Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/49304 |
Resumo: | We evaluated the post-thaw development of in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine embryos cryopreserved using vitrification and slow-freezing techniques on different days after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Nine replicates of IVP were performed. Embryos at the expanded blastocyst stage with quality grades 1 and 2 (according to the International Embryo Technology Society (IETS) manual) were selected on days 7, 7.5, and 8 after IVF. Embryos (n = 472) were randomly divided and cryopreserved using slow freezing (n = 257) or vitrification (n = 215). The embryos were organized into six groups according to the cryopreservation technique and the day: 1) Group DT7 (embryos subjected to slow freezing on D7, n = 140); 2) Group DT7.5 (embryos subjected to slow freezing 12 hours after D7, on D7.5; n = 61); 3) Group DT8 (embryos subjected to slow freezing on D8, n = 56); 4) Group VIT7 (embryos vitrified on D7, n = 127); 5) Group VIT7.5 (embryos vitrified 12 hours after D7, on D7.5; n = 49); and 6) Group VIT8 (embryos vitrified on D8, n = 39). Data were arcsine-transformed and analyzed using analysis of variance and the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (SAS 9.2), with P < 0.05. The re-expansion and embryo hatching rates were higher in vitrified embryos than in embryos subjected to slow freezing (P < 0.05). Embryo quality grade did not influence the total developmental rate (P > 0.05). However, grade 1 embryos re-expanded more rapidly (within 24 hours) than grade 2 embryos. Grade 1 embryos showed better results with vitrification than with slow freezing. The experimental groups represented a technique × day interaction and did not differ in terms of re-expansion and hatching rates (P > 0.05). |
id |
UEL-11_85c9c768405a32610d73bab944f2f043 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/49304 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitroComparación entre técnicas de criopreservación (vitrificación o congelación lenta) sobre el desarrollo post-descongelación de embriones bovinos producidos in vitroComparação entre vitrificação e congelamento lento sobre o desenvolvimento pós-descongelamento de embriões bovinos produzidos in vitroCryosurvivalDirect TransferIVEP.criosupervivenciaPIVETransferencia directaCriossobrevivênciaDirect TransferPIV.We evaluated the post-thaw development of in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine embryos cryopreserved using vitrification and slow-freezing techniques on different days after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Nine replicates of IVP were performed. Embryos at the expanded blastocyst stage with quality grades 1 and 2 (according to the International Embryo Technology Society (IETS) manual) were selected on days 7, 7.5, and 8 after IVF. Embryos (n = 472) were randomly divided and cryopreserved using slow freezing (n = 257) or vitrification (n = 215). The embryos were organized into six groups according to the cryopreservation technique and the day: 1) Group DT7 (embryos subjected to slow freezing on D7, n = 140); 2) Group DT7.5 (embryos subjected to slow freezing 12 hours after D7, on D7.5; n = 61); 3) Group DT8 (embryos subjected to slow freezing on D8, n = 56); 4) Group VIT7 (embryos vitrified on D7, n = 127); 5) Group VIT7.5 (embryos vitrified 12 hours after D7, on D7.5; n = 49); and 6) Group VIT8 (embryos vitrified on D8, n = 39). Data were arcsine-transformed and analyzed using analysis of variance and the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (SAS 9.2), with P < 0.05. The re-expansion and embryo hatching rates were higher in vitrified embryos than in embryos subjected to slow freezing (P < 0.05). Embryo quality grade did not influence the total developmental rate (P > 0.05). However, grade 1 embryos re-expanded more rapidly (within 24 hours) than grade 2 embryos. Grade 1 embryos showed better results with vitrification than with slow freezing. The experimental groups represented a technique × day interaction and did not differ in terms of re-expansion and hatching rates (P > 0.05).Se evaluó el desarrollo post-descongelación de embriones PIV criopreservados mediante la técnica de vitrificación y congelación lenta en diferentes días posteriores a la fertilización in vitro (FIV). Se realizaron 9 replicaciones de producción de embriones in vitro. El día 7; 7,5 y 8 después de la FIV, se seleccionaron embriones en estadio de blastocisto expandido de calidad grado 1 y 2 (según el manual del IETS). Los embriones (n=472) se dividieron aleatoriamente para ser criopreservados mediante vitrificación (n=257) o congelación lenta (n=215). Los embriones se organizaron en 6 grupos según la técnica de criopreservación y el día: 1) Grupo DT7 (embriones sometidos a congelación lenta el día D7); 2) Grupo DT7.5 (embriones sometidos a congelación lenta 12 horas después de D7, en D7.5); 3) grupo DT8 (embriones sometidos a congelación lenta en D8); 4) Grupo VIT7 (embriones vitrificados en D7); 5) Grupo VIT7.5 (embriones vitrificados 12 horas después del D7, el D7.5); 6) Grupo VIT8 (embriones vitrificados en D8). Los datos se transformaron a arcoseno y se analizaron mediante Análisis de Varianza utilizando el procedimiento GLIMMIX de SAS (SAS 9.2) con P<0,05. La tasa de reexpansión y eclosión embrionaria fue mayor para los embriones vitrificados que para los embriones sometidos a congelación lenta (P<0,05). El grado de calidad embrionaria no influyó en las tasas de desarrollo total (P>0.05). Sin embargo, los embriones de grado 1 se volvieron a expandir más rápidamente (a las 24 h) que los embriones de grado 2. Los embriones de grado 1 mostraron mejores resultados con la técnica de vitrificación que con la congelación lenta. Los grupos experimentales representaron la interacción técnica*día y no difirieron en términos de reexpansión y tasas de eclosión (P>0.05).Avaliou-se o desenvolvimento pós-descongelamento de embriões bovinos produzidos in vitro (PIV) criopreservados pela técnica de vitrificação e de congelamento lento em diferentes dias após a fertilização in vitro (FIV). Foram realizadas 9 réplicas de PIV. Nos dias 7; 7,5 e 8 após a FIV, foram selecionados embriões no estágio de blastocisto expandido de grau de qualidade 1 e 2 (de acordo com o manual IETS). Os embriões (n=472) foram divididos aleatoriamente para serem criopreservados por congelamento lento (n=257) ou vitrificação (n=215). Organizou-se os embriões em 6 grupos de acordo com a técnica de criopreservação e o dia: 1) Grupo DT7 (embriões submetidos ao congelamento lento no D7, n= 140); 2) Grupo DT7,5 (embriões submetidos ao congelamento lento 12 horas após o D7, no D7,5; n= 61); 3) Grupo DT8 (embriões submetidos ao congelamento lento no D8, n=56); 4) Grupo VIT7 (embriões vitrificados no D7, n= 127); 5) Grupo VIT7,5 (embriões vitrificados 12 horas após o D7, no D7,5; n= 49); 6) Grupo VIT8 (embriões vitrificados no D8, n= 39). Os dados foram transformados para arcoseno e analisados por Análise de Variância utilizando o procedimento GLIMMIX do SAS (SAS 9.2) com P<0,05. A taxa de re-expansão e de eclosão embrionária foi maior para embriões vitrificados que para embriões submetidos ao congelamento lento (P<0,05). O grau de qualidade embrionária não influenciou as taxas de desenvolvimento totais (P>0,05). Porém embriões de grau 1 re-expandiram mais rapidamente (às 24 h) que embriões grau 2. Embriões grau 1 apresentaram melhores resultados com a técnica de vitrificação do que com congelamento lento. Os grupos experimentais representaram a interação técnica*dia e não diferiram entre si quanto as taxas de re-expansão e eclosão (P>0,05).UEL2024-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4930410.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p537Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024); 537-554Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2024); 537-5541679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/49304/50314Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNunes, Vanessa Rachele RibeiroGregianini, Jennifer Teodoro Ferreira Gregianini, Helton Aparecido Garcia Fantin, Bárbara SouzaLoureiro, BárbaraSatrapa, Rafael Augusto2024-04-24T16:09:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/49304Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2024-04-24T16:09:57Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro Comparación entre técnicas de criopreservación (vitrificación o congelación lenta) sobre el desarrollo post-descongelación de embriones bovinos producidos in vitro Comparação entre vitrificação e congelamento lento sobre o desenvolvimento pós-descongelamento de embriões bovinos produzidos in vitro |
title |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro Nunes, Vanessa Rachele Ribeiro Cryosurvival Direct Transfer IVEP. criosupervivencia PIVE Transferencia directa Criossobrevivência Direct Transfer PIV. |
title_short |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro |
title_full |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro |
title_sort |
Comparison between vitrification and slow freezing on the post-thaw development of bovine embryos produced in vitro |
author |
Nunes, Vanessa Rachele Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Nunes, Vanessa Rachele Ribeiro Gregianini, Jennifer Teodoro Ferreira Gregianini, Helton Aparecido Garcia Fantin, Bárbara Souza Loureiro, Bárbara Satrapa, Rafael Augusto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gregianini, Jennifer Teodoro Ferreira Gregianini, Helton Aparecido Garcia Fantin, Bárbara Souza Loureiro, Bárbara Satrapa, Rafael Augusto |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nunes, Vanessa Rachele Ribeiro Gregianini, Jennifer Teodoro Ferreira Gregianini, Helton Aparecido Garcia Fantin, Bárbara Souza Loureiro, Bárbara Satrapa, Rafael Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cryosurvival Direct Transfer IVEP. criosupervivencia PIVE Transferencia directa Criossobrevivência Direct Transfer PIV. |
topic |
Cryosurvival Direct Transfer IVEP. criosupervivencia PIVE Transferencia directa Criossobrevivência Direct Transfer PIV. |
description |
We evaluated the post-thaw development of in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine embryos cryopreserved using vitrification and slow-freezing techniques on different days after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Nine replicates of IVP were performed. Embryos at the expanded blastocyst stage with quality grades 1 and 2 (according to the International Embryo Technology Society (IETS) manual) were selected on days 7, 7.5, and 8 after IVF. Embryos (n = 472) were randomly divided and cryopreserved using slow freezing (n = 257) or vitrification (n = 215). The embryos were organized into six groups according to the cryopreservation technique and the day: 1) Group DT7 (embryos subjected to slow freezing on D7, n = 140); 2) Group DT7.5 (embryos subjected to slow freezing 12 hours after D7, on D7.5; n = 61); 3) Group DT8 (embryos subjected to slow freezing on D8, n = 56); 4) Group VIT7 (embryos vitrified on D7, n = 127); 5) Group VIT7.5 (embryos vitrified 12 hours after D7, on D7.5; n = 49); and 6) Group VIT8 (embryos vitrified on D8, n = 39). Data were arcsine-transformed and analyzed using analysis of variance and the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS (SAS 9.2), with P < 0.05. The re-expansion and embryo hatching rates were higher in vitrified embryos than in embryos subjected to slow freezing (P < 0.05). Embryo quality grade did not influence the total developmental rate (P > 0.05). However, grade 1 embryos re-expanded more rapidly (within 24 hours) than grade 2 embryos. Grade 1 embryos showed better results with vitrification than with slow freezing. The experimental groups represented a technique × day interaction and did not differ in terms of re-expansion and hatching rates (P > 0.05). |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/49304 10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p537 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/49304 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2024v44n2p537 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/49304/50314 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024); 537-554 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 44 n. 2 (2024); 537-554 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306055277084672 |