Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leiva-Revilla, Johanna
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Cadenas, Jesús, Vieira, Luis Alberto, Campello, Claudio Cabral, Celestino, Juliana Jales de Hollanda, Pessoa, Otília Deusdênia Loiola, Apgar, Gary Allen, Rodrigues, Ana Paula Ribeiro, Figueiredo, José Ricardo de, Maside, Carolina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25905
Resumo: Crude extract of the heartwood of Auxemma oncocalyx (A. oncocalyx) and its main component i.e., Oncocalyxone A (onco A), have elevated antioxidant and anti-tumoral activity, but studies on the action of these drugs regarding folliculogenesis are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of A. oncocalyx and onco A on the in vitro culture of isolated secondary follicles and on the in vitro maturation of oocytes from caprine antral follicles grown in vivo. Isolated secondary follicles were randomly distributed in six groups; the non-cultured control was immediately fixed upon isolation. The remaining follicles were cultured for 7 days in ?-MEM+ alone (control) or supplemented with DMSO, doxorrubicin, A. oncocalyx or onco A. After culture, follicles were evaluated for antrum formation, growth rate, apoptosis (TUNEL) and cellular proliferation (PCNA), as well as gene expression of Bcl2 and Bax. Additionally, cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated and allocated into five treatments for in vitro maturation: control, cultured only in maturation base medium (TCM 199+); or supplemented with DMSO; DXR; A. oncocalyx or onco A. After in vitro maturation, oocyte chromatin configuration and viability were assessed. After 7 days of culture, there was a reduction (P < 0.05) in the percentage of morphologically intact follicles, antrum formation, growth rate and number of PCNA positive granulosa cells in DXR treatment compared to the other treatments. In the DXR treatment a higher percentage (P < 0.05) of TUNEL positive follicles and higher (P < 0.05) relative BAX:BCL2 mRNA ratio’s were observed. After in vitro maturation of the COCs DXR, A. oncocalyx and onco A treatments had a greater (P < 0.05) percentage of abnormal oocytes and a lower (P < 0.05) percentage of viable oocytes as compared with the control group. However, only DXR and onco A treatments increased (P < 0.05) the percentage of alive oocytes with abnormal chromatin configuration. There were no differences in maturation rates between the control group and DXR, A. oncocalyx and onco A treatments. In conclusion, under our culture conditions, A. oncocalyx and onco A do not exhibit a toxic effect on isolated secondary follicles and on maturation rates of COCs recovered from antral follicles, however, these drugs negatively affected the COCs viability.  Thus, the use of culture biotechnologies as an in vitro secondary follicle culture and in vitro oocyte maturation toxicity testing are appropriated methods to evaluate the possible effects of drugs in folliculogesis.
id UEL-11_3cbc26e0b27b2ea1ec1799d941b8133e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25905
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturationEfeito da toxicidade da fração da Auxemma oncocalyx e seu princípio ativo oncocalyxona A no cultivo in vitro de folículos secundários e na maturação in vitro de oócitos de caprinosAuxemma oncocalyxDoxorubicinOncocalyxone AFolliculogenesisOocytes.Auxemma oncocalyxDoxorubicinaOncocalyxona AFoliculogénesisOvócitos.Crude extract of the heartwood of Auxemma oncocalyx (A. oncocalyx) and its main component i.e., Oncocalyxone A (onco A), have elevated antioxidant and anti-tumoral activity, but studies on the action of these drugs regarding folliculogenesis are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of A. oncocalyx and onco A on the in vitro culture of isolated secondary follicles and on the in vitro maturation of oocytes from caprine antral follicles grown in vivo. Isolated secondary follicles were randomly distributed in six groups; the non-cultured control was immediately fixed upon isolation. The remaining follicles were cultured for 7 days in ?-MEM+ alone (control) or supplemented with DMSO, doxorrubicin, A. oncocalyx or onco A. After culture, follicles were evaluated for antrum formation, growth rate, apoptosis (TUNEL) and cellular proliferation (PCNA), as well as gene expression of Bcl2 and Bax. Additionally, cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated and allocated into five treatments for in vitro maturation: control, cultured only in maturation base medium (TCM 199+); or supplemented with DMSO; DXR; A. oncocalyx or onco A. After in vitro maturation, oocyte chromatin configuration and viability were assessed. After 7 days of culture, there was a reduction (P < 0.05) in the percentage of morphologically intact follicles, antrum formation, growth rate and number of PCNA positive granulosa cells in DXR treatment compared to the other treatments. In the DXR treatment a higher percentage (P < 0.05) of TUNEL positive follicles and higher (P < 0.05) relative BAX:BCL2 mRNA ratio’s were observed. After in vitro maturation of the COCs DXR, A. oncocalyx and onco A treatments had a greater (P < 0.05) percentage of abnormal oocytes and a lower (P < 0.05) percentage of viable oocytes as compared with the control group. However, only DXR and onco A treatments increased (P < 0.05) the percentage of alive oocytes with abnormal chromatin configuration. There were no differences in maturation rates between the control group and DXR, A. oncocalyx and onco A treatments. In conclusion, under our culture conditions, A. oncocalyx and onco A do not exhibit a toxic effect on isolated secondary follicles and on maturation rates of COCs recovered from antral follicles, however, these drugs negatively affected the COCs viability.  Thus, the use of culture biotechnologies as an in vitro secondary follicle culture and in vitro oocyte maturation toxicity testing are appropriated methods to evaluate the possible effects of drugs in folliculogesis.O extrato da Auxemma oncocalyx (A. oncocalyx) e seu componente, Oncocalyxona A (onco A), possui atividade antitumoral, podendo afetar a fertilidade. Entretanto, estudos sobre a ação dessas substâncias em relação à foliculogênese caprina são desconhecidos. O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar o efeito da A. oncocalyx e onco A no cultivo in vitro de folículos secundários isolados (Experimento 1) e na maturação in vitro (MIV) de oócitos de folículos antrais caprinos crescidos in vivo (Experimento 2). Folículos secundários isolados foram distribuídos em seis grupos, em que o controle não-cultivado foi imediatamente fixado em paraformaldeído 4%. Os folículos restantes foram cultivados durante 7 dias em ?-MEM+ sozinho (controle) ou suplementado com DMSO, doxorrubicina (DXR), A. oncocalyx ou onco A. Após o cultivo, os folículos foram avaliados quanto à formação de antro, taxa de crescimento, apoptose (TUNEL) e proliferação celular (PCNA), bem como a expressão dos genes BCL2 e BAX. Além disso, os complexos cumulus-oócitos (CCOs) foram aspirados e distribuídos em cinco tratamentos para MIV: o controle em meio de maturação (TCM 199+), e os demais tratamentos suplementados com DMSO, DXR, A. oncocalyx ou onco A. Depois da MIV, a configuração da cromatina e viabilidade oocitária foram avaliadas. Após 7 dias de cultivo, observou-se redução na percentagem de folículos morfologicamente intactos, na formação de antro, na taxa de crescimento e no número de células PCNA positivas (P < 0,05). Depois do cultivo, no tratamento DXR foi observada maior percentagem de folículos TUNEL positivos (P < 0,05) e também aumento na taxa de RNAm BAX: BCL2 (P < 0,05). Após MIV dos CCOs, nos tratamentos com DXR, A. oncocalyx e onco A, observou-se maior (P < 0,05) percentagem de oócitos anormais e menor de oócitos viáveis quando comparados ao grupo controle (P < 0,05). No entanto, apenas nos tratamentos DXR e onco A aumentou a percentagem de oócitos viáveis com configuração da cromatina anormais (P < 0,05). Não houve diferenças nas taxas de maturação entre o grupo controle e os tratamentos DXR, A. oncocalyx e onco A. De acordo com nossas condições de cultivo, pode-se concluir que a A. oncocalyx e onco A não apresentaram efeitos tóxicos sobre folículos secundários isolados e as taxas de maturação dos CCOs recuperados a partir de folículos antrais. No entanto, estas substâncias afetam negativamente a viabilidade oocitária. Assim, o uso de biotecnologias como o cultivo de folículos secundários in vitro e MIV de oócitos para testes de toxicidade são métodos apropriados para avaliar possíveis efeitos das drogas na foliculogênese.UEL2017-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2590510.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1361Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2017); 1361-1374Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 3 (2017); 1361-13741679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25905/21113Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeiva-Revilla, JohannaCadenas, JesúsVieira, Luis AlbertoCampello, Claudio CabralCelestino, Juliana Jales de HollandaPessoa, Otília Deusdênia LoiolaApgar, Gary AllenRodrigues, Ana Paula RibeiroFigueiredo, José Ricardo deMaside, Carolina2022-10-24T13:33:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25905Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T13:33:50Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
Efeito da toxicidade da fração da Auxemma oncocalyx e seu princípio ativo oncocalyxona A no cultivo in vitro de folículos secundários e na maturação in vitro de oócitos de caprinos
title Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
spellingShingle Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
Leiva-Revilla, Johanna
Auxemma oncocalyx
Doxorubicin
Oncocalyxone A
Folliculogenesis
Oocytes.
Auxemma oncocalyx
Doxorubicina
Oncocalyxona A
Foliculogénesis
Ovócitos.
title_short Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
title_full Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
title_fullStr Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
title_full_unstemmed Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
title_sort Toxicity effect of Auxemma oncocalyx fraction and its active principle oncocalyxone A on in vitro culture of caprine secondary follicles and in vitro oocyte maturation
author Leiva-Revilla, Johanna
author_facet Leiva-Revilla, Johanna
Cadenas, Jesús
Vieira, Luis Alberto
Campello, Claudio Cabral
Celestino, Juliana Jales de Hollanda
Pessoa, Otília Deusdênia Loiola
Apgar, Gary Allen
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Ribeiro
Figueiredo, José Ricardo de
Maside, Carolina
author_role author
author2 Cadenas, Jesús
Vieira, Luis Alberto
Campello, Claudio Cabral
Celestino, Juliana Jales de Hollanda
Pessoa, Otília Deusdênia Loiola
Apgar, Gary Allen
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Ribeiro
Figueiredo, José Ricardo de
Maside, Carolina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leiva-Revilla, Johanna
Cadenas, Jesús
Vieira, Luis Alberto
Campello, Claudio Cabral
Celestino, Juliana Jales de Hollanda
Pessoa, Otília Deusdênia Loiola
Apgar, Gary Allen
Rodrigues, Ana Paula Ribeiro
Figueiredo, José Ricardo de
Maside, Carolina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Auxemma oncocalyx
Doxorubicin
Oncocalyxone A
Folliculogenesis
Oocytes.
Auxemma oncocalyx
Doxorubicina
Oncocalyxona A
Foliculogénesis
Ovócitos.
topic Auxemma oncocalyx
Doxorubicin
Oncocalyxone A
Folliculogenesis
Oocytes.
Auxemma oncocalyx
Doxorubicina
Oncocalyxona A
Foliculogénesis
Ovócitos.
description Crude extract of the heartwood of Auxemma oncocalyx (A. oncocalyx) and its main component i.e., Oncocalyxone A (onco A), have elevated antioxidant and anti-tumoral activity, but studies on the action of these drugs regarding folliculogenesis are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of A. oncocalyx and onco A on the in vitro culture of isolated secondary follicles and on the in vitro maturation of oocytes from caprine antral follicles grown in vivo. Isolated secondary follicles were randomly distributed in six groups; the non-cultured control was immediately fixed upon isolation. The remaining follicles were cultured for 7 days in ?-MEM+ alone (control) or supplemented with DMSO, doxorrubicin, A. oncocalyx or onco A. After culture, follicles were evaluated for antrum formation, growth rate, apoptosis (TUNEL) and cellular proliferation (PCNA), as well as gene expression of Bcl2 and Bax. Additionally, cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated and allocated into five treatments for in vitro maturation: control, cultured only in maturation base medium (TCM 199+); or supplemented with DMSO; DXR; A. oncocalyx or onco A. After in vitro maturation, oocyte chromatin configuration and viability were assessed. After 7 days of culture, there was a reduction (P < 0.05) in the percentage of morphologically intact follicles, antrum formation, growth rate and number of PCNA positive granulosa cells in DXR treatment compared to the other treatments. In the DXR treatment a higher percentage (P < 0.05) of TUNEL positive follicles and higher (P < 0.05) relative BAX:BCL2 mRNA ratio’s were observed. After in vitro maturation of the COCs DXR, A. oncocalyx and onco A treatments had a greater (P < 0.05) percentage of abnormal oocytes and a lower (P < 0.05) percentage of viable oocytes as compared with the control group. However, only DXR and onco A treatments increased (P < 0.05) the percentage of alive oocytes with abnormal chromatin configuration. There were no differences in maturation rates between the control group and DXR, A. oncocalyx and onco A treatments. In conclusion, under our culture conditions, A. oncocalyx and onco A do not exhibit a toxic effect on isolated secondary follicles and on maturation rates of COCs recovered from antral follicles, however, these drugs negatively affected the COCs viability.  Thus, the use of culture biotechnologies as an in vitro secondary follicle culture and in vitro oocyte maturation toxicity testing are appropriated methods to evaluate the possible effects of drugs in folliculogesis.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25905
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1361
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25905
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n3p1361
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25905/21113
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2017); 1361-1374
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 3 (2017); 1361-1374
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306075899428864