Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Apolyana Lorrayne
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Sales, Juliana de Fátima, Campos, Rafael Cândido, Rubio Neto, Aurélio, Silva, Fabiano Guimarães
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/10230
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of immersion for varying periods in different concentrations of gibberellic acid and separate methods of scarification on the germination of seeds tucum. In the first trial, testing different soaking periods (24 and 48 hours), different forms of soaking (fast and slow) and different concentrations of gibberellic acid (0 , 100 and 200 mg L-¹ ) compared to the control (water) under completely randomized design in a factorial 2x2x3. The second experiment evaluated the different scarification treatments being: physical (seed coat removal in the hilar region with the aid of a scalpel), chemical (sulfuric acid 98 PA for 2:04 minutes) and thermal (hot water at approximately 98 ° C and cold water at about 2°C for 4 minutes). In the first trial were evaluated % of  contaminated seeds (seeds infected by microorganisms) and hard seeds ( who did not start the germination process , but not soiled), and in the second we assessed germination percentage (%) every two days for three months; germination Speed Index (GSI), time to occurrence of 50 % germination (T50) and Emergency Speed Index (ESI). The use of gibberellic acid was ineffective in promoting germination of Tucum (Astrocaryum Huaimi Mart.). Scarification treatments were effective in promoting germination and emergence of seedlings in the nursery and the most efficient physical removal scarification of the seed coat in the hilar region with the highest percentage of germination.
id UEL-11_a6c0ad6f2d429b018665a46f376eacf0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10230
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)Superação da dormência de sementes de Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)ScarificationSeedling emergenceArecaceaePlant growth regulator.EscarificaçãoEmergência de plântulasArecaceaeRegulador vegetal.5.01.00.00-9 AgronomiaThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of immersion for varying periods in different concentrations of gibberellic acid and separate methods of scarification on the germination of seeds tucum. In the first trial, testing different soaking periods (24 and 48 hours), different forms of soaking (fast and slow) and different concentrations of gibberellic acid (0 , 100 and 200 mg L-¹ ) compared to the control (water) under completely randomized design in a factorial 2x2x3. The second experiment evaluated the different scarification treatments being: physical (seed coat removal in the hilar region with the aid of a scalpel), chemical (sulfuric acid 98 PA for 2:04 minutes) and thermal (hot water at approximately 98 ° C and cold water at about 2°C for 4 minutes). In the first trial were evaluated % of  contaminated seeds (seeds infected by microorganisms) and hard seeds ( who did not start the germination process , but not soiled), and in the second we assessed germination percentage (%) every two days for three months; germination Speed Index (GSI), time to occurrence of 50 % germination (T50) and Emergency Speed Index (ESI). The use of gibberellic acid was ineffective in promoting germination of Tucum (Astrocaryum Huaimi Mart.). Scarification treatments were effective in promoting germination and emergence of seedlings in the nursery and the most efficient physical removal scarification of the seed coat in the hilar region with the highest percentage of germination. Objetivou-se com esse trabalho, avaliar o efeito da embebição por períodos variados, em diferentes concentrações do ácido giberélico e, métodos de escarificação; no processo germinativo das sementes de tucum. No primeiro ensaio foram testados diferentes períodos de embebição (24 e 48 horas), diferentes formas de embebição (rápida e lenta) e diferentes concentrações do ácido giberélico (0, 100 e 200 mg.L-¹) sob o delineamento experimental inteiramente casualizado em esquema fatorial 2x2x3. No segundo experimento, avaliaram-se os diferentes tratamentos de escarificação sendo eles: físico (remoção do tegumento na região do hilo com auxilio de bisturi); químico (ácido sulfúrico 98 PA por 2 e 4 minutos) e térmico (água quente a aproximadamente 98°C e água fria a aproximadamente 2°C por 4 minutos). No primeiro ensaio foram avaliadas % de sementes contaminadas (sementes infectadas por microorganismos) e de sementes duras (sementes que não iniciaram o processo germinativo, mas também não contaminaram); e no segundo avaliou-se porcentagem de germinação (%) a cada dois dias por três meses; Índice de Velocidade de Germinação (IVG), Tempo para ocorrência de 50% de germinação (T50) e Índice de Velocidade Emergência (IVE). O uso de ácido giberélico foi ineficiente na promoção da germinação de sementes de Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.). Os tratamentos de escarificação mostraram-se eficientes na promoção da germinação e na emergência de plântulas em viveiro, sendo o mais eficiente a escarificação física com remoção do tegumento na região do hilo com a maior porcentagem de germinação. UEL2014-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresPesquisa de Laboratórioapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1023010.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n2p749Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2014); 749-758Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 2 (2014); 749-7581679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/10230/pdf_274Souza, Apolyana LorrayneSales, Juliana de FátimaCampos, Rafael CândidoRubio Neto, AurélioSilva, Fabiano Guimarãesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:35:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10230Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:35:49Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
Superação da dormência de sementes de Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
title Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
spellingShingle Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
Souza, Apolyana Lorrayne
Scarification
Seedling emergence
Arecaceae
Plant growth regulator.
Escarificação
Emergência de plântulas
Arecaceae
Regulador vegetal.
5.01.00.00-9 Agronomia
title_short Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
title_full Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
title_fullStr Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
title_full_unstemmed Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
title_sort Overcome dormancy of seeds of Tucum (Astrocaryum huaimi Mart.)
author Souza, Apolyana Lorrayne
author_facet Souza, Apolyana Lorrayne
Sales, Juliana de Fátima
Campos, Rafael Cândido
Rubio Neto, Aurélio
Silva, Fabiano Guimarães
author_role author
author2 Sales, Juliana de Fátima
Campos, Rafael Cândido
Rubio Neto, Aurélio
Silva, Fabiano Guimarães
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Apolyana Lorrayne
Sales, Juliana de Fátima
Campos, Rafael Cândido
Rubio Neto, Aurélio
Silva, Fabiano Guimarães
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Scarification
Seedling emergence
Arecaceae
Plant growth regulator.
Escarificação
Emergência de plântulas
Arecaceae
Regulador vegetal.
5.01.00.00-9 Agronomia
topic Scarification
Seedling emergence
Arecaceae
Plant growth regulator.
Escarificação
Emergência de plântulas
Arecaceae
Regulador vegetal.
5.01.00.00-9 Agronomia
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of immersion for varying periods in different concentrations of gibberellic acid and separate methods of scarification on the germination of seeds tucum. In the first trial, testing different soaking periods (24 and 48 hours), different forms of soaking (fast and slow) and different concentrations of gibberellic acid (0 , 100 and 200 mg L-¹ ) compared to the control (water) under completely randomized design in a factorial 2x2x3. The second experiment evaluated the different scarification treatments being: physical (seed coat removal in the hilar region with the aid of a scalpel), chemical (sulfuric acid 98 PA for 2:04 minutes) and thermal (hot water at approximately 98 ° C and cold water at about 2°C for 4 minutes). In the first trial were evaluated % of  contaminated seeds (seeds infected by microorganisms) and hard seeds ( who did not start the germination process , but not soiled), and in the second we assessed germination percentage (%) every two days for three months; germination Speed Index (GSI), time to occurrence of 50 % germination (T50) and Emergency Speed Index (ESI). The use of gibberellic acid was ineffective in promoting germination of Tucum (Astrocaryum Huaimi Mart.). Scarification treatments were effective in promoting germination and emergence of seedlings in the nursery and the most efficient physical removal scarification of the seed coat in the hilar region with the highest percentage of germination.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
Pesquisa de Laboratório
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/10230
10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n2p749
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/10230
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n2p749
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/10230/pdf_274
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2014); 749-758
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 35 n. 2 (2014); 749-758
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306065915936768