Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090 |
Resumo: | In this study, we compared cassava starch-based biodegradable polymers (PBMs) and glycerol (G) as additives used to increase biogas production from the co-digestion of swine wastewater (ARS). We chose to work with an inoculum comprising 40% (v/v) of the total volume of the reactor; this inoculum was obtained from a Canadian model digester for treating swine waste. In the anaerobic digestion process, batch reactors were used on a laboratory scale with a total volume of approximately 4 L and a working volume of 3.2 L. Three treatments were conducted to compare the efficiency of solid removal, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the production of biogas. The first treatment contained only swine waste; the second included the addition of glycerol at 1, 3, and 5% (w/v); and the third treatment included the addition of 1, 3, and 5% (w/v) of PBM residue in relation to the swine wastewater. From the results, it can be concluded that higher yields were obtained for the treatment with 3% PBM and 1% glycerol. Most treatments showed high removal rates of total solids and total volatile solids. Reductions lower than 70% were obtained only for treatments with PBM and glycerol at a ratio of 5%. |
id |
UEL-11_d102da3ddb9e6e04f3bca1d264b51e5c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22090 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas productionComparação entre glicerol e polímero biodegradável a base de mandioca como aditivos na biodigestão anaeróbiaAdditivesAlternative fuelsBiodegradable polymersGlycerol.In this study, we compared cassava starch-based biodegradable polymers (PBMs) and glycerol (G) as additives used to increase biogas production from the co-digestion of swine wastewater (ARS). We chose to work with an inoculum comprising 40% (v/v) of the total volume of the reactor; this inoculum was obtained from a Canadian model digester for treating swine waste. In the anaerobic digestion process, batch reactors were used on a laboratory scale with a total volume of approximately 4 L and a working volume of 3.2 L. Three treatments were conducted to compare the efficiency of solid removal, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the production of biogas. The first treatment contained only swine waste; the second included the addition of glycerol at 1, 3, and 5% (w/v); and the third treatment included the addition of 1, 3, and 5% (w/v) of PBM residue in relation to the swine wastewater. From the results, it can be concluded that higher yields were obtained for the treatment with 3% PBM and 1% glycerol. Most treatments showed high removal rates of total solids and total volatile solids. Reductions lower than 70% were obtained only for treatments with PBM and glycerol at a ratio of 5%.O presente trabalho tem por finalidade comparar o potencial aditivo no aumento da produção de biogás de polímeros biodegradáveis a base de fécula de mandioca (PBM) e do glicerol, já comumente empregado com essa finalidade, ambos em co-digestão com água residuária de suinocultura. Utilizou-se como matéria-prima para produção de biogás, água residual de suinocultura, material plástico biodegradável produzido a partir de fécula de mandioca e glicerina bruta proveniente do processo de produção de biodiesel. Optou-se por trabalhar com 40% (v/v) de inóculo do volume total do reator. Para a condução do processo de digestão anaeróbia empregaram-se reatores com alimentação batelada de escala laboratorial de volume total de aproximadamente 4 litros e volume útil de 3,2 litros. Foram realizados 3 tratamentos visando comparar a eficiência da remoção de sólidos, demanda química de oxigênio e produção de biogás. O primeiro tratamento conteve apenas resíduo de suíno, o segundo a adição de glicerol em percentuais de 1, 3 e 5% (m/v) no mesmo resíduo e o terceiro a adição de 1, 3 e 5% (m/v) do polímero biodegradável a base de fécula de mandioca ao resíduo suíno. A partir dos resultados pode-se concluir que as maiores produções foram obtidas no tratamento de 3% de PBM e 1% de glicerol. A maioria dos tratamentos apresentou elevadas taxas de remoção de sólidos totais e sólidos totais voláteis. Apenas os tratamentos com PBM e glicerol na proporção de 5% obtiveram reduções inferiores a 70%.UEL2016-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2209010.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p1827Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4 (2016); 1827-1844Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4 (2016); 1827-18441679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/19634http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCremonez, Paulo AndréFeiden, ArminTeleken, Joel GustavoSouza, Samuel Nelson Melegari deFeroldi, MichaelMeier, Thompson WeiserTeleken, Jhony TiagoDieter, Jonathan2022-11-30T16:28:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22090Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-30T16:28:34Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production Comparação entre glicerol e polímero biodegradável a base de mandioca como aditivos na biodigestão anaeróbia |
title |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production Cremonez, Paulo André Additives Alternative fuels Biodegradable polymers Glycerol. |
title_short |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production |
title_full |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production |
title_sort |
Comparison between biodegradable polymers from cassava starch and glycerol as additives to biogas production |
author |
Cremonez, Paulo André |
author_facet |
Cremonez, Paulo André Feiden, Armin Teleken, Joel Gustavo Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari de Feroldi, Michael Meier, Thompson Weiser Teleken, Jhony Tiago Dieter, Jonathan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Feiden, Armin Teleken, Joel Gustavo Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari de Feroldi, Michael Meier, Thompson Weiser Teleken, Jhony Tiago Dieter, Jonathan |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cremonez, Paulo André Feiden, Armin Teleken, Joel Gustavo Souza, Samuel Nelson Melegari de Feroldi, Michael Meier, Thompson Weiser Teleken, Jhony Tiago Dieter, Jonathan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Additives Alternative fuels Biodegradable polymers Glycerol. |
topic |
Additives Alternative fuels Biodegradable polymers Glycerol. |
description |
In this study, we compared cassava starch-based biodegradable polymers (PBMs) and glycerol (G) as additives used to increase biogas production from the co-digestion of swine wastewater (ARS). We chose to work with an inoculum comprising 40% (v/v) of the total volume of the reactor; this inoculum was obtained from a Canadian model digester for treating swine waste. In the anaerobic digestion process, batch reactors were used on a laboratory scale with a total volume of approximately 4 L and a working volume of 3.2 L. Three treatments were conducted to compare the efficiency of solid removal, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), and the production of biogas. The first treatment contained only swine waste; the second included the addition of glycerol at 1, 3, and 5% (w/v); and the third treatment included the addition of 1, 3, and 5% (w/v) of PBM residue in relation to the swine wastewater. From the results, it can be concluded that higher yields were obtained for the treatment with 3% PBM and 1% glycerol. Most treatments showed high removal rates of total solids and total volatile solids. Reductions lower than 70% were obtained only for treatments with PBM and glycerol at a ratio of 5%. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p1827 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p1827 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/22090/19634 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4 (2016); 1827-1844 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4 (2016); 1827-1844 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306074069663744 |