Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Maria Aparecida da
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Deived Uilian de, Costa, Denis Santiago da, Colombo, Ronan Carlos, Pacheco, Camilla de Andrade, Tazima, Zuleide Hissano, Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30111
Resumo: A well-developed root system is a very important characteristic of rootstocks. Initial plant characterization is a potential technique to highlight cultivars with desirable root architecture for the diversification of rootstocks in the national citriculture. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus cultivars used as rootstocks. Seeds from five rootstocks, ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin, ‘Rangpur’ lime, ‘Rough’ lemon, ‘C13’ and ‘Troyer’ citranges, were sown in black polyethylene bags. A completely randomized block design with five replications and one plant per plot was applied. At 30 and 45 days after emergence, shoots and roots were collected for analysis. Shoot analysis measured the total number of leaves, leaf area, stem diameter, plant height, and fresh and dry matter weights. Root analysis evaluated fresh and dry matter weights and root architecture by image analysis, which recorded root traits including primary, secondary, and tertiary root numbers; length and total volume; and the percentage of secondary roots present in the upper third of the primary root. Shoot and root data of fresh and dry weights were submitted to variance analysis and compared using Tukey’s test (5%). The remaining root data were standardized for variance 1 and studied through principal component analysis. The ‘C13’ citrange showed good shoot development, with greater leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, and shoot fresh and dry matter weights during both evaluation periods, followed by the ‘Troyer’ citrange. The ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin had the smallest shoot and root development during both evaluation periods, presenting lower primary root, secondary root, and root volume than other cultivars evaluated at the same time. The ‘Troyer’ citrange had fewer roots in the upper third of the primary root and a higher root insertion angle.
id UEL-11_38ccb70045aa093f252270360031d7e2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30111
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocksDesenvolvimento inicial de parte aérea e arquitetura de raiz de porta-enxertos de citrosInitial plant characterizationRoot systemSmartRoot.Caracterização inicial de plantasSistema radicularSmartRoot.A well-developed root system is a very important characteristic of rootstocks. Initial plant characterization is a potential technique to highlight cultivars with desirable root architecture for the diversification of rootstocks in the national citriculture. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus cultivars used as rootstocks. Seeds from five rootstocks, ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin, ‘Rangpur’ lime, ‘Rough’ lemon, ‘C13’ and ‘Troyer’ citranges, were sown in black polyethylene bags. A completely randomized block design with five replications and one plant per plot was applied. At 30 and 45 days after emergence, shoots and roots were collected for analysis. Shoot analysis measured the total number of leaves, leaf area, stem diameter, plant height, and fresh and dry matter weights. Root analysis evaluated fresh and dry matter weights and root architecture by image analysis, which recorded root traits including primary, secondary, and tertiary root numbers; length and total volume; and the percentage of secondary roots present in the upper third of the primary root. Shoot and root data of fresh and dry weights were submitted to variance analysis and compared using Tukey’s test (5%). The remaining root data were standardized for variance 1 and studied through principal component analysis. The ‘C13’ citrange showed good shoot development, with greater leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, and shoot fresh and dry matter weights during both evaluation periods, followed by the ‘Troyer’ citrange. The ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin had the smallest shoot and root development during both evaluation periods, presenting lower primary root, secondary root, and root volume than other cultivars evaluated at the same time. The ‘Troyer’ citrange had fewer roots in the upper third of the primary root and a higher root insertion angle.Um sistema radicular bem desenvolvido é uma característica muito importante dos porta-enxertos. A caracterização inicial das plantas é uma técnica que apresenta potencial para detecção de cultivares com arquitetura desejável de raízes para uso na diversificação dos porta-enxertos da citricultura nacional. Com isso, o objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o desenvolvimento inicial da parte aérea e a arquitetura de raiz de cinco cultivares de citros usadas como porta-enxertos. Sementes de cinco porta-enxertos, tangerina ‘Cleópatra’, limão ‘Cravo’, limão ‘Rugoso’, citrange ‘C13’ e ‘Troyer’, foram semeadas em sacolas pretas de polietileno. Foi utilizado delineamento experimental de blocos inteiramente casualizados, com cinco repetições e uma planta por bloco. Aos 30 e 45 dias após emergência a parte aérea e as raízes foram coletadas para análise. As análises de parte aérea avaliaram número total de folhas, área foliar, diâmetro do caule, altura da planta, massa fresca e seca. Análises de raízes avaliaram massa fresca e seca e arquitetura de raízes por análise de imagem, que avaliou características como, número de raízes primárias, secundários e terciárias, comprimento e volume total de raízes e porcentagem de raízes secundárias presentes no primeiro terço da raiz principal. Os dados de parte aérea e massa fresca e seca de raiz foram submetidos à análise de variância e comparados usando teste de Tukey (5%). O restante dos dados de raiz foram padronizados para a variância 1 e estudados pela análise de componentes principais. O citrange ‘C13’ apresentou bom desenvolvimento de parte aérea, com maior área foliar, altura de planta, diâmetro de caule e massa fresca e seca de parte aérea em ambos períodos avaliados, seguido pelo citrange ‘Troyer’. A tangerina ‘Cleópatra’ apresentou menor desenvolvimento radicular e de parte aérea nos dois períodos avaliados, com menor desenvolvimento de raízes primárias, secundárias e menor volume, comparada com as outras cultivares avaliadas no mesmo período. O citrange ‘Troyer’ apresenta poucas raízes no terço superior e maior ângulo de inserção das raízes.UEL2019-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3011110.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1393Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2019); 1393-1404Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 4 (2019); 1393-14041679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30111/25444Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCruz, Maria Aparecida daCarvalho, Deived Uilian deCosta, Denis Santiago daColombo, Ronan CarlosPacheco, Camilla de AndradeTazima, Zuleide HissanoNeves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro2022-10-19T12:13:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30111Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-19T12:13:19Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
Desenvolvimento inicial de parte aérea e arquitetura de raiz de porta-enxertos de citros
title Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
spellingShingle Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
Cruz, Maria Aparecida da
Initial plant characterization
Root system
SmartRoot.
Caracterização inicial de plantas
Sistema radicular
SmartRoot.
title_short Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
title_full Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
title_fullStr Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
title_full_unstemmed Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
title_sort Initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus rootstocks
author Cruz, Maria Aparecida da
author_facet Cruz, Maria Aparecida da
Carvalho, Deived Uilian de
Costa, Denis Santiago da
Colombo, Ronan Carlos
Pacheco, Camilla de Andrade
Tazima, Zuleide Hissano
Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Deived Uilian de
Costa, Denis Santiago da
Colombo, Ronan Carlos
Pacheco, Camilla de Andrade
Tazima, Zuleide Hissano
Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz, Maria Aparecida da
Carvalho, Deived Uilian de
Costa, Denis Santiago da
Colombo, Ronan Carlos
Pacheco, Camilla de Andrade
Tazima, Zuleide Hissano
Neves, Carmen Silvia Vieira Janeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Initial plant characterization
Root system
SmartRoot.
Caracterização inicial de plantas
Sistema radicular
SmartRoot.
topic Initial plant characterization
Root system
SmartRoot.
Caracterização inicial de plantas
Sistema radicular
SmartRoot.
description A well-developed root system is a very important characteristic of rootstocks. Initial plant characterization is a potential technique to highlight cultivars with desirable root architecture for the diversification of rootstocks in the national citriculture. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the initial shoot development and root architecture of citrus cultivars used as rootstocks. Seeds from five rootstocks, ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin, ‘Rangpur’ lime, ‘Rough’ lemon, ‘C13’ and ‘Troyer’ citranges, were sown in black polyethylene bags. A completely randomized block design with five replications and one plant per plot was applied. At 30 and 45 days after emergence, shoots and roots were collected for analysis. Shoot analysis measured the total number of leaves, leaf area, stem diameter, plant height, and fresh and dry matter weights. Root analysis evaluated fresh and dry matter weights and root architecture by image analysis, which recorded root traits including primary, secondary, and tertiary root numbers; length and total volume; and the percentage of secondary roots present in the upper third of the primary root. Shoot and root data of fresh and dry weights were submitted to variance analysis and compared using Tukey’s test (5%). The remaining root data were standardized for variance 1 and studied through principal component analysis. The ‘C13’ citrange showed good shoot development, with greater leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, and shoot fresh and dry matter weights during both evaluation periods, followed by the ‘Troyer’ citrange. The ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin had the smallest shoot and root development during both evaluation periods, presenting lower primary root, secondary root, and root volume than other cultivars evaluated at the same time. The ‘Troyer’ citrange had fewer roots in the upper third of the primary root and a higher root insertion angle.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30111
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1393
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30111
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n4p1393
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30111/25444
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2019); 1393-1404
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 4 (2019); 1393-1404
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1750315426842148864