Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Luiz Felipe de Melo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lapaz, Allan de Marcos, Tomaz, Rafael Simões, Lira, Maikon Vinicius da Silva, Moreira, Adônis, Reis, André Rodrigues dos, Heinrichs, Reges
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33476
Resumo: Sulfur deficiency in soils has become a worldwide concern for agricultural production. This study aimed to evaluate the concequence of variable sulfur source and dosing on the nutritional status and production of Piatã forage in a dystrophic Ultisol. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The 4 x 5 factorial treatments consisted of four sulfur sources (elemental sulfur pastilles [ESPA], gypsum [GY], gypsite [GI], and elemental sulfur powder [ESPO]) and five sulfur doses (0, 50, 100, 150. and 200 mg kg-1). The sulfur applications resulted in similar maximum shoot dry mass (SDM) production (16.66 to 17.69 g pot-1) with all sources. However, Piatã grass achieved maximum production in the treatments with 112 mg kg-1 of GI, 118 mg kg-1 of GY and ESPA, and 146 mg kg-1 of ESPO. The number of tillers, the leaf:stem ratio, and SPAD increased with increasing sulfur dose. The greatest increments of root dry mass (RDM) and of the tiller number were obtained with the ESPO source. Macronutrient concentrations in shoot dry mass tissue were in the order K > N > Ca > P > S > Mg. Low sulfur supply resulted in decreased Piatã grass growth with all sulfur sources tested. Differential responses were found with applications of different sulfur sources for SDM, RDM, and tillers number. The sources did not alter the leaf:stem ratio or SPAD index.
id UEL-11_dd871310cad155919ab1f95d9be13c29
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33476
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forageAvaliação de fonte e dose de enxofre no estado nutricional e produção de forragem do piatãFertilizerPlant nutritionPasturesUrochloa brizantha.FertilizantesNutrição de PlantasPastagemUrochloa brizantha.Sulfur deficiency in soils has become a worldwide concern for agricultural production. This study aimed to evaluate the concequence of variable sulfur source and dosing on the nutritional status and production of Piatã forage in a dystrophic Ultisol. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The 4 x 5 factorial treatments consisted of four sulfur sources (elemental sulfur pastilles [ESPA], gypsum [GY], gypsite [GI], and elemental sulfur powder [ESPO]) and five sulfur doses (0, 50, 100, 150. and 200 mg kg-1). The sulfur applications resulted in similar maximum shoot dry mass (SDM) production (16.66 to 17.69 g pot-1) with all sources. However, Piatã grass achieved maximum production in the treatments with 112 mg kg-1 of GI, 118 mg kg-1 of GY and ESPA, and 146 mg kg-1 of ESPO. The number of tillers, the leaf:stem ratio, and SPAD increased with increasing sulfur dose. The greatest increments of root dry mass (RDM) and of the tiller number were obtained with the ESPO source. Macronutrient concentrations in shoot dry mass tissue were in the order K > N > Ca > P > S > Mg. Low sulfur supply resulted in decreased Piatã grass growth with all sulfur sources tested. Differential responses were found with applications of different sulfur sources for SDM, RDM, and tillers number. The sources did not alter the leaf:stem ratio or SPAD index.A deficiência de enxofre nos solos tem se tornado uma preocupação mundial para a produção agrícola. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a conceituação da variável fonte e dose de enxofre no estado nutricional e produção de forragem do Piatã em um Argissolo Vermelho distrófico. O experimento foi arranjado em blocos ao acaso com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram dispostos em esquema fatorial 4 x 5, sendo constítuído de quatro fontes de enxofre (enxofre elementar pastilhado [ESPA], gesso [GY], gibsita [GI] e enxofre elementar em pó [ESPO]) e cinco doses de enxofre (0, 50, 100, 150 e 200 mg kg-1). As aplicações de enxofre resultaram em uma produção similar de massa seca da parte aérea (SDM) (16,66 a 17,69 g vaso-1) com todas as fontes. No entanto, o capim Piatã alcançou a produção máxima nos tratamentos com 112 mg kg-1 para GI; 118 mg kg-1 para GY e ESPA; e 146 mg kg-1 de ESPO. O número de perfilhos, a relação folha: haste e SPAD aumentaram com o aumento das doses de enxofre. Os maiores incrementos de massa seca da raiz (RDM) e do número de perfilhos foram obtidos com a fonte ESPO. As concentrações de macronutrientes na parte aérea foram na ordem de K > N > Ca > P > S > Mg. A baixa oferta de enxofre resultou na diminuição do crescimento do capim Piatã com todas as fontes de enxofre testadas. Respostas diferenciais foram encontradas com as diferentes aplicações de fontes de enxofre para SDM, RDM e número de perfilhos. As fontes não alteraram a relação folha: haste ou índice SPAD.UEL2019-05-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearchapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3347610.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n3p1237Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 3 (2019); 1237-1248Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 3 (2019); 1237-12481679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33476/25422Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Luiz Felipe de MeloLapaz, Allan de MarcosTomaz, Rafael SimõesLira, Maikon Vinicius da SilvaMoreira, AdônisReis, André Rodrigues dosHeinrichs, Reges2022-10-19T13:29:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33476Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-19T13:29:08Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
Avaliação de fonte e dose de enxofre no estado nutricional e produção de forragem do piatã
title Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
spellingShingle Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
Santos, Luiz Felipe de Melo
Fertilizer
Plant nutrition
Pastures
Urochloa brizantha.
Fertilizantes
Nutrição de Plantas
Pastagem
Urochloa brizantha.
title_short Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
title_full Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
title_fullStr Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
title_sort Evaluation of sulfur source and dose on the nutritional state and production of piatã forage
author Santos, Luiz Felipe de Melo
author_facet Santos, Luiz Felipe de Melo
Lapaz, Allan de Marcos
Tomaz, Rafael Simões
Lira, Maikon Vinicius da Silva
Moreira, Adônis
Reis, André Rodrigues dos
Heinrichs, Reges
author_role author
author2 Lapaz, Allan de Marcos
Tomaz, Rafael Simões
Lira, Maikon Vinicius da Silva
Moreira, Adônis
Reis, André Rodrigues dos
Heinrichs, Reges
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Luiz Felipe de Melo
Lapaz, Allan de Marcos
Tomaz, Rafael Simões
Lira, Maikon Vinicius da Silva
Moreira, Adônis
Reis, André Rodrigues dos
Heinrichs, Reges
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fertilizer
Plant nutrition
Pastures
Urochloa brizantha.
Fertilizantes
Nutrição de Plantas
Pastagem
Urochloa brizantha.
topic Fertilizer
Plant nutrition
Pastures
Urochloa brizantha.
Fertilizantes
Nutrição de Plantas
Pastagem
Urochloa brizantha.
description Sulfur deficiency in soils has become a worldwide concern for agricultural production. This study aimed to evaluate the concequence of variable sulfur source and dosing on the nutritional status and production of Piatã forage in a dystrophic Ultisol. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The 4 x 5 factorial treatments consisted of four sulfur sources (elemental sulfur pastilles [ESPA], gypsum [GY], gypsite [GI], and elemental sulfur powder [ESPO]) and five sulfur doses (0, 50, 100, 150. and 200 mg kg-1). The sulfur applications resulted in similar maximum shoot dry mass (SDM) production (16.66 to 17.69 g pot-1) with all sources. However, Piatã grass achieved maximum production in the treatments with 112 mg kg-1 of GI, 118 mg kg-1 of GY and ESPA, and 146 mg kg-1 of ESPO. The number of tillers, the leaf:stem ratio, and SPAD increased with increasing sulfur dose. The greatest increments of root dry mass (RDM) and of the tiller number were obtained with the ESPO source. Macronutrient concentrations in shoot dry mass tissue were in the order K > N > Ca > P > S > Mg. Low sulfur supply resulted in decreased Piatã grass growth with all sulfur sources tested. Differential responses were found with applications of different sulfur sources for SDM, RDM, and tillers number. The sources did not alter the leaf:stem ratio or SPAD index.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Research
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33476
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n3p1237
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33476
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n3p1237
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/33476/25422
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 40 No. 3 (2019); 1237-1248
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 40 n. 3 (2019); 1237-1248
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306079887163392