Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Marielen de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Cicero, Claudineia Emidio, Menck-Costa, Maísa Fabiana, Justino, Larissa, Gerez, Juliana Rubira, Baptista, Ana Angelita Sampaio, Bracarense, Ana Paula Frederico Rodrigues Loureiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42061
Resumo: After the growth-promoting antibiotics prohibition, intestinal health became an increasing concern worldwide in poultry farming. The intestinal histological evaluation is an inexpensive technique that brings relevant information, but in poultry, the immediate process of intestinal post-mortem autolysis interferes directly on the samples quality for histological analysis hindering a precise diagnosis. This study aimed to standardize a technique for broilers’ intestines sample collection and fixation for histological analysis. Seven broiler chickens received a standard diet until 23 days of age when they were euthanized. Fragments of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were collected using three methods: intestine strips, transverse section, and Swiss roll and posteriorly fixed in 10% buffered formalin and bouin solution. Tissue samples were submitted for histological (number of villi and viable villi per field) and morphometrical (villi height, crypt depth and villi:crypt ratio) evaluations and the results analyzed statistically. A significant high number of villi and viable villi per field in all regions was observed in the Swiss roll method. In the duodenum (p= 0.0066) and jejunum (p= 0.0058) an interaction between the Swiss roll method and the fixative buffered formalin was observed in the viable and number of villi per field, respectively. Regarding the morphometrical analysis significant differences were observed, in the jejunum villi height sampling by the methods Swiss roll (1,157.66 ± 148.25 µm, p= 0.0015) that showed the highest mean. Deeper crypt depths were observed in the jejunum (156.59 ± 15.68 µm, p= 0.0002) and ileum (131.13 ± 15.01 µm, p= 0.0006) collect by the Swiss roll method. An interaction between the bouin fixative was also observed in the jejunum (p= 0.0223) for this variable. Duodenum sampling by transversal section (12.68 ± 1.45 µm, p= 0.0076) was the only segment that had a significant difference for villi:crypt ratio, showing the highest mean. It can be concluded that the Swiss roll technique was the best method for morphometrical evaluation of the chickens’ intestines, since the highest counts of villi per field and viable villi per field were obtained, while buffered formalin was considered as the best fixative.
id UEL-11_cf4b8fa74471ca711dca4890c97d2ef0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42061
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methodsAvaliação histológica do intestino de frangos de corte: comparação de três métodos de colheitaPost-mortem autolysisHistologyIntestinal healthIntestinal morphometryPoultry.Autólise post-mortemHistologiaSaúde intestinalMorfometria intestinalAves.After the growth-promoting antibiotics prohibition, intestinal health became an increasing concern worldwide in poultry farming. The intestinal histological evaluation is an inexpensive technique that brings relevant information, but in poultry, the immediate process of intestinal post-mortem autolysis interferes directly on the samples quality for histological analysis hindering a precise diagnosis. This study aimed to standardize a technique for broilers’ intestines sample collection and fixation for histological analysis. Seven broiler chickens received a standard diet until 23 days of age when they were euthanized. Fragments of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were collected using three methods: intestine strips, transverse section, and Swiss roll and posteriorly fixed in 10% buffered formalin and bouin solution. Tissue samples were submitted for histological (number of villi and viable villi per field) and morphometrical (villi height, crypt depth and villi:crypt ratio) evaluations and the results analyzed statistically. A significant high number of villi and viable villi per field in all regions was observed in the Swiss roll method. In the duodenum (p= 0.0066) and jejunum (p= 0.0058) an interaction between the Swiss roll method and the fixative buffered formalin was observed in the viable and number of villi per field, respectively. Regarding the morphometrical analysis significant differences were observed, in the jejunum villi height sampling by the methods Swiss roll (1,157.66 ± 148.25 µm, p= 0.0015) that showed the highest mean. Deeper crypt depths were observed in the jejunum (156.59 ± 15.68 µm, p= 0.0002) and ileum (131.13 ± 15.01 µm, p= 0.0006) collect by the Swiss roll method. An interaction between the bouin fixative was also observed in the jejunum (p= 0.0223) for this variable. Duodenum sampling by transversal section (12.68 ± 1.45 µm, p= 0.0076) was the only segment that had a significant difference for villi:crypt ratio, showing the highest mean. It can be concluded that the Swiss roll technique was the best method for morphometrical evaluation of the chickens’ intestines, since the highest counts of villi per field and viable villi per field were obtained, while buffered formalin was considered as the best fixative.Após a proibição da utilização dos antimicrobianos promotores de crescimento, saúde intestinal se tornou uma preocupação crescente na avicultura mundialmente. A avaliação histológica intestinal é uma técnica de baixo custo que traz informações relevantes, porém nas aves, o imediato processo de autólise intestinal post-mortem interfere diretamente na qualidade da amostra para histologia dificultando um diagnóstico preciso. Este estudo objetivou a padronização de uma técnica para coleta e fixação do intestino de frangos de corte para análise histológica. Sete frangos de corte receberam uma dieta padrão até 23 dias de vida, quando foram eutanasiados. Fragmentos de duodeno, jejuno e íleo foram coletados utilizando três métodos: intestino aberto, corte transversal e rocambole, e posteriormente fixados em formalina tamponada 10% e solução de bouin. Amostras de tecidos foram submetidas a avaliações histológicas (número de vilosidades e vilosidades viáveis por campo) e morfométricas (altura de vilosidade, profundidade de cripta e relação vilosidade:cripta) e os resultados analisados estatisticamente. Um significativo maior número de vilosidades e vilosidades viáveis por campo foi observado, em todos os segmentos intestinais, no método rocambole. No duodeno (p= 0,0066) e jejuno (p= 0,0058) uma interação entre o método rocambole e o fixador formalina tamponada foi observado para as variáveis vilosidades viáveis e número de vilosidades por campo, respectivamente. Referente a análise morfométrica diferenças significativas foram observadas na altura de vilosidade no jejuno amostrado pelo método rocambole (1.157,66 ± 148,25 µm, p= 0,0015) que apresentou a maior média. Criptas mais profundas foram observadas no jejuno (156,59 ± 15,68 µm, p= 0,0002) e íleo (131,13 ± 15,01 µm, p= 0,0006) coletados pelo método rocambole. Uma interação entre o fixador bouin também foi observado no jejuno (p= 0,0223) para esta variável. Amostragem do duodeno pelo método corte transversal (12,68 ± 1,45 µm, p= 0,0076) foi o único segmento que teve uma diferença significativa para relação vilosidade:cripta apresentando a maior média. Pode-se concluir que o método rocambole foi o melhor para avaliação morfométrica do intestino de frangos de corte, uma vez que as maiores contagens de vilosidades e vilosidades viáveis por campo foram obtidas, enquanto formalina tamponada foi considerada o melhor fixador.UEL2021-08-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4206110.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3247Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6 (2021); 3247-3258Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6 (2021); 3247-32581679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42061/30056Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Marielen deCicero, Claudineia EmidioMenck-Costa, Maísa FabianaJustino, LarissaGerez, Juliana RubiraBaptista, Ana Angelita SampaioBracarense, Ana Paula Frederico Rodrigues Loureiro2022-09-30T12:09:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42061Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-09-30T12:09:11Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
Avaliação histológica do intestino de frangos de corte: comparação de três métodos de colheita
title Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
spellingShingle Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
Souza, Marielen de
Post-mortem autolysis
Histology
Intestinal health
Intestinal morphometry
Poultry.
Autólise post-mortem
Histologia
Saúde intestinal
Morfometria intestinal
Aves.
title_short Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
title_full Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
title_fullStr Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
title_full_unstemmed Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
title_sort Histological evaluation of the intestine of broiler chickens: comparison of three sampling methods
author Souza, Marielen de
author_facet Souza, Marielen de
Cicero, Claudineia Emidio
Menck-Costa, Maísa Fabiana
Justino, Larissa
Gerez, Juliana Rubira
Baptista, Ana Angelita Sampaio
Bracarense, Ana Paula Frederico Rodrigues Loureiro
author_role author
author2 Cicero, Claudineia Emidio
Menck-Costa, Maísa Fabiana
Justino, Larissa
Gerez, Juliana Rubira
Baptista, Ana Angelita Sampaio
Bracarense, Ana Paula Frederico Rodrigues Loureiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Marielen de
Cicero, Claudineia Emidio
Menck-Costa, Maísa Fabiana
Justino, Larissa
Gerez, Juliana Rubira
Baptista, Ana Angelita Sampaio
Bracarense, Ana Paula Frederico Rodrigues Loureiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Post-mortem autolysis
Histology
Intestinal health
Intestinal morphometry
Poultry.
Autólise post-mortem
Histologia
Saúde intestinal
Morfometria intestinal
Aves.
topic Post-mortem autolysis
Histology
Intestinal health
Intestinal morphometry
Poultry.
Autólise post-mortem
Histologia
Saúde intestinal
Morfometria intestinal
Aves.
description After the growth-promoting antibiotics prohibition, intestinal health became an increasing concern worldwide in poultry farming. The intestinal histological evaluation is an inexpensive technique that brings relevant information, but in poultry, the immediate process of intestinal post-mortem autolysis interferes directly on the samples quality for histological analysis hindering a precise diagnosis. This study aimed to standardize a technique for broilers’ intestines sample collection and fixation for histological analysis. Seven broiler chickens received a standard diet until 23 days of age when they were euthanized. Fragments of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were collected using three methods: intestine strips, transverse section, and Swiss roll and posteriorly fixed in 10% buffered formalin and bouin solution. Tissue samples were submitted for histological (number of villi and viable villi per field) and morphometrical (villi height, crypt depth and villi:crypt ratio) evaluations and the results analyzed statistically. A significant high number of villi and viable villi per field in all regions was observed in the Swiss roll method. In the duodenum (p= 0.0066) and jejunum (p= 0.0058) an interaction between the Swiss roll method and the fixative buffered formalin was observed in the viable and number of villi per field, respectively. Regarding the morphometrical analysis significant differences were observed, in the jejunum villi height sampling by the methods Swiss roll (1,157.66 ± 148.25 µm, p= 0.0015) that showed the highest mean. Deeper crypt depths were observed in the jejunum (156.59 ± 15.68 µm, p= 0.0002) and ileum (131.13 ± 15.01 µm, p= 0.0006) collect by the Swiss roll method. An interaction between the bouin fixative was also observed in the jejunum (p= 0.0223) for this variable. Duodenum sampling by transversal section (12.68 ± 1.45 µm, p= 0.0076) was the only segment that had a significant difference for villi:crypt ratio, showing the highest mean. It can be concluded that the Swiss roll technique was the best method for morphometrical evaluation of the chickens’ intestines, since the highest counts of villi per field and viable villi per field were obtained, while buffered formalin was considered as the best fixative.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42061
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3247
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42061
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n6p3247
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/42061/30056
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 6 (2021); 3247-3258
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 6 (2021); 3247-3258
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306084785061888