Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tavares, André Silva
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Spalevic, Velibor, Avanzi, Junior Cesar, Nogueira, Denismar Alves, Silva, Marx Leandro Naves, Mincato, Ronaldo Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30999
Resumo: Soil losses due to water erosion threaten the sustainability of agriculture and the food security of current and future generations. This study estimated potential soil losses and sediment production under different types of land uses in a subbasin in the Municipality of Alfenas, southern Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil. The objective of this research was to evaluate the application of the Potential Erosion Method by the Intensity of Erosion and Drainage program and correlate the findings with the results obtained by the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation as well as geoprocessing techniques and statistical analyses. In the Potential Erosion Method, the coefficient indicating the mean erosion intensity was 0.37, which corresponded to erosion category IV and indicated weak laminar erosion processes, and the total soil loss was 649.31 Mg year-1 and the mean was 1.46 Mg ha-1 year-1. These results were consistent in magnitude with those obtained in the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, which estimated a mean soil loss of 1.52 Mg ha-1 year-1 and a total soil loss of 668.26 Mg year-1. The Potential Erosion Method suggests that 1.5% of the area presents potential soil losses above the soil loss tolerance limit, which ranged from 5.19 to 5.90 Mg ha-1 year-1, while the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation indicated that 7.3% of the area has potential soil losses above the limit. The maximum sediment discharge was 60 Mg year-1, meaning that 9.3% of the total soil loss reached the depositional areas of the river plains or watercourses. The Potential Erosion Method was efficient in the evaluation of water erosion in tropical soils, and the results were consistent with models widely employed in the estimation of soil losses. Thus, the model can support the evaluation of soil losses in Brazil and is a robust tool for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural activities.
id UEL-11_9e00dbc48da53debe50fbda65e7bb975
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30999
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas GeraisModelagem da erosão hídrica pelo método de erosão potencial em uma sub-bacia hidrográfica de referência no sul de Minas GeraisGavrilovic methodHydrologyIntErOSoil conservation.Método de GavrilovicHidrologiaIntErOConservação do Solo.Soil losses due to water erosion threaten the sustainability of agriculture and the food security of current and future generations. This study estimated potential soil losses and sediment production under different types of land uses in a subbasin in the Municipality of Alfenas, southern Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil. The objective of this research was to evaluate the application of the Potential Erosion Method by the Intensity of Erosion and Drainage program and correlate the findings with the results obtained by the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation as well as geoprocessing techniques and statistical analyses. In the Potential Erosion Method, the coefficient indicating the mean erosion intensity was 0.37, which corresponded to erosion category IV and indicated weak laminar erosion processes, and the total soil loss was 649.31 Mg year-1 and the mean was 1.46 Mg ha-1 year-1. These results were consistent in magnitude with those obtained in the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, which estimated a mean soil loss of 1.52 Mg ha-1 year-1 and a total soil loss of 668.26 Mg year-1. The Potential Erosion Method suggests that 1.5% of the area presents potential soil losses above the soil loss tolerance limit, which ranged from 5.19 to 5.90 Mg ha-1 year-1, while the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation indicated that 7.3% of the area has potential soil losses above the limit. The maximum sediment discharge was 60 Mg year-1, meaning that 9.3% of the total soil loss reached the depositional areas of the river plains or watercourses. The Potential Erosion Method was efficient in the evaluation of water erosion in tropical soils, and the results were consistent with models widely employed in the estimation of soil losses. Thus, the model can support the evaluation of soil losses in Brazil and is a robust tool for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural activities.Perdas de solo por erosão hídrica colocam em risco a sustentabilidade agrícola e a segurança alimentar das gerações atuais e futuras. Assim, este trabalho estimou as perdas potenciais de solo e a produção de sedimentos em diferentes tipos de usos da terra em uma sub-bacia hidrográfica no Município de Alfenas, sul de Minas Gerais, Sudeste do Brasil. A pesquisa teve como objetivo avaliar a aplicação do Método de Erosão Potencial pelo programa Intensidade de Erosão e Escoamento, correlacionando com os resultados obtidos pela Equação Universal de Perdas de Solo Revisada, aliado às técnicas de geoprocessamento e de análise estatística. No Método de Erosão Potencial, o coeficiente que indica a intensidade média da erosão foi de 0,37, ou categoria IV de deterioração, que aponta processos de erosão laminar de grau fraco, com perda total de solo de 649,31 Mg ano-1 e média de 1,46 Mg ha-1 ano-1. Os resultados corresponderam, em magnitude, aos obtidos na Equação Universal de Perdas de Solo Revisada, com perda média de solo de 1,52 Mg ha-1 ano-1 e total de 668,26 Mg ano-1. O Método de Erosão Potencial sugere que 1,5% da área possui perdas potenciais de solo acima do limite da Tolerância de Perda de Solo, que variou de 5,19 a 5,90 Mg ha-1 ano-1, enquanto a Equação Universal de Perdas de Solo Revisada indicou que 7,3% da área possui perdas potenciais de solo acima do limite. A descarga máxima de sedimentos foi de 60 Mg ano-1, ou seja, 9,3% da perda total de solo atinge as áreas deposicionais do deflúvio ou cursos d’água. O Método de Erosão Potencial mostrou eficiência na avaliação da erosão hídrica em solos tropicais, com resultados consistentes com modelos amplamente empregados na estimativa de perdas de solo, e dão suporte para a avaliação das perdas de solo no Brasil, sendo assim, uma ferramenta robusta para avaliar a sustentabilidade das atividades agrícolas.UEL2019-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionModelagem da Erosão, Intero, ArcGis, EPM, RUSLE, TPS.application/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3099910.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n2p555Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 2 (2019); 555-572Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 2 (2019); 555-5721679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30999/25321Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTavares, André SilvaSpalevic, VeliborAvanzi, Junior CesarNogueira, Denismar AlvesSilva, Marx Leandro NavesMincato, Ronaldo Luiz2022-10-19T13:54:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30999Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-19T13:54:57Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
Modelagem da erosão hídrica pelo método de erosão potencial em uma sub-bacia hidrográfica de referência no sul de Minas Gerais
title Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
spellingShingle Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
Tavares, André Silva
Gavrilovic method
Hydrology
IntErO
Soil conservation.
Método de Gavrilovic
Hidrologia
IntErO
Conservação do Solo.
title_short Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
title_full Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
title_fullStr Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
title_full_unstemmed Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
title_sort Modeling of water erosion by the erosion potential method in a pilot subbasin in southern Minas Gerais
author Tavares, André Silva
author_facet Tavares, André Silva
Spalevic, Velibor
Avanzi, Junior Cesar
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Silva, Marx Leandro Naves
Mincato, Ronaldo Luiz
author_role author
author2 Spalevic, Velibor
Avanzi, Junior Cesar
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Silva, Marx Leandro Naves
Mincato, Ronaldo Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tavares, André Silva
Spalevic, Velibor
Avanzi, Junior Cesar
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Silva, Marx Leandro Naves
Mincato, Ronaldo Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gavrilovic method
Hydrology
IntErO
Soil conservation.
Método de Gavrilovic
Hidrologia
IntErO
Conservação do Solo.
topic Gavrilovic method
Hydrology
IntErO
Soil conservation.
Método de Gavrilovic
Hidrologia
IntErO
Conservação do Solo.
description Soil losses due to water erosion threaten the sustainability of agriculture and the food security of current and future generations. This study estimated potential soil losses and sediment production under different types of land uses in a subbasin in the Municipality of Alfenas, southern Minas Gerais, southeastern Brazil. The objective of this research was to evaluate the application of the Potential Erosion Method by the Intensity of Erosion and Drainage program and correlate the findings with the results obtained by the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation as well as geoprocessing techniques and statistical analyses. In the Potential Erosion Method, the coefficient indicating the mean erosion intensity was 0.37, which corresponded to erosion category IV and indicated weak laminar erosion processes, and the total soil loss was 649.31 Mg year-1 and the mean was 1.46 Mg ha-1 year-1. These results were consistent in magnitude with those obtained in the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, which estimated a mean soil loss of 1.52 Mg ha-1 year-1 and a total soil loss of 668.26 Mg year-1. The Potential Erosion Method suggests that 1.5% of the area presents potential soil losses above the soil loss tolerance limit, which ranged from 5.19 to 5.90 Mg ha-1 year-1, while the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation indicated that 7.3% of the area has potential soil losses above the limit. The maximum sediment discharge was 60 Mg year-1, meaning that 9.3% of the total soil loss reached the depositional areas of the river plains or watercourses. The Potential Erosion Method was efficient in the evaluation of water erosion in tropical soils, and the results were consistent with models widely employed in the estimation of soil losses. Thus, the model can support the evaluation of soil losses in Brazil and is a robust tool for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural activities.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Modelagem da Erosão, Intero, ArcGis, EPM, RUSLE, TPS.
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30999
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n2p555
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30999
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n2p555
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/30999/25321
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 2 (2019); 555-572
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 2 (2019); 555-572
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306078517723136