Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36691 |
Resumo: | The aim of the study was to identify suitability of different purpose sorghum cultivars for silage production and for green chopping, at the first and second season, based on the chemical composition and degradation kinetics. The experiment was based on a randomized block design with four replicates, with sowing in the months of November and March, as the first and second season, respectively. The trial was conducted at the Plant Production Sector of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rondônia, Colorado do Oeste campus, and chemical analyses were performed at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiaba campus. The treatments comprised six sorghum hybrids of different purposes (BRS 308 and BRS 310, grain sorghum; BRS 655 and BRS 610, forage sorghum; BRS 506 and CMSXS 647, sweet sorghum). The chemical composition, digestibility, and kinetic parameters were evaluated. At the first season, there was a higher digestibility (P < 0.0001) for sweet sorghum BRS 506, while for the second season, both grain sorghum BRS 308 and sweet sorghum cultivars BRS 506 and CMSXS 647 presented higher digestibility (P = 0.0005). Considering the nutritional value, all sorghum cultivars have the potential to produce silage, or to be used as green chop, at the first and second season. |
id |
UEL-11_7615551e6a0c55f73e9baf2848756ff8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36691 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivarsComposição bromatológica, cinética de degradação e digestibilidade de forragem de cultivares de sorgo de distintas aptidõesNutritive valueSorghum bicolorSweet sorghum.Sorghum bicolorSorgo sacarinoValor nutritivo.The aim of the study was to identify suitability of different purpose sorghum cultivars for silage production and for green chopping, at the first and second season, based on the chemical composition and degradation kinetics. The experiment was based on a randomized block design with four replicates, with sowing in the months of November and March, as the first and second season, respectively. The trial was conducted at the Plant Production Sector of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rondônia, Colorado do Oeste campus, and chemical analyses were performed at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiaba campus. The treatments comprised six sorghum hybrids of different purposes (BRS 308 and BRS 310, grain sorghum; BRS 655 and BRS 610, forage sorghum; BRS 506 and CMSXS 647, sweet sorghum). The chemical composition, digestibility, and kinetic parameters were evaluated. At the first season, there was a higher digestibility (P < 0.0001) for sweet sorghum BRS 506, while for the second season, both grain sorghum BRS 308 and sweet sorghum cultivars BRS 506 and CMSXS 647 presented higher digestibility (P = 0.0005). Considering the nutritional value, all sorghum cultivars have the potential to produce silage, or to be used as green chop, at the first and second season.Objetivou-se identificar, com base na composição bromatológica e cinética de degradação, híbridos de sorgo de diferentes propósitos para produção de silagem e para verde picado em primeira e segunda safra, no sul de Rondônia. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi em blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. O experimento foi realizado Setor de Produção Vegetal do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Rondônia, Campus Colorado do Oeste, e as análises bromatológicas foram realizadas no Laboratório de Nutrição Animal da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Campus Cuiabá, em primeira e segunda safra, com semeadura nos meses de novembro e março, respectivamente. Os tratamentos consistiram em seis híbridos de sorgo de diferentes aptidões (BRS 308 e BRS 310, graníferos; BRS 655 e BRS 610, forrageiros; BRS 506 e CMSXS 647, sacarinos). As variáveis avaliadas foram a composição bromatológica, a digestibilidade e parâmetros cinéticos. Na primeira safra, observou-se maior digestibilidade (P < 0,0001) para o sorgo sacarino BRS 506. Na segunda safra, evidenciou-se maior digestibilidade (P = 0,0005) em cultivares de sorgo sacarino e no sorgo granífero BRS 308. As cultivares de sorgo sacarino apresentaram maior digestibilidade, com maior proporção de proteína potencialmente digestível, com bom potencial de uso para ensilagem. Considerando o valor nutritivo, todas as cultivares de sorgo tem potencial para a produção de silagem e para verde picado em primeira e segunda safra.UEL2020-03-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3669110.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p607Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2020); 607-620Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 2 (2020); 607-6201679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36691/26891Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Ana Paula da SilvaBehling Neto, ArthurMoraes, Kellen Núbia Carvalho deCabral, Luciano da SilvaAbreu, Joadil Gonçalves deSousa, Daniel de PaulaReis, Rafael Henrique Pereira dosCabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino2022-10-10T13:49:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36691Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-10T13:49:34Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars Composição bromatológica, cinética de degradação e digestibilidade de forragem de cultivares de sorgo de distintas aptidões |
title |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars |
spellingShingle |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars Carvalho, Ana Paula da Silva Nutritive value Sorghum bicolor Sweet sorghum. Sorghum bicolor Sorgo sacarino Valor nutritivo. |
title_short |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars |
title_full |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars |
title_fullStr |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars |
title_sort |
Chemical composition, kinetics of degradation, and digestibility of forage of different purpose sorghum cultivars |
author |
Carvalho, Ana Paula da Silva |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Ana Paula da Silva Behling Neto, Arthur Moraes, Kellen Núbia Carvalho de Cabral, Luciano da Silva Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de Sousa, Daniel de Paula Reis, Rafael Henrique Pereira dos Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Behling Neto, Arthur Moraes, Kellen Núbia Carvalho de Cabral, Luciano da Silva Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de Sousa, Daniel de Paula Reis, Rafael Henrique Pereira dos Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Ana Paula da Silva Behling Neto, Arthur Moraes, Kellen Núbia Carvalho de Cabral, Luciano da Silva Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de Sousa, Daniel de Paula Reis, Rafael Henrique Pereira dos Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nutritive value Sorghum bicolor Sweet sorghum. Sorghum bicolor Sorgo sacarino Valor nutritivo. |
topic |
Nutritive value Sorghum bicolor Sweet sorghum. Sorghum bicolor Sorgo sacarino Valor nutritivo. |
description |
The aim of the study was to identify suitability of different purpose sorghum cultivars for silage production and for green chopping, at the first and second season, based on the chemical composition and degradation kinetics. The experiment was based on a randomized block design with four replicates, with sowing in the months of November and March, as the first and second season, respectively. The trial was conducted at the Plant Production Sector of the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rondônia, Colorado do Oeste campus, and chemical analyses were performed at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiaba campus. The treatments comprised six sorghum hybrids of different purposes (BRS 308 and BRS 310, grain sorghum; BRS 655 and BRS 610, forage sorghum; BRS 506 and CMSXS 647, sweet sorghum). The chemical composition, digestibility, and kinetic parameters were evaluated. At the first season, there was a higher digestibility (P < 0.0001) for sweet sorghum BRS 506, while for the second season, both grain sorghum BRS 308 and sweet sorghum cultivars BRS 506 and CMSXS 647 presented higher digestibility (P = 0.0005). Considering the nutritional value, all sorghum cultivars have the potential to produce silage, or to be used as green chop, at the first and second season. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36691 10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p607 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36691 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p607 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36691/26891 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2020); 607-620 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 2 (2020); 607-620 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306081606828032 |