Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676 |
Resumo: | The tests were performed with a biostimulant (GAAP) containing yeast extract and amino acids. The yield data of the off-season corn for meta-analysis were collected from 41 trials conducted in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Goiás during the 2013/2014 crop season. The tests consisted of eight treatments, with four replicates per treatment, and were conducted on 3.6 × 6.0 m plots. The treatments consisted of application of biostimulant at 2.0 L ha-1 at different times and the control (no biostimulant). The time of application corresponded to the growth stages, V8, VT, R1, (V8 + VT), (V8 + R1), (VT + R1), and (V8 + VT + R1). The influence of biostimulant application was quantified as the difference in yield, expressed as kilogram per hectare (kg ha-1), between treatments and the control (effect measurements). Meta-analysis was used to study the effects of the treatments and to calculate the probability of yield increase with product use. The meta-analysis was performed using the software R. The random effects model was used for meta-analysis because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Next, the mixed effect model was applied to explain the high heterogeneity, considering the following subgroups: the number of applications, the timing of applications, the presence of water stress, and the region where the tests were conducted. The probability of yield increase was calculated at the levels of 2, 5, and 10 bags, each of 60 kg ha-1. The meta-analysis results for the variable "General" and the subgroups were significantly positive (p < 0.0001), with a meta-analytic estimate of 342.1 kg ha-1 and the confidence interval for 95% probability ranging between 301.2 kg ha-1 and 383.0 kg ha-1. The probability for yield greater than zero or equal to 2, 5, and 10 bags of 60 kg ha-1 in subgroup "three applications" was 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 38.9%, respectively. These same values were estimated at 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 39.0% for the variable "applications in V8 + VT + R1"; 79.1%, 69.3%, 50.1%, and 21.1% for the variable "trials under stress condition"; and 84.2%, 75.1%, 57.7%, and 26.9% for the variable "investments made in Southern Brazil," respectively. The meta-analysis of the data from 287 effect measurements generated in 41 trials demonstrated that foliar application of GAAP biostimulant increases corn yield by 342.1 kg ha-1 with 83.7% probability of positive response. |
id |
UEL-11_ca02dd8a61b4ddca1b42ac5244a67a2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26676 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yieldMetanálise do efeito da aplicação de bioestimulante à base de extratos de leveduras e aminoácidos na produtividade de milho safrinhaFoliar applicationForest plotMeta-analytic estimateQuantis.Aplicação foliarEstimativa MetanalíticaForest plotQuantis.The tests were performed with a biostimulant (GAAP) containing yeast extract and amino acids. The yield data of the off-season corn for meta-analysis were collected from 41 trials conducted in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Goiás during the 2013/2014 crop season. The tests consisted of eight treatments, with four replicates per treatment, and were conducted on 3.6 × 6.0 m plots. The treatments consisted of application of biostimulant at 2.0 L ha-1 at different times and the control (no biostimulant). The time of application corresponded to the growth stages, V8, VT, R1, (V8 + VT), (V8 + R1), (VT + R1), and (V8 + VT + R1). The influence of biostimulant application was quantified as the difference in yield, expressed as kilogram per hectare (kg ha-1), between treatments and the control (effect measurements). Meta-analysis was used to study the effects of the treatments and to calculate the probability of yield increase with product use. The meta-analysis was performed using the software R. The random effects model was used for meta-analysis because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Next, the mixed effect model was applied to explain the high heterogeneity, considering the following subgroups: the number of applications, the timing of applications, the presence of water stress, and the region where the tests were conducted. The probability of yield increase was calculated at the levels of 2, 5, and 10 bags, each of 60 kg ha-1. The meta-analysis results for the variable "General" and the subgroups were significantly positive (p < 0.0001), with a meta-analytic estimate of 342.1 kg ha-1 and the confidence interval for 95% probability ranging between 301.2 kg ha-1 and 383.0 kg ha-1. The probability for yield greater than zero or equal to 2, 5, and 10 bags of 60 kg ha-1 in subgroup "three applications" was 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 38.9%, respectively. These same values were estimated at 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 39.0% for the variable "applications in V8 + VT + R1"; 79.1%, 69.3%, 50.1%, and 21.1% for the variable "trials under stress condition"; and 84.2%, 75.1%, 57.7%, and 26.9% for the variable "investments made in Southern Brazil," respectively. The meta-analysis of the data from 287 effect measurements generated in 41 trials demonstrated that foliar application of GAAP biostimulant increases corn yield by 342.1 kg ha-1 with 83.7% probability of positive response.Os testes foram realizados com um bioestimulante (AAAP) o qual contém em sua composição extratos de leveduras e aminoácidos. Os dados de produtividade de milho safrinha para metanálise foram coletados de 41 ensaios, nos estados do Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais e Goiás no ano agrícola de 2013/2014. Os ensaios constituíam-se de 8 tratamentos com quatro repetições, com parcelas de tamanho de 3,6 x 6,0 m. Os tratamentos testados eram compostos pela testemunha (sem aplicação de bioestimulante) e os demais tratamentos foram formados pela variação na época de aplicação do bioestimulante na dose de 2,0 L ha-1. As épocas corresponderam aos estádios fenológicos V8, VT, R1, (V8+VT), (V8+R1), (VT+R1) e (V8+VT+R1). Avaliou-se a produtividade em kg ha-1 e com base nas diferenças entre tratamentos e testemunha (medidas de efeito), quantificou-se a influência da aplicação do bioestimulante. A metanálise foi utilizada para estudar os efeitos dos tratamentos e para o cálculo da probabilidade de incremento em produtividade com o uso do produto. A metanálise foi realizada usando-se o software R. O modelo de efeitos aleatórios foi utilizado para metanálise pois constatou-se alta heterogeneidade entre os estudos. Posteriormente aplicou-se o modelo de efeito misto, afim de explicar a alta heterogeneidade, onde, definiram-se as variáveis moderadoras em função do número de aplicações, época das aplicações, ocorrência de stress hídrico e região onde foram conduzidos os ensaios. Em posse da estimativa metanalítica das variáveis moderadoras calculou-se a probabilidade de incremento em produtividade nos níveis de 2, 5 e 10 sacas de 60 kg ha-1. Os resultados da metanálise para variável “Geral” e as variáveis moderadoras foram significativamente positivos (p-valor < 0,0001) com estimativa metanalítica de 342,1 kg ha-1 e intervalo de confiança 95% de probabilidade, entre 301,2 kg ha-1 e 383,0 kg ha-1. A variável moderadora “3 aplicações” apresentou probabilidades de 91,7%, 85,4%, 71,0% e 38,9%, respectivamente para apresentar produtividade acima de zero e nos níveis de 2, 5 e 10 sacas 60 kg ha-1. Estes mesmos valores foram 91,7%, 85,4%, 71,0% e 39,0% para a variável “aplicações realizadas em V8+VT+R1”, 79,1%, 69,3%, 50,1% e 21,1% para a variável “ensaios realizados sob condição de stress” e 84,2%, 75,1%, 57,7% e 26,9% para a variável “aplicações realizadas na região Sul do Brasil”. Demonstrou-se através da metanálise que a aplicação foliar do bioestimulante incrementou a produtividade do milho com 83,7% de probabilidade de resposta positiva, com dados de 287 medidas de efeito geradas em 41 ensaios.UEL2017-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2667610.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2293Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-2304Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-23041679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676/21490Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, André Luis daCanteri, Marcelo GiovanettiSilva, Alexandre José daBracale, Marina Faria2022-10-21T14:57:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26676Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-21T14:57:43Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield Metanálise do efeito da aplicação de bioestimulante à base de extratos de leveduras e aminoácidos na produtividade de milho safrinha |
title |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield |
spellingShingle |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield Silva, André Luis da Foliar application Forest plot Meta-analytic estimate Quantis. Aplicação foliar Estimativa Metanalítica Forest plot Quantis. |
title_short |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield |
title_full |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield |
title_fullStr |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield |
title_sort |
Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield |
author |
Silva, André Luis da |
author_facet |
Silva, André Luis da Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti Silva, Alexandre José da Bracale, Marina Faria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti Silva, Alexandre José da Bracale, Marina Faria |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, André Luis da Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti Silva, Alexandre José da Bracale, Marina Faria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Foliar application Forest plot Meta-analytic estimate Quantis. Aplicação foliar Estimativa Metanalítica Forest plot Quantis. |
topic |
Foliar application Forest plot Meta-analytic estimate Quantis. Aplicação foliar Estimativa Metanalítica Forest plot Quantis. |
description |
The tests were performed with a biostimulant (GAAP) containing yeast extract and amino acids. The yield data of the off-season corn for meta-analysis were collected from 41 trials conducted in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Goiás during the 2013/2014 crop season. The tests consisted of eight treatments, with four replicates per treatment, and were conducted on 3.6 × 6.0 m plots. The treatments consisted of application of biostimulant at 2.0 L ha-1 at different times and the control (no biostimulant). The time of application corresponded to the growth stages, V8, VT, R1, (V8 + VT), (V8 + R1), (VT + R1), and (V8 + VT + R1). The influence of biostimulant application was quantified as the difference in yield, expressed as kilogram per hectare (kg ha-1), between treatments and the control (effect measurements). Meta-analysis was used to study the effects of the treatments and to calculate the probability of yield increase with product use. The meta-analysis was performed using the software R. The random effects model was used for meta-analysis because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Next, the mixed effect model was applied to explain the high heterogeneity, considering the following subgroups: the number of applications, the timing of applications, the presence of water stress, and the region where the tests were conducted. The probability of yield increase was calculated at the levels of 2, 5, and 10 bags, each of 60 kg ha-1. The meta-analysis results for the variable "General" and the subgroups were significantly positive (p < 0.0001), with a meta-analytic estimate of 342.1 kg ha-1 and the confidence interval for 95% probability ranging between 301.2 kg ha-1 and 383.0 kg ha-1. The probability for yield greater than zero or equal to 2, 5, and 10 bags of 60 kg ha-1 in subgroup "three applications" was 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 38.9%, respectively. These same values were estimated at 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 39.0% for the variable "applications in V8 + VT + R1"; 79.1%, 69.3%, 50.1%, and 21.1% for the variable "trials under stress condition"; and 84.2%, 75.1%, 57.7%, and 26.9% for the variable "investments made in Southern Brazil," respectively. The meta-analysis of the data from 287 effect measurements generated in 41 trials demonstrated that foliar application of GAAP biostimulant increases corn yield by 342.1 kg ha-1 with 83.7% probability of positive response. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2293 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2293 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676/21490 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-2304 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-2304 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306076491874304 |