Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Espírito Santo, Lidiane Silva
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Correa, Gerusa Silva Salles, Vieites, Flávio Medeiros, Romani, Alessandra, Tavares, João Marcos Novais, Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Melo, Oliveira, Cleber Franklin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/24770
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different rearing densities during brooding (0 to 2 weeks) and growth (3 to 15 weeks) on performance and egg quality of laying hens (Hy-line W-36) during production phase (18 to 42 weeks). In the brooding phase, a total of 3250 day-old chicks were allocated in wire cages, distributed in a completely randomized design composed of 5 treatments (63.57; 66.38; 69.44; 72.80 and 76.50 cm²/bird) with 10 replications each. At the beginning of the growth phase, floor space in each treatment was increased. Therefore, a total of 750 birds were selected from the original treatments, which represented 237.57, 265.52, 300.92, 347.22, and 410.35 cm²/bird. At the end of the growing phase, 390 pullets were transferred to production facilities and distributed, according to their original treatment, in conventional cages with 430.76 cm²/bird (13 birds/cage). For this phase, only 6 replications per treatment were adopted. Experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance and, in the case of significant differences, means were analyzed using polynomial regression test. Body weight, weight gain and uniformity were compared during the brooding and growth phases. First-egg weight, age at first egg, age at 50% daily production, weights of egg, albumen, yolk and shell, egg mass, yolk diameter, yolk height, yolk index, albumen height, percentages of shell, albumen and yolk, shell thickness, Haugh unit, and egg specific gravity were analyzed during the production stage. In conclusion, raising pullets on 63.57 cm2/bird (71 birds/cage) does not affect chicks’ performance during the brooding phase. However, for the growth phase, the recommendation is to provide 410.35 cm2/bird, which corresponded to 11 birds/cage in this research. For the production period, the recommendation is to utilize pullets raised on 265.52 cm2/bird, which corresponded to 17 birds/cage on this research.
id UEL-11_828853649b90b4b9e2c6561b3771aa47
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24770
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densitiesDesempenho e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras leves submetidas à diferentes densidades populacionaisPerformanceUniformityWeight gain.Ganho de pesoProduçãoUniformidade.This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different rearing densities during brooding (0 to 2 weeks) and growth (3 to 15 weeks) on performance and egg quality of laying hens (Hy-line W-36) during production phase (18 to 42 weeks). In the brooding phase, a total of 3250 day-old chicks were allocated in wire cages, distributed in a completely randomized design composed of 5 treatments (63.57; 66.38; 69.44; 72.80 and 76.50 cm²/bird) with 10 replications each. At the beginning of the growth phase, floor space in each treatment was increased. Therefore, a total of 750 birds were selected from the original treatments, which represented 237.57, 265.52, 300.92, 347.22, and 410.35 cm²/bird. At the end of the growing phase, 390 pullets were transferred to production facilities and distributed, according to their original treatment, in conventional cages with 430.76 cm²/bird (13 birds/cage). For this phase, only 6 replications per treatment were adopted. Experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance and, in the case of significant differences, means were analyzed using polynomial regression test. Body weight, weight gain and uniformity were compared during the brooding and growth phases. First-egg weight, age at first egg, age at 50% daily production, weights of egg, albumen, yolk and shell, egg mass, yolk diameter, yolk height, yolk index, albumen height, percentages of shell, albumen and yolk, shell thickness, Haugh unit, and egg specific gravity were analyzed during the production stage. In conclusion, raising pullets on 63.57 cm2/bird (71 birds/cage) does not affect chicks’ performance during the brooding phase. However, for the growth phase, the recommendation is to provide 410.35 cm2/bird, which corresponded to 11 birds/cage in this research. For the production period, the recommendation is to utilize pullets raised on 265.52 cm2/bird, which corresponded to 17 birds/cage on this research.O objetivo foi avaliar diferentes densidades populacionais nas fases de cria, recria sobre a produção de poedeiras leves comerciais (linhagem Hy-line W-36). O experimento foi dividido em três fases: cria (0 a duas semanas), recria (três a 15 semanas) e produção (18 a 42 semanas de idade). Em ambas as fases foi utilizado o delineamento inteiramente casualizado. Na fase de cria foram utilizadas 3250 pintainhas, de um dia de idade que foram distribuídas em cinco tratamentos 63,57; 66,38; 69,44; 72,80 e 76,50 cm²/ave com dez repetições cada. Para a fase de recria foram selecionadas 750 aves provenientes dos tratamentos utilizados na fase de cria, e redistribuídas em cinco tratamentos (237,57; 265,52; 300,92; 347,22 e 410,35 cm²/ave) com dez repetições por tratamento. Na fase de produção as aves foram alojadas com a mesma densidade para isso foram utilizadas 455 poedeiras advindas de cada tratamento utilizadas nas fases de cria e recria e foram distribuídas em cinco tratamentos com a mesma densidade de 430,76 cm²/ave que corresponde a 13 aves/gaiola com seis repetições. As variáveis analisadas para as fases de cria e recria foram: peso médio, ganho de peso e uniformidade e na fase de produção as variáveis foram: idade e peso do ovo a primeira postura e a idade aos 50% de produção, peso do ovo, peso do albúmen, gema e casca, massa do ovo, diâmetro e índice de gema, altura de gema e albúmen, porcentagens de casca, albúmen e gema, espessura da casca, unidade Haugh e gravidade específica. Os dados experimentais foram submetidos à análise de variância, e em caso de diferença, as médias foram analisadas utilizando testes de regressão polinomial. Na fase de cria é possível criar as aves na densidade de 63,57cm2/ave ou 71 aves/gaiola sem comprometer o desempenho das aves. Para a fase de recria recomenda-se uma densidade de 410,35 cm²/ave que corresponde a 11 aves/gaiola. Na fase de produção, recomenda-se as aves provenientes da densidade 265,52 cm²/ave que corresponde a 18 aves/gaiola.UEL2017-05-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionartigo cientificoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2477010.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p831Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 2 (2017); 831-842Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 2 (2017); 831-8421679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/24770/20819Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEspírito Santo, Lidiane SilvaCorrea, Gerusa Silva SallesVieites, Flávio MedeirosRomani, AlessandraTavares, João Marcos NovaisSilva, Guilherme Moreira de MeloOliveira, Cleber Franklin2022-11-16T16:42:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24770Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-16T16:42Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
Desempenho e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras leves submetidas à diferentes densidades populacionais
title Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
spellingShingle Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
Espírito Santo, Lidiane Silva
Performance
Uniformity
Weight gain.
Ganho de peso
Produção
Uniformidade.
title_short Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
title_full Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
title_fullStr Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
title_full_unstemmed Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
title_sort Performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens submitted to different rearing densities
author Espírito Santo, Lidiane Silva
author_facet Espírito Santo, Lidiane Silva
Correa, Gerusa Silva Salles
Vieites, Flávio Medeiros
Romani, Alessandra
Tavares, João Marcos Novais
Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Melo
Oliveira, Cleber Franklin
author_role author
author2 Correa, Gerusa Silva Salles
Vieites, Flávio Medeiros
Romani, Alessandra
Tavares, João Marcos Novais
Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Melo
Oliveira, Cleber Franklin
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Espírito Santo, Lidiane Silva
Correa, Gerusa Silva Salles
Vieites, Flávio Medeiros
Romani, Alessandra
Tavares, João Marcos Novais
Silva, Guilherme Moreira de Melo
Oliveira, Cleber Franklin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Performance
Uniformity
Weight gain.
Ganho de peso
Produção
Uniformidade.
topic Performance
Uniformity
Weight gain.
Ganho de peso
Produção
Uniformidade.
description This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different rearing densities during brooding (0 to 2 weeks) and growth (3 to 15 weeks) on performance and egg quality of laying hens (Hy-line W-36) during production phase (18 to 42 weeks). In the brooding phase, a total of 3250 day-old chicks were allocated in wire cages, distributed in a completely randomized design composed of 5 treatments (63.57; 66.38; 69.44; 72.80 and 76.50 cm²/bird) with 10 replications each. At the beginning of the growth phase, floor space in each treatment was increased. Therefore, a total of 750 birds were selected from the original treatments, which represented 237.57, 265.52, 300.92, 347.22, and 410.35 cm²/bird. At the end of the growing phase, 390 pullets were transferred to production facilities and distributed, according to their original treatment, in conventional cages with 430.76 cm²/bird (13 birds/cage). For this phase, only 6 replications per treatment were adopted. Experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance and, in the case of significant differences, means were analyzed using polynomial regression test. Body weight, weight gain and uniformity were compared during the brooding and growth phases. First-egg weight, age at first egg, age at 50% daily production, weights of egg, albumen, yolk and shell, egg mass, yolk diameter, yolk height, yolk index, albumen height, percentages of shell, albumen and yolk, shell thickness, Haugh unit, and egg specific gravity were analyzed during the production stage. In conclusion, raising pullets on 63.57 cm2/bird (71 birds/cage) does not affect chicks’ performance during the brooding phase. However, for the growth phase, the recommendation is to provide 410.35 cm2/bird, which corresponded to 11 birds/cage in this research. For the production period, the recommendation is to utilize pullets raised on 265.52 cm2/bird, which corresponded to 17 birds/cage on this research.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
artigo cientifico
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/24770
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p831
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/24770
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p831
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/24770/20819
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 2 (2017); 831-842
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 2 (2017); 831-842
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306075677130752