Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15023 |
Resumo: | The aim of this work was to evaluate the chemical composition of the woody forage silage in the completely randomized design with six treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of forage species: Prosopis juliflora, Mimosa tenuiflora, Mimosa caesalpiniifolia, Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala. It was found that the silages jurema preta, jucá and sabiá, showed higher levels of DM more than 35 %. Leucena silage presented a higher content of CP (22.40 %) and higher pH (5.5), while the algaroba silage presented lowest level of EE (2.83 %). Higher levels of N-NH3 (10.93 %) and TDN (66.94 %) and lowest content of lignin (3.79 %) were found for gliricidia silage. Sabia silage presented a higher content of NDF (64.09%), while its ADF valor (35.54%) was similar to jurema preta silage (35.76 %). Algaroba and gliricidia silages presented highest levels of NFC (28.32 and 26.86%, respectively) and lower hemicellulose (13.39 and 12.65%, respectively). Leucena and gliricidia silages showed lower levels of cellulose with 14.77 and 15.53%, respectively. The woody forage silages studied in this work shown a good quality and can be used as sources in animal feed. |
id |
UEL-11_7591e4eb150a1943a188ea97d87063cc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15023 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiaridAvaliação da composição químico-bromatológica das silagens de forrageiras lenhosas do semiárido brasileiroCaatingaMimosa tenuifloraMimosa caesalphiifoliaPotential forageProsopis juliflora.CaatingaMimosa tenuifloraMimosa caesalphiifoliaPotencial forrageiroProsopis juliflora.ZootecniaThe aim of this work was to evaluate the chemical composition of the woody forage silage in the completely randomized design with six treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of forage species: Prosopis juliflora, Mimosa tenuiflora, Mimosa caesalpiniifolia, Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala. It was found that the silages jurema preta, jucá and sabiá, showed higher levels of DM more than 35 %. Leucena silage presented a higher content of CP (22.40 %) and higher pH (5.5), while the algaroba silage presented lowest level of EE (2.83 %). Higher levels of N-NH3 (10.93 %) and TDN (66.94 %) and lowest content of lignin (3.79 %) were found for gliricidia silage. Sabia silage presented a higher content of NDF (64.09%), while its ADF valor (35.54%) was similar to jurema preta silage (35.76 %). Algaroba and gliricidia silages presented highest levels of NFC (28.32 and 26.86%, respectively) and lower hemicellulose (13.39 and 12.65%, respectively). Leucena and gliricidia silages showed lower levels of cellulose with 14.77 and 15.53%, respectively. The woody forage silages studied in this work shown a good quality and can be used as sources in animal feed.Avaliou-se a composição químico-bromatológica de silagens de forrageiras lenhosas em delineamento experimental inteiramente casualizado com seis tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram compostos pelas espécies forrageiras: Prosopis juliflora, Mimosa tenuiflora, Mimosa caesalpiniifolia, Gliricidia sepium e Leucaena leucocephala. Verificou-se que as silagens de jurema preta, jucá e sabiá, apresentaram altos teores de MS, acima de 35%. A silagem de leucena apresentou maior teor de PB (22,40%) e maior pH (5,5), enquanto que a silagem de algaroba apresentou o menor teor de EE (2,83%). A silagem de gliricídia resultou em maior teor de N-NH3 (10,93%) e de NDT (66,94%) e menor teor (3,79%) de lignina. A silagem de sabiá apresentou maior teor de FDN (64,09%), enquanto seu teor de FDA (35,54%) foi semelhante à da silagem de jurema preta (35,76%). As silagens de algaroba e gliricídia apresentaram os maiores teores de CNF (28,32 e 26,86%, respectivamente) e menores teores de hemicelulose (13,39 e 12,65%, respectivamente). As silagens de leucena e gliricídia apresentaram menores teores de celulose com 14,77% e 15,53%, respectivamente. As silagens das forrageiras lenhosas estudadas nesse trabalho apresentam boa qualidade e podem ser fontes de alimento animal.UEL2015-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1502310.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p571Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015); 571-578Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 1 (2015); 571-5781679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15023/pdf_608Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Marcos Deames AraújoCarneiro, Maria Socorro de SouzaPinto, Andréa PereiraPompeu, Roberto Cláudio Fernandes FrancoSilva, Divan SoaresCoutinho, Maria Janiele FerreiraFontenele, Rildson Melo2023-01-13T15:49:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15023Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-13T15:49:42Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid Avaliação da composição químico-bromatológica das silagens de forrageiras lenhosas do semiárido brasileiro |
title |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid Silva, Marcos Deames Araújo Caatinga Mimosa tenuiflora Mimosa caesalphiifolia Potential forage Prosopis juliflora. Caatinga Mimosa tenuiflora Mimosa caesalphiifolia Potencial forrageiro Prosopis juliflora. Zootecnia |
title_short |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid |
title_full |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the chemical composition of woody forage silages of the Brazilian semiarid |
author |
Silva, Marcos Deames Araújo |
author_facet |
Silva, Marcos Deames Araújo Carneiro, Maria Socorro de Souza Pinto, Andréa Pereira Pompeu, Roberto Cláudio Fernandes Franco Silva, Divan Soares Coutinho, Maria Janiele Ferreira Fontenele, Rildson Melo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carneiro, Maria Socorro de Souza Pinto, Andréa Pereira Pompeu, Roberto Cláudio Fernandes Franco Silva, Divan Soares Coutinho, Maria Janiele Ferreira Fontenele, Rildson Melo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Marcos Deames Araújo Carneiro, Maria Socorro de Souza Pinto, Andréa Pereira Pompeu, Roberto Cláudio Fernandes Franco Silva, Divan Soares Coutinho, Maria Janiele Ferreira Fontenele, Rildson Melo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Caatinga Mimosa tenuiflora Mimosa caesalphiifolia Potential forage Prosopis juliflora. Caatinga Mimosa tenuiflora Mimosa caesalphiifolia Potencial forrageiro Prosopis juliflora. Zootecnia |
topic |
Caatinga Mimosa tenuiflora Mimosa caesalphiifolia Potential forage Prosopis juliflora. Caatinga Mimosa tenuiflora Mimosa caesalphiifolia Potencial forrageiro Prosopis juliflora. Zootecnia |
description |
The aim of this work was to evaluate the chemical composition of the woody forage silage in the completely randomized design with six treatments and four replications. The treatments consisted of forage species: Prosopis juliflora, Mimosa tenuiflora, Mimosa caesalpiniifolia, Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala. It was found that the silages jurema preta, jucá and sabiá, showed higher levels of DM more than 35 %. Leucena silage presented a higher content of CP (22.40 %) and higher pH (5.5), while the algaroba silage presented lowest level of EE (2.83 %). Higher levels of N-NH3 (10.93 %) and TDN (66.94 %) and lowest content of lignin (3.79 %) were found for gliricidia silage. Sabia silage presented a higher content of NDF (64.09%), while its ADF valor (35.54%) was similar to jurema preta silage (35.76 %). Algaroba and gliricidia silages presented highest levels of NFC (28.32 and 26.86%, respectively) and lower hemicellulose (13.39 and 12.65%, respectively). Leucena and gliricidia silages showed lower levels of cellulose with 14.77 and 15.53%, respectively. The woody forage silages studied in this work shown a good quality and can be used as sources in animal feed. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares Pesquisa |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15023 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p571 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15023 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p571 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/15023/pdf_608 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2015); 571-578 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 1 (2015); 571-578 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306069722267648 |