose. Among the animals of the three vaccinated groups, there was no difference in seroconversion and IgG production. Therefore, no benefits of mineral supplementation or enriched with protected methionine were observed for the humoral immune response of the studied animals.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resposta imune humoral em novilhas de corte suplementadas com suplemento mineral com ou sem adição de metionina protegida da degradação ruminal. Quarenta e oito novilhas nulíparas da raça Brangus, foram distribuídas em quatro grupos experimentais com três repetições cada: Grupo Controle sem suplementação e ausente de vacinação (GC01), Grupo Controle sem suplementação e com vacinação (GC02), Grupo Tratamento com suplementação mineral e com vacinação (GT01) e Grupo Tratamento com suplementação mineral adicionada de metionina protegida e com vacinação (GT02). Os animais foram mantidos em pastagem nativa com acesso à água ad libitum e a suplementação disponibilizada em cochos cobertos de alto consumo. Um período de suplementação prévio às vacinações de 60 dias foi adotado até a aplicação da primeira dose de uma vacina experimental monovalente inativada para BoHV-5, como método de estímulo da resposta imune para avaliar os efeitos da suplementação. Após 21 dias de intervalo, foram realizadas coletas de sangue para avaliação da resposta humoral e aplicada a segunda dose de reforço vacinal, seguindo o intervalo de 21 dias para novas coletas de sangue a fim de avaliar a resposta imune frente ao protocolo de duas vacinações. A partir do início do experimento, os animais foram pesados nos dias -60, -10, 0, 21 e 42 em relação ao protocolo vacinal. Os grupos experimentais, independente do tratamento, não diferiram quanto ao peso corporal, GMD e ECC após os 102 dias de suplementação. Nenhum animal pertencente ao GC01 soroconverteu ao longo do experimento, comprovando que não houve introdução do agente (BoHV) na área estudada. Quando os animais vacinados foram comparados ao grupo controle GC01, níveis estatisticamente superiores de anticorpos neutralizantes (P ? 0,0001) e de IgG (P ? 0,0001) foram observados 21 dias após a segunda dose vacinal. Entre os animais dos três grupos vacinados, não houve diferença na soroconversão e na produção de IgG. Desta forma, pode-se concluir que não houve benefícios da suplementação mineral ou enriquecida com metionina protegida para a resposta imune humoral dos animais avaliados.UEL2019-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de CampoPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3505910.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl2p3057Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-3068Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-30681679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059/26130Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Matheus GomesDominguez, José Henrique EcheniquePeter, Cristina MendesSantos, EdersonRodrigues, Paula AlmeidaRodrigues, Paulo Ricardo CentenoPicoli, TonyCorrêa, Marcio NunesSchmitt, EduardoLima, Marcelo deFischer, Geferson2022-10-10T16:06:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35059Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-10T16:06:49Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
Resposta imune humoral em novilhas de corte suplementadas com sal mineral com ou sem adição de metionina protegida da degradação ruminal
title Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
spellingShingle Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
Lopes, Matheus Gomes
Amino acids
Pampa biome
Immunity
Mineralization.
Aminoácidos
Bioma pampa
Imunidade
Mineralização.
title_short Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
title_full Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
title_fullStr Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
title_full_unstemmed Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
title_sort Humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral salt with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine
author Lopes, Matheus Gomes
author_facet Lopes, Matheus Gomes
Dominguez, José Henrique Echenique
Peter, Cristina Mendes
Santos, Ederson
Rodrigues, Paula Almeida
Rodrigues, Paulo Ricardo Centeno
Picoli, Tony
Corrêa, Marcio Nunes
Schmitt, Eduardo
Lima, Marcelo de
Fischer, Geferson
author_role author
author2 Dominguez, José Henrique Echenique
Peter, Cristina Mendes
Santos, Ederson
Rodrigues, Paula Almeida
Rodrigues, Paulo Ricardo Centeno
Picoli, Tony
Corrêa, Marcio Nunes
Schmitt, Eduardo
Lima, Marcelo de
Fischer, Geferson
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Matheus Gomes
Dominguez, José Henrique Echenique
Peter, Cristina Mendes
Santos, Ederson
Rodrigues, Paula Almeida
Rodrigues, Paulo Ricardo Centeno
Picoli, Tony
Corrêa, Marcio Nunes
Schmitt, Eduardo
Lima, Marcelo de
Fischer, Geferson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Amino acids
Pampa biome
Immunity
Mineralization.
Aminoácidos
Bioma pampa
Imunidade
Mineralização.
topic Amino acids
Pampa biome
Immunity
Mineralization.
Aminoácidos
Bioma pampa
Imunidade
Mineralização.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the humoral immune response in beef heifers supplemented with mineral supplementation with or without the addition of rumen-protected methionine. Forty-eight Brangus nulliparous heifers were distributed into four experimental groups with three replications each: control group without supplementation and without vaccination (CG01), control group without supplementation and with vaccination (CG02), treatment group with mineral supplementation and vaccination (TG01), and treatment group with mineral supplementation added with protected methionine and vaccination (TG02). The animals were maintained under native pasture with access to water ad libitum and the supplementation was available in high-consumption covered troughs. A supplementation period of 60 days prior to vaccinations was adopted until the first dose of a monovalent experimental vaccine inactivated for BoHV-5 was applied as a method of stimulating the immune response to evaluate the supplementation effects. After a 21-day interval, blood samples were collected to evaluate the humoral response and the second vaccine booster dose was applied following the 21-day interval for new blood samples in order to evaluate the immune response against the two-vaccination protocol. From the beginning of the experiment, the animals were weighed on the days ?60, ?10, 0, 21, and 42 in relation to the vaccine protocol. The experimental groups did not differ for body weight, mean daily weight gain, and body condition score after 102 days of supplementation regardless of the treatment. No animals belonging to CG01 seroconverted throughout the experiment, proving that there was no introduction of the agent (BoHV) in the studied area. When vaccinated animals were compared to the CG01 control group, statistically higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P ? 0.0001) and IgG (P ? 0.0001) were verified 21 days after the second vaccine dose. Among the animals of the three vaccinated groups, there was no difference in seroconversion and IgG production. Therefore, no benefits of mineral supplementation or enriched with protected methionine were observed for the humoral immune response of the studied animals.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl2p3057
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6Supl2p3057
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/35059/26130
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-3068
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 6Supl2 (2019); 3057-3068
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306080954613760