Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Benazzi, Eloísa dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Bianchi, Miriam de Oliveira, Correia, Maria Elizabeth Fernades, Lima, Eduardo, Zonta, Everaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12760
Resumo:  The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of harvesting methods on the macrofauna, a known indicator of soil quality that detects changes in the system and indicates management alternatives. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six replications, with each block consisting of four parcels that corresponded to treatments green cane (CC), burnt cane (CQ), green cane – burnt cane (CC-Q) and burnt cane – green cane (CQ-C). Samples were collected in February and July 2010. The animals were divided into major taxonomic groups and accounted. Were evaluated ecological indexes (Shannon, Pielou and richness) and average total density of individuals and groups. Data were analyzed by the nonparametric statistical tools by Friedman or Signal test at 5%. To check relationships between soil fauna and environmental variables, was used a multivariate conditional ordination method, the redundancy analysis (RDA). The index richness was more efficient than the total average density to evaluate the influence of cane harvesting systems, with the highest values related to areas harvested without burning. Further, the occurrence of key groups in the areas harvested without burning configures the establishment of a trophic web. There was dominance of the social group Formicidae in all treatments.
id UEL-11_6b2ae4076c6c380d423e0853dca13a33
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12760
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – BrazilImpactos dos métodos de colheita da cana-de-açúcar sobre a macrofauna do solo em área de produção no Espírito Santo – BrasilSaccharumTSBFGreen caneBurnt caneBioindicator.SaccharumTSBFCana cruaCana queimadaBioindicador. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of harvesting methods on the macrofauna, a known indicator of soil quality that detects changes in the system and indicates management alternatives. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six replications, with each block consisting of four parcels that corresponded to treatments green cane (CC), burnt cane (CQ), green cane – burnt cane (CC-Q) and burnt cane – green cane (CQ-C). Samples were collected in February and July 2010. The animals were divided into major taxonomic groups and accounted. Were evaluated ecological indexes (Shannon, Pielou and richness) and average total density of individuals and groups. Data were analyzed by the nonparametric statistical tools by Friedman or Signal test at 5%. To check relationships between soil fauna and environmental variables, was used a multivariate conditional ordination method, the redundancy analysis (RDA). The index richness was more efficient than the total average density to evaluate the influence of cane harvesting systems, with the highest values related to areas harvested without burning. Further, the occurrence of key groups in the areas harvested without burning configures the establishment of a trophic web. There was dominance of the social group Formicidae in all treatments.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar os efeitos dos métodos de colheita sobre a macrofauna edáfica, um conhecido indicador da qualidade do solo que detecta as alterações ocorridas no sistema e indica alternativas de manejo. O delineamento experimental adotado foi blocos casualizados com seis repetições, sendo cada bloco composto por quatro parcelas que correspondiam aos tratamentos cana cru (CC), cana queimada (CQ), cana crua-queimada (CC-Q) e cana queimada-crua (CQ-C). As coletas foram realizadas nos meses de fevereiro e julho de 2010. Os animais foram classificados em grandes grupos taxonômicos e contabilizados. Avaliaram-se os índices ecológicos (Shannon, Pielou e riqueza) e a densidade média total de indivíduos e grupos. Os dados foram analisados por ferramentas de estatística não paramétrica através do teste de Friedman ou do Sinal a 5%. Para verificar relações entre fauna edáfica e variáveis ambientais utilizou-se um método de ordenação multivariada condicionada, a análise de redundância (RDA). O índice riqueza foi mais eficiente que a densidade média total na avaliação da influência dos sistemas de colheita da cana, estando seus maiores valores relacionados às áreas colhidas sem queima. Ainda, a ocorrência de grupos chave – também nas áreas colhidas sem queima – configura o estabelecimento de uma teia trófica. Houve dominância do grupo social Formicidae em todos os tratamentos.UEL2013-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1276010.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl1p3425Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6Supl1 (2013); 3425-3442Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6Supl1 (2013); 3425-34421679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12760/pdf_79Benazzi, Eloísa dos SantosBianchi, Miriam de OliveiraCorreia, Maria Elizabeth FernadesLima, EduardoZonta, Everaldoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:36:13Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12760Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:36:13Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
Impactos dos métodos de colheita da cana-de-açúcar sobre a macrofauna do solo em área de produção no Espírito Santo – Brasil
title Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
spellingShingle Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
Benazzi, Eloísa dos Santos
Saccharum
TSBF
Green cane
Burnt cane
Bioindicator.
Saccharum
TSBF
Cana crua
Cana queimada
Bioindicador.
title_short Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
title_full Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
title_fullStr Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
title_sort Impacts of harvesting methods of sugar cane on the soil macrofauna in production area in Espírito Santo – Brazil
author Benazzi, Eloísa dos Santos
author_facet Benazzi, Eloísa dos Santos
Bianchi, Miriam de Oliveira
Correia, Maria Elizabeth Fernades
Lima, Eduardo
Zonta, Everaldo
author_role author
author2 Bianchi, Miriam de Oliveira
Correia, Maria Elizabeth Fernades
Lima, Eduardo
Zonta, Everaldo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Benazzi, Eloísa dos Santos
Bianchi, Miriam de Oliveira
Correia, Maria Elizabeth Fernades
Lima, Eduardo
Zonta, Everaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saccharum
TSBF
Green cane
Burnt cane
Bioindicator.
Saccharum
TSBF
Cana crua
Cana queimada
Bioindicador.
topic Saccharum
TSBF
Green cane
Burnt cane
Bioindicator.
Saccharum
TSBF
Cana crua
Cana queimada
Bioindicador.
description  The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of harvesting methods on the macrofauna, a known indicator of soil quality that detects changes in the system and indicates management alternatives. The experimental design was randomized blocks with six replications, with each block consisting of four parcels that corresponded to treatments green cane (CC), burnt cane (CQ), green cane – burnt cane (CC-Q) and burnt cane – green cane (CQ-C). Samples were collected in February and July 2010. The animals were divided into major taxonomic groups and accounted. Were evaluated ecological indexes (Shannon, Pielou and richness) and average total density of individuals and groups. Data were analyzed by the nonparametric statistical tools by Friedman or Signal test at 5%. To check relationships between soil fauna and environmental variables, was used a multivariate conditional ordination method, the redundancy analysis (RDA). The index richness was more efficient than the total average density to evaluate the influence of cane harvesting systems, with the highest values related to areas harvested without burning. Further, the occurrence of key groups in the areas harvested without burning configures the establishment of a trophic web. There was dominance of the social group Formicidae in all treatments.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12760
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl1p3425
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12760
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl1p3425
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/12760/pdf_79
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6Supl1 (2013); 3425-3442
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6Supl1 (2013); 3425-3442
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306067801276416