Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melanda, Carlos Augusto Alves
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de, Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa, Souza, Anne Kemmer, Trautwein, Luiz Guilherme Corsi, Haddad Neta, Jamile, Santos, Évelyn Rangel dos, Dearo, Antonio Cezar de Oliveira, Martins, Maria Isabel Mello
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n4p2439
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41924
Resumo: The present study aimed to evaluate the filtration for separating seminal plasma of boars’ ejaculate by means of sperm viability and the occurrence of hyperactivation and lipid peroxidation in fresh semen and after cooling for up to 96 hours. The ejaculate of eight healthy boars of different breeds was collected and the gelatinous portion was separated and discarded. In the laboratory, the semen was fractioned into three aliquots (groups G1, G2 and G3) as follows: G1: semen with plasma diluted in BTS (TOTAL BTS); G2: semen centrifuged at 600G/10’ (BTS CEN); and G3: semen filtered with the Sperm-filter® following dilution of the retained cells with BTS (BTS FIL). The analyses were performed at three moments: with fresh samples (D0) and after 48 (D2) and 96 hours (D4) of cooling at 17ºC. The kinetic evaluation was performed using the CASA system, which provided data for the classification of sperm hyperactivity. For lipid stress analysis, the TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substance) test was performed. The variance analysis test was conducted to compare the results between the groups and moments analyzed. The results showed better total motility values (%) for G1 at D0 (67.9, P= 0.001), D2 (36.6, P= 0.004) and D4 (26.1, P= 0.003). The occurrence of hyperactivity was observed in G2 and G3 at moments D2 and D4. In addition, TBARS showed higher peroxidation levels for G1 at D0 (8.1 mM MDA/ml, P= 0.01), D2 (7.4 mM MDA/ml, P= 0.02), and D4 (6.41mMol MDA/ml, P= 0.008) when compared to G2 and G3. Since the filtration method did not demonstrate any damage to the sperm viability, the study concluded that sperm filtration is an accessible and valid tool to replace centrifugation.
id UEL-11_9d5ce80aa2eaa841836e259d5909de05
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41924
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
spelling Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boarsFiltração de ejaculados suínos como alternativa para a separação do plasma seminalHyperactivitySperm-filterSemenLipid peroxidationBoar.CachaçoHiperatividadePeroxidação lipídicaSêmenSperm-filter.The present study aimed to evaluate the filtration for separating seminal plasma of boars’ ejaculate by means of sperm viability and the occurrence of hyperactivation and lipid peroxidation in fresh semen and after cooling for up to 96 hours. The ejaculate of eight healthy boars of different breeds was collected and the gelatinous portion was separated and discarded. In the laboratory, the semen was fractioned into three aliquots (groups G1, G2 and G3) as follows: G1: semen with plasma diluted in BTS (TOTAL BTS); G2: semen centrifuged at 600G/10’ (BTS CEN); and G3: semen filtered with the Sperm-filter® following dilution of the retained cells with BTS (BTS FIL). The analyses were performed at three moments: with fresh samples (D0) and after 48 (D2) and 96 hours (D4) of cooling at 17ºC. The kinetic evaluation was performed using the CASA system, which provided data for the classification of sperm hyperactivity. For lipid stress analysis, the TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substance) test was performed. The variance analysis test was conducted to compare the results between the groups and moments analyzed. The results showed better total motility values (%) for G1 at D0 (67.9, P= 0.001), D2 (36.6, P= 0.004) and D4 (26.1, P= 0.003). The occurrence of hyperactivity was observed in G2 and G3 at moments D2 and D4. In addition, TBARS showed higher peroxidation levels for G1 at D0 (8.1 mM MDA/ml, P= 0.01), D2 (7.4 mM MDA/ml, P= 0.02), and D4 (6.41mMol MDA/ml, P= 0.008) when compared to G2 and G3. Since the filtration method did not demonstrate any damage to the sperm viability, the study concluded that sperm filtration is an accessible and valid tool to replace centrifugation.O presente estudo objetivou avaliar a filtração como alternativa para a separação do plasma seminal de ejaculados suínos, ao considerar a viabilidade espermática por meio da ocorrência de hiperativação e peroxidação lipídica no sêmen fresco e após refrigeração por até 96 horas. O ejaculado, de oito cachaços saudáveis de diferentes raças, foram colhidos por meio da técnica da mão enluvada e porção gelatinosa foi separada e descartada. Em laboratório, o sêmen foi fracionado em três alíquotas (grupos G1, G2 e G3) da seguinte forma: G1: sêmen e plasma seminal, diluído em BTS (TOTAL BTS); G2: ejaculado centrifugado a 600G/10’ para separação do plasma seminal, e o pellet de espermatozoides formados foram ressuspensos em BTS (BTS CEN); e G3: sêmen filtrado com Sperm-filter®, e espermatozoides retidos foram diluídos em BTS (BTS FIL). As análises foram realizadas em três momentos: amostras frescas (D0), após 48 horas (D2) e seguidas 96 horas (D4) de refrigeração a 17ºC. A avaliação cinética foi realizada pelo sistema CASA, que forneceu dados para a classificação da hiperatividade espermática. Para análise de estresse lipídico, foi realizado o teste TBARS (substâncias reagente ao ácido barbitúrico). Um teste de análise de variâncias foi feito para detectar diferenças entre os grupos e momentos avaliados. Os resultados mostraram melhores valores de motilidade total (%) para G1 em D0 (67,9, P = 0,001), D2 (36,6, P = 0,004) e D4 (26,1, P = 0,003). A ocorrência de hiperatividade foi observada em G2 e G3 nos momentos D2 e D4. Além disso, o TBARS mostrou níveis de peroxidação lipídica mais elevados para G1 em D0 (8,1 mM MDA / ml, P = 0,01), D2 (7,4 mM MDA/ml, P = 0,02) e D4 (6,41 mMol MDA / ml, P = 0,008) quando comparado com G2 e G3. Como a filtração não induziu a danos na viabilidade espermática, o estudo concluiu que a filtração espermática é uma ferramenta acessível e válida para substituir a centrifugação com intuito de separar o plasma seminal.UEL2021-05-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionApplied researchapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4192410.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n4p2439Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2021); 2439-2452Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 4 (2021); 2439-24521679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41924/29669Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelanda, Carlos Augusto AlvesAlmeida, Ana Beatriz Marques deHidalgo, Myrian Megumy TsunokawaSouza, Anne KemmerTrautwein, Luiz Guilherme CorsiHaddad Neta, JamileSantos, Évelyn Rangel dosDearo, Antonio Cezar de OliveiraMartins, Maria Isabel Mello2022-09-30T14:35:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41924Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-09-30T14:35:16Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
Filtração de ejaculados suínos como alternativa para a separação do plasma seminal
title Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
spellingShingle Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
Melanda, Carlos Augusto Alves
Hyperactivity
Sperm-filter
Semen
Lipid peroxidation
Boar.
Cachaço
Hiperatividade
Peroxidação lipídica
Sêmen
Sperm-filter.
Melanda, Carlos Augusto Alves
Hyperactivity
Sperm-filter
Semen
Lipid peroxidation
Boar.
Cachaço
Hiperatividade
Peroxidação lipídica
Sêmen
Sperm-filter.
title_short Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
title_full Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
title_fullStr Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
title_full_unstemmed Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
title_sort Sperm filtration as an alternative technique for seminal plasma separation in boars
author Melanda, Carlos Augusto Alves
author_facet Melanda, Carlos Augusto Alves
Melanda, Carlos Augusto Alves
Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de
Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa
Souza, Anne Kemmer
Trautwein, Luiz Guilherme Corsi
Haddad Neta, Jamile
Santos, Évelyn Rangel dos
Dearo, Antonio Cezar de Oliveira
Martins, Maria Isabel Mello
Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de
Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa
Souza, Anne Kemmer
Trautwein, Luiz Guilherme Corsi
Haddad Neta, Jamile
Santos, Évelyn Rangel dos
Dearo, Antonio Cezar de Oliveira
Martins, Maria Isabel Mello
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de
Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa
Souza, Anne Kemmer
Trautwein, Luiz Guilherme Corsi
Haddad Neta, Jamile
Santos, Évelyn Rangel dos
Dearo, Antonio Cezar de Oliveira
Martins, Maria Isabel Mello
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melanda, Carlos Augusto Alves
Almeida, Ana Beatriz Marques de
Hidalgo, Myrian Megumy Tsunokawa
Souza, Anne Kemmer
Trautwein, Luiz Guilherme Corsi
Haddad Neta, Jamile
Santos, Évelyn Rangel dos
Dearo, Antonio Cezar de Oliveira
Martins, Maria Isabel Mello
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hyperactivity
Sperm-filter
Semen
Lipid peroxidation
Boar.
Cachaço
Hiperatividade
Peroxidação lipídica
Sêmen
Sperm-filter.
topic Hyperactivity
Sperm-filter
Semen
Lipid peroxidation
Boar.
Cachaço
Hiperatividade
Peroxidação lipídica
Sêmen
Sperm-filter.
description The present study aimed to evaluate the filtration for separating seminal plasma of boars’ ejaculate by means of sperm viability and the occurrence of hyperactivation and lipid peroxidation in fresh semen and after cooling for up to 96 hours. The ejaculate of eight healthy boars of different breeds was collected and the gelatinous portion was separated and discarded. In the laboratory, the semen was fractioned into three aliquots (groups G1, G2 and G3) as follows: G1: semen with plasma diluted in BTS (TOTAL BTS); G2: semen centrifuged at 600G/10’ (BTS CEN); and G3: semen filtered with the Sperm-filter® following dilution of the retained cells with BTS (BTS FIL). The analyses were performed at three moments: with fresh samples (D0) and after 48 (D2) and 96 hours (D4) of cooling at 17ºC. The kinetic evaluation was performed using the CASA system, which provided data for the classification of sperm hyperactivity. For lipid stress analysis, the TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substance) test was performed. The variance analysis test was conducted to compare the results between the groups and moments analyzed. The results showed better total motility values (%) for G1 at D0 (67.9, P= 0.001), D2 (36.6, P= 0.004) and D4 (26.1, P= 0.003). The occurrence of hyperactivity was observed in G2 and G3 at moments D2 and D4. In addition, TBARS showed higher peroxidation levels for G1 at D0 (8.1 mM MDA/ml, P= 0.01), D2 (7.4 mM MDA/ml, P= 0.02), and D4 (6.41mMol MDA/ml, P= 0.008) when compared to G2 and G3. Since the filtration method did not demonstrate any damage to the sperm viability, the study concluded that sperm filtration is an accessible and valid tool to replace centrifugation.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Applied research
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41924
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n4p2439
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41924
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n4p2439
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/41924/29669
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 4 (2021); 2439-2452
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 4 (2021); 2439-2452
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1822182691709124608
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n4p2439