Controlling bovine brucellosis in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: results after ten years of a vaccination program

• Autor(a) principal: Dias, Ricardo Augusto
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Outros Autores: Belchior, Ana Paula Cunha, Ferreira, Rodrigo de Souza, Gonçalves, Rita Coelho, Aguiar, Ricardo Souza Costa Barão de, Sousa, Paola da Rocha, Santos, Arianne Mastrangeli Amici, Amaku, Marcos, Ferreira, Fernando, Telles, Evelise Oliveira, Grisi-Filho, José Henrique Hildebrand, Heinemann, Marcos Bryan, Gonçalves, Vitor Salvador Picão, Ferreira Neto, José Soares
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
• Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27233
• topic: Bovine brucellosis; PNCEBT; Prevalence; Risk factors; São Paulo; Brazil.; Brucelose bovina; Fatores de risco; PNCEBT; Prevalência; São Paulo; Brasil.

A cross- sectional study was carried out, between May and November 2011, to estimate the situation of the bovine brucellosis in São Paulo State, 10 years after the commencement of the vaccination of the heifers with the S19 strain. The State was divided into seven regions and in each of them, 300 farms with reproductive activity were randomly chosen and considered as primary sample units. A fixed number of cows was randomly selected and tested for antibodies against Brucella spp. A farm was considered infected if at least one female tested positive. In the selected farms, an epidemiological questionnaire was administered which focused on herd traits as well as husbandry and sanitary practices that could be associated with the risk of infection. The prevalence (percentile, [95% confidence interval]) of infected herds was 10.2% [8.8-11.8] for the State, and for the regions, it varied from 7.3% [4.7-11.2] to 12.3% [8.8-16.8], not showing significant difference between different regions. The apparent prevalence of positive farms in the State and regions remained similar to the prevalence observed 10 years before. The prevalence of positive animals was 2.4% [1.8-3.1] in the State and varied from 1.1% [0.6-2] to 3.5% [1.7-7.1] in the regions, not showing significant difference between regions. Again, there was no difference in the prevalence of positive animals after 10 years of the vaccination program. The risk factors (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) associated with bovine brucellosis in the State included number of cows ? 24 (3.08, 2.22-4.27) and the acquisition of breeding animals (1.33, 0.95-1.87). The São Paulo State should conduct systematic vaccination coverage of above 80% of the eligible heifers with the S19 strain vaccine annually. Moreover, the State should emphatically use RB51 strain vaccine in females above 8 months of age not vaccinated with S19 strain vaccine. An efficient animal health education program to orientate farmers to test replacement animals for brucellosis prior to introduction in their herds should also be implemented.