Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Piza, Marina Lais Sabião de Toledo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Almeida, Fabiana Alves de, Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães, Costa, Ciniro, Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33676
Resumo: The economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes are one of the biggest obstacles in the small ruminants production. Understanding the population dynamics of the infective larvae (L3) in the pasture is the key point to develop control programs, and reliable results depend on the used methodology to quantify L3 numbers. The use of the sampling directly from the pasture appears as a viable option, since it is not required the use of animals with an esophageal fistula or tracer animals, decreasing the costs involved in the study. Therefore, the present project, which had as objective evaluate the efficiency of two collection methods for quantification of L3 in the pasture, utilized 64 lambs (n = 16) allocated to four integrated crop-livestock systems (treatments) with 12 paddocks each. Pasture samples were collected every nine days. The W method consists in traversing the area in the form of a W and again an inverted W, forage samples being collected every 10 steps, and the Square method, in tossing a 0.16 m2 square to four random points within the area, the forage within the square being collected after each toss. After the forage samples had been processed, the L3 were recovered and identified. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (k) was determined. The W-transect and Random-plot methods did not differ (p ? 0.05) with respect to the number of L3 recovered from the pasture, and a positive correlation was found between them, suggesting agreement with one another, being that when the number of L3 recovered by the W-transect method increases, the same occurs in the Random-plot technique. The Random-plot method, which is already used to collect samples of forage for chemical analyses, can also be employed to estimate the pasture contamination by L3. The W-transect and Random-plot methods showed to be important in the epidemiological study of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Therefore, the use of both on the same occasions and with different purposes, with one complementing the information that is not provided by the other, may be more effective in the investigation of environmental contamination by L3 of gastrointestinal nematodes.
id UEL-11_886cca6cf620ce0b2eac7323150308ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33676
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pastureComparação de dois métodos para quantificação de larvas infectantes de nematódeos gastrintestinais da pastagemEpidemiologyLambsMethods of samplingNematoda.CordeirosEpidemiologiaMétodos de amostragemNematódeos.The economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes are one of the biggest obstacles in the small ruminants production. Understanding the population dynamics of the infective larvae (L3) in the pasture is the key point to develop control programs, and reliable results depend on the used methodology to quantify L3 numbers. The use of the sampling directly from the pasture appears as a viable option, since it is not required the use of animals with an esophageal fistula or tracer animals, decreasing the costs involved in the study. Therefore, the present project, which had as objective evaluate the efficiency of two collection methods for quantification of L3 in the pasture, utilized 64 lambs (n = 16) allocated to four integrated crop-livestock systems (treatments) with 12 paddocks each. Pasture samples were collected every nine days. The W method consists in traversing the area in the form of a W and again an inverted W, forage samples being collected every 10 steps, and the Square method, in tossing a 0.16 m2 square to four random points within the area, the forage within the square being collected after each toss. After the forage samples had been processed, the L3 were recovered and identified. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (k) was determined. The W-transect and Random-plot methods did not differ (p ? 0.05) with respect to the number of L3 recovered from the pasture, and a positive correlation was found between them, suggesting agreement with one another, being that when the number of L3 recovered by the W-transect method increases, the same occurs in the Random-plot technique. The Random-plot method, which is already used to collect samples of forage for chemical analyses, can also be employed to estimate the pasture contamination by L3. The W-transect and Random-plot methods showed to be important in the epidemiological study of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Therefore, the use of both on the same occasions and with different purposes, with one complementing the information that is not provided by the other, may be more effective in the investigation of environmental contamination by L3 of gastrointestinal nematodes.As perdas econômicas causadas por nematódeos gastrintestinais são um dos maiores entraves na produção de pequenos ruminantes. Entender a dinâmica populacional das larvas infectantes (L3) no capim é o ponto chave para que se desenvolva programas de controle, e resultados confiáveis dependem das metodologias utilizadas para quantificar o número dessas L3. O uso da amostragem diretamente da pastagem aparece como uma opção viável, já que não requer o uso de animais fistulados ou traçadores, reduzindo os custos envolvidos no estudo. Assim, no presente estudo, que teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia de dois métodos de coleta para quantificação de L3 na pastagem, foram utilizados 64 cordeiros (n = 16) alocados em quatro sistemas integrados de produção agropecuária (tratamentos) com 12 piquetes cada. As amostras de pasto foram coletadas a cada nove dias. O método W consiste em percorrer a área sob a forma de um W e novamente um W invertido, sendo as amostras de forragem coletadas a cada 10 passos, e o método Quadrado, em lançar um quadrado de 0,16 m² em quatro pontos aleatórios dentro da área, sendo coletada a forragem contida dentro do quadrado após cada lance. Após o processamento das amostras de forragem, as L3 foram recuperadas e identificadas. O coeficiente Kappa de Cohen (k) foi determinado. Os métodos W e Quadrado não diferiram (P ? 0,05), quanto ao número de L3 recuperadas do pasto, sendo que existe uma correlação positiva entre os dois métodos, sugerindo que eles correlacionam positivamente entre si, sendo que quando a quantidade de L3 recuperada no método W aumenta, no método Quadrado também aumenta. O método Quadrado, que já é utilizado para coletar amostras de forragem para análises bromatológicas, pode ser utilizado para estimar a contaminação da pastagem por L3. Os métodos W e Quadrado se mostraram importantes no estudo epidemiológico dos nematódeos gastrintestinais de ovinos. Com isso, o uso de ambos, na mesma ocasião e com diferentes objetivos, de forma que um complemente as informações que o outro não oferece, pode ser mais eficaz no estudo da contaminação ambiental por L3 de nematódeos gastrintestinais.UEL2019-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3367610.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n2p712Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 2 (2019); 712-722Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 2 (2019); 712-7221679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33676/25258Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPiza, Marina Lais Sabião de ToledoAlmeida, Fabiana Alves dePariz, Cristiano MagalhãesCosta, CiniroAmarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do2022-10-19T14:17:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33676Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-19T14:17:47Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
Comparação de dois métodos para quantificação de larvas infectantes de nematódeos gastrintestinais da pastagem
title Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
spellingShingle Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
Piza, Marina Lais Sabião de Toledo
Epidemiology
Lambs
Methods of sampling
Nematoda.
Cordeiros
Epidemiologia
Métodos de amostragem
Nematódeos.
title_short Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
title_full Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
title_fullStr Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
title_sort Comparison of two methods for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode infective larvae from pasture
author Piza, Marina Lais Sabião de Toledo
author_facet Piza, Marina Lais Sabião de Toledo
Almeida, Fabiana Alves de
Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
Costa, Ciniro
Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Fabiana Alves de
Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
Costa, Ciniro
Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Piza, Marina Lais Sabião de Toledo
Almeida, Fabiana Alves de
Pariz, Cristiano Magalhães
Costa, Ciniro
Amarante, Alessandro Francisco Talamini do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epidemiology
Lambs
Methods of sampling
Nematoda.
Cordeiros
Epidemiologia
Métodos de amostragem
Nematódeos.
topic Epidemiology
Lambs
Methods of sampling
Nematoda.
Cordeiros
Epidemiologia
Métodos de amostragem
Nematódeos.
description The economic losses caused by gastrointestinal nematodes are one of the biggest obstacles in the small ruminants production. Understanding the population dynamics of the infective larvae (L3) in the pasture is the key point to develop control programs, and reliable results depend on the used methodology to quantify L3 numbers. The use of the sampling directly from the pasture appears as a viable option, since it is not required the use of animals with an esophageal fistula or tracer animals, decreasing the costs involved in the study. Therefore, the present project, which had as objective evaluate the efficiency of two collection methods for quantification of L3 in the pasture, utilized 64 lambs (n = 16) allocated to four integrated crop-livestock systems (treatments) with 12 paddocks each. Pasture samples were collected every nine days. The W method consists in traversing the area in the form of a W and again an inverted W, forage samples being collected every 10 steps, and the Square method, in tossing a 0.16 m2 square to four random points within the area, the forage within the square being collected after each toss. After the forage samples had been processed, the L3 were recovered and identified. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (k) was determined. The W-transect and Random-plot methods did not differ (p ? 0.05) with respect to the number of L3 recovered from the pasture, and a positive correlation was found between them, suggesting agreement with one another, being that when the number of L3 recovered by the W-transect method increases, the same occurs in the Random-plot technique. The Random-plot method, which is already used to collect samples of forage for chemical analyses, can also be employed to estimate the pasture contamination by L3. The W-transect and Random-plot methods showed to be important in the epidemiological study of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Therefore, the use of both on the same occasions and with different purposes, with one complementing the information that is not provided by the other, may be more effective in the investigation of environmental contamination by L3 of gastrointestinal nematodes.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33676
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n2p712
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33676
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n2p712
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33676/25258
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 2 (2019); 712-722
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 2 (2019); 712-722
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306080255213568