Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maciel, Jonas Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Brustolin, Joice Magali, Krawczak, Felipe da Silva, Alves, Marta Elena Machado, Pivoto, Felipe Lamberti, Moraes-Filho, Jonas, Labruna, Marcelo Bahia, Lovato, Maristela, Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flores, Botton, Sônia de Avila, Sangioni, Luis Antônio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21352
Resumo: The aim of the present study was to investigate experimental infections by Rickettsia parkeri in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and to determine the dynamics of antibody production during acute and chronic infection. The animals (n = 64) were allocated into eight groups as follows: G1, inoculated intramuscularly (IM) with 2.5 × 105 Vero cells (1 mL) infected with R. parkeri; G2, inoculated IM with 5.0 × 105 Vero cells (2 mL) infected with R. parkeri; G3, received 1 mL of the inoculum subcutaneously (SC); G4, received 2 mL of inoculum SC; G5, received 1 mL of the inoculum intraperitoneally (IP); G6, injected with 2 mL of the inoculum IP; G7 and G8, received 1 mL and 2 mL of culture medium IM, respectively (negative control groups). All R. parkeri inocula were viable prior to inoculation in the birds. In order to assess the dynamics of antibody production in acute and chronic infection, sera of chickens were collected 3, 7, 14, and 21 d post infection (PI) and assessed using an immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT). In addition, PCR (gltA gene) was performed using fragments of spleen and lung from euthanized chickens to detect the replication of R. parkeri in tissues during the experimental period. Animals from the G4 and G3 groups exhibited the highest mean antibody titers, with maximum levels observed at 7 and 14 d PI, respectively. Conversely, G2, G4 and G6 exhibited higher mean antibody titers than G1, G3 and G5, respectively. Antibody titers were dose-dependent. Rickettsial DNA was not detected in either spleen or lung tissue. The present study demonstrated that birds seroconvert after being challenged by R. parkeri. However, there was no replication of the agent in the tissues analyzed and rickettsemia was not observed.
id UEL-11_641f13033dd7411abf0a44eb0b0ca4fb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21352
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickensDinâmica da infecção por Rickettsia parkeri em galinhas domésticasGallus gallus domesticusImmunofluorescence antibody testInoculationPolymerase chain reactionSpotted fever.Febre maculosaGallus gallus domesticusInoculaçãoReação de imunofluorescência indiretaReação em cadeia da polimerase.The aim of the present study was to investigate experimental infections by Rickettsia parkeri in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and to determine the dynamics of antibody production during acute and chronic infection. The animals (n = 64) were allocated into eight groups as follows: G1, inoculated intramuscularly (IM) with 2.5 × 105 Vero cells (1 mL) infected with R. parkeri; G2, inoculated IM with 5.0 × 105 Vero cells (2 mL) infected with R. parkeri; G3, received 1 mL of the inoculum subcutaneously (SC); G4, received 2 mL of inoculum SC; G5, received 1 mL of the inoculum intraperitoneally (IP); G6, injected with 2 mL of the inoculum IP; G7 and G8, received 1 mL and 2 mL of culture medium IM, respectively (negative control groups). All R. parkeri inocula were viable prior to inoculation in the birds. In order to assess the dynamics of antibody production in acute and chronic infection, sera of chickens were collected 3, 7, 14, and 21 d post infection (PI) and assessed using an immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT). In addition, PCR (gltA gene) was performed using fragments of spleen and lung from euthanized chickens to detect the replication of R. parkeri in tissues during the experimental period. Animals from the G4 and G3 groups exhibited the highest mean antibody titers, with maximum levels observed at 7 and 14 d PI, respectively. Conversely, G2, G4 and G6 exhibited higher mean antibody titers than G1, G3 and G5, respectively. Antibody titers were dose-dependent. Rickettsial DNA was not detected in either spleen or lung tissue. The present study demonstrated that birds seroconvert after being challenged by R. parkeri. However, there was no replication of the agent in the tissues analyzed and rickettsemia was not observed.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a infecção experimental por Rickettsia parkeri em galinhas domésticas (Gallus gallus domesticus) e investigar a dinâmica de anticorpos. Para tanto, foram utilizadas 64 galinhas criadas extensivamente divididas em oito grupos: G1 - inoculado com 2,5 x 105 células Vero (1 ml) infectadas por R. parkeri via intramuscular (IM); G2 – 5,0 x 105 células Vero (2 ml) infectadas por R. parkeri via IM; G3 - 1 ml do inóculo via subcutânea (SC); G4 - 2 ml de inóculo via SC; G5 – 1 ml do inóculo via intraperitoneal (IP); G6 - 2 ml de inóculo via IP, e G7 e G8 - 1 e 2 ml de meio de cultivo de células Vero via IM, respectivamente representando os grupos controles negativos. Ressaltase que todos os inóculos de R. parkeri estavam viáveis no momento da inoculação. Os soros das aves foram coletados aos 3, 7, 14 e 21 dias pós-infecção (PI) e testadas por reação de imunofluorescência indireta (RIFI) para avaliar a dinâmica de anticorpos na infecção aguda e crônica. A identificação da multiplicação de R. parkeri nos tecidos, no mesmo período PI, foi realizada por PCR, para um fragmento do gene gltA, em amostras de baço e pulmão provenientes das galinhas eutanasiadas. As aves do G4 e G3 apresentaram as maiores médias de anticorpos obtendo os níveis mais elevados aos sete e 14 dias PI, respectivamente. G2, G4 e G6 apresentaram médias de anticorpos superiores comparados aos G1, G3 e G5 respectivamente, sendo considerada a infecção dose-dependente. Não foi detectado DNA rickettsial nos tecidos avaliados. No presente trabalho foi possível demonstrar que as aves soroconverteram mediante o desafio da inoculação por R. parkeri, todavia não houve a identificação do agente nos tecidos analisados, bem como a presença de rickettsemia.UEL2016-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa CientíficaPesquisa Científicaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2135210.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p233Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2016); 233-242Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 1 (2016); 233-2421679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21352/17994http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaciel, Jonas FernandesBrustolin, Joice MagaliKrawczak, Felipe da SilvaAlves, Marta Elena MachadoPivoto, Felipe LambertiMoraes-Filho, JonasLabruna, Marcelo BahiaLovato, MaristelaVogel, Fernanda Silveira FloresBotton, Sônia de AvilaSangioni, Luis Antônio2022-12-02T13:23:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21352Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-02T13:23:51Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
Dinâmica da infecção por Rickettsia parkeri em galinhas domésticas
title Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
spellingShingle Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
Maciel, Jonas Fernandes
Gallus gallus domesticus
Immunofluorescence antibody test
Inoculation
Polymerase chain reaction
Spotted fever.
Febre maculosa
Gallus gallus domesticus
Inoculação
Reação de imunofluorescência indireta
Reação em cadeia da polimerase.
title_short Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
title_full Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
title_fullStr Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
title_sort Dynamics of Rickettsia parkeri infection in domestic chickens
author Maciel, Jonas Fernandes
author_facet Maciel, Jonas Fernandes
Brustolin, Joice Magali
Krawczak, Felipe da Silva
Alves, Marta Elena Machado
Pivoto, Felipe Lamberti
Moraes-Filho, Jonas
Labruna, Marcelo Bahia
Lovato, Maristela
Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flores
Botton, Sônia de Avila
Sangioni, Luis Antônio
author_role author
author2 Brustolin, Joice Magali
Krawczak, Felipe da Silva
Alves, Marta Elena Machado
Pivoto, Felipe Lamberti
Moraes-Filho, Jonas
Labruna, Marcelo Bahia
Lovato, Maristela
Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flores
Botton, Sônia de Avila
Sangioni, Luis Antônio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maciel, Jonas Fernandes
Brustolin, Joice Magali
Krawczak, Felipe da Silva
Alves, Marta Elena Machado
Pivoto, Felipe Lamberti
Moraes-Filho, Jonas
Labruna, Marcelo Bahia
Lovato, Maristela
Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flores
Botton, Sônia de Avila
Sangioni, Luis Antônio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gallus gallus domesticus
Immunofluorescence antibody test
Inoculation
Polymerase chain reaction
Spotted fever.
Febre maculosa
Gallus gallus domesticus
Inoculação
Reação de imunofluorescência indireta
Reação em cadeia da polimerase.
topic Gallus gallus domesticus
Immunofluorescence antibody test
Inoculation
Polymerase chain reaction
Spotted fever.
Febre maculosa
Gallus gallus domesticus
Inoculação
Reação de imunofluorescência indireta
Reação em cadeia da polimerase.
description The aim of the present study was to investigate experimental infections by Rickettsia parkeri in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and to determine the dynamics of antibody production during acute and chronic infection. The animals (n = 64) were allocated into eight groups as follows: G1, inoculated intramuscularly (IM) with 2.5 × 105 Vero cells (1 mL) infected with R. parkeri; G2, inoculated IM with 5.0 × 105 Vero cells (2 mL) infected with R. parkeri; G3, received 1 mL of the inoculum subcutaneously (SC); G4, received 2 mL of inoculum SC; G5, received 1 mL of the inoculum intraperitoneally (IP); G6, injected with 2 mL of the inoculum IP; G7 and G8, received 1 mL and 2 mL of culture medium IM, respectively (negative control groups). All R. parkeri inocula were viable prior to inoculation in the birds. In order to assess the dynamics of antibody production in acute and chronic infection, sera of chickens were collected 3, 7, 14, and 21 d post infection (PI) and assessed using an immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT). In addition, PCR (gltA gene) was performed using fragments of spleen and lung from euthanized chickens to detect the replication of R. parkeri in tissues during the experimental period. Animals from the G4 and G3 groups exhibited the highest mean antibody titers, with maximum levels observed at 7 and 14 d PI, respectively. Conversely, G2, G4 and G6 exhibited higher mean antibody titers than G1, G3 and G5, respectively. Antibody titers were dose-dependent. Rickettsial DNA was not detected in either spleen or lung tissue. The present study demonstrated that birds seroconvert after being challenged by R. parkeri. However, there was no replication of the agent in the tissues analyzed and rickettsemia was not observed.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Científica
Pesquisa Científica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21352
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p233
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21352
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21352/17994
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2016); 233-242
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 1 (2016); 233-242
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306073865191424