Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368 |
Resumo: | The scientific basis of bone transplantation was established during the mid-nineteenth century, when the osteogenic properties of the bone and periosteum, beneficial influence of cold preservation of bones, and first conventional attempt to store bones for elective use, were described. A bone bank has several advantages, such as the immediate availability of grafts in large quantities, and different shapes and sizes, and maintenance of osteoinductive activity in grafts. In addition, it reduces patient blood loss, surgical time, and quantity of anesthetics required. Clinical applications include the correction of comminuted fractures, treatment of non-union bones, and replacement of bone loss due to infections or malignancies. The success of these procedures depends on the preservation and integrity of the graft. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a canine bone bank (Canis familiaris) by quantifying the bacterial contamination of bone grafts preserved at –24°C. The samples were evaluated through a monthly assessment of bacteriological cultures over a period of 6 months. The harvest method was efficient and sterile, reducing the risk of contamination. We conclude that the techniques chosen for the implementation of a bone bank were effective and feasible (use of a common freezer reaching a temperature below –24°C). The viability of the bones was attested during a 6-month period, and the samples demonstrated a 100% sterility rate. |
id |
UEL-11_4e818fab43df92c62097412f0563749d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19368 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bankAvaliação bacteriológica de enxertos ósseos submetidos à técnica criogênica a -24°C em banco de ossos de cães (Canis familiaris)Bone bankCanineCryogenicsGrafts.Banco de ossosCãesCriogeniaEnxertos.The scientific basis of bone transplantation was established during the mid-nineteenth century, when the osteogenic properties of the bone and periosteum, beneficial influence of cold preservation of bones, and first conventional attempt to store bones for elective use, were described. A bone bank has several advantages, such as the immediate availability of grafts in large quantities, and different shapes and sizes, and maintenance of osteoinductive activity in grafts. In addition, it reduces patient blood loss, surgical time, and quantity of anesthetics required. Clinical applications include the correction of comminuted fractures, treatment of non-union bones, and replacement of bone loss due to infections or malignancies. The success of these procedures depends on the preservation and integrity of the graft. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a canine bone bank (Canis familiaris) by quantifying the bacterial contamination of bone grafts preserved at –24°C. The samples were evaluated through a monthly assessment of bacteriological cultures over a period of 6 months. The harvest method was efficient and sterile, reducing the risk of contamination. We conclude that the techniques chosen for the implementation of a bone bank were effective and feasible (use of a common freezer reaching a temperature below –24°C). The viability of the bones was attested during a 6-month period, and the samples demonstrated a 100% sterility rate.A base científica do transplante ósseo foi estabelecida na metade do século IX quando foram descritas as propriedades osteogênicas do osso e do periósteo, a influência benéfica do frio na preservação das mesmas, e a primeira tentativa convencional para armazenar ossos para uso eletivo. As vantagens do banco de ossos são a disponibilidade imediata do enxerto em quantidade, forma e tamanhos variados, com a manutenção de sua atividade osteoindutora, e redução do tempo cirúrgico, anestésico e perda sanguínea do paciente. Dentre as aplicações clínicas cita-se a correção de fraturas cominutivas, tratamento de não união óssea e reposição de perda óssea devido a infecções ou neoplasias. O sucesso destes procedimentos depende dos parâmetros de conservação e integridade do enxerto. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a viabilidade da manutenção de banco de ossos de cães (Canis familiaris) quantificando a contaminação bacteriológica dos enxertos ósseos, submetidos à técnica criogênica (-24°C) e avaliados através de realização mensal de culturas bacteriológicas por um período de seis meses. O método de coleta mostrou-se eficiente e propiciou adequada manutenção de esterilidade durante o período de coleta, diminuindo o risco de contaminação dos ossos. Concluímos que as técnicas escolhidas para implantação do banco de ossos mostraram-se eficientes e factíveis, com freezer comum de temperatura abaixo de –24°C, comprovou-se a viabilidade dos ossos por um período de 6 meses, obtendo-se taxa de esterilidade dos mesmos de 100% através das culturas bacteriológicas.UEL2015-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1936810.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3713Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2015); 3713-3720Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6 (2015); 3713-37201679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368/17454http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Jaqueline França dosMariani, Tatiana CasimiroDellla Nina, Marcos IshimotoFerraz, Vanessa Couto de MagalhãesFerrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada2022-12-05T11:36:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19368Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-05T11:36:23Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank Avaliação bacteriológica de enxertos ósseos submetidos à técnica criogênica a -24°C em banco de ossos de cães (Canis familiaris) |
title |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank |
spellingShingle |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank Santos, Jaqueline França dos Bone bank Canine Cryogenics Grafts. Banco de ossos Cães Criogenia Enxertos. |
title_short |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank |
title_full |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank |
title_fullStr |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank |
title_sort |
Bacteriological evaluation of bone grafts stored by cryogenic freezing at –24°C from a canine (Canis familiaris) bone bank |
author |
Santos, Jaqueline França dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Jaqueline França dos Mariani, Tatiana Casimiro Dellla Nina, Marcos Ishimoto Ferraz, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mariani, Tatiana Casimiro Dellla Nina, Marcos Ishimoto Ferraz, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Jaqueline França dos Mariani, Tatiana Casimiro Dellla Nina, Marcos Ishimoto Ferraz, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães Ferrigno, Cassio Ricardo Auada |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bone bank Canine Cryogenics Grafts. Banco de ossos Cães Criogenia Enxertos. |
topic |
Bone bank Canine Cryogenics Grafts. Banco de ossos Cães Criogenia Enxertos. |
description |
The scientific basis of bone transplantation was established during the mid-nineteenth century, when the osteogenic properties of the bone and periosteum, beneficial influence of cold preservation of bones, and first conventional attempt to store bones for elective use, were described. A bone bank has several advantages, such as the immediate availability of grafts in large quantities, and different shapes and sizes, and maintenance of osteoinductive activity in grafts. In addition, it reduces patient blood loss, surgical time, and quantity of anesthetics required. Clinical applications include the correction of comminuted fractures, treatment of non-union bones, and replacement of bone loss due to infections or malignancies. The success of these procedures depends on the preservation and integrity of the graft. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a canine bone bank (Canis familiaris) by quantifying the bacterial contamination of bone grafts preserved at –24°C. The samples were evaluated through a monthly assessment of bacteriological cultures over a period of 6 months. The harvest method was efficient and sterile, reducing the risk of contamination. We conclude that the techniques chosen for the implementation of a bone bank were effective and feasible (use of a common freezer reaching a temperature below –24°C). The viability of the bones was attested during a 6-month period, and the samples demonstrated a 100% sterility rate. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3713 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6p3713 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/19368/17454 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6 (2015); 3713-3720 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6 (2015); 3713-3720 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306072709660672 |