Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Jaqueline França dos
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Mariani, Tatiana Casimiro, Dellla Nina, Marcos Ishimoto, Ferraz, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães, Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368
Resumo: The scientific basis of bone transplantation was established during the mid-nineteenth century, when the osteogenic properties of the bone and periosteum, beneficial influence of cold preservation of bones, and first conventional attempt to store bones for elective use, were described. A bone bank has several advantages, such as the immediate availability of grafts in large quantities, and different shapes and sizes, and maintenance of osteoinductive activity in grafts. In addition, it reduces patient blood loss, surgical time, and quantity of anesthetics required. Clinical applications include the correction of comminuted fractures, treatment of non-union bones, and replacement of bone loss due to infections or malignancies. The success of these procedures depends on the preservation and integrity of the graft. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a canine bone bank (Canis familiaris) by quantifying the bacterial contamination of bone grafts preserved at –24°C. The samples were evaluated through a monthly assessment of bacteriological cultures over a period of 6 months. The harvest method was efficient and sterile, reducing the risk of contamination. We conclude that the techniques chosen for the implementation of a bone bank were effective and feasible (use of a common freezer reaching a temperature below –24°C). The viability of the bones was attested during a 6-month period, and the samples demonstrated a 100% sterility rate.
id UEL-11_4e818fab43df92c62097412f0563749d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19368
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bankAvaliação bacteriológica de enxertos ósseos submetidos à técnica criogênica a -24°C em banco de ossos de cães (Canis familiaris)Bone bankCanineCryogenicsGrafts.Banco de ossosCãesCriogeniaEnxertos.The scientific basis of bone transplantation was established during the mid-nineteenth century, when the osteogenic properties of the bone and periosteum, beneficial influence of cold preservation of bones, and first conventional attempt to store bones for elective use, were described. A bone bank has several advantages, such as the immediate availability of grafts in large quantities, and different shapes and sizes, and maintenance of osteoinductive activity in grafts. In addition, it reduces patient blood loss, surgical time, and quantity of anesthetics required. Clinical applications include the correction of comminuted fractures, treatment of non-union bones, and replacement of bone loss due to infections or malignancies. The success of these procedures depends on the preservation and integrity of the graft. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a canine bone bank (Canis familiaris) by quantifying the bacterial contamination of bone grafts preserved at –24°C. The samples were evaluated through a monthly assessment of bacteriological cultures over a period of 6 months. The harvest method was efficient and sterile, reducing the risk of contamination. We conclude that the techniques chosen for the implementation of a bone bank were effective and feasible (use of a common freezer reaching a temperature below –24°C). The viability of the bones was attested during a 6-month period, and the samples demonstrated a 100% sterility rate.A base científica do transplante ósseo foi estabelecida na metade do século IX quando foram descritas as propriedades osteogênicas do osso e do periósteo, a influência benéfica do frio na preservação das mesmas, e a primeira tentativa convencional para armazenar ossos para uso eletivo. As vantagens do banco de ossos são a disponibilidade imediata do enxerto em quantidade, forma e tamanhos variados, com a manutenção de sua atividade osteoindutora, e redução do tempo cirúrgico, anestésico e perda sanguínea do paciente. Dentre as aplicações clínicas cita-se a correção de fraturas cominutivas, tratamento de não união óssea e reposição de perda óssea devido a infecções ou neoplasias. O sucesso destes procedimentos depende dos parâmetros de conservação e integridade do enxerto. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a viabilidade da manutenção de banco de ossos de cães (Canis familiaris) quantificando a contaminação bacteriológica dos enxertos ósseos, submetidos à técnica criogênica (-24°C) e avaliados através de realização mensal de culturas bacteriológicas por um período de seis meses. O método de coleta mostrou-se eficiente e propiciou adequada manutenção de esterilidade durante o período de coleta, diminuindo o risco de contaminação dos ossos. Concluímos que as técnicas escolhidas para implantação do banco de ossos mostraram-se eficientes e factíveis, com freezer comum de temperatura abaixo de –24°C, comprovou-se a viabilidade dos ossos por um período de 6 meses, obtendo-se taxa de esterilidade dos mesmos de 100% através das culturas bacteriológicas.UEL2015-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1936810.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3713Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2015); 3713-3720Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6 (2015); 3713-37201679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368/17454http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Jaqueline França dosMariani, Tatiana CasimiroDellla Nina, Marcos IshimotoFerraz, Vanessa Couto de MagalhãesFerrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada2022-12-05T11:36:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19368Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-05T11:36:23Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
Avaliação bacteriológica de enxertos ósseos submetidos à técnica criogênica a -24°C em banco de ossos de cães (Canis familiaris)
title Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
spellingShingle Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
Santos, Jaqueline França dos
Bone bank
Canine
Cryogenics
Grafts.
Banco de ossos
Cães
Criogenia
Enxertos.
title_short Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
title_full Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
title_fullStr Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
title_full_unstemmed Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
title_sort Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
author Santos, Jaqueline França dos
author_facet Santos, Jaqueline França dos
Mariani, Tatiana Casimiro
Dellla Nina, Marcos Ishimoto
Ferraz, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães
Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada
author_role author
author2 Mariani, Tatiana Casimiro
Dellla Nina, Marcos Ishimoto
Ferraz, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães
Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Jaqueline França dos
Mariani, Tatiana Casimiro
Dellla Nina, Marcos Ishimoto
Ferraz, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães
Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone bank
Canine
Cryogenics
Grafts.
Banco de ossos
Cães
Criogenia
Enxertos.
topic Bone bank
Canine
Cryogenics
Grafts.
Banco de ossos
Cães
Criogenia
Enxertos.
description The scientific basis of bone transplantation was established during the mid-nineteenth century, when the osteogenic properties of the bone and periosteum, beneficial influence of cold preservation of bones, and first conventional attempt to store bones for elective use, were described. A bone bank has several advantages, such as the immediate availability of grafts in large quantities, and different shapes and sizes, and maintenance of osteoinductive activity in grafts. In addition, it reduces patient blood loss, surgical time, and quantity of anesthetics required. Clinical applications include the correction of comminuted fractures, treatment of non-union bones, and replacement of bone loss due to infections or malignancies. The success of these procedures depends on the preservation and integrity of the graft. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a canine bone bank (Canis familiaris) by quantifying the bacterial contamination of bone grafts preserved at –24°C. The samples were evaluated through a monthly assessment of bacteriological cultures over a period of 6 months. The harvest method was efficient and sterile, reducing the risk of contamination. We conclude that the techniques chosen for the implementation of a bone bank were effective and feasible (use of a common freezer reaching a temperature below –24°C). The viability of the bones was attested during a 6-month period, and the samples demonstrated a 100% sterility rate.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3713
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3713
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368/17454
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2015); 3713-3720
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6 (2015); 3713-3720
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306072709660672