Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21478 |
Resumo: | Cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) is one of the most important orthopedic conditions in dogs, leading to joint instability, pain, osteoarthritis and eventually to meniscal injuries. Several surgical techniques have been described to reestablish joint stability following CCLR, including extracapsular procedures. This study compared the biomechanical effects of two extracapsular stabilization techniques (lateral fabello-tibial suture – LFTS, and modified retinacular imbrication technique – MRIT) using nylon leader line following experimental CCLR in cadaver dogs. Twenty canine cadaveric stifles were used. Joint stiffness, cranial and caudal tibial displacement were evaluated in 4 different experimental scenarios: intact stifle, stifle with CCLR, CCLR treated with lateral fabello-tibial suture (LFTS), and CCLR treated with modified retinacular imbrication technique (MRIT). Results: Mean cranial tibial displacement increased progressively from intact to MRIT, LFTS and CCRL stifles. MRIT resulted in less caudal drawer motion than LFTS. Joint stiffness did not differ significantly between LFTS and MRIT treated stifles. Conclusion: LFTS and MRIT increase joint stability but MRIT is more effective; however none of the techniques studied was able to restore original intact stifle stiffness. Clinical implications of the results presented remain to be determined but kinetic gait analysis studies are warranted to determine whether this biomechanical advantage translates into improved hind limb function in dogs. |
id |
UEL-11_a10d866f9b071662896a676e8faf484d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21478 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogsAvaliação biomecânica de duas técnicas extracapsulares para reconstrução do ligamento cruzado cranial em cadáveres de cãesBiomechanicsCranial cruciate ligamentDogsFabellar sutureStifle.BiomecânicaCãesJoelhoLigamento cruzado cranialSutura fabelo-tibial.Cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) is one of the most important orthopedic conditions in dogs, leading to joint instability, pain, osteoarthritis and eventually to meniscal injuries. Several surgical techniques have been described to reestablish joint stability following CCLR, including extracapsular procedures. This study compared the biomechanical effects of two extracapsular stabilization techniques (lateral fabello-tibial suture – LFTS, and modified retinacular imbrication technique – MRIT) using nylon leader line following experimental CCLR in cadaver dogs. Twenty canine cadaveric stifles were used. Joint stiffness, cranial and caudal tibial displacement were evaluated in 4 different experimental scenarios: intact stifle, stifle with CCLR, CCLR treated with lateral fabello-tibial suture (LFTS), and CCLR treated with modified retinacular imbrication technique (MRIT). Results: Mean cranial tibial displacement increased progressively from intact to MRIT, LFTS and CCRL stifles. MRIT resulted in less caudal drawer motion than LFTS. Joint stiffness did not differ significantly between LFTS and MRIT treated stifles. Conclusion: LFTS and MRIT increase joint stability but MRIT is more effective; however none of the techniques studied was able to restore original intact stifle stiffness. Clinical implications of the results presented remain to be determined but kinetic gait analysis studies are warranted to determine whether this biomechanical advantage translates into improved hind limb function in dogs.A ruptura do ligamento cruzado cranial (RLCCr) é uma das principais afecções ortopédicas em cães e resulta na instabilidade do joelho, dor, desenvolvimento de osteoartrose, podendo também causar lesão de menisco. Com o intuito de restabelecer a estabilidade da articulação, muitas técnicas são utilizadas, dentre elas, as extracapsulares. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi realizar a avaliação biomecânica de duas dessas técnicas em 20 joelhos de cadáveres de cães utilizando-se fio de náilon leader line. Nestas peças foram avaliados a rigidez articular e o deslocamento tanto cranial quanto caudal da tíbia em quatro situações distintas: joelho íntegro; joelho com RLCCr e sutura fabelo-tibial lateral (SFTL); joelho com RLCCr e sutura fabelo-tibial lateral e medial (SFTLM); e por fim, o joelho com RLCCr sem as técnicas de estabilização. Houve diferença no deslocamento cranial entre todas as situações, sendo em ordem crescente, o joelho integro, com SFTLM, com SFTL e por fim, o joelho com RLCCr não estabilizado. Na comparação da presença de movimento de gaveta caudal a técnica de SFTLM apresentou menor deslocamento que a técnica de SFTL. Com relação à rigidez tanto cranial quanto caudal, as duas técnicas não apresentaram diferença. As duas técnicas testadas diminuem a instabilidade do joelho, sendo a SFTLM mais efetiva, e nenhuma delas restaurou a rigidez articular de um joelho íntegro. As implicações clínicas dos resultados apresentados ainda precisam ser determinadas, mas um estudo clínico com avaliação cinética da locomoção pode esclarecer se as diferenças biomecânicas encontradas entre estas duas técnicas são relevantes para a função locomotora dos cães.UEL2016-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionartigo científicoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2147810.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1327Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2016); 1327-1336Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 3 (2016); 1327-13361679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21478/18976http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOda, Sam Golgy ShoyamaSouza, Alexandre Navarro AlvesPereira, Cesar Augusto MartinsEscobar, Andrés Sebastian AristizabalTartarunas, Angélica CeciliaMatera, Julia Maria2022-12-01T15:07:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21478Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-01T15:07:02Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs Avaliação biomecânica de duas técnicas extracapsulares para reconstrução do ligamento cruzado cranial em cadáveres de cães |
title |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs |
spellingShingle |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs Oda, Sam Golgy Shoyama Biomechanics Cranial cruciate ligament Dogs Fabellar suture Stifle. Biomecânica Cães Joelho Ligamento cruzado cranial Sutura fabelo-tibial. |
title_short |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs |
title_full |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs |
title_fullStr |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs |
title_sort |
Biomechanical evaluation of two extracapsular techniques for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in cadaver dogs |
author |
Oda, Sam Golgy Shoyama |
author_facet |
Oda, Sam Golgy Shoyama Souza, Alexandre Navarro Alves Pereira, Cesar Augusto Martins Escobar, Andrés Sebastian Aristizabal Tartarunas, Angélica Cecilia Matera, Julia Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Alexandre Navarro Alves Pereira, Cesar Augusto Martins Escobar, Andrés Sebastian Aristizabal Tartarunas, Angélica Cecilia Matera, Julia Maria |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oda, Sam Golgy Shoyama Souza, Alexandre Navarro Alves Pereira, Cesar Augusto Martins Escobar, Andrés Sebastian Aristizabal Tartarunas, Angélica Cecilia Matera, Julia Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biomechanics Cranial cruciate ligament Dogs Fabellar suture Stifle. Biomecânica Cães Joelho Ligamento cruzado cranial Sutura fabelo-tibial. |
topic |
Biomechanics Cranial cruciate ligament Dogs Fabellar suture Stifle. Biomecânica Cães Joelho Ligamento cruzado cranial Sutura fabelo-tibial. |
description |
Cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) is one of the most important orthopedic conditions in dogs, leading to joint instability, pain, osteoarthritis and eventually to meniscal injuries. Several surgical techniques have been described to reestablish joint stability following CCLR, including extracapsular procedures. This study compared the biomechanical effects of two extracapsular stabilization techniques (lateral fabello-tibial suture – LFTS, and modified retinacular imbrication technique – MRIT) using nylon leader line following experimental CCLR in cadaver dogs. Twenty canine cadaveric stifles were used. Joint stiffness, cranial and caudal tibial displacement were evaluated in 4 different experimental scenarios: intact stifle, stifle with CCLR, CCLR treated with lateral fabello-tibial suture (LFTS), and CCLR treated with modified retinacular imbrication technique (MRIT). Results: Mean cranial tibial displacement increased progressively from intact to MRIT, LFTS and CCRL stifles. MRIT resulted in less caudal drawer motion than LFTS. Joint stiffness did not differ significantly between LFTS and MRIT treated stifles. Conclusion: LFTS and MRIT increase joint stability but MRIT is more effective; however none of the techniques studied was able to restore original intact stifle stiffness. Clinical implications of the results presented remain to be determined but kinetic gait analysis studies are warranted to determine whether this biomechanical advantage translates into improved hind limb function in dogs. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artigo científico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21478 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1327 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21478 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1327 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21478/18976 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 3 (2016); 1327-1336 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 3 (2016); 1327-1336 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306073892454400 |