Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/28878 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study is to analyze the typology of dairy production systems (DPS) in Paraná, Brazil, based on sustainable practices adopted by agricultural producers. A total of 153 semi-structured questionnaires containing variables for general characterization of DPS, socioeconomic characteristics of farmers, as well as environmental, social, and economic sustainability actions implemented by rural workers were applied. Common factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate sustainability variables. Three factors were created: economic (F1), social (F2), and environmental (F3). Hierarchical clusters were formed using the factor scores obtained in CFA. Three clusters were defined and were compared with F1, F2, and F3. There were significant differences in F1 and F2 between clusters 1, 2, and 3. Cluster 1 contained DPS highly compliant with economic, social, and environmental sustainability practices. Cluster 2 was defined by DPS with negative mean values for all three factors. Cluster 3 contained DPS that were highly compliant with F1 and F2 activities compared to cluster 2 and poorly compliant with F1 and F2 actions compared to cluster 1. Therefore, the DPS in Paraná vary according to the sustainable activities implemented by farm managers. In addition, most analyzed DPS have low survival capacity in the medium- and long-term. The most critical sustainability factor was F3, followed by F2 and F1. |
id |
UEL-11_75ca2273eea88d209a8507509a8fee7b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28878 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systemsSustentabilidade e tipologia de sistemas produtivos leiteirosCompetitivenessMilk productionEnvironmental.CompetitividadeProdução de leiteMeio ambiente.The objective of this study is to analyze the typology of dairy production systems (DPS) in Paraná, Brazil, based on sustainable practices adopted by agricultural producers. A total of 153 semi-structured questionnaires containing variables for general characterization of DPS, socioeconomic characteristics of farmers, as well as environmental, social, and economic sustainability actions implemented by rural workers were applied. Common factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate sustainability variables. Three factors were created: economic (F1), social (F2), and environmental (F3). Hierarchical clusters were formed using the factor scores obtained in CFA. Three clusters were defined and were compared with F1, F2, and F3. There were significant differences in F1 and F2 between clusters 1, 2, and 3. Cluster 1 contained DPS highly compliant with economic, social, and environmental sustainability practices. Cluster 2 was defined by DPS with negative mean values for all three factors. Cluster 3 contained DPS that were highly compliant with F1 and F2 activities compared to cluster 2 and poorly compliant with F1 and F2 actions compared to cluster 1. Therefore, the DPS in Paraná vary according to the sustainable activities implemented by farm managers. In addition, most analyzed DPS have low survival capacity in the medium- and long-term. The most critical sustainability factor was F3, followed by F2 and F1.Buscou-se analisar a tipologia de sistemas produtivos leiteiros (SPL) a partir de ações de sustentabilidade tomadas pelos produtores rurais nestes sistemas. Foram aplicados 153 formulários semiestruturados contendo variáveis de caracterização geral dos SPL, características socioeconômicas dos produtores de leite, bem como variáveis sobre as ações de sustentabilidade ambiental, social e econômica empregadas nestes sistemas. A técnica de análise fatorial comum (AFC) foi utilizada para gerar fatores de sustentabilidade. Três fatores foram gerados: econômico (F1), social (F2) e ambiental (F3). Em seguida, a partir dos scores fatoriais, foi empregada técnica de formação de clusters hierárquicos. Três clusters foram definidos e comparados frente a F1, F2 e F3. Foram identificadas diferenças para F1 e F2 entre os clusters 1, 2 e 3. O cluster 1 foi definido por SPL com os melhores resultados para as práticas de sustentabilidade econômica, social e ambiental. O cluster 2 foi definido por SPL com valores médios negativos para os três fatores. O cluster 3, foi definido por SPL com bons resultados para F1 e F2, frente aos SPL do cluster 2. Entretanto, o cluster 3 apresentou piores resultados quando comparado com o cluster 1. Foi identificada grande variabilidade nas ações de sustentabilidade empregadas nos SPL paranaenses analisados. A maior parte destes sistemas apresentou baixa adequação para a sustentabilidade. O fator de sustentabilidade mais crítico foi o ambiental, seguido pelo social e econômico.UEL2018-08-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnálise Fatorial Comum (AFC); teste não-paramétrico de Kruska-Wallis; teste da soma de Ranks de Wilcoxonapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2887810.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n5p2081Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 39 No. 5 (2018); 2081-2092Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 39 n. 5 (2018); 2081-20921679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/28878/24253Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKuwahara, Kellen CristinaDamasceno, Julio CesarBánkuti, Ferenc IstvanPrizon, Rodrigo CésarRossoni, Diogo FranciscoEckstein, Ilton Isandro2022-10-20T18:01:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28878Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-20T18:01:56Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems Sustentabilidade e tipologia de sistemas produtivos leiteiros |
title |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems |
spellingShingle |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems Kuwahara, Kellen Cristina Competitiveness Milk production Environmental. Competitividade Produção de leite Meio ambiente. |
title_short |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems |
title_full |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems |
title_fullStr |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems |
title_sort |
Sustainability and typology of dairy production systems |
author |
Kuwahara, Kellen Cristina |
author_facet |
Kuwahara, Kellen Cristina Damasceno, Julio Cesar Bánkuti, Ferenc Istvan Prizon, Rodrigo César Rossoni, Diogo Francisco Eckstein, Ilton Isandro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Damasceno, Julio Cesar Bánkuti, Ferenc Istvan Prizon, Rodrigo César Rossoni, Diogo Francisco Eckstein, Ilton Isandro |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kuwahara, Kellen Cristina Damasceno, Julio Cesar Bánkuti, Ferenc Istvan Prizon, Rodrigo César Rossoni, Diogo Francisco Eckstein, Ilton Isandro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Competitiveness Milk production Environmental. Competitividade Produção de leite Meio ambiente. |
topic |
Competitiveness Milk production Environmental. Competitividade Produção de leite Meio ambiente. |
description |
The objective of this study is to analyze the typology of dairy production systems (DPS) in Paraná, Brazil, based on sustainable practices adopted by agricultural producers. A total of 153 semi-structured questionnaires containing variables for general characterization of DPS, socioeconomic characteristics of farmers, as well as environmental, social, and economic sustainability actions implemented by rural workers were applied. Common factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate sustainability variables. Three factors were created: economic (F1), social (F2), and environmental (F3). Hierarchical clusters were formed using the factor scores obtained in CFA. Three clusters were defined and were compared with F1, F2, and F3. There were significant differences in F1 and F2 between clusters 1, 2, and 3. Cluster 1 contained DPS highly compliant with economic, social, and environmental sustainability practices. Cluster 2 was defined by DPS with negative mean values for all three factors. Cluster 3 contained DPS that were highly compliant with F1 and F2 activities compared to cluster 2 and poorly compliant with F1 and F2 actions compared to cluster 1. Therefore, the DPS in Paraná vary according to the sustainable activities implemented by farm managers. In addition, most analyzed DPS have low survival capacity in the medium- and long-term. The most critical sustainability factor was F3, followed by F2 and F1. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Análise Fatorial Comum (AFC); teste não-paramétrico de Kruska-Wallis; teste da soma de Ranks de Wilcoxon |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/28878 10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n5p2081 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/28878 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n5p2081 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/28878/24253 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 39 No. 5 (2018); 2081-2092 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 39 n. 5 (2018); 2081-2092 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306077678862336 |