Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Luiz Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Itavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas, Mateus, Rodrigo Gonçalves, Leal, Eduardo Souza, Abreu, Urbano Gomes Pinto, Nogueira, Eriklis, Ferreira, Marcos Barbosa, Carvalho, Cristiano Marcelo Espinola
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25920
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the performance and economic viability of including the aerial parts of cassava (PAM) in the feed of semi-confined lambs for partial reduction of food concentrates. Fifty-six sheep, including males and females of the Pantaneira genetic group weighing 18.84 ± 2.02 kg on an average were used. The experiment was conducted in a factorial randomized complete block design with four treatments, each with seven females and seven males. Each group of 14 animals received one of four treatments: control, 10% of food concentrate in diet replaced with PAM, 20% replaced with PAM, and 30% replaced with PAM. The average total gain in weight (GWT) of the male lambs was 26.89% higher than the gains observed in females. Based on the cost analysis, we observed a linear effect (P < 0.01), i.e., a decrease in the feed cost for male and female groups with increase in PAM content. For the study period, the expenditure for the control male group was the highest at $ 17.60 per animal. Expenditure for the PAM 30 male group was the lowest at $ 12.74 per animal. These figures reflect the actual operating costs (COE), i.e., the power is 75.78% and 74.77%, for male and female groups respectively. The total cost, decreased linearly (P < 0.05) with PAM 30 treatment costing the least at $ 47.90, which was $ 7.02 lower than the control. When assessing the net margin per kilogram among the female groups, we observed a quadratic effect (P < 0.01) with a maximum gain of 23.98% when adding PAM and $ 0.50 kg-1. Our results show that the raising of lambs in semi-confinement was economically viable, and the addition of the aerial part of processed cassava in the feed presented a higher economic return. Further, the addition of aerial parts of cassava did not affect the performance of the lambs.
id UEL-11_a9d56c07db9e387b7b1125d7887234dc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25920
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinementParte aérea da mandioca em substituição parcial a alimentos concentrados na dieta de cordeirosFodderNutritionProduction costSheep.ForragemCusto de produçãoNutriçãoOvinos.This study aimed to evaluate the performance and economic viability of including the aerial parts of cassava (PAM) in the feed of semi-confined lambs for partial reduction of food concentrates. Fifty-six sheep, including males and females of the Pantaneira genetic group weighing 18.84 ± 2.02 kg on an average were used. The experiment was conducted in a factorial randomized complete block design with four treatments, each with seven females and seven males. Each group of 14 animals received one of four treatments: control, 10% of food concentrate in diet replaced with PAM, 20% replaced with PAM, and 30% replaced with PAM. The average total gain in weight (GWT) of the male lambs was 26.89% higher than the gains observed in females. Based on the cost analysis, we observed a linear effect (P < 0.01), i.e., a decrease in the feed cost for male and female groups with increase in PAM content. For the study period, the expenditure for the control male group was the highest at $ 17.60 per animal. Expenditure for the PAM 30 male group was the lowest at $ 12.74 per animal. These figures reflect the actual operating costs (COE), i.e., the power is 75.78% and 74.77%, for male and female groups respectively. The total cost, decreased linearly (P < 0.05) with PAM 30 treatment costing the least at $ 47.90, which was $ 7.02 lower than the control. When assessing the net margin per kilogram among the female groups, we observed a quadratic effect (P < 0.01) with a maximum gain of 23.98% when adding PAM and $ 0.50 kg-1. Our results show that the raising of lambs in semi-confinement was economically viable, and the addition of the aerial part of processed cassava in the feed presented a higher economic return. Further, the addition of aerial parts of cassava did not affect the performance of the lambs.Objetivou-se avaliar o desempenho produtivo e viabilidade econômica da inclusão da parte aérea de mandioca in natura na ração de cordeiros semi-confinados, em busca da redução parcial de alimentos concentrados. Foram utilizados 56 ovinos da raça Pantaneira, sendo 28 machos e 28 fêmeas, com idade média de 75 dias, pesos médios de 18,84kg ± 2,02, avaliados durante os meses de janeiro a março de 2015, totalizando 65 dias. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos inteiramente casualizados com quatro tratamentos, cada um com 7 fêmeas e 7 machos, sendo que foram divididos de forma que os pesos e os animais fossem o mais homogêneos. Cada grupo de 14 animais recebeu um dos quatro tratamentos: Controle; tratamento com adição de 10% PAM em substituição ao concentrado; tratamento com adição de 20% de PAM em substituição ao concentrado e tratamento com adição de 30% de PAM em substituição ao concentrado. O valor de ganho médio total (GPT) dos cordeiros machos foi 26,89% superior aos ganhos observados no grupamento de fêmeas. Com base no centro de custos foi observado efeito linear (P < 0,01) decrescente no valor da alimentação para os grupamentos de macho e fêmea. Sendo o tratamento controle o maior dispêndio no período com R$ 56,86 animal-1 e o tratamento PAM 30 o menor valor com R$ 41,17 animal-1 no grupamento de machos. Estes valores refletiram no custo operacional efetivo (COE), ou seja, a alimentação representa 75,78% e 74,77%, do COE para os grupamentos de macho e fêmea respectivamente. O custo total apresentou efeito linear (P < 0,05) decrescente, o tratamento PAM 30 o menor valor apurado R$ 154,72. Resultando em redução no custo total em R$ 22,69 em relação ao tratamento controle (R$ 177,41). Ao se avaliar a margem liquida por quilo dentre o grupamento de fêmeas observou efeito quadrático (P < 0,01) com ponto de máxima em 23,98% de adição de PAM e valor em R$ 1,61 Kg ganho-1. Conclui-se a terminação de cordeiros em semi-confinamento, foi economicamente viável, tendo apresentado maior retorno econômico com a adição da parte aérea de mandioca in natura na ração, não afetando o desempenho dos cordeiros.UEL2017-05-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2592010.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p943Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 2 (2017); 943-956Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 2 (2017); 943-9561679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25920/20878Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Luiz CarlosItavo, Luís Carlos VinhasMateus, Rodrigo GonçalvesLeal, Eduardo SouzaAbreu, Urbano Gomes PintoNogueira, EriklisFerreira, Marcos BarbosaCarvalho, Cristiano Marcelo Espinola2022-11-16T16:56:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25920Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-16T16:56:45Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
Parte aérea da mandioca em substituição parcial a alimentos concentrados na dieta de cordeiros
title Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
spellingShingle Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
Pereira, Luiz Carlos
Fodder
Nutrition
Production cost
Sheep.
Forragem
Custo de produção
Nutrição
Ovinos.
title_short Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
title_full Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
title_fullStr Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
title_full_unstemmed Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
title_sort Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement
author Pereira, Luiz Carlos
author_facet Pereira, Luiz Carlos
Itavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas
Mateus, Rodrigo Gonçalves
Leal, Eduardo Souza
Abreu, Urbano Gomes Pinto
Nogueira, Eriklis
Ferreira, Marcos Barbosa
Carvalho, Cristiano Marcelo Espinola
author_role author
author2 Itavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas
Mateus, Rodrigo Gonçalves
Leal, Eduardo Souza
Abreu, Urbano Gomes Pinto
Nogueira, Eriklis
Ferreira, Marcos Barbosa
Carvalho, Cristiano Marcelo Espinola
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Luiz Carlos
Itavo, Luís Carlos Vinhas
Mateus, Rodrigo Gonçalves
Leal, Eduardo Souza
Abreu, Urbano Gomes Pinto
Nogueira, Eriklis
Ferreira, Marcos Barbosa
Carvalho, Cristiano Marcelo Espinola
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fodder
Nutrition
Production cost
Sheep.
Forragem
Custo de produção
Nutrição
Ovinos.
topic Fodder
Nutrition
Production cost
Sheep.
Forragem
Custo de produção
Nutrição
Ovinos.
description This study aimed to evaluate the performance and economic viability of including the aerial parts of cassava (PAM) in the feed of semi-confined lambs for partial reduction of food concentrates. Fifty-six sheep, including males and females of the Pantaneira genetic group weighing 18.84 ± 2.02 kg on an average were used. The experiment was conducted in a factorial randomized complete block design with four treatments, each with seven females and seven males. Each group of 14 animals received one of four treatments: control, 10% of food concentrate in diet replaced with PAM, 20% replaced with PAM, and 30% replaced with PAM. The average total gain in weight (GWT) of the male lambs was 26.89% higher than the gains observed in females. Based on the cost analysis, we observed a linear effect (P < 0.01), i.e., a decrease in the feed cost for male and female groups with increase in PAM content. For the study period, the expenditure for the control male group was the highest at $ 17.60 per animal. Expenditure for the PAM 30 male group was the lowest at $ 12.74 per animal. These figures reflect the actual operating costs (COE), i.e., the power is 75.78% and 74.77%, for male and female groups respectively. The total cost, decreased linearly (P < 0.05) with PAM 30 treatment costing the least at $ 47.90, which was $ 7.02 lower than the control. When assessing the net margin per kilogram among the female groups, we observed a quadratic effect (P < 0.01) with a maximum gain of 23.98% when adding PAM and $ 0.50 kg-1. Our results show that the raising of lambs in semi-confinement was economically viable, and the addition of the aerial part of processed cassava in the feed presented a higher economic return. Further, the addition of aerial parts of cassava did not affect the performance of the lambs.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25920
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p943
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25920
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p943
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/25920/20878
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 2 (2017); 943-956
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 2 (2017); 943-956
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306075906768896