Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Bruno Serpa
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Barbosa, Silvana Alves Pedrozo Vitalino, Tavares, João Marcos Novais, Beloli, Inês Gameiro Colvara, Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Mello, Lima Neto, Hélio Rezende, Caramori Júnior, João Garcia, Corrêa, Gerusa Silva Salles
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25111
Resumo: The effects of the combination of enzymes in commercial laying hens need to be more explored in literature. To determine if the type of protease affects performance, egg quality, nutrient intake, and morphometry of intestinal mucosa of laying hens in peak egg production and fed with phytase, 780 25-weeks Hy-Line W36 hens were assigned to a completely randomized design composed of five treatments/diets (one positive control, two negative controls, and negative controls plus protease A or B), with 12 replicates of 13 birds each. There was no effect of treatments (P > 0.05) on egg production, egg mass and feed conversion, even though the nutritional restriction imposed by the negative controls reduced egg weight (P = 0.02), albumen height (P < 0.01), and Haugh unit (P < 0.01). Although inclusion of proteases in negative controls did not cause the calculated intake of protein and amino acids to return to the same amount consumed by positive-control hens, egg quality parameters returned to positive control standards with protease A. Intestinal mucosa responded to treatment only at jejunum, where birds fed with protease B showed greater (P < 0.01) villus height and crypt depth than those treated with protease A. These findings suggest that different proteases and phytases interact distinctly and, in consequence, induce different responses on the birds. Moreover, the behavior of egg quality parameters after protease A inclusion in the diet indicates that the nutritional contribution of the combination of this protease with phytase is greater than the contribution of protease alone.
id UEL-11_8165131a07f7441f392fb8aff430ace7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25111
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg productionSuplementação de fitase e protease para galinhas em pico de produçãoAmino acidEgg productionEgg qualityEnzymeNutritional restriction.AminoácidoEnzimaProdução de ovoQualidade de ovoRestrição nutricional.The effects of the combination of enzymes in commercial laying hens need to be more explored in literature. To determine if the type of protease affects performance, egg quality, nutrient intake, and morphometry of intestinal mucosa of laying hens in peak egg production and fed with phytase, 780 25-weeks Hy-Line W36 hens were assigned to a completely randomized design composed of five treatments/diets (one positive control, two negative controls, and negative controls plus protease A or B), with 12 replicates of 13 birds each. There was no effect of treatments (P > 0.05) on egg production, egg mass and feed conversion, even though the nutritional restriction imposed by the negative controls reduced egg weight (P = 0.02), albumen height (P < 0.01), and Haugh unit (P < 0.01). Although inclusion of proteases in negative controls did not cause the calculated intake of protein and amino acids to return to the same amount consumed by positive-control hens, egg quality parameters returned to positive control standards with protease A. Intestinal mucosa responded to treatment only at jejunum, where birds fed with protease B showed greater (P < 0.01) villus height and crypt depth than those treated with protease A. These findings suggest that different proteases and phytases interact distinctly and, in consequence, induce different responses on the birds. Moreover, the behavior of egg quality parameters after protease A inclusion in the diet indicates that the nutritional contribution of the combination of this protease with phytase is greater than the contribution of protease alone.Os efeitos da utilização em conjunto de enzimas exógenas para aves de postura precisam ser mais explorados na literatura. No intuito de determinar se o tipo de protease, em dietas suplementadas com fitase, interfere no desempenho, qualidade do ovo, ingestão de nutrientes e morfometria da mucosa intestinal de galinhas em pico de postura, 780 galinhas Hy-Line W36 de 25 semanas foram distribuídas em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado composto por cinco tratamentos/dietas com 12 repetições de 13 aves cada. Os cinco tratamentos foram: 1) controle positivo: dieta formulada de acordo com as recomendações nutricionais da Hy-Line, sem proteases, 2) controle negativo A: dieta controle positivo reduzida em energia, proteína e aminoácidos conforme a matriz nutricional da protease A, sem proteases, 3) controle negativo B: dieta controle positivo reduzida em energia, proteína e aminoácidos conforme a matriz nutricional da protease B, sem proteases, 4) controle negativo A com inclusão da protease A, 5) controle negativo B com inclusão da protease B. Não houve efeito dos tratamentos (P > 0,05) sobre produção de ovos, massa de ovos e conversão alimentar; porém, a restrição nutricional imposta pelos controles negativos diminuiu o peso do ovo (controle negativo A, P = 0,02), a altura do albúmen (P < 0,01) e a unidade Haugh (P < 0,01). Embora a inclusão das proteases em seus respectivos controles negativos não tenha garantido o mesmo consumo de proteína e aminoácidos observado no grupo controle positivo, a adição da protease A reverteu os efeitos adversos da restrição nutricional sobre o peso do ovo, a altura do albúmen e a unidade Haugh. O efeito dos tratamentos sobre a morfometria da mucosa intestinal foi detectado somente no jejuno (P < 0,01), porém, o consumo dos controles negativos não alterou a altura de vilosidades e a profundidade de criptas em relação ao controle positivo. Aves suplementadas com a protease B, no entanto, apresentaram maior profundidade de criptas que o controle positivo. Em conclusão, quando utilizadas em dietas suplementadas com fitase, o tipo de protease interfere no desempenho, qualidade do ovo, ingestão de nutrientes e morfometria da mucosa intestinal de galinhas em pico de postura.UEL2016-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2511110.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p4285Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 6 (2016); 4285-4294Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 6 (2016); 4285-42941679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25111/20083Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira, Bruno SerpaBarbosa, Silvana Alves Pedrozo VitalinoTavares, João Marcos NovaisBeloli, Inês Gameiro ColvaraSilva, Guilherme Moreira de MelloLima Neto, Hélio RezendeCaramori Júnior, João GarciaCorrêa, Gerusa Silva Salles2022-11-29T16:18:38Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25111Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-29T16:18:38Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
Suplementação de fitase e protease para galinhas em pico de produção
title Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
spellingShingle Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
Vieira, Bruno Serpa
Amino acid
Egg production
Egg quality
Enzyme
Nutritional restriction.
Aminoácido
Enzima
Produção de ovo
Qualidade de ovo
Restrição nutricional.
title_short Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
title_full Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
title_fullStr Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
title_full_unstemmed Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
title_sort Phytase and protease supplementation for laying hens in peak egg production
author Vieira, Bruno Serpa
author_facet Vieira, Bruno Serpa
Barbosa, Silvana Alves Pedrozo Vitalino
Tavares, João Marcos Novais
Beloli, Inês Gameiro Colvara
Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Mello
Lima Neto, Hélio Rezende
Caramori Júnior, João Garcia
Corrêa, Gerusa Silva Salles
author_role author
author2 Barbosa, Silvana Alves Pedrozo Vitalino
Tavares, João Marcos Novais
Beloli, Inês Gameiro Colvara
Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Mello
Lima Neto, Hélio Rezende
Caramori Júnior, João Garcia
Corrêa, Gerusa Silva Salles
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira, Bruno Serpa
Barbosa, Silvana Alves Pedrozo Vitalino
Tavares, João Marcos Novais
Beloli, Inês Gameiro Colvara
Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Mello
Lima Neto, Hélio Rezende
Caramori Júnior, João Garcia
Corrêa, Gerusa Silva Salles
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Amino acid
Egg production
Egg quality
Enzyme
Nutritional restriction.
Aminoácido
Enzima
Produção de ovo
Qualidade de ovo
Restrição nutricional.
topic Amino acid
Egg production
Egg quality
Enzyme
Nutritional restriction.
Aminoácido
Enzima
Produção de ovo
Qualidade de ovo
Restrição nutricional.
description The effects of the combination of enzymes in commercial laying hens need to be more explored in literature. To determine if the type of protease affects performance, egg quality, nutrient intake, and morphometry of intestinal mucosa of laying hens in peak egg production and fed with phytase, 780 25-weeks Hy-Line W36 hens were assigned to a completely randomized design composed of five treatments/diets (one positive control, two negative controls, and negative controls plus protease A or B), with 12 replicates of 13 birds each. There was no effect of treatments (P > 0.05) on egg production, egg mass and feed conversion, even though the nutritional restriction imposed by the negative controls reduced egg weight (P = 0.02), albumen height (P < 0.01), and Haugh unit (P < 0.01). Although inclusion of proteases in negative controls did not cause the calculated intake of protein and amino acids to return to the same amount consumed by positive-control hens, egg quality parameters returned to positive control standards with protease A. Intestinal mucosa responded to treatment only at jejunum, where birds fed with protease B showed greater (P < 0.01) villus height and crypt depth than those treated with protease A. These findings suggest that different proteases and phytases interact distinctly and, in consequence, induce different responses on the birds. Moreover, the behavior of egg quality parameters after protease A inclusion in the diet indicates that the nutritional contribution of the combination of this protease with phytase is greater than the contribution of protease alone.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25111
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p4285
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25111
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p4285
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25111/20083
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 6 (2016); 4285-4294
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 6 (2016); 4285-4294
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306075720122368