Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
DOI: | 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911 |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339 |
Resumo: | The formulation of a drug can interfere with its absorption into the circulatory system and may result in changes in the dose required to achieve that particular effect. The aim of this study was to determine the lethal dose 50 (LD 50) and 100 (LD100) of a nanoemulsion of propofol and the lipid emulsion in mice intraperitoneally. One hundred sixty animals weighing 36.47±4.6g, which were distributed randomly into two groups: NANO and EMU who received propofol 1% in the nanoemulsion and lipid emulsion, respectively, intraperitoneally. Began with a dose of 250mg/kg (n=10) and from this isdecreased or increased the dose until achieving 0 and 100% of deaths in each group thus formed were seven subgroups in NANO (each subgroup n = 10) at doses 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 and 475 mg/kg and in EMU eight subgroups (n= 10 each subset) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 and 575 mg/kg. In the CONTROL group (n=10) animals received saline in the largest volume used in the other groups to rule out death by the volume injected. Analysis of LD 50 and LD 100 were obtained by linear regression. The LD 50 was 320, 95 mg / kg and 4243, 51mg / kg and the LD 100 was445.99 mg / kg and 595.31 mg / kg to groups NANO and EMU, respectively. It follows that nanoemulsion is propofol in 25% more potent compared to the lipid emulsionintraperitoneally. |
id |
UEL-11_be066838319b0bb8750a8c362fe5a3fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11339 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
spelling |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in miceDeterminação das doses letal 50 e 100 do propofol em nanoemulsão ou em emulsão lipídica pela via intraperitoneal em camundongosLethal dosePotencyPropofolNanoemulsionMice.5.05.01.01-1Dose letalPotênciaPropofolNanoemulsãoCamundongos.5.05.01.01-1The formulation of a drug can interfere with its absorption into the circulatory system and may result in changes in the dose required to achieve that particular effect. The aim of this study was to determine the lethal dose 50 (LD 50) and 100 (LD100) of a nanoemulsion of propofol and the lipid emulsion in mice intraperitoneally. One hundred sixty animals weighing 36.47±4.6g, which were distributed randomly into two groups: NANO and EMU who received propofol 1% in the nanoemulsion and lipid emulsion, respectively, intraperitoneally. Began with a dose of 250mg/kg (n=10) and from this isdecreased or increased the dose until achieving 0 and 100% of deaths in each group thus formed were seven subgroups in NANO (each subgroup n = 10) at doses 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 and 475 mg/kg and in EMU eight subgroups (n= 10 each subset) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 and 575 mg/kg. In the CONTROL group (n=10) animals received saline in the largest volume used in the other groups to rule out death by the volume injected. Analysis of LD 50 and LD 100 were obtained by linear regression. The LD 50 was 320, 95 mg / kg and 4243, 51mg / kg and the LD 100 was445.99 mg / kg and 595.31 mg / kg to groups NANO and EMU, respectively. It follows that nanoemulsion is propofol in 25% more potent compared to the lipid emulsionintraperitoneally. A formulação de um fármaco pode interferir na sua absorção para o sistema circulatório, podendo resultar em alterações da dose necessária para que se consiga determinado efeito. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar as doses letais 50 (DL 50) e 100 (DL100) do propofol em nanoemulsão e emulsão lipídica em camundongos pela via intraperitoneal. Foram utilizados 160 animais pesando 36,47 ± 4,6g, os quais foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: NANO e EMU que receberam propofol à 1% em nanoemulsão e em emulsão lipídica, respectivamente, pela via intraperitoneal. Iniciou-se com a dose de 250mg/kg (n=10) e a partir desta diminuiu-se ou aumentou-se a dose até que se obtivesse 0 e 100% de óbitos em cada grupo, desta forma foram constituídos sete subgrupos no NANO (n=10 cada subgrupo) nas doses de 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 e 475 mg/kg e oito subgrupos no EMU (n=10 cada subgrupo) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 e 575 mg/kg. No grupo CONTROLE (n=10) os animais receberam solução fisiológica no maior volume utilizado nos demais grupos para descartar óbito pelo volume injetado. As análises de DL50 e DL 100 foram obtidas através de regressão linear simples. A DL 50 foi de 320,95 mg/kg e 423,51 mg/kg e a DL 100 foi de de 445,99 mg/kg e 595,31 mg/kg para os grupos NANO e EMU, respectivamente. Conclui-se que o propofol em nanoemulsão é 25 % mais potente quando comparado à emulsão lipídica pela via intraperitoneal.UEL2012-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1133910.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 5 (2012); 1911-1918Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 5 (2012); 1911-19181679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/11571Copyright (c) 2012 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGehrcke, Martielo IvanRosa, Ademir Cassiano daTamanho, Renato BatistaMoraes, Aury Nunes deOleskovicz, Nilson2023-01-27T13:40:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11339Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-27T13:40:16Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice Determinação das doses letal 50 e 100 do propofol em nanoemulsão ou em emulsão lipídica pela via intraperitoneal em camundongos |
title |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice |
spellingShingle |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan Lethal dose Potency Propofol Nanoemulsion Mice. 5.05.01.01-1 Dose letal Potência Propofol Nanoemulsão Camundongos. 5.05.01.01-1 Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan Lethal dose Potency Propofol Nanoemulsion Mice. 5.05.01.01-1 Dose letal Potência Propofol Nanoemulsão Camundongos. 5.05.01.01-1 |
title_short |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice |
title_full |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice |
title_fullStr |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice |
title_sort |
Determination of lethal doses 50 and 100 of propofol in lipid emulsion nor nanoemulsion intraperitoneally in mice |
author |
Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan |
author_facet |
Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da Tamanho, Renato Batista Moraes, Aury Nunes de Oleskovicz, Nilson Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da Tamanho, Renato Batista Moraes, Aury Nunes de Oleskovicz, Nilson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da Tamanho, Renato Batista Moraes, Aury Nunes de Oleskovicz, Nilson |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gehrcke, Martielo Ivan Rosa, Ademir Cassiano da Tamanho, Renato Batista Moraes, Aury Nunes de Oleskovicz, Nilson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lethal dose Potency Propofol Nanoemulsion Mice. 5.05.01.01-1 Dose letal Potência Propofol Nanoemulsão Camundongos. 5.05.01.01-1 |
topic |
Lethal dose Potency Propofol Nanoemulsion Mice. 5.05.01.01-1 Dose letal Potência Propofol Nanoemulsão Camundongos. 5.05.01.01-1 |
description |
The formulation of a drug can interfere with its absorption into the circulatory system and may result in changes in the dose required to achieve that particular effect. The aim of this study was to determine the lethal dose 50 (LD 50) and 100 (LD100) of a nanoemulsion of propofol and the lipid emulsion in mice intraperitoneally. One hundred sixty animals weighing 36.47±4.6g, which were distributed randomly into two groups: NANO and EMU who received propofol 1% in the nanoemulsion and lipid emulsion, respectively, intraperitoneally. Began with a dose of 250mg/kg (n=10) and from this isdecreased or increased the dose until achieving 0 and 100% of deaths in each group thus formed were seven subgroups in NANO (each subgroup n = 10) at doses 200, 250, 325, 350, 400, 425 and 475 mg/kg and in EMU eight subgroups (n= 10 each subset) 250, 325, 350, 400, 425, 475, 525 and 575 mg/kg. In the CONTROL group (n=10) animals received saline in the largest volume used in the other groups to rule out death by the volume injected. Analysis of LD 50 and LD 100 were obtained by linear regression. The LD 50 was 320, 95 mg / kg and 4243, 51mg / kg and the LD 100 was445.99 mg / kg and 595.31 mg / kg to groups NANO and EMU, respectively. It follows that nanoemulsion is propofol in 25% more potent compared to the lipid emulsionintraperitoneally. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11339/11571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2012 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2012 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 5 (2012); 1911-1918 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 5 (2012); 1911-1918 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1822182519945035776 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n5p1911 |