Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20074 |
Resumo: | Agricultural gypsum is considered an important tool in the improvement of soil chemical properties; however, crop responses to its application are contradictory. Studies have shown that the physical effects of soil mechanical intervention is short-lasting and has little impact on grain yield. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate corn and soybean response to soil mechanical interventions and to the application of agricultural gypsum to soil surface. The experiment involved cultivation of two crops each of soybean (i. e., 2009/2010 and 2011/2012 crop years) and corn (i. e., 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 crop years) with application of agricultural gypsum (0, 2, 4 and 6 Mg ha-1) to the soil surface during the winter of 2009, after 12 years under continuous no-tillage system and two types of mechanical intervention: chisel plowing and plowing+harrowing. Soybean responded to mechanical interventions conducted in an area under continuous no-tillage system, but showed an increase of only 10% (114 kg ha-1) in the grain yield with the use of agricultural gypsum in the 2011/2012 crop year. Gypsum caused a higher increase in the grain yield of corn than that of soybean. Moreover, the crop response to gypsum application varied considerably in the 2010/2011 crop year after mechanical interventions under continuous no-tillage cultivation. |
id |
UEL-11_5a50eaa2d001d7ede190fe9741232a1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20074 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surfaceResposta da soja e milho a intervenção mecânica do solo e aplicação de gesso agrícola em superfícieGlycinemax (L)No-tillage systemYieldZea mays.Glycine max (L)Sistema plantio diretoProdutividadeZea mays.Agricultural gypsum is considered an important tool in the improvement of soil chemical properties; however, crop responses to its application are contradictory. Studies have shown that the physical effects of soil mechanical intervention is short-lasting and has little impact on grain yield. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate corn and soybean response to soil mechanical interventions and to the application of agricultural gypsum to soil surface. The experiment involved cultivation of two crops each of soybean (i. e., 2009/2010 and 2011/2012 crop years) and corn (i. e., 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 crop years) with application of agricultural gypsum (0, 2, 4 and 6 Mg ha-1) to the soil surface during the winter of 2009, after 12 years under continuous no-tillage system and two types of mechanical intervention: chisel plowing and plowing+harrowing. Soybean responded to mechanical interventions conducted in an area under continuous no-tillage system, but showed an increase of only 10% (114 kg ha-1) in the grain yield with the use of agricultural gypsum in the 2011/2012 crop year. Gypsum caused a higher increase in the grain yield of corn than that of soybean. Moreover, the crop response to gypsum application varied considerably in the 2010/2011 crop year after mechanical interventions under continuous no-tillage cultivation. O gesso agrícola tem sido apontado como importante ferramenta para a melhoria do perfil químico do solo, porém, as respostas das culturas, especificamente as de grãos são contraditórias. Para as intervenções mecânicas de solo, os resultados existentes revelam efeito físico pouco duradouro e com pouco impacto sobre o rendimento de grãos. Por isso, o objetivo do trabalho foi verificar as respostas do milho e da soja a intervenções mecânicas do solo e aplicação de gesso agrícola em superfície. O experimento consistiu no cultivo de duas safras de grãos de soja (2009/2010 e 2011/2012) e duas de milho (2010/2011 e 2012/2013), com aplicação de gesso agrícola (0; 2; 4 e 6 Mg ha-1) em superfície no período invernal de 2009, após 12 anos de plantio direto contínuo e após dois tipos de intervenções mecânicas: (escarificação e aração+gradagem). Os resultados mostraram que a soja responde a intervenções mecânicas realizadas em área de plantio direto contínuo e, o incremento no rendimento de grãos com o uso de gesso agrícola foi de apenas 10% (114 kg ha-1) e somente na safra 2011/2012. Na cultura do milho houve maior incremento no rendimento de grãos com as doses de gesso em relação à soja e com variação na resposta ao gesso na safra 2010/2011 com as intervenções mecânicas aplicadas no plantio direto contínuo. UEL2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa científicaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2007410.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p95Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2016); 95-102Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 1 (2016); 95-1021679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20074/17979http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSomavilla, LucindoPinto, Marlo Adriano BisonBasso, Claudir JoséDa Ros, Clovis OrlandoSilva, Vanderlei Rodrigues daBrun, ThiarlesSanti, Antônio Luis2022-12-02T12:58:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20074Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-02T12:58:07Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface Resposta da soja e milho a intervenção mecânica do solo e aplicação de gesso agrícola em superfície |
title |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface |
spellingShingle |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface Somavilla, Lucindo Glycinemax (L) No-tillage system Yield Zea mays. Glycine max (L) Sistema plantio direto Produtividade Zea mays. |
title_short |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface |
title_full |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface |
title_fullStr |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface |
title_full_unstemmed |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface |
title_sort |
Response of soybean and corn to soil mechanical intervention and agricultural gypsum application to the soil surface |
author |
Somavilla, Lucindo |
author_facet |
Somavilla, Lucindo Pinto, Marlo Adriano Bison Basso, Claudir José Da Ros, Clovis Orlando Silva, Vanderlei Rodrigues da Brun, Thiarles Santi, Antônio Luis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinto, Marlo Adriano Bison Basso, Claudir José Da Ros, Clovis Orlando Silva, Vanderlei Rodrigues da Brun, Thiarles Santi, Antônio Luis |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Somavilla, Lucindo Pinto, Marlo Adriano Bison Basso, Claudir José Da Ros, Clovis Orlando Silva, Vanderlei Rodrigues da Brun, Thiarles Santi, Antônio Luis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glycinemax (L) No-tillage system Yield Zea mays. Glycine max (L) Sistema plantio direto Produtividade Zea mays. |
topic |
Glycinemax (L) No-tillage system Yield Zea mays. Glycine max (L) Sistema plantio direto Produtividade Zea mays. |
description |
Agricultural gypsum is considered an important tool in the improvement of soil chemical properties; however, crop responses to its application are contradictory. Studies have shown that the physical effects of soil mechanical intervention is short-lasting and has little impact on grain yield. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate corn and soybean response to soil mechanical interventions and to the application of agricultural gypsum to soil surface. The experiment involved cultivation of two crops each of soybean (i. e., 2009/2010 and 2011/2012 crop years) and corn (i. e., 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 crop years) with application of agricultural gypsum (0, 2, 4 and 6 Mg ha-1) to the soil surface during the winter of 2009, after 12 years under continuous no-tillage system and two types of mechanical intervention: chisel plowing and plowing+harrowing. Soybean responded to mechanical interventions conducted in an area under continuous no-tillage system, but showed an increase of only 10% (114 kg ha-1) in the grain yield with the use of agricultural gypsum in the 2011/2012 crop year. Gypsum caused a higher increase in the grain yield of corn than that of soybean. Moreover, the crop response to gypsum application varied considerably in the 2010/2011 crop year after mechanical interventions under continuous no-tillage cultivation. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa científica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20074 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p95 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20074 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p95 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/20074/17979 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2016); 95-102 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 1 (2016); 95-102 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306073237094400 |