Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12534 |
Resumo: | The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of the addition of chemical and bacterial additive in the ensiling of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) on chemical composition, pH, kinectic fraction and in situ degradation of nutritions components of silages. Five rumen-cannulated ½ Simental + ½ Zebu steers were allotted to a completely randomized design. The steers were placed in individual cages and they were fed with diets with 76% forage (%DM). Five silages were evaluated: control – sugar cane, no additives; urea – sugar cane + 0.5% of urea (wet basis); inoculant – sugar cane inoculated with LactoSilo® (390 g/40 t forage); NaOH – sugar cane + 1.0% of sodium hydroxide (wet basis); CaOH – sugar cane + 0.6% of calcium hydroxide (wet basis). The silage additives with sodium hydroxide showed the highest pH values before (11.20) and after (4.87) for silage. No differences were observed among the silages for dry matter (26.85), crude protein (5.25) and acid detergent fiber (57.21). Fractionation of dry matter and organic matter of silages showed similar behavior, with higher values of the soluble fraction (fraction A) for silages with sodium hydroxide (45.86 and 30.95%) and calcium hydroxide (29.47 and 26.13%). The use of sodium hydroxide allowed obtaining higher values for the degradation of cell wall components of silages from cane sugar. The potencial and effective degradability with 3, 5 and 8%/h of passage rate were respectively 88.44, 64.45, 56.73 and 49.83% for NDF and 82.57, 55.51, 46.72 and 38.83% for ADF, indicating that the use of sodium hydroxide as chemical additives can improve the nutritive value of cane sugar silage. |
id |
UEL-11_609bfa8320b6db1a5310b08e981c7ac4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12534 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additivesComposição química e degradabilidade ruminal de silagens da cana-de-açúcar tratada com aditivos químicos e bacterianoCalcium hydroxideRuminal kineticsSodium hydroxideUreaCinética ruminalHidróxido de cálcioHidróxido de sódioUréia.ZootecniaThe objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of the addition of chemical and bacterial additive in the ensiling of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) on chemical composition, pH, kinectic fraction and in situ degradation of nutritions components of silages. Five rumen-cannulated ½ Simental + ½ Zebu steers were allotted to a completely randomized design. The steers were placed in individual cages and they were fed with diets with 76% forage (%DM). Five silages were evaluated: control – sugar cane, no additives; urea – sugar cane + 0.5% of urea (wet basis); inoculant – sugar cane inoculated with LactoSilo® (390 g/40 t forage); NaOH – sugar cane + 1.0% of sodium hydroxide (wet basis); CaOH – sugar cane + 0.6% of calcium hydroxide (wet basis). The silage additives with sodium hydroxide showed the highest pH values before (11.20) and after (4.87) for silage. No differences were observed among the silages for dry matter (26.85), crude protein (5.25) and acid detergent fiber (57.21). Fractionation of dry matter and organic matter of silages showed similar behavior, with higher values of the soluble fraction (fraction A) for silages with sodium hydroxide (45.86 and 30.95%) and calcium hydroxide (29.47 and 26.13%). The use of sodium hydroxide allowed obtaining higher values for the degradation of cell wall components of silages from cane sugar. The potencial and effective degradability with 3, 5 and 8%/h of passage rate were respectively 88.44, 64.45, 56.73 and 49.83% for NDF and 82.57, 55.51, 46.72 and 38.83% for ADF, indicating that the use of sodium hydroxide as chemical additives can improve the nutritive value of cane sugar silage.Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito da inclusão de aditivos químicos e bacterianos na ensilagem de cana-de-açúcar sobre a composição, pH, fracionamento e cinética de degradação in situ dos componentes nutritivos. Utilizaram-se cinco bovinos ½ Simental + ½ Zebu providos de cânula ruminal, alocados em delineamento inteiramente casualizado e alimentados com dietas contendo 76% de volumoso (% MS). Foram avaliadas cinco silagens: controle – cana-de-açúcar sem aditivo; uréia – cana-de-açúcar acrescida de 1,0% de uréia na massa verde; inoculante – cana-de-açúcar inoculada com LactoSilo® na proporção de 390 g/40 t material ensilado; NaOH – cana-de-açúcar hidrolisada com hidróxido de sódio a 1,0% do material ensilado; CaOH – cana-de-açúcar hidrolisada com hidróxido de cálcio a 0,6% do material ensilado. A silagem aditivada com hidróxido de sódio apresentou os maiores valores de pH antes (11,20) e após (4,87) a ensilagem. Não houve diferença para os teores de matéria seca (MS), proteína bruta e e fibra em detergente ácido entre as silagens avaliadas, com valores médios de 26,85; 5,25 e 57,21, respectivamente. O fracionamento da MS e da matéria orgânica das silagens avaliadas apresentaram comportamento semelhante, com maiores valores da fração solúvel (A) para as silagens aditivadas com hidróxido de sódio (45,86 e 30,95%) e hidróxido de cálcio (29,47 e 26,13%). A utilização do hidróxido de sódio possibilitou obtenção de maiores valores para a degradabilidade dos componentes da parede celular da silagem de cana-de-açúcar. A degradabilidade potencial para a FDN e FDA foram, respectivamente, 88,44 e 82,57% e os valores relatados para degradabilidade efetiva à taxa de passagem de 3; 5 e 8%/h foram, respectivamente; 64,45; 56,73 e 49,83 para a FDN e 55,51; 46,72 e 38,83 para a FDA, indicando que a utilização de hidróxido de sódio como aditivo químico pode melhorar o valor nutritivo da cana-de-açúcar ensilada. UEL2013-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1253410.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3341Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 6Supl2 (2012); 3341-3352Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 6Supl2 (2012); 3341-33521679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12534/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFortaleza, Ana Paula de SouzaSilva, Leandro das Dores Ferreira daZackm, EdwardBarbero, Rondineli PavezziRibeiro, Edson Luis de AzambujaPegoraro, MauriciusSantos, Luiz Eduardo dosMizubuti, Ivone Yurika2023-01-26T16:03:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12534Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-26T16:03Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives Composição química e degradabilidade ruminal de silagens da cana-de-açúcar tratada com aditivos químicos e bacteriano |
title |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives |
spellingShingle |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives Fortaleza, Ana Paula de Souza Calcium hydroxide Ruminal kinetics Sodium hydroxide Urea Cinética ruminal Hidróxido de cálcio Hidróxido de sódio Uréia. Zootecnia |
title_short |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives |
title_full |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives |
title_fullStr |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives |
title_sort |
Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of the sugar cane silage treated with chemical and bacterial additives |
author |
Fortaleza, Ana Paula de Souza |
author_facet |
Fortaleza, Ana Paula de Souza Silva, Leandro das Dores Ferreira da Zackm, Edward Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi Ribeiro, Edson Luis de Azambuja Pegoraro, Mauricius Santos, Luiz Eduardo dos Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Leandro das Dores Ferreira da Zackm, Edward Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi Ribeiro, Edson Luis de Azambuja Pegoraro, Mauricius Santos, Luiz Eduardo dos Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fortaleza, Ana Paula de Souza Silva, Leandro das Dores Ferreira da Zackm, Edward Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi Ribeiro, Edson Luis de Azambuja Pegoraro, Mauricius Santos, Luiz Eduardo dos Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Calcium hydroxide Ruminal kinetics Sodium hydroxide Urea Cinética ruminal Hidróxido de cálcio Hidróxido de sódio Uréia. Zootecnia |
topic |
Calcium hydroxide Ruminal kinetics Sodium hydroxide Urea Cinética ruminal Hidróxido de cálcio Hidróxido de sódio Uréia. Zootecnia |
description |
The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of the addition of chemical and bacterial additive in the ensiling of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) on chemical composition, pH, kinectic fraction and in situ degradation of nutritions components of silages. Five rumen-cannulated ½ Simental + ½ Zebu steers were allotted to a completely randomized design. The steers were placed in individual cages and they were fed with diets with 76% forage (%DM). Five silages were evaluated: control – sugar cane, no additives; urea – sugar cane + 0.5% of urea (wet basis); inoculant – sugar cane inoculated with LactoSilo® (390 g/40 t forage); NaOH – sugar cane + 1.0% of sodium hydroxide (wet basis); CaOH – sugar cane + 0.6% of calcium hydroxide (wet basis). The silage additives with sodium hydroxide showed the highest pH values before (11.20) and after (4.87) for silage. No differences were observed among the silages for dry matter (26.85), crude protein (5.25) and acid detergent fiber (57.21). Fractionation of dry matter and organic matter of silages showed similar behavior, with higher values of the soluble fraction (fraction A) for silages with sodium hydroxide (45.86 and 30.95%) and calcium hydroxide (29.47 and 26.13%). The use of sodium hydroxide allowed obtaining higher values for the degradation of cell wall components of silages from cane sugar. The potencial and effective degradability with 3, 5 and 8%/h of passage rate were respectively 88.44, 64.45, 56.73 and 49.83% for NDF and 82.57, 55.51, 46.72 and 38.83% for ADF, indicating that the use of sodium hydroxide as chemical additives can improve the nutritive value of cane sugar silage. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12534 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3341 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12534 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3341 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12534/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 6Supl2 (2012); 3341-3352 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 6Supl2 (2012); 3341-3352 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306067726827520 |