Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/32990 |
Resumo: | Thermal discomfort is one of the main causes of production losses in animals fully exposed to solar radiation under extensive livestock farming. The inclusion of trees in this farming system is the most efficient strategy to decrease the temperature and increase animal productivity without the need to explore new areas. In this context, the objective of this study was to characterize the microclimate in a silvopastoral system (SPS), a refuge area, and an open pasture, and evaluate thermal comfort and the ingestive behavior of animals under shade. The study was conducted at the Agronomic Institute of Paraná (IAPAR), located in Ibiporã, Paraná state, Brazil, in three areas with distinct management systems: a SPS of Eucalyptus grandis with Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.), a woodland of Leucena leucocephala that provided shade to cattle, and a pasture in full sun (PFS). Automatic meteorological stations were installed in the SPS (one station beside the tree lines and the other in an average distance perpendicular to the rows), one in the refuge area, and one in the PFS. The measured variables were air temperature and relative humidity. The mean temperatures of the shaded treatments were compared to those of the PFS using a t-test. The mean values of the temperature and humidity index (THI) were calculated for each season of the year. The animal ingestion behavior in the SPS was analyzed in three typical days in different seasons of the year. Significant differences were observed between shade treatments and full-sun pasture, with a temperature decrease ranging from 0.4 to 1.6 °C in the shaded systems. The comparison of animal thermal comfort between the study areas in different seasons of the year indicated that there were no significant differences in thermal comfort between the SPS and refuge area relative to the PFS, suggesting a need to monitor the animals’ body temperature to better estimate thermal comfort. The evaluation of the ingestive behavior evidenced the animals’ preference to perform activities under tree shade and that the SPS led to changes in their food habits, optimizing grazing time. Therefore, the trees directly affected the microclimate of the studied environments, attenuating the temperature, protecting the animals against direct solar radiation, and providing better thermal comfort. |
id |
UEL-11_b6e5f396cf35d3de1f09859749ceac75 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32990 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral systemTemperatura, conforto térmico e comportamento ingestivo animal em sistema silvipastorilArea of refugeForest-livestockMicroclimateShadeTemperature and Humidity Index.Área de refúgioÍndice de Temperatura e UmidadeMicroclimaPecuária-florestaSombreamento.Thermal discomfort is one of the main causes of production losses in animals fully exposed to solar radiation under extensive livestock farming. The inclusion of trees in this farming system is the most efficient strategy to decrease the temperature and increase animal productivity without the need to explore new areas. In this context, the objective of this study was to characterize the microclimate in a silvopastoral system (SPS), a refuge area, and an open pasture, and evaluate thermal comfort and the ingestive behavior of animals under shade. The study was conducted at the Agronomic Institute of Paraná (IAPAR), located in Ibiporã, Paraná state, Brazil, in three areas with distinct management systems: a SPS of Eucalyptus grandis with Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.), a woodland of Leucena leucocephala that provided shade to cattle, and a pasture in full sun (PFS). Automatic meteorological stations were installed in the SPS (one station beside the tree lines and the other in an average distance perpendicular to the rows), one in the refuge area, and one in the PFS. The measured variables were air temperature and relative humidity. The mean temperatures of the shaded treatments were compared to those of the PFS using a t-test. The mean values of the temperature and humidity index (THI) were calculated for each season of the year. The animal ingestion behavior in the SPS was analyzed in three typical days in different seasons of the year. Significant differences were observed between shade treatments and full-sun pasture, with a temperature decrease ranging from 0.4 to 1.6 °C in the shaded systems. The comparison of animal thermal comfort between the study areas in different seasons of the year indicated that there were no significant differences in thermal comfort between the SPS and refuge area relative to the PFS, suggesting a need to monitor the animals’ body temperature to better estimate thermal comfort. The evaluation of the ingestive behavior evidenced the animals’ preference to perform activities under tree shade and that the SPS led to changes in their food habits, optimizing grazing time. Therefore, the trees directly affected the microclimate of the studied environments, attenuating the temperature, protecting the animals against direct solar radiation, and providing better thermal comfort.O desconforto térmico é uma das principais causas da queda produtiva da pecuária extensiva a pleno sol, sendo a inserção de árvores no sistema a alternativa mais eficiente para atenuar a temperatura e aumentar a produtividade sem a necessidade de explorar novas áreas. Nesse contexto, objetivou-se caracterizar o microclima em um sistema silvipastoril, uma área de refúgio e a pleno sol, além de estimar o conforto térmico e avaliar o comportamento ingestivo dos animais sob sombra. O estudo foi realizado na estação experimental do Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR), localizada em Ibiporã-PR, em três áreas com manejos distintos: um sistema silvipastoril, um bosque que serve como refúgio dos animais e uma pastagem a pleno sol. Foram instaladas estações meteorológicas automáticas no sistema silvipastoril, uma sob a sombra e outra na distância média perpendicular aos renques, na área de refúgio e no pasto a pleno sol. As variáveis medidas foram temperatura do ar e umidade relativa do ar. As temperaturas médias dos tratamentos arborizados foram comparadas com as do pasto a pleno sol por meio do test t. Valores médios de Temperatura e Índice de Umidade (ITU) foram calculados para cada estação do ano. Analisou-se o comportamento ingestivo animal no sistema silvipastoril em três dias representativos de diferentes estações do ano. Constatou-se diferenças significativas entre os tratamentos sombreados e a pastagem a pleno sol, com redução de temperatura variando entre 0,4 a 1,6 °C nos sistemas sombreados. Ao comparar o conforto térmico animal para as estações do ano, não verificou-se diferenças entre o sistema silvipastoril e refúgio em relação ao pleno sol, sendo indicado monitorar a temperatura corporal animal para melhor estimar sua condição de conforto térmico. Entretanto, ao avaliar o comportamento ingestivo animal evidenciou-se a preferência dos animais por realizar suas atividades sob a sombra das árvores; o sistema silvipastoril propiciou mudanças no seu hábito alimentar, otimizando o tempo de pastejo. Conclui-se que o componente arbóreo influenciou diretamente no microclima dos ambientes estudados, atenuando a temperatura e protegendo os animais contra a incidência direta de radiação solar, proporcionando maior conforto térmico.UEL2019-02-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo científicoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3299010.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n1p403Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 1 (2019); 403-416Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 1 (2019); 403-4161679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/32990/25016Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira Junior, Nilson AparecidoSilva, Marcelo Augusto de Aguiar eCaramori, Paulo HenriqueNitsche, Pablo RicardoCorrêa, Karlmer Abel BuenoAlves, Daniel Soares2022-10-19T15:32:24Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32990Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-19T15:32:24Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system Temperatura, conforto térmico e comportamento ingestivo animal em sistema silvipastoril |
title |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system |
spellingShingle |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system Vieira Junior, Nilson Aparecido Area of refuge Forest-livestock Microclimate Shade Temperature and Humidity Index. Área de refúgio Índice de Temperatura e Umidade Microclima Pecuária-floresta Sombreamento. |
title_short |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system |
title_full |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system |
title_fullStr |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system |
title_sort |
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system |
author |
Vieira Junior, Nilson Aparecido |
author_facet |
Vieira Junior, Nilson Aparecido Silva, Marcelo Augusto de Aguiar e Caramori, Paulo Henrique Nitsche, Pablo Ricardo Corrêa, Karlmer Abel Bueno Alves, Daniel Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Marcelo Augusto de Aguiar e Caramori, Paulo Henrique Nitsche, Pablo Ricardo Corrêa, Karlmer Abel Bueno Alves, Daniel Soares |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira Junior, Nilson Aparecido Silva, Marcelo Augusto de Aguiar e Caramori, Paulo Henrique Nitsche, Pablo Ricardo Corrêa, Karlmer Abel Bueno Alves, Daniel Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Area of refuge Forest-livestock Microclimate Shade Temperature and Humidity Index. Área de refúgio Índice de Temperatura e Umidade Microclima Pecuária-floresta Sombreamento. |
topic |
Area of refuge Forest-livestock Microclimate Shade Temperature and Humidity Index. Área de refúgio Índice de Temperatura e Umidade Microclima Pecuária-floresta Sombreamento. |
description |
Thermal discomfort is one of the main causes of production losses in animals fully exposed to solar radiation under extensive livestock farming. The inclusion of trees in this farming system is the most efficient strategy to decrease the temperature and increase animal productivity without the need to explore new areas. In this context, the objective of this study was to characterize the microclimate in a silvopastoral system (SPS), a refuge area, and an open pasture, and evaluate thermal comfort and the ingestive behavior of animals under shade. The study was conducted at the Agronomic Institute of Paraná (IAPAR), located in Ibiporã, Paraná state, Brazil, in three areas with distinct management systems: a SPS of Eucalyptus grandis with Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.), a woodland of Leucena leucocephala that provided shade to cattle, and a pasture in full sun (PFS). Automatic meteorological stations were installed in the SPS (one station beside the tree lines and the other in an average distance perpendicular to the rows), one in the refuge area, and one in the PFS. The measured variables were air temperature and relative humidity. The mean temperatures of the shaded treatments were compared to those of the PFS using a t-test. The mean values of the temperature and humidity index (THI) were calculated for each season of the year. The animal ingestion behavior in the SPS was analyzed in three typical days in different seasons of the year. Significant differences were observed between shade treatments and full-sun pasture, with a temperature decrease ranging from 0.4 to 1.6 °C in the shaded systems. The comparison of animal thermal comfort between the study areas in different seasons of the year indicated that there were no significant differences in thermal comfort between the SPS and refuge area relative to the PFS, suggesting a need to monitor the animals’ body temperature to better estimate thermal comfort. The evaluation of the ingestive behavior evidenced the animals’ preference to perform activities under tree shade and that the SPS led to changes in their food habits, optimizing grazing time. Therefore, the trees directly affected the microclimate of the studied environments, attenuating the temperature, protecting the animals against direct solar radiation, and providing better thermal comfort. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo científico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/32990 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n1p403 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/32990 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n1p403 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/32990/25016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 1 (2019); 403-416 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 1 (2019); 403-416 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306079725682688 |