Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38589 |
Resumo: | The growth and yield of sunflower plants can be influenced by the plant population arrangement and the type of irrigation system adopted to meet the water requirements of the crop. This study examines the influence of different irrigation systems and spacings between planting rows on the development of sunflower cultivars for the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with a split-plot arrangement in which the plots consisted of three irrigation systems (drip, micro-sprinkler and sprinkler); sub-plots were represented by three spacings between planting rows (0.65, 0.55 and 0.45 m); and sub-sub-plots corresponded to two sunflower cultivars (Hélio 251 and Hélio 360). The following variables were analyzed: plant height; number of leaves; stem diameter; number of heads; head diameter; dry biomass of stems, leaves and heads; and achene yield. The different irrigation systems and row spacings markedly influenced the growth of the sunflower cultivars. The highest yield of cultivar Hélio 251 was obtained with the drip irrigation system and 0.55 m spacing. Cultivar Hélio 360 achieved the highest yields when irrigated by the micro-sprinkler system at 0.55 and 0.45 m spacing. In the sprinkler irrigation system, cultivar Hélio 360 obtained the highest yield at 0.45 m spacing. |
id |
UEL-11_c016885ee6d4eafcef155c933b0d0270 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38589 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco ValleyCultivo do girassol com diferentes sistemas de irrigação e espaçamentos de plantio no Submédio São FranciscoHelianthus annuusPopulation arrangementWater availabilityYield.Helianthus annuusArranjo populacionalDisponibilidade hídricaProdutividade.The growth and yield of sunflower plants can be influenced by the plant population arrangement and the type of irrigation system adopted to meet the water requirements of the crop. This study examines the influence of different irrigation systems and spacings between planting rows on the development of sunflower cultivars for the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with a split-plot arrangement in which the plots consisted of three irrigation systems (drip, micro-sprinkler and sprinkler); sub-plots were represented by three spacings between planting rows (0.65, 0.55 and 0.45 m); and sub-sub-plots corresponded to two sunflower cultivars (Hélio 251 and Hélio 360). The following variables were analyzed: plant height; number of leaves; stem diameter; number of heads; head diameter; dry biomass of stems, leaves and heads; and achene yield. The different irrigation systems and row spacings markedly influenced the growth of the sunflower cultivars. The highest yield of cultivar Hélio 251 was obtained with the drip irrigation system and 0.55 m spacing. Cultivar Hélio 360 achieved the highest yields when irrigated by the micro-sprinkler system at 0.55 and 0.45 m spacing. In the sprinkler irrigation system, cultivar Hélio 360 obtained the highest yield at 0.45 m spacing.O crescimento e a produtividade de plantas de girassol podem ser influenciados pelo arranjo populacional de plantas e pelo tipo de sistema de irrigação adotado para suprir as necessidades hídricas da cultura. O objetivo com este trabalho foi avaliar a influência de diferentes sistemas de irrigação e espaçamentos entre linhas de plantio no desenvolvimento de cultivares de girassol, para a região do Submédio do Vale do São Francisco. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados dispostos em parcelas subsubdivididas, sendo as parcelas três sistemas de irrigação (gotejamento, microaspersão e aspersão), as subparcelas três espaçamentos entre linhas de plantio (0,65; 0,55; e 0,45 m) e as subsubparcelas duas cultivares de girassol (Hélio 251 e Hélio 360). As variáveis analisadas foram: altura de plantas, número de folhas, diâmetro do caule, número de capítulos, diâmetro do capítulo, biomassa seca do caule, folhas e capítulos e produtividade de aquênios. Os diferentes sistemas de irrigação e de espaçamento entre linhas influenciaram o crescimento das cultivares de girassol de forma singular. A maior produtividade da cultivar Hélio 251 foi obtida quando submetida ao sistema de irrigação por gotejamento e ao espaçamento de 0,55 m. A cultivar Hélio 360 irrigado pelo sistema de microaspersão, alcançou as maiores produtividades, com os espaçamentos 0,55 m e 0,45 m. No sistema de irrigação por aspersão, a cultivar Hélio 360 expressou maior produtividade no espaçamento de 0,45 m.UEL2020-11-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3858910.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6Supl2p2899Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6Supl2 (2020); 2899-2910Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6Supl2 (2020); 2899-29101679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38589/28247Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSimões, Welson LimaSilva, Jucicléia Soares daOliveira, Anderson Ramos deRegitano Neto, AmadeuDrumond, Marcos AntonioLima, Jair AndradeNascimento, Bruno Rodrigues do2022-10-04T16:09:54Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/38589Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-04T16:09:54Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley Cultivo do girassol com diferentes sistemas de irrigação e espaçamentos de plantio no Submédio São Francisco |
title |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley |
spellingShingle |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley Simões, Welson Lima Helianthus annuus Population arrangement Water availability Yield. Helianthus annuus Arranjo populacional Disponibilidade hídrica Produtividade. |
title_short |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley |
title_full |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley |
title_fullStr |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley |
title_sort |
Sunflower cultivation under different irrigation systems and planting spacings in the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley |
author |
Simões, Welson Lima |
author_facet |
Simões, Welson Lima Silva, Jucicléia Soares da Oliveira, Anderson Ramos de Regitano Neto, Amadeu Drumond, Marcos Antonio Lima, Jair Andrade Nascimento, Bruno Rodrigues do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Jucicléia Soares da Oliveira, Anderson Ramos de Regitano Neto, Amadeu Drumond, Marcos Antonio Lima, Jair Andrade Nascimento, Bruno Rodrigues do |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Simões, Welson Lima Silva, Jucicléia Soares da Oliveira, Anderson Ramos de Regitano Neto, Amadeu Drumond, Marcos Antonio Lima, Jair Andrade Nascimento, Bruno Rodrigues do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Helianthus annuus Population arrangement Water availability Yield. Helianthus annuus Arranjo populacional Disponibilidade hídrica Produtividade. |
topic |
Helianthus annuus Population arrangement Water availability Yield. Helianthus annuus Arranjo populacional Disponibilidade hídrica Produtividade. |
description |
The growth and yield of sunflower plants can be influenced by the plant population arrangement and the type of irrigation system adopted to meet the water requirements of the crop. This study examines the influence of different irrigation systems and spacings between planting rows on the development of sunflower cultivars for the sub-middle region of São Francisco Valley. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with a split-plot arrangement in which the plots consisted of three irrigation systems (drip, micro-sprinkler and sprinkler); sub-plots were represented by three spacings between planting rows (0.65, 0.55 and 0.45 m); and sub-sub-plots corresponded to two sunflower cultivars (Hélio 251 and Hélio 360). The following variables were analyzed: plant height; number of leaves; stem diameter; number of heads; head diameter; dry biomass of stems, leaves and heads; and achene yield. The different irrigation systems and row spacings markedly influenced the growth of the sunflower cultivars. The highest yield of cultivar Hélio 251 was obtained with the drip irrigation system and 0.55 m spacing. Cultivar Hélio 360 achieved the highest yields when irrigated by the micro-sprinkler system at 0.55 and 0.45 m spacing. In the sprinkler irrigation system, cultivar Hélio 360 obtained the highest yield at 0.45 m spacing. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38589 10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6Supl2p2899 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38589 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n6Supl2p2899 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/38589/28247 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 6Supl2 (2020); 2899-2910 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 6Supl2 (2020); 2899-2910 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306082652258304 |