Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23388 |
Resumo: | Theileria equi is the causative agent of worldwide piroplasmosis, an important tick-borne disease of equids associated to a lifetime carrier state of infected horses. Since rapid, accessible and reliable tests have been posted as a challenge for clinicians, the aim of the present study was to verify the agreement between an in-house immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFA) and a commercial competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) in a population of 198 carthorses from Southern Brazil. The horse seroreactivity for T. equi revealed 152/198 (76.8%) positive samples by IFA and 155/198 (78.3%) by cELISA. Using cELISA as gold standard, IFA has shown a sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI = 86.18-95.03%) and specificity of 76.7% (95% CI = 62.26-86.85%), with a substantial degree of agreement (k = 0.8445). In conclusion, the in-house IFA may be used as a screening test for diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis. |
id |
UEL-11_452a8db682af2a76cf4de0df52ce9f01 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23388 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horsesEstudo comparativo de dois testes sorológicos para detecção de anticorpos anti-Theileria equi em equinosPiroplasmosisEquidsSeroepidemiologyTheileriosis.IroplasmoseEqüídeosSoroepidemiologiaTeileriose.Theileria equi is the causative agent of worldwide piroplasmosis, an important tick-borne disease of equids associated to a lifetime carrier state of infected horses. Since rapid, accessible and reliable tests have been posted as a challenge for clinicians, the aim of the present study was to verify the agreement between an in-house immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFA) and a commercial competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) in a population of 198 carthorses from Southern Brazil. The horse seroreactivity for T. equi revealed 152/198 (76.8%) positive samples by IFA and 155/198 (78.3%) by cELISA. Using cELISA as gold standard, IFA has shown a sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI = 86.18-95.03%) and specificity of 76.7% (95% CI = 62.26-86.85%), with a substantial degree of agreement (k = 0.8445). In conclusion, the in-house IFA may be used as a screening test for diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis.Theileria equi é o agente causador da piroplasmose no mundo, é uma importante doença transmitida por carrapatos nos equídeos em todo o mundo, e está associada ao estado de portador nos equinos infectados. Uma vez que testes rápidos, acessíveis e confiáveis são considerados um desafio para os clínicos, o objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a concordância entre os testes de imunofluorescência indireta (RIFI) e um ensaio imunoenzimático por competição comercial (cELISA) em uma população de 198 equinos de tração na região Sul do Brasil. A sororreatividade dos cavalos para T. equi mostrou 152/198 (76.8%) amostras positivas para RIFI e 155/198 (78.3%) amostras positivas para cELISA. Utilizando o cELISA como padrão ouro, a RIFI demonstrou sensibilidade de 91.6% (95% CI = 86.18-95.03%) e especificidade de 76.7% (95% CI = 62.26-86.85%), com uma concordância de grau substancial (k = 0.8445). Em conclusão, a RIFI pode ser utilizada como um teste de triagem para o diagnóstico de piroplasmose equina.UEL2015-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionshort communicationAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2338810.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4361Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6Supl2 (2015); 4361-4364Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6Supl2 (2015); 4361-43641679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23388/17558Vieira, Thállitha Samih Wischral JaymeValente, Jessica Damiana MarinhoSilva, Nayara BezerraSicupira, Patrícia Mara LopesBarros-Filho, Ivan RoqueBiondo, Alexander WelkerVieira, Rafael Felipe da CostaVidotto, Odiloninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-12-17T16:15:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23388Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-12-17T16:15Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses Estudo comparativo de dois testes sorológicos para detecção de anticorpos anti-Theileria equi em equinos |
title |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses Vieira, Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme Piroplasmosis Equids Seroepidemiology Theileriosis. Iroplasmose Eqüídeos Soroepidemiologia Teileriose. |
title_short |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses |
title_full |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses |
title_sort |
Comparative study of two serological tests for detection of anti-Theileria equi antibodies in horses |
author |
Vieira, Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme |
author_facet |
Vieira, Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme Valente, Jessica Damiana Marinho Silva, Nayara Bezerra Sicupira, Patrícia Mara Lopes Barros-Filho, Ivan Roque Biondo, Alexander Welker Vieira, Rafael Felipe da Costa Vidotto, Odilon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Valente, Jessica Damiana Marinho Silva, Nayara Bezerra Sicupira, Patrícia Mara Lopes Barros-Filho, Ivan Roque Biondo, Alexander Welker Vieira, Rafael Felipe da Costa Vidotto, Odilon |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira, Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme Valente, Jessica Damiana Marinho Silva, Nayara Bezerra Sicupira, Patrícia Mara Lopes Barros-Filho, Ivan Roque Biondo, Alexander Welker Vieira, Rafael Felipe da Costa Vidotto, Odilon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Piroplasmosis Equids Seroepidemiology Theileriosis. Iroplasmose Eqüídeos Soroepidemiologia Teileriose. |
topic |
Piroplasmosis Equids Seroepidemiology Theileriosis. Iroplasmose Eqüídeos Soroepidemiologia Teileriose. |
description |
Theileria equi is the causative agent of worldwide piroplasmosis, an important tick-borne disease of equids associated to a lifetime carrier state of infected horses. Since rapid, accessible and reliable tests have been posted as a challenge for clinicians, the aim of the present study was to verify the agreement between an in-house immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFA) and a commercial competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) in a population of 198 carthorses from Southern Brazil. The horse seroreactivity for T. equi revealed 152/198 (76.8%) positive samples by IFA and 155/198 (78.3%) by cELISA. Using cELISA as gold standard, IFA has shown a sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI = 86.18-95.03%) and specificity of 76.7% (95% CI = 62.26-86.85%), with a substantial degree of agreement (k = 0.8445). In conclusion, the in-house IFA may be used as a screening test for diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion short communication Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23388 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4361 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23388 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4361 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23388/17558 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6Supl2 (2015); 4361-4364 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6Supl2 (2015); 4361-4364 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306075016527872 |