Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gontijo, Lídia Mendes de Aquino
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ferro, Diogo Alves da Costa, Ferro, Rafael Alves da Costa, Silva, Bruna Paula Alves da, Santos, Klayto José Gonçalves dos, Santos, Aracele Pinheiro Pales dos, Lima, Laís Gabrielly Freitas, Belizário, Diogo da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42097
Resumo: Artificial shading is widely used to provide thermal comfort to animals and has been extensively researched due to its relationship with their welfare and performance. This study examines the physiological and behavioral traits of sheep in a feedlot system with and without access to shade. Twenty male Santa Inês × Dorper crossbred sheep with an initial average weight of 25 kg were used in the experiment. The animals were kept in two collective stalls, one of which was equipped with a polypropylene mesh shade net with 80% light interception capacity. The experiment was conducted in the feedlot of the Fazenda Escola farm at UEG, São Luís de Montes Belos Campus, state of Goiás, Brazil. Environmental indices (ambient temperature, relative humidity, temperature-humidity index), respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT) and surface temperature (ST) were measured once weekly and behavioral assessments were performed one day after the physiological assessment, between 07h00 and 19h00. The following behaviors were evaluated: feeding, rumination, rest/sleep, social, play and anomalous activities. There were no significant differences for the analyzed variables and treatments. Animals with access to shade had the following physiological results: RR - 75.06 mov. min-1; ST - 33.03 ºC; and RT - 39.21 ºC. Those without access to shade, in turn, showed the following indices: RR - 81.52 mov. min-1; ST - 33.45 ºC; and RT - 39.43 ºC. The evaluated behaviors did not differ significantly, averaging 226.11 and 225.44 min (feeding), 153.33 and 149.44 min (rumination), 341.39 and 339.72 min (rest/sleep) and 152.50 and 154.72 min (other activities) recorded in the sheep with and without access to shade, respectively. Despite the lack of differences between the analyzed responses, the animals with access to artificial shade showed greater comfort, welfare and quality of life.
id UEL-11_7d03b125d6debea319009fc6861a02ea
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42097
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shadeRespostas fisiológicas e comportamentais de ovinos mestiços confinados com e sem acesso ao sombreamento artificialAmbianceEthologyLambsWelfare.AmbiênciaBem-estarCordeirosEtologia.Artificial shading is widely used to provide thermal comfort to animals and has been extensively researched due to its relationship with their welfare and performance. This study examines the physiological and behavioral traits of sheep in a feedlot system with and without access to shade. Twenty male Santa Inês × Dorper crossbred sheep with an initial average weight of 25 kg were used in the experiment. The animals were kept in two collective stalls, one of which was equipped with a polypropylene mesh shade net with 80% light interception capacity. The experiment was conducted in the feedlot of the Fazenda Escola farm at UEG, São Luís de Montes Belos Campus, state of Goiás, Brazil. Environmental indices (ambient temperature, relative humidity, temperature-humidity index), respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT) and surface temperature (ST) were measured once weekly and behavioral assessments were performed one day after the physiological assessment, between 07h00 and 19h00. The following behaviors were evaluated: feeding, rumination, rest/sleep, social, play and anomalous activities. There were no significant differences for the analyzed variables and treatments. Animals with access to shade had the following physiological results: RR - 75.06 mov. min-1; ST - 33.03 ºC; and RT - 39.21 ºC. Those without access to shade, in turn, showed the following indices: RR - 81.52 mov. min-1; ST - 33.45 ºC; and RT - 39.43 ºC. The evaluated behaviors did not differ significantly, averaging 226.11 and 225.44 min (feeding), 153.33 and 149.44 min (rumination), 341.39 and 339.72 min (rest/sleep) and 152.50 and 154.72 min (other activities) recorded in the sheep with and without access to shade, respectively. Despite the lack of differences between the analyzed responses, the animals with access to artificial shade showed greater comfort, welfare and quality of life.O sombreamento artificial é muito utilizado para proporcionar conforto térmico aos animais, e tem sido muito estudado em função da sua relação com o bem-estar e desempenho dos mesmos. Objetivou-se avaliar as características fisiológicas e comportamentais de ovinos em sistema de confinamento com e sem acesso a sombra. Foram avaliados 20 ovinos machos mestiços Santa Inês x Dorper com peso médio inicial de 25 Kg, mantidos em duas baias coletivas, com implantação do sombrite de malha de polipropileno, 80% de interceptação luminosa em uma das baias. O experimento foi conduzido no confinamento da Fazenda Escola da UEG, Campus São Luís de Montes Belos, Goiás, Brasil. Avaliações ambientais, temperatura ambiente (TA), umidade relativa do ar (UR), índice de temperatura e umidade (ITU), frequência respiratória (FR) e de superfície (TS) foram realizadas uma vez por semana e avaliações de comportamento foram realizadas um dia após a avaliação fisiológica, entre 7h e 19h. Os comportamentos avaliados foram o alimentar, ruminação, descanso e sono, social, lúdico e anormal. Em relação aos resultados obtidos, não apresentaram diferença significativa em relação as variáveis e tratamentos analisados. Os animais com acesso a sombra apresentaram em relação à FR, TS e TR, valores de 75,06 mov. min-1, 33,03ºC e 39,21ºC, respectivamente, enquanto os animais sem acesso ao sombreamento apresentaram 81,52 mov. min-1, 33,45ºC de TS e 39,43ºC de TC. Os comportamentos avaliados não diferiram significativamente, com médias em minutos para os comportamentos alimentar de 226,11 e 225,44, ruminação de 153,33 e 149,44, descanso e sono de 341,39 e 339,72 e outras atividades de 152,50 e 154,72, para os animais com e sem acesso ao sombreamento, respectivamente. Apesar de não observar diferenças entre as respostas analisadas, pode-se observar um maior conforto, bem-estar e qualidade de vida para os animais com acesso ao sombreamento artificial.UEL2021-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4209710.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n3Supl1p1955Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 3Supl1 (2021); 1955-1966Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 3Supl1 (2021); 1955-19661679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42097/29468Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGontijo, Lídia Mendes de AquinoFerro, Diogo Alves da CostaFerro, Rafael Alves da CostaSilva, Bruna Paula Alves daSantos, Klayto José Gonçalves dosSantos, Aracele Pinheiro Pales dosLima, Laís Gabrielly FreitasBelizário, Diogo da Silva2022-09-30T16:48:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42097Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-09-30T16:48:46Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
Respostas fisiológicas e comportamentais de ovinos mestiços confinados com e sem acesso ao sombreamento artificial
title Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
spellingShingle Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
Gontijo, Lídia Mendes de Aquino
Ambiance
Ethology
Lambs
Welfare.
Ambiência
Bem-estar
Cordeiros
Etologia.
title_short Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
title_full Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
title_fullStr Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
title_full_unstemmed Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
title_sort Physiological and behavioral responses of feedlot sheep with and without access to artificial shade
author Gontijo, Lídia Mendes de Aquino
author_facet Gontijo, Lídia Mendes de Aquino
Ferro, Diogo Alves da Costa
Ferro, Rafael Alves da Costa
Silva, Bruna Paula Alves da
Santos, Klayto José Gonçalves dos
Santos, Aracele Pinheiro Pales dos
Lima, Laís Gabrielly Freitas
Belizário, Diogo da Silva
author_role author
author2 Ferro, Diogo Alves da Costa
Ferro, Rafael Alves da Costa
Silva, Bruna Paula Alves da
Santos, Klayto José Gonçalves dos
Santos, Aracele Pinheiro Pales dos
Lima, Laís Gabrielly Freitas
Belizário, Diogo da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gontijo, Lídia Mendes de Aquino
Ferro, Diogo Alves da Costa
Ferro, Rafael Alves da Costa
Silva, Bruna Paula Alves da
Santos, Klayto José Gonçalves dos
Santos, Aracele Pinheiro Pales dos
Lima, Laís Gabrielly Freitas
Belizário, Diogo da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ambiance
Ethology
Lambs
Welfare.
Ambiência
Bem-estar
Cordeiros
Etologia.
topic Ambiance
Ethology
Lambs
Welfare.
Ambiência
Bem-estar
Cordeiros
Etologia.
description Artificial shading is widely used to provide thermal comfort to animals and has been extensively researched due to its relationship with their welfare and performance. This study examines the physiological and behavioral traits of sheep in a feedlot system with and without access to shade. Twenty male Santa Inês × Dorper crossbred sheep with an initial average weight of 25 kg were used in the experiment. The animals were kept in two collective stalls, one of which was equipped with a polypropylene mesh shade net with 80% light interception capacity. The experiment was conducted in the feedlot of the Fazenda Escola farm at UEG, São Luís de Montes Belos Campus, state of Goiás, Brazil. Environmental indices (ambient temperature, relative humidity, temperature-humidity index), respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT) and surface temperature (ST) were measured once weekly and behavioral assessments were performed one day after the physiological assessment, between 07h00 and 19h00. The following behaviors were evaluated: feeding, rumination, rest/sleep, social, play and anomalous activities. There were no significant differences for the analyzed variables and treatments. Animals with access to shade had the following physiological results: RR - 75.06 mov. min-1; ST - 33.03 ºC; and RT - 39.21 ºC. Those without access to shade, in turn, showed the following indices: RR - 81.52 mov. min-1; ST - 33.45 ºC; and RT - 39.43 ºC. The evaluated behaviors did not differ significantly, averaging 226.11 and 225.44 min (feeding), 153.33 and 149.44 min (rumination), 341.39 and 339.72 min (rest/sleep) and 152.50 and 154.72 min (other activities) recorded in the sheep with and without access to shade, respectively. Despite the lack of differences between the analyzed responses, the animals with access to artificial shade showed greater comfort, welfare and quality of life.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42097
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n3Supl1p1955
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42097
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n3Supl1p1955
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42097/29468
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 3Supl1 (2021); 1955-1966
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 3Supl1 (2021); 1955-1966
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306084798693376