Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
DOI: | 10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p683 |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27295 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% slow release urea (SRU) in sheep feed on nitrogen balance (intake, fecal and urinary excretion, nitrogen absorbed and retained and/or nitrogen balance). Four sheep with an average body weight (BW) of 30.8 ± 1.7 kg were distributed using a Latin square experimental design. Sheep were allocated in metabolic cages and received two meals a day. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and differences were tested using a regression equation with a 5% probability. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not change (p > 0.05) nitrogen intake (NI), with an average value of 20.49 g animal day-1 and 1.57 g (kg0.75)-1. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not affect (p > 0.05) fecal nitrogen (FN) in g (kg0.75)-1, with an average value of 0.65 g (kg0.75)-1. However, the inclusion of SRU changed (p < 0.05) the FN, expressed as g animal day-1, and % BW, in a quadratic manner. The lowest FN excretion was 7.63 g animal day-1 and 36.41% NI, and it was obtained at inclusion levels of 0.82% and 0.66% SRU, respectively. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets had a quadratic effect (p < 0.05) in urinary nitrogen (UN), expressed as g animal day-1, g (kg0.75)-1, and % of NI. The minimum values calculated with the equations for UN were 0.86 g animal day-1, 0.06 g (kg0.75)-1, and 0.28% NI for SRU inclusion levels of 0.79%, 0.76%, and 0.71%, respectively. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not change (p > 0.05) the NB expressed as g animal day-1 (10.86) and g (kg0.75)-1 (0.82). However, the NB expressed as % NI or in relation to the NI responded in a quadratic manner (p < 0.05) to the inclusion of different levels of SRU in sheep food. The maximum value for NB was 59.68% NI and it was obtained at 0.68% SRU. Thus, the inclusion of 0.6% to 0.8% slow release urea in sheep diets provides the lowest fecal and urinary nitrogen losses. In addition, these levels provide the best NB values, expressed as a percentage of NI. |
id |
UEL-11_2a8ba8e7814c4b3955b575fdf8ed3282 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27295 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
spelling |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balanceUreia de liberação lenta na alimentação de ovinos sobre o balanço de nitrogênioExcretionFacesIntakeNon-protein nitrogenUrine.ConsumoExcreçãoFezesNitrogênio não proteicoUrina.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% slow release urea (SRU) in sheep feed on nitrogen balance (intake, fecal and urinary excretion, nitrogen absorbed and retained and/or nitrogen balance). Four sheep with an average body weight (BW) of 30.8 ± 1.7 kg were distributed using a Latin square experimental design. Sheep were allocated in metabolic cages and received two meals a day. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and differences were tested using a regression equation with a 5% probability. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not change (p > 0.05) nitrogen intake (NI), with an average value of 20.49 g animal day-1 and 1.57 g (kg0.75)-1. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not affect (p > 0.05) fecal nitrogen (FN) in g (kg0.75)-1, with an average value of 0.65 g (kg0.75)-1. However, the inclusion of SRU changed (p < 0.05) the FN, expressed as g animal day-1, and % BW, in a quadratic manner. The lowest FN excretion was 7.63 g animal day-1 and 36.41% NI, and it was obtained at inclusion levels of 0.82% and 0.66% SRU, respectively. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets had a quadratic effect (p < 0.05) in urinary nitrogen (UN), expressed as g animal day-1, g (kg0.75)-1, and % of NI. The minimum values calculated with the equations for UN were 0.86 g animal day-1, 0.06 g (kg0.75)-1, and 0.28% NI for SRU inclusion levels of 0.79%, 0.76%, and 0.71%, respectively. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not change (p > 0.05) the NB expressed as g animal day-1 (10.86) and g (kg0.75)-1 (0.82). However, the NB expressed as % NI or in relation to the NI responded in a quadratic manner (p < 0.05) to the inclusion of different levels of SRU in sheep food. The maximum value for NB was 59.68% NI and it was obtained at 0.68% SRU. Thus, the inclusion of 0.6% to 0.8% slow release urea in sheep diets provides the lowest fecal and urinary nitrogen losses. In addition, these levels provide the best NB values, expressed as a percentage of NI.Objetivou-se avaliar a inclusão de 0,0%; 0,4%; 0,8% e 1,2% de ureia de liberação lenta (ULL) na alimentação de ovinos sobre o balanço de nitrogênio (consumo, excreção fecal e urinária de nitrogênio, nitrogênio absorvido e balanço de nitrogênio). Foram utilizados quatro ovinos com peso corporal (PC) médio de 30,8 ± 1,7 kg, distribuídos em um delineamento em quadrado latino. Os ovinos foram alocados em gaiolas de metabolismo e receberam duas refeições por dia. Os dados do balanço de nitrogênio dos ovinos foram submetidos à análise de variância e as diferenças observadas para as variáveis estudadas foram testadas utilizando equação de regressão a 5% de probabilidade. A inclusão de 0,0%; 0,4%; 0,8% e 1,2% de ULL na alimentação dos ovinos não alterou (p > 0,05) o consumo de nitrogênio (N), com valor médio de 20,49 g animal dia-1 e 1,57 gramas por quilo de peso metabólico (g kg0,75)-1. A inclusão de níveis crescentes de ULL na alimentação de ovinos não influenciou (p > 0,05) o nitrogênio fecal (NF) expresso em g kg0,75-1, com valor médio de 0,65 g (kg0,75)-1. Porém, foi observado que a inclusão de ULL alterou (p < 0,05) de maneira quadrática o NF expresso em g animal dia-1. O menor valor estimado de excreção do NF foi de 7,63 g animal dia-1 para o nível de inclusão da ULL de 0,82%. A utilização dos níveis de 0,0%; 0,4%; 0,8% e 1,2% de ULL na alimentação dos ovinos propiciou um comportamento quadrático (p < 0,05) para o N urinário (NU) expresso em g animal dia-1; g (kg0,75)-1 e % do N consumido (NC). Os pontos de mínimo obtidos pelas equações para o NU foram de 0,86 g animal dia-1; 0,06 g (kg0,75)-1 e 0,28% NC, para os teores de inclusão de 0,79%; 0,76% e 0,71%, respectivamente. A inclusão de 0,0%; 0,4%; 0,8% e 1,2% de ULL na alimentação de ovinos não alterou (p > 0,05) o balanço de nitrogênio (BN) expresso em g animal dia-1 (10,86) e em g (kg0,75)-1 (0,82). Entretanto, o BN expresso em %NC ou em relação ao NC apresentou um comportamento quadrático (p < 0,05) com a inclusão dos diferentes níveis de ULL nas rações de ovinos. O valor máximo do BN de 59,68% NC foi obtido para o nível de 0,68% de ULL. Assim, a inclusão de 0,6% a 0,8% de ureia de liberação lenta na alimentação de ovinos propicia as menores perdas do nitrogênio fecal e urinário, além de proporcionar os melhores valores de balaço de nitrogênio expresso em percentagem do nitrogênio consumido.UEL2018-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2729510.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p683Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 39 No. 2 (2018); 683-696Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 39 n. 2 (2018); 683-6961679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27295/23307Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGeron, Luiz Juliano ValérioGarcia, JocilaineAguiar, Sílvia Cristina deCosta, Fabiana Gomes daSilva, Ana Paula daSousa Neto, Eurico LucasCarvalho, Joilma Toniolo Honório deRoberto, Lucas SilvaCoelho, Kallynka Samara MartinsSantos, Ilda Souza2022-10-20T21:46:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27295Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-20T21:46:37Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance Ureia de liberação lenta na alimentação de ovinos sobre o balanço de nitrogênio |
title |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance |
spellingShingle |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Excretion Faces Intake Non-protein nitrogen Urine. Consumo Excreção Fezes Nitrogênio não proteico Urina. Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Excretion Faces Intake Non-protein nitrogen Urine. Consumo Excreção Fezes Nitrogênio não proteico Urina. |
title_short |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance |
title_full |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance |
title_fullStr |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance |
title_sort |
Effect of slow release urea in sheep feed on nitrogen balance |
author |
Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério |
author_facet |
Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Garcia, Jocilaine Aguiar, Sílvia Cristina de Costa, Fabiana Gomes da Silva, Ana Paula da Sousa Neto, Eurico Lucas Carvalho, Joilma Toniolo Honório de Roberto, Lucas Silva Coelho, Kallynka Samara Martins Santos, Ilda Souza Garcia, Jocilaine Aguiar, Sílvia Cristina de Costa, Fabiana Gomes da Silva, Ana Paula da Sousa Neto, Eurico Lucas Carvalho, Joilma Toniolo Honório de Roberto, Lucas Silva Coelho, Kallynka Samara Martins Santos, Ilda Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garcia, Jocilaine Aguiar, Sílvia Cristina de Costa, Fabiana Gomes da Silva, Ana Paula da Sousa Neto, Eurico Lucas Carvalho, Joilma Toniolo Honório de Roberto, Lucas Silva Coelho, Kallynka Samara Martins Santos, Ilda Souza |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Geron, Luiz Juliano Valério Garcia, Jocilaine Aguiar, Sílvia Cristina de Costa, Fabiana Gomes da Silva, Ana Paula da Sousa Neto, Eurico Lucas Carvalho, Joilma Toniolo Honório de Roberto, Lucas Silva Coelho, Kallynka Samara Martins Santos, Ilda Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Excretion Faces Intake Non-protein nitrogen Urine. Consumo Excreção Fezes Nitrogênio não proteico Urina. |
topic |
Excretion Faces Intake Non-protein nitrogen Urine. Consumo Excreção Fezes Nitrogênio não proteico Urina. |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% slow release urea (SRU) in sheep feed on nitrogen balance (intake, fecal and urinary excretion, nitrogen absorbed and retained and/or nitrogen balance). Four sheep with an average body weight (BW) of 30.8 ± 1.7 kg were distributed using a Latin square experimental design. Sheep were allocated in metabolic cages and received two meals a day. The data were subjected to analysis of variance and differences were tested using a regression equation with a 5% probability. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not change (p > 0.05) nitrogen intake (NI), with an average value of 20.49 g animal day-1 and 1.57 g (kg0.75)-1. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not affect (p > 0.05) fecal nitrogen (FN) in g (kg0.75)-1, with an average value of 0.65 g (kg0.75)-1. However, the inclusion of SRU changed (p < 0.05) the FN, expressed as g animal day-1, and % BW, in a quadratic manner. The lowest FN excretion was 7.63 g animal day-1 and 36.41% NI, and it was obtained at inclusion levels of 0.82% and 0.66% SRU, respectively. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets had a quadratic effect (p < 0.05) in urinary nitrogen (UN), expressed as g animal day-1, g (kg0.75)-1, and % of NI. The minimum values calculated with the equations for UN were 0.86 g animal day-1, 0.06 g (kg0.75)-1, and 0.28% NI for SRU inclusion levels of 0.79%, 0.76%, and 0.71%, respectively. The inclusion of 0.0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.2% SRU in sheep diets did not change (p > 0.05) the NB expressed as g animal day-1 (10.86) and g (kg0.75)-1 (0.82). However, the NB expressed as % NI or in relation to the NI responded in a quadratic manner (p < 0.05) to the inclusion of different levels of SRU in sheep food. The maximum value for NB was 59.68% NI and it was obtained at 0.68% SRU. Thus, the inclusion of 0.6% to 0.8% slow release urea in sheep diets provides the lowest fecal and urinary nitrogen losses. In addition, these levels provide the best NB values, expressed as a percentage of NI. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27295 10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p683 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27295 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p683 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/27295/23307 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 39 No. 2 (2018); 683-696 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 39 n. 2 (2018); 683-696 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1822182784300482560 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p683 |