Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, André Luis da
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti, Silva, Alexandre José da, Bracale, Marina Faria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676
Resumo: The tests were performed with a biostimulant (GAAP) containing yeast extract and amino acids. The yield data of the off-season corn for meta-analysis were collected from 41 trials conducted in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Goiás during the 2013/2014 crop season. The tests consisted of eight treatments, with four replicates per treatment, and were conducted on 3.6 × 6.0 m plots. The treatments consisted of application of biostimulant at 2.0 L ha-1 at different times and the control (no biostimulant). The time of application corresponded to the growth stages, V8, VT, R1, (V8 + VT), (V8 + R1), (VT + R1), and (V8 + VT + R1). The influence of biostimulant application was quantified as the difference in yield, expressed as kilogram per hectare (kg ha-1), between treatments and the control (effect measurements). Meta-analysis was used to study the effects of the treatments and to calculate the probability of yield increase with product use. The meta-analysis was performed using the software R. The random effects model was used for meta-analysis because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Next, the mixed effect model was applied to explain the high heterogeneity, considering the following subgroups: the number of applications, the timing of applications, the presence of water stress, and the region where the tests were conducted. The probability of yield increase was calculated at the levels of 2, 5, and 10 bags, each of 60 kg ha-1. The meta-analysis results for the variable "General" and the subgroups were significantly positive (p < 0.0001), with a meta-analytic estimate of 342.1 kg ha-1 and the confidence interval for 95% probability ranging between 301.2 kg ha-1 and 383.0 kg ha-1. The probability for yield greater than zero or equal to 2, 5, and 10 bags of 60 kg ha-1 in subgroup "three applications" was 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 38.9%, respectively. These same values were estimated at 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 39.0% for the variable "applications in V8 + VT + R1"; 79.1%, 69.3%, 50.1%, and 21.1% for the variable "trials under stress condition"; and 84.2%, 75.1%, 57.7%, and 26.9% for the variable "investments made in Southern Brazil," respectively. The meta-analysis of the data from 287 effect measurements generated in 41 trials demonstrated that foliar application of GAAP biostimulant increases corn yield by 342.1 kg ha-1 with 83.7% probability of positive response.
id UEL-11_ca02dd8a61b4ddca1b42ac5244a67a2e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26676
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yieldMetanálise do efeito da aplicação de bioestimulante à base de extratos de leveduras e aminoácidos na produtividade de milho safrinhaFoliar applicationForest plotMeta-analytic estimateQuantis.Aplicação foliarEstimativa MetanalíticaForest plotQuantis.The tests were performed with a biostimulant (GAAP) containing yeast extract and amino acids. The yield data of the off-season corn for meta-analysis were collected from 41 trials conducted in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Goiás during the 2013/2014 crop season. The tests consisted of eight treatments, with four replicates per treatment, and were conducted on 3.6 × 6.0 m plots. The treatments consisted of application of biostimulant at 2.0 L ha-1 at different times and the control (no biostimulant). The time of application corresponded to the growth stages, V8, VT, R1, (V8 + VT), (V8 + R1), (VT + R1), and (V8 + VT + R1). The influence of biostimulant application was quantified as the difference in yield, expressed as kilogram per hectare (kg ha-1), between treatments and the control (effect measurements). Meta-analysis was used to study the effects of the treatments and to calculate the probability of yield increase with product use. The meta-analysis was performed using the software R. The random effects model was used for meta-analysis because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Next, the mixed effect model was applied to explain the high heterogeneity, considering the following subgroups: the number of applications, the timing of applications, the presence of water stress, and the region where the tests were conducted. The probability of yield increase was calculated at the levels of 2, 5, and 10 bags, each of 60 kg ha-1. The meta-analysis results for the variable "General" and the subgroups were significantly positive (p < 0.0001), with a meta-analytic estimate of 342.1 kg ha-1 and the confidence interval for 95% probability ranging between 301.2 kg ha-1 and 383.0 kg ha-1. The probability for yield greater than zero or equal to 2, 5, and 10 bags of 60 kg ha-1 in subgroup "three applications" was 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 38.9%, respectively. These same values were estimated at 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 39.0% for the variable "applications in V8 + VT + R1"; 79.1%, 69.3%, 50.1%, and 21.1% for the variable "trials under stress condition"; and 84.2%, 75.1%, 57.7%, and 26.9% for the variable "investments made in Southern Brazil," respectively. The meta-analysis of the data from 287 effect measurements generated in 41 trials demonstrated that foliar application of GAAP biostimulant increases corn yield by 342.1 kg ha-1 with 83.7% probability of positive response.Os testes foram realizados com um bioestimulante (AAAP) o qual contém em sua composição extratos de leveduras e aminoácidos. Os dados de produtividade de milho safrinha para metanálise foram coletados de 41 ensaios, nos estados do Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais e Goiás no ano agrícola de 2013/2014. Os ensaios constituíam-se de 8 tratamentos com quatro repetições, com parcelas de tamanho de 3,6 x 6,0 m. Os tratamentos testados eram compostos pela testemunha (sem aplicação de bioestimulante) e os demais tratamentos foram formados pela variação na época de aplicação do bioestimulante na dose de 2,0 L ha-1. As épocas corresponderam aos estádios fenológicos V8, VT, R1, (V8+VT), (V8+R1), (VT+R1) e (V8+VT+R1). Avaliou-se a produtividade em kg ha-1 e com base nas diferenças entre tratamentos e testemunha (medidas de efeito), quantificou-se a influência da aplicação do bioestimulante. A metanálise foi utilizada para estudar os efeitos dos tratamentos e para o cálculo da probabilidade de incremento em produtividade com o uso do produto. A metanálise foi realizada usando-se o software R. O modelo de efeitos aleatórios foi utilizado para metanálise pois constatou-se alta heterogeneidade entre os estudos. Posteriormente aplicou-se o modelo de efeito misto, afim de explicar a alta heterogeneidade, onde, definiram-se as variáveis moderadoras em função do número de aplicações, época das aplicações, ocorrência de stress hídrico e região onde foram conduzidos os ensaios. Em posse da estimativa metanalítica das variáveis moderadoras calculou-se a probabilidade de incremento em produtividade nos níveis de 2, 5 e 10 sacas de 60 kg ha-1. Os resultados da metanálise para variável “Geral” e as variáveis moderadoras foram significativamente positivos (p-valor < 0,0001) com estimativa metanalítica de 342,1 kg ha-1 e intervalo de confiança 95% de probabilidade, entre 301,2 kg ha-1 e 383,0 kg ha-1. A variável moderadora “3 aplicações” apresentou probabilidades de 91,7%, 85,4%, 71,0% e 38,9%, respectivamente para apresentar produtividade acima de zero e nos níveis de 2, 5 e 10 sacas 60 kg ha-1. Estes mesmos valores foram 91,7%, 85,4%, 71,0% e 39,0% para a variável “aplicações realizadas em V8+VT+R1”, 79,1%, 69,3%, 50,1% e 21,1% para a variável “ensaios realizados sob condição de stress” e 84,2%, 75,1%, 57,7% e 26,9% para a variável “aplicações realizadas na região Sul do Brasil”. Demonstrou-se através da metanálise que a aplicação foliar do bioestimulante incrementou a produtividade do milho com 83,7% de probabilidade de resposta positiva, com dados de 287 medidas de efeito geradas em 41 ensaios.UEL2017-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2667610.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2293Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-2304Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-23041679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676/21490Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, André Luis daCanteri, Marcelo GiovanettiSilva, Alexandre José daBracale, Marina Faria2022-10-21T14:57:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26676Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-21T14:57:43Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
Metanálise do efeito da aplicação de bioestimulante à base de extratos de leveduras e aminoácidos na produtividade de milho safrinha
title Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
spellingShingle Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
Silva, André Luis da
Foliar application
Forest plot
Meta-analytic estimate
Quantis.
Aplicação foliar
Estimativa Metanalítica
Forest plot
Quantis.
title_short Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
title_full Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
title_sort Meta-analysis of the application effects of a biostimulant based on extracts of yeast and amino acids on off-season corn yield
author Silva, André Luis da
author_facet Silva, André Luis da
Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti
Silva, Alexandre José da
Bracale, Marina Faria
author_role author
author2 Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti
Silva, Alexandre José da
Bracale, Marina Faria
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, André Luis da
Canteri, Marcelo Giovanetti
Silva, Alexandre José da
Bracale, Marina Faria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Foliar application
Forest plot
Meta-analytic estimate
Quantis.
Aplicação foliar
Estimativa Metanalítica
Forest plot
Quantis.
topic Foliar application
Forest plot
Meta-analytic estimate
Quantis.
Aplicação foliar
Estimativa Metanalítica
Forest plot
Quantis.
description The tests were performed with a biostimulant (GAAP) containing yeast extract and amino acids. The yield data of the off-season corn for meta-analysis were collected from 41 trials conducted in the states of Paraná, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and Goiás during the 2013/2014 crop season. The tests consisted of eight treatments, with four replicates per treatment, and were conducted on 3.6 × 6.0 m plots. The treatments consisted of application of biostimulant at 2.0 L ha-1 at different times and the control (no biostimulant). The time of application corresponded to the growth stages, V8, VT, R1, (V8 + VT), (V8 + R1), (VT + R1), and (V8 + VT + R1). The influence of biostimulant application was quantified as the difference in yield, expressed as kilogram per hectare (kg ha-1), between treatments and the control (effect measurements). Meta-analysis was used to study the effects of the treatments and to calculate the probability of yield increase with product use. The meta-analysis was performed using the software R. The random effects model was used for meta-analysis because of the high heterogeneity among the studies. Next, the mixed effect model was applied to explain the high heterogeneity, considering the following subgroups: the number of applications, the timing of applications, the presence of water stress, and the region where the tests were conducted. The probability of yield increase was calculated at the levels of 2, 5, and 10 bags, each of 60 kg ha-1. The meta-analysis results for the variable "General" and the subgroups were significantly positive (p < 0.0001), with a meta-analytic estimate of 342.1 kg ha-1 and the confidence interval for 95% probability ranging between 301.2 kg ha-1 and 383.0 kg ha-1. The probability for yield greater than zero or equal to 2, 5, and 10 bags of 60 kg ha-1 in subgroup "three applications" was 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 38.9%, respectively. These same values were estimated at 91.7%, 85.4%, 71.0%, and 39.0% for the variable "applications in V8 + VT + R1"; 79.1%, 69.3%, 50.1%, and 21.1% for the variable "trials under stress condition"; and 84.2%, 75.1%, 57.7%, and 26.9% for the variable "investments made in Southern Brazil," respectively. The meta-analysis of the data from 287 effect measurements generated in 41 trials demonstrated that foliar application of GAAP biostimulant increases corn yield by 342.1 kg ha-1 with 83.7% probability of positive response.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2293
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2293
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26676/21490
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-2304
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4Supl1 (2017); 2293-2304
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306076491874304