Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandez, Leticia Andrea
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cibanal, Irene Laura, Paraluppi, Anna Livia, Freitas, Caroline de, Gallez, Lilliana María, Ceccato-Antonini, Sandra Regina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34595
Resumo: Dekkera bruxellensis is one of the most important contaminant yeasts of alcoholic fermentation. The use of propolis, which can selectively target contaminating yeasts without affecting the starter one, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, could be a useful nonconventional strategy for controlling the growth of contaminant yeasts. The objective of this research was to evaluate four samples of propolis produced by Apis mellifera honeybees from different regions of Argentina as antimicrobial agents against the growth of D. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae. Hydroalcoholic extracts of propolis were prepared with ethanol:water (70:30 v/v), and the specific absorbance and final concentration of the samples were evaluated. A qualitative in vitro assay in solid medium was performed with different propolis concentrations, and the evaluation of yeast growth was based on a qualitative scale. A quantitative in vitro assay in liquid medium was also performed to assess the yeast cell number, using two different propolis concentrations. The cell number of D. bruxellensis decreased 1.52 and 1.85 log cycles with the two propolis extracts utilised at a concentration of 4.5 mg mL-1 while the cell number of S. cerevisiae decreased 0.48 and 0.76 log cycles with the same samples of propolis. The results from both assays demonstrated the selectivity of propolis use on the yeast species, leading to a higher inhibition of D. bruxellensis growth. This indicates a good potential for using propolis at the concentration of 4.5 mg mL-1, as a nonconventional strategy to control the growth of D. bruxellensis without significantly affecting S. cerevisiae, the yeast starter of ethanol fermentation.
id UEL-11_4769865910f543eda4412b6b167d8941
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34595
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentationPrópolis como alternativa potencial para o controle de Dekkera bruxellensis em fermentação alcoólicaApis mellifera honeybeesAntimicrobial activityHydroalcoholic extractsArgentinaSaccharomyces cerevisiae.Abelhas Apis melliferaAtividade antimicrobianaExtratos hidroalcoólicosArgentinaSaccharomyces cerevisiae.Dekkera bruxellensis is one of the most important contaminant yeasts of alcoholic fermentation. The use of propolis, which can selectively target contaminating yeasts without affecting the starter one, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, could be a useful nonconventional strategy for controlling the growth of contaminant yeasts. The objective of this research was to evaluate four samples of propolis produced by Apis mellifera honeybees from different regions of Argentina as antimicrobial agents against the growth of D. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae. Hydroalcoholic extracts of propolis were prepared with ethanol:water (70:30 v/v), and the specific absorbance and final concentration of the samples were evaluated. A qualitative in vitro assay in solid medium was performed with different propolis concentrations, and the evaluation of yeast growth was based on a qualitative scale. A quantitative in vitro assay in liquid medium was also performed to assess the yeast cell number, using two different propolis concentrations. The cell number of D. bruxellensis decreased 1.52 and 1.85 log cycles with the two propolis extracts utilised at a concentration of 4.5 mg mL-1 while the cell number of S. cerevisiae decreased 0.48 and 0.76 log cycles with the same samples of propolis. The results from both assays demonstrated the selectivity of propolis use on the yeast species, leading to a higher inhibition of D. bruxellensis growth. This indicates a good potential for using propolis at the concentration of 4.5 mg mL-1, as a nonconventional strategy to control the growth of D. bruxellensis without significantly affecting S. cerevisiae, the yeast starter of ethanol fermentation.Dekkera bruxellensis é uma das mais importantes leveduras contaminantes da fermentação alcoólica. O uso de própolis, que pode seletivamente afetar a levedura contaminante mas não a levedura do processo, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, pode ser uma estratégia não convencional útil para o controle de leveduras contaminantes. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar quatro amostras de própolis produzidas por Apis mellifera de diferentes regiões da Argentina como agentes antimicrobianos no controle do crescimento de D. bruxellensis e S. cerevisiae. Foram preparados extratos hidroalcoólicos de própolis com etanol: água (70:30 v/v) e avaliadas a absorbância específica e concentração final das amostras. Um ensaio qualitativo in vitro foi realizado em meio sólido com diferentes concentrações de própolis e a avaliação do crescimento da levedura foi baseada em uma escala qualitativa. Um ensaio quantitativo in vitro em meio líquido foi realizado com duas concentrações de própolis, avaliando-se o número de leveduras. O número de células de D. bruxellensis diminuiu 1,52 e 1,85 ciclos log com dois extratos de própolis na concentração de 4,5 mg mL-1 enquanto para S. cerevisiae, a diminuição no número de células foi de 0,48 e 0,76 ciclos log com as mesmas amostras de própolis. Os resultados de ambos os ensaios demonstraram claramente a seletividade do efeito do emprego de própolis nas leveduras estudadas, resultando em maior inibição no crescimento da levedura D. bruxellensis. Isso indica a boa perspectiva do uso de própolis, na concentração de 4,5 mg mL-1, como uma estratégia não convencional para controlar o crescimento de D. bruxellensis sem afetar substancialmente S. cerevisiae, a levedura agente da fermentação etanólica.UEL2019-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3459510.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5p2071Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 5 (2019); 2071-2078Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 5 (2019); 2071-20781679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34595/25660Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandez, Leticia AndreaCibanal, Irene LauraParaluppi, Anna LiviaFreitas, Caroline deGallez, Lilliana MaríaCeccato-Antonini, Sandra Regina2022-10-19T12:08:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34595Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-19T12:08:37Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
Própolis como alternativa potencial para o controle de Dekkera bruxellensis em fermentação alcoólica
title Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
spellingShingle Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
Fernandez, Leticia Andrea
Apis mellifera honeybees
Antimicrobial activity
Hydroalcoholic extracts
Argentina
Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Abelhas Apis mellifera
Atividade antimicrobiana
Extratos hidroalcoólicos
Argentina
Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
title_short Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
title_full Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
title_fullStr Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
title_full_unstemmed Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
title_sort Propolis as a potential alternative for the control of Dekkera bruxellensis in bioethanol fermentation
author Fernandez, Leticia Andrea
author_facet Fernandez, Leticia Andrea
Cibanal, Irene Laura
Paraluppi, Anna Livia
Freitas, Caroline de
Gallez, Lilliana María
Ceccato-Antonini, Sandra Regina
author_role author
author2 Cibanal, Irene Laura
Paraluppi, Anna Livia
Freitas, Caroline de
Gallez, Lilliana María
Ceccato-Antonini, Sandra Regina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandez, Leticia Andrea
Cibanal, Irene Laura
Paraluppi, Anna Livia
Freitas, Caroline de
Gallez, Lilliana María
Ceccato-Antonini, Sandra Regina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apis mellifera honeybees
Antimicrobial activity
Hydroalcoholic extracts
Argentina
Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Abelhas Apis mellifera
Atividade antimicrobiana
Extratos hidroalcoólicos
Argentina
Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
topic Apis mellifera honeybees
Antimicrobial activity
Hydroalcoholic extracts
Argentina
Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Abelhas Apis mellifera
Atividade antimicrobiana
Extratos hidroalcoólicos
Argentina
Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
description Dekkera bruxellensis is one of the most important contaminant yeasts of alcoholic fermentation. The use of propolis, which can selectively target contaminating yeasts without affecting the starter one, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, could be a useful nonconventional strategy for controlling the growth of contaminant yeasts. The objective of this research was to evaluate four samples of propolis produced by Apis mellifera honeybees from different regions of Argentina as antimicrobial agents against the growth of D. bruxellensis and S. cerevisiae. Hydroalcoholic extracts of propolis were prepared with ethanol:water (70:30 v/v), and the specific absorbance and final concentration of the samples were evaluated. A qualitative in vitro assay in solid medium was performed with different propolis concentrations, and the evaluation of yeast growth was based on a qualitative scale. A quantitative in vitro assay in liquid medium was also performed to assess the yeast cell number, using two different propolis concentrations. The cell number of D. bruxellensis decreased 1.52 and 1.85 log cycles with the two propolis extracts utilised at a concentration of 4.5 mg mL-1 while the cell number of S. cerevisiae decreased 0.48 and 0.76 log cycles with the same samples of propolis. The results from both assays demonstrated the selectivity of propolis use on the yeast species, leading to a higher inhibition of D. bruxellensis growth. This indicates a good potential for using propolis at the concentration of 4.5 mg mL-1, as a nonconventional strategy to control the growth of D. bruxellensis without significantly affecting S. cerevisiae, the yeast starter of ethanol fermentation.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34595
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5p2071
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34595
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5p2071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/34595/25660
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 5 (2019); 2071-2078
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 5 (2019); 2071-2078
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306080508968960